) Case 3:05-cv MEJ Document 21-2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 6

Similar documents
EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

Case 2:03-cv WBS-KJM Document 10 Filed 05/18/2004 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[f'~8dl CONSENT DECREE NOV Fax: (661) Attorneys for Esparza Enterprises, Inc. 16

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

ORIGINAL. Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ) OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) Plain tiff, ) )

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO I. INTRODUCTION. 1. This action originated with a discrimination charge filed by Travis Woods

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

EEOC v. Den-Cal North, Den-Tex West, d/b/a Denny's Restaurant

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

EEOC v. Zale Corporation

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 116 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 24

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

Case 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

Please Refer to Attached Sample Form

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:99-cv JW

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:08-cv MOC-DSC

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION [NOTE: OR RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION AND COUNTERCLAIMS, IF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. 21 Plaintiffs Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and Olivia Tamayo ("Ms.

Case 2:99-cv JPM Document 14 Filed 11/24/1999 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

APPLICATION FOR JUVENILE DEPENDENCY LAW PANEL. Name: State Bar number: Telephone: Fax: Full time SF office address: Mailing address (if different):

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. 10 Case 3:07-cv MJJ Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 13

Case 5:07-cv RMW Document 1 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

CONSENT DECREE;~:~~~~~ s; ~~~: c:? The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission" or "EEi:;~ins0\Ited

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 32 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 98 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 11

Transcription:

Case 3:0-cv-02492-MEJ Document -2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 6 1 WILLIAM R. TAMAYO- 08496 (CA) DAVID F. OFFEN-BROWN- 0633 (CA) 2 RAYMOND T. CHEUNG - 176086 (CA) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 3 San Francisco District Office 30 The Embarcadero, Suite 00 4 San Francisco, CA 941 0 Telephone: (41) 62-649 Facsimile: (41) 62-67 raymond.cheung@eeoc.gov 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) Case No. 0-02492 MEJ and COMMISSION, ) Case No. 06-3008 CRB 14 ) Plaintiff,) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 ) BETWEEN THE EQUAL v. ) EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 16 ) COMMISSION AND AMELCO AMELCO ELECTRIC SAN FRANCISCO ) ELECTRIC SAN FRANCISCO & 17 and AMELCO CORPORATION, ) AMELCO CORPORATION; ORDER 18 Defendants. ) 19 20 ------------------------------) ) 22 I. INTRODUCTION A. Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission") filed 23 Case No. 0-02492 MEJ under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, on 24 behalf of Carl McNair and a class of similarly situated individuals, alleging that Carl McNair 2 and class members were electricians working for Amelco Electric San Francisco and Amelco 26 Corporation (individually and collectively, "Defendants") when they were subjected to 27 harassing comments and/or disparate treatment due to their race, gender, religion and national 28 origin in violation oftitle VII. 1

Case 3:0-cv-02492-MEJ Document -2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 2 of 6. 1 B. Case No. 06-3008 CRB was filed by the Commission on behalf of Susanna 2 Ortez and a class of similarly situated electricians against Defendants Amelco Electric San 3 Francisco and Amelco Corporation. This action alleges that they were subjected to harassing 4 comments and/or disparate treatment due to their gender, race and/or national origin in violation of Title VII. 6 c. Amelco Corporation and Amelco Electric S.F. Inc. (erroneously named as 7 Amelco Electric San Francisco), answered and denied all allegations of discrimination, 8 harassment and unlawful conduct in Case No.0-02492 MEJ. 9 D. Defendants were never served with Case No.06-3008 CRB, but received a copy 10 of the Complaint, and have alleged that it represents an abuse of EEOC process by the 11 Commission. The EEOC has mailed a Request for Waiver of Service of Case No.06-3008 12 CRB to Defendants' attorney of record. 13 14 The Commission and Defendants now seek to resolve both Case No. 0-02492 MEJ and 1 Case No.06-3008 CRB (individually and collectively, the "Actions") as to each other, and as to 16 all Class Members referenced in the Actions (individually and collectively, the "Class 17 Members"), without further contested litigation, through the instant Settlement Agreement. 18 19 II. NON-ADMISSION OF LIABILITY 20 This resolution does not constitute any admission of liability or any other act or fact on the part of Defendants, nor constitute any finding one way or the other as to any allegations 22 stated in the Commission's Complaints, or in Defendants' Answer or allegations in or about the 23 Actions. This Settlement Agreement represents a good faith settlement of contested and 24 disputed claims. 2 26 III. GENERAL PROVISIONS 27 1. 28 This Settlement Agreement constitutes a full and final resolution as against Defendants, and each of them, of all claims in the Actions by and on behalf of the Commission and 2

Case 3:0-cv-02492-MEJ Document -2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 3 of 6 1 by and on behalf of all Class Members. 2 2. This Settlement Agreement will be filed as an exhibit to Plaintiff EEOC's Notice of 3 Dismissal of the Actions. 4 3. 6 4. This Settlement Agreement is final and binding on Defendants, the Commission and the Class Members, and each of them, and their successors and assigns, and each of them. The Commission, Class Members, and Defendants will each bear their own costs and 7 attorneys' fees in this action. 8 9 IV. NON-RETALIATION 10. The Defendants and their current officers, agents, employees agree not to. retaliate 11 against Carl McNair, Susanna Ortez and class members for having testified or 12 participated in any manner in the Con:imission' s investigation and the proceedings in 13 these cases. 14 1 V. MONETARY AND OTHER TERMS 16 6. 17 Upon execution of this Agreement, and subject to other conditions stated herein, Defendants agree to pay a total of$12,000.00 in settlement of the Actions. 18 (A) The specific allocation of these monies among Carl McNair, Susanna Ortez 19 and/or other Class members shall be within the sole discretion of the EEOC, without 20 any input requested from or required of Defendants. (B) Within ten days of the full execution of this Settlement Agreement by all 22 signatory Plaintiffs and Defendants, EEOC will notify Defendants' counsel of record, in 23 writing, of the allocation of all settlement monies, identifying recipient individuals and 24 amounts. 2 (C) Within twenty (20) days of Defendants' receipt of such notification, 26 Defendants will send checks (for the amounts and made payable to the persons specified 27 in the notification) via certified mail, Federal Express, or United Parcel Service delivery 28 to Commission attorney Raymond Cheung at the Commission's San Francisco District 3

Case 3:0-cv-02492-MEJ Document -2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 4 of 6 1 Office- 30 The Embarcadero, Suite 00, San Francisco, California 9410. 2 Defendants will issue the appropriate tax documents (1099) directly to the payees at 3 addresses to be provided to Defendants by EEOC. 4 (D) Upon receipt of settlement checks totaling $12,000, the Commission shall send to Defendants' counsel of record a signed Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice of 6 the entirety of both Actions, which Defendants shall be responsible for filing with the 7 Court. 8 (E) The Commission shall not distribute any check to any specified individual 9 Class Member unless and until said individual signs a Release of Claims acceptable to 10 Defendants, which signed Releases of Claims the Commission shall thereafter send to 11 Defendants' undersigned counsel. If any individual refuses to sign their Release of 12 Claims form, their check shall be returned to Defendants, for reissuance of a check or 13 checks totaling that same amount to such other Class Member(s) as EEOC shall 14 designate, such reissued checks being subject to the same conditions set forth herein. 1 7. The EEOC agrees not to institute any civil or administrative proceeding or action 16 against Defendants, or either of them, or their officers, directors, employees, agents or 17 representatives, based in whole or in part on any act alleged in EEOC Charge Nos. 370-18 2003-00 and/or 370-2002-08472, respectively, filed by Carl McNair and Susanna 19 Ortez, or any act alleged in the Actions, or either of them. 20 22 8. 23 VI. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION AND DISMISSAL For the purposes of enforcing the provisions of this Settlement Agreement, and pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 11 U.S. 37, 381-82 (1994) and 24 Flanagan v. Arnaiz, 143 F.3d 40, 43-44 (9th Cir. 1998), this Court will retain 2 jurisdiction of these two actions until Entry of the Dismissals with Prejudice of both 26 Case Nos. 0-02492 MEJ and Case No. 06-3008 CRB. 27 Ill 28 Ill SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER 4 CIV NOS. 0-02492 MEJ and 06-3008 CRB

Case 3:0-cv-02492-MEJ Document -2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page of 6 1 AMELCO ELECTRIC S.F. INC., 2 3 4 Dated: \-\2,o ~ By erroneously named as AMELCO ELEZ~c ~~ F:NCisco 6 AMELCO CORPORATION 7 8 Dated: 1.. \L\ - fjk 9 By@t~ 10 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 11 12 13 Dated: By COMMISSION WILLIAM R. TAMAYO 14 Regional Attorney 1 16 Dated: By DAVID F. OFFEN-BROWN 17 Supervisory Trial Attorney 18 19 Dated: By RAYMOND T. CHEUNG 20 Senior Trial Attorney 22 23 24 It is so ordered. 2 ORDER 26 Dated: 27 28 United States District Judge

Case 3:0-cv-02492-MEJ Document -2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 6 of 6 1 2 AMELCO ELECTRIC S.F. INC., erroneously named as AMELCO ELECTRIC SAN FRANCISCO 3 4 Dated: By 6 AMELCO CORPORATION 7 8 Dated: 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 I>ated: ~ I>ated:?#~/ 24 It is so ordered. 2 26 Dated: 27 28 By EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION By ORDER United States District Judge SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER CIV NOS. 0-02492 MEJ and 06-3008 CRB