NO. 07-CI JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION TEN (10) JUDGE IRV MAZE TONIA FREEMAN PLAINTIFF. BECKER LAW OFFICE, PLC, et al.

Similar documents
MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

Preparing the Physician for Deposition and Trial

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

CO:MMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY 28th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT DMSION.1 CML ACTION NO. 17-CI INSTRUCTIONS OF THE COURT

your members to serve as foreperson of the Jury. Your verdict will be determined by how you

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Tara A. Newman v. Wonderful Miracle Hospital, Dr. Sharpest Blade, Ima Smartone, RN and Sharron D. Blame, RN EXHIBITS

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

7.32 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: INTERROGATORIES (Approved before 1985) NOTE TO JUDGE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA JUDGMENT ORDER

Alpena County. Version 1.0 JURY DUTY HANDBOOK

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep an open

Immejdiatelyjupon retiring to the jury room, you shall elect aforeperson. To reach averdict,

Also, please carefully follow the directions accompanying each question.

HEALTHCARE PROVIDER LIABILITY IN WEST VIRGINIA UPDATE ON THE LAW

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

OCTOBER 2012 LAW REVIEW OBVIOUS TREE HAZARD ON PARK SLEDDING HILL

How the Law Works A guide to the Oregon court system and civil cases

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

9 of their attorneys you have learned the conclusion which 10 each party believes should be drawn from the evidence

Pennsylvania Bar Association 100 South Street P.O. Box 186 Harrisburg, PA (800)

Supreme Court of Florida

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

PROCEDURE TO FILE AN EVICTION

CAUSE NO IN THE INTEREST OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHILDS NAME CHILDREN COUNTY, TEXAS A CHILD 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHARGE OF THE COURT

VOIR DIRE RECENT CASES AND SOME THOUGHTS. By Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. and Megan E. Coleman, Esq.

WILLOUGHBY MUNICIPAL COURT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO JURY USE MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

MOCK TRIAL PROCEDURE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :18 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 172 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

HONORABLE JACK R. ST. ARNOLD 315 COURT ST., ROOM 423 CLEARWATER, FL (727) Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil / Foreclosures

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Learning Objectives. Litigation. The Legal & Regulatory Environment of Business 16e

William N. Lundy Justice of the Peace

* * * * * * * * Members of the Jury Panel [or Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury Panel]:

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20

RECITALS. F. The Agreement, and the First, Second, and Third Amendments to the Agreement, are collectively referred to as the Amended Agreement.

13 ADVANCED TRIAL TIPS. Gary K. Burger BURGER LAW BurgerLaw.com

JULY 2017 LAW REVIEW CRASH ON CHALLENGING MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL

This memo was published originally as Appendix C to the 1996 Report of the Governor s Advisory Task Force on Civil Justice Reform.

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil (Revised March 2018)

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 23

Religious Beliefs, Motion for Voir Dire on Sentence Length, and Motion for Voir

SCMF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Form DC-429 TENANT S ASSERTION AND COMPLAINT Form DC-429

PLAINTIFF'S SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. Civil No Judge Barry Lawrence. Tier 3

Case 1:17-cv WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 JURY INSTRUCTIONS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice. 400 County Center, 2 Floor Redwood City, CA

WELLINGTON COMMONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Policy Resolution Due Process Procedures PREAMBLE

Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888)

LAW REVIEW JANUARY 1987 MUST LANDOWNER PROTECT MOONING REVELER FROM HIMSELF? James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C.

Trial Academy Voir Dire: The Rejection Process

1 of 6 6/12/ :10 PM

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT'S CHARGE

Special Thanks to Daisy Espinoza Administrative Court Clerk, Tarrant County

Circuit Court, D. New Jersey.

THEATRE USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

RAWAA FADHEL, as Parent and Next Friend of KAWTHAR O. ALI, a Minor. v. PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

MODEL JURY SELECTION QUESTIONS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

DEPARTMENT 34. Michael Paul Linfield. Telephone: (213)

Fr:8 I "TAFJ. Case 2:02-cr DT Document 1541 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine

LAW REVIEW JUNE 1992 RAINWATER ACCUMULATED IN CLOSED CITY POOL RAISES ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE RISK

UPDATE MEMORANDUM 2016 ISBA High School Mock Trial Invitational

LAW REVIEW MARCH 1992 SWIMMING POOL NOT "ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE" IN TEEN TRESPASSER DIVING INJURY

Jury Selection. Chapter 2. 2:1 Introduction. 2:1.1 Roles of Judge and Counsel

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JOHN DOE EXETER HOSPITAL COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR PANEL AND CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

OUTLINE JURY SELECTION AND VOIR DIRE THE ROSSDALE GROUP CLE OCTOBER 23, 2013

CAUSE NO CHARGE OF THE COURT

" findings in regard to the following offenses against Tanji Jackson:

HONORABLE KEITH MEYER 315 COURT STREET, ROOM 468 CLEARWATER, FL Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil

Pages , Looking Back

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Professional Liability for Engineers. Presented by: Bill Henn Attorney Henn Lesperance PLC

Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.

JURY INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION-CRIMINAL

The Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution

Introduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions. Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries

RESOLUTION NO

Voir Dire Workshop. Making and Preserving For- Cause Challenges in Voir Dire

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Case 5:06-cr TBR-JDM Document 202 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 29

3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16

Transcription:

NO. 07-CI-10400 JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION TEN (10) JUDGE IRV MAZE TONIA FREEMAN PLAINTIFF v. BECKER LAW OFFICE, PLC, et al. DEFENDANTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * JURY INSTRUCTIONS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Court hereby issues the following instructions to the jury for the above-styled case. Please review each Instruction carefully and complete the appropriate Verdict Form(s) as required by these Instructions. IRV MAZE, JUDGE JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DATE 1

INSTRUCTION NO.1 Before beginning your deliberations, select one of your number as the Foreperson. The deputy will deliver the exhibits to the jury room for your consideration and review. A deputy will be posted outside your door so no one can interfere with your deliberations. Nine or more of you must agree to reach a verdict on any issue you are to decide. If all twelve of you agree on verdict, only the Foreperson need sign the verdict. If at least nine, but less than twelve, agree on a verdict, all of you agreeing must sign. Each juror must decide this case in his or her own mind, but only after impartial consideration of all the evidence with all of the other jurors. If you award damages, the amount awarded can not be determined by agreeing in advance to accept an average of what each juror individually would award, although such a number may be calculated as a point of discussion. If you feel the necessity to make further inquiry with the Court, the foreperson will need to hand the deputy a note advising the Court of the question. I will then consult with the attorneys and address your inquiry to the extent possible. 2

INSTRUCTION NO. 2 As was explained to you prior to voir dire, this is a legal malpractice case being tried in two separate phases. During this first phase, you must determine whether the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, would have probably been successful if she had initiated a civil action against Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. for the injuries she sustained on October 14, 2004 at Fort Knox Building 48. The evidence you have heard until this point has only focused on this underlying claim. If, and only if, you are satisfied from the evidence that the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, would have probably been successful if she had initiated a civil action against Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. will you hear the second phase of the trial. 3

INSTRUCTION NO. 3 DEFINITIONS Known means knowledge of the existence of the condition and appreciation of the danger it involves. Obvious means both the condition and the risk are apparent to and would be recognized by a reasonable person, in a position similar to the Plaintiff, exercising ordinary perception, intelligence, and judgment. Open and obvious doctrine. A possessor of land is not liable to his invitees for physical harm caused to them by any activity or condition on the land whose danger is known or obvious to them, unless the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such knowledge or obviousness. Ordinary care means such care as the jury would expect an ordinarily prudent person to exercise under similar circumstances. Possession. A possessor of land is: (a) (b) a person who is in occupation of the land with intent to control it, or a person who has been in occupation of land with intent to control it, if no other person has subsequently occupied it with intent to control it, or (c) a person who is entitled to immediate occupation of the land, if no other person is in possession under Clauses (a) and (b). Successful. A plaintiff is successful in bringing a claim if the jury returns a verdict awarding judgment for the plaintiff. A plaintiff is unsuccessful in bringing a claim if the jury returns a verdict in full for the defendant. 4

INSTRUCTION NO. 4 State whether you are satisfied from the evidence that Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. was in possession of Fort Knox Building 48 on October 14, 2004. YES NO If you have answered NO to Instruction No. 4, you have found that Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. is not liable for the injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman. Please proceed to Instruction No. 10. If you have answered YES to Instruction No. 4, please proceed to Instruction No. 5. 5

INSTRUCTION NO. 5 You will only complete this Instruction if you have answered YES to Instruction No. 4. State whether you are satisfied from the evidence as follows (if you are not so satisfied, answer NO): (1) That the danger of the condition of the steps leading into Fort Knox Building 48 was not known to the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, nor obvious to her on October 14, 2004. YES (i.e. condition of the steps was not known or obvious) NO (i.e. condition of the steps was not known and/or obvious) If you have answered YES to question (1), please disregard the remainder of this instruction and proceed to Instruction No. 6. If you have answered NO to question (1), please answer question (2) below. (2) That in the exercise of ordinary care, Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. should have anticipated that the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, would not discover the condition of the steps leading into Fort Knox Building 48 and have her foot pierced by a piece of wood causing her bodily injury on October 14, 2004. YES NO If you have answered NO to question (2), you have found that Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. is not liable for the injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Tonia 6

Freeman. Please sign the signature lines below and proceed to Instruction No. 10. If you have answered YES to question (2), please proceed to question (3). _ Foreperson (if unanimous) (3) That by reason of the steps leading into Fort Knox Building 48, Fort Knox Building 48 was not in a reasonably safe condition for use by the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, on October 14, 2004. YES (not reasonably safe) NO (reasonably safe) If you have answered NO to question (3), you have found that Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. is not liable for the injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Tonia 7

Freeman. Please sign the signature lines below and proceed to Instruction No. 10. If you have answered YES to question (3), please proceed to question (4). _ Foreperson (if unanimous) (4) That Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. failed to provide such reasonable precautions against the injury sustained by the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, as an ordinarily prudent person engaged in possessing such a building would have provided under similar circumstances on October 14, 2004. YES (failed to provide safeguards) NO (provided safeguards) 8

If you have answered NO to question (4), you have found that Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. is not liable for the injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman. Please sign the signature lines below and proceed to Instruction No. 10. If you have answered YES to question (4), please proceed to question (5). _ Foreperson (if unanimous) (5) That such failure to provide reasonable precautions on the part of Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. was a substantial factor in causing the injuries of the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, on October 14, 2004. YES (substantial factor) NO (not a substantial factor) 9

If you have answered NO to question (4), you have found that Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. is not liable for the injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman. Please sign the signature lines below and proceed to Instruction No. 10. If you have answered YES to question (5), please proceed to Instruction No. 6. _ Foreperson (if unanimous) 10

INSTRUCTION NO. 6 You will only complete this Instruction if you answered YES to question (1) in Instruction No. 5 or if you answered YES to questions (2), (3), (4), and (5) in Instruction No. 5. It was the duty of Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. to exercise ordinary care to maintain and keep Fort Knox Building 48 and its premises in a reasonably safe condition for the use of its invitees, including the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman. Are you satisfied from the evidence that Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. failed to satisfy its duty and that such failure was a substantial factor in causing the injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman? YES NO If you have answered NO to Instruction No. 6, you have found that Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. is not liable for the injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman. Please proceed to Instruction No. 10. If you have answered YES to Instruction No. 6, please proceed to Instruction No. 7. 11

INSTRUCTION NO. 7 You will only complete this Instruction if you have answered YES to Instruction No. 6. It was the duty of the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, on October 14, 2004, to exercise ordinary care for her own safety and protection. Are you satisfied from the evidence that the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, failed to comply with this duty and that such failure on her own part was a substantial factor in causing her foot to be pierced by a piece of wood? YES NO If you have answered NO to Instruction No. 7, you have found for the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman. If you have answered YES to Instruction No. 7, you have found both the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, and Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. liable for her injuries. Please proceed to Instruction No. 8. 12

INSTRUCTION NO. 8 You will only complete this Instruction if you have answered YES to Instruction No. 5 and Instruction No. 6 and were therefore required to answer Instruction No. 7. Having found under Instruction No. 7 for the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, either in full or in part, you must now determine from the evidence the sum or sums of money you are satisfied from the evidence will fairly and reasonably compensate her for her damages, if any, you believe she sustained directly by reason of her injury on October 14, 2004 regardless of any apportionment of fault. If you are further satisfied from the evidence that the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, failed to exercise ordinary care in treating or obtaining proper treatment for her injuries, you will exclude from the amount of the award so much of her damages as you believe from the evidence would have been avoided by the exercise of such care. (1) Medical Expenses (not to exceed $250,000.00): $ (2) Lost Wages (not to exceed $626,120.00): $ (3) Past and Future Pain and Suffering (not to exceed $10,000,000.00): $ TOTAL DAMAGES: $ 13

If you found for the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, in Instruction No. 7, please proceed to Instruction No. 10. If you found both the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, and Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. liable for her injuries under Instruction No. 7, please proceed to Instruction No. 9. 14

INSTRUCTION NO. 9 You will only complete this Instruction if you have answered YES to Instruction No. 7. You will determine from the evidence and indicate in the following blank spaces what percentage of the total fault was attributable to each of the parties you find to have been at fault, as follows: Tonia Freeman: Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. % % TOTAL: 100% In determining the percentages of fault you shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between the party s conduct and the damages claimed. Please proceed to Instruction No. 10. 15

INSTRUCTION NO. 10 You will determine from the evidence whether, had Freeman brought her claim against Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc., she would have probably been successful. You may not answer YES to this Instruction if you have found that Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. is not liable for the injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, under Instruction No. 4, Instruction No. 5, or Instruction No. 6. Are you satisfied from the evidence that the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, would have probably been successful had she initiated a civil action against Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. for the injuries she sustained on October 14, 2004? YES NO If you have answered NO to this instruction, you have found for the Defendants, Becker Law Office PLC, et al. Please complete Verdict Form A attached to these Instructions and inform the Sheriff you have reached a verdict. If you have answered YES to this Instruction, and if you have found for the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, under Instruction No. 7, please complete Verdict Form B attached to these Instructions and inform the Sheriff that you have reached a verdict. If you have answered YES to this Instruction, and if you have found both the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, and Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. liable for her injuries sustained on October 14, 2004 under Instruction No. 7, please complete Verdict Form C attached to these Instructions and inform the Sheriff that you have reached a verdict. 16

VERDICT FORM A We, the Jury, have answered NO to Instruction No. 10, and therefore find for the Defendants, Becker Law Office, PLC, et al. _ Foreperson (if unanimous) If you completed this verdict form, please inform the Sheriff that you have reached a verdict. 17

VERDICT FORM B We, the Jury, have answered YES to Instruction No. 10 and found for the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, in Instruction No. 7. As calculated in Instruction No. 8, we determine the amount of her damages from the lost claim against Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. to be as follows: (1) Medical Expenses (not to exceed $250,000.00): $ (2) Lost Wages (not to exceed $626,120.00): $ (3) Past and Future Pain and Suffering (not to exceed $10,000,000.00): $ TOTAL DAMAGES: $ NOTE: AMOUNTS SHOWN ON THIS VERDICT FORM MUST MATCH THOSE CALCULATED IN INSTRUCTION NO. 8. _ Foreperson (if unanimous) 18

If you completed this verdict form, please inform the Sheriff that you have reached a verdict. VERDICT FORM C 19

We, the Jury, have answered YES to Instruction No. 10. Further, we have found under Instruction No. 7 that both the Plaintiff, Tonia Freeman, and Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. were liable for her injuries sustained on October 14, 2004. As calculated in Instruction No. 9, we attribute fault as follows: Tonia Freeman: Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc. % % TOTAL: 100% NOTE: PERCENTAGES SHOWN ON THIS VERDICT FORM MUST MATCH THOSE CALCULATED IN INSTRUCTION NO. 9. As calculated in Instruction No. 8, we determine the amount of her damages from the lost claim against Marine Toys for Tots Foundation, Inc., regardless of the above attribution of fault, to be as follows: (1) Medical Expenses (not to exceed $250,000.00): $ (2) Lost Wages (not to exceed $626,120.00): $ (3) Past and Future Pain and Suffering (not to exceed $10,000,000.00): $ TOTAL DAMAGES: $ NOTE: AMOUNTS SHOWN ON THIS VERDICT FORM MUST MATCH THOSE CALCULATED IN INSTRUCTION NO. 8. 20

_ Foreperson (if unanimous) If you completed this verdict form, please inform the Sheriff that you have reached a verdict. 21