Council Agenda Report

Similar documents
IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

ORDINANCE NO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MARIN HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

Michigan Marihuana Legalization, Regulation and Economic Stimulus Act DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT- APRIL 10, 2015

Short Title Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTIONS AND OF CHAPTER 18.

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

ARTICLE III. - MEDICAL MARIJUANA. Sec Distribution. Page 1

(a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996.

Florida Senate SB 1176

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

ORDINANCE NO

SUMMARY: BILL NUMBER: ORDINANCE NUMBER:

WHEREAS, the City of Westminster, pursuant to its police power, may adopt

ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AMENDING THE CALISTOGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 56

The City Council of the City of Etna does hereby ordain as follows: Chapter 8.10 Medical Marijuana

TOWNSHIP OF CHESTER OTTAWA COUNTY, MICHIGAN

BILL NO ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and

=* ^ ' ^ OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL Approved as to form ^-Legality OFFICE OK THE~CITV CLERK x^'..f INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMEMBER

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Manteca does ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE NO IT IS ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Carlos as follows:

ORDINANCE NO

(Bill No. 29) An Act to Respond to the Legalization of Cannabis

STAFF REPORT. MEETING October 24, City Council. Adam McGill, Chief of Police. PRESENTER: Michael Howard, Patrol Lieutenant

City Attorney s Synopsis

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO ; CEQA

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Yolo hereby ordains as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAMAR, COLORADO AS FOLLOWS:

AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION TO THE EL DORADO COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

Staff Report. Susanne Brown, City Attorney Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development Laura Simpson, Planning Manager

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ADDING CHAPTER 6

CITY AND COUNfiY OF DENVER REVIEW AND COMMENT ON AN INITIATED ORDINANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Gerald L. Hobrecht, City Attorney (Staff Contacts: Gerald Hobrecht (707) and Scott Whitehouse, (707) )

ORDINANCE NO. City Attorney s Synopsis

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. C.S AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND ADOPTING CHAPTER 9.86 OF THE STANISLAUS COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING CANNABIS ACTIVITIES

Assembly Bill No. 243 CHAPTER 688

WINDSOR CHARTER TOWNSHIP EATON COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND PERMITTING COMMERCIAL MEDICAL MARIHUANA FACILITIES ORDINANCE NO.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CLARE BY amending the City Code, Chapter 52.

STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP

For the Agenda of December 5, 2016

SENATE ENROLLED ACT No. 52

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT. Jonathan P. Hobbs, City Attorney

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING URBANA CITY CODE SECTIONS AND POSSESSION OF CANNABIS PARAPHERNALIA AND PENALTY

City of Denver Cannabis Consumption Pilot Program Initiative Ballot Title:

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE BILL 4014

ORDINANCE ADDING COUNTY OF MARIN CODE CHAPTER 6.86, MEDICINAL CANNABIS DELIVERY-ONLY RETAILER LICENSING

/ 8 ~Qb ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO. 08- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CITY OF HEMET Hemet, California ORDINANCE NO. 1850

PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JUNE 20, 2016

"Licensee" means a person holding a state operating license under the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act, MCL et seq.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Lancaster ( City ) is becoming an increasingly attractive place for families with young children; and

MEDICAL MARIHUANA FACILITIES LICENSING ORDINANCE. (Adopted December 4, 2017, Amended January 8, 2018)

Au Gres Township Arenac County, Michigan Ordinance Authorizing and Permitting Commercial Medical Marijuana Facilities Ordinance No.

[Hemp Ordinances and Resolution]

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE By Amy O Gorman Jenkins, Legislative Advocate

DEWITT CHARTER TOWNSHIP CLINTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.

BLAIR TOWNSHIP MEDICAL MARIHUANA ORDINANCE #140-12

California Cannabis Regulations

PROSPECTIVE PETITION FOR LOCAL MEASURE. C 1 kt z -6 A 5 ~ Po r f bnd ~

License means a current and valid license for a commercial medical marihuana facility issued by the State of Michigan.

Ehrenclou & Grover. attorneys at law

Battle Creek Code of Ordinances. CHAPTER 833 Medical Marihuana Facilities

ORDINANCE NO. 457 (Declared Invalid through Court System)

require that cities provide for or allow the establishment and or operation of medical marijuana

TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD COUNTY OF OAKLAND, STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 655 ADOPTED: November 26, 2018 EFFECTIVE: December 2, 2018

MEDICAL MARIHUANA FACILITIES Definitions.

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING Chapter 23 Section 18-6 Exceptions, Fireworks

CHAPTER VI. LIQUOR, BEER AND WINE

CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 12, 2012

B. In regards to existing approvals for medical marijuana establishments, any establishment NYE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.511

CITY OF COAL RUN VILLAGE

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER ( PARKING AND

[ ] Consent [ ] Regular [X] Public Hearing

ORDINANCE NO. 902 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 902.1) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ESTABLISHING SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY AND LOITERING PROHIBITIONS

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. ORD-17-19

No. 84. An act relating to modifying the requirements for hemp production in the State of Vermont. (S.157)

S U P P L E M E N T No. 2 TO THE SOVEREIGN BASE AREAS GAZETTE No of 13th October 2006 L E G I S L A T I O N

ORDINANCE NO

CITY Of RANCHO SANTA MAR GAR IT A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ACT 228 S.B. NO. 862

AS PASSED BY SENATE S Page 1 S.76 AN ACT RELATING TO THE MEDICAL USE OF MARIJUANA

ORDINANCE NO A

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 174

TEXT OF PROPOSED LAWS PROPOSED LAW

in Sections et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; herein the State Fireworks Law")

S 2253 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

TITLE 7 FIRE PROTECTION AND FIREWORKS 1 CHAPTER 1 FIRE DISTRICT

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ELDORADO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Medical Marihuana Facilities Ordinance

SCC NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TOBACCO RETAILERS

Ordinance No. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: 1.

Transcription:

Agenda Item # 10 Council Agenda Report SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIO VISTA OPPOSING PROPOSITION 19 AN INITIATIVE TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA IN CALIFORNIA WHICH WILL BE ON THE NOVEMBER 02, 2010 GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT MEETING DATE: August 19, 2010 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council of the City of Rio Vista adopt Resolution No., "Opposing Proposition 19 an Initiative to Legalize Marijuana in the State of California which will be on the November 02, 2010 General Election Ballot." BACKGROUND California s Proposition 19, which is also known as the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010, is a California ballot initiative which will be voted on during the November 2, 2010 Statewide General Election. Passage of proposition 19 will legalize various marijuana activities which are currently illegal in California and will allow local governments to regulate these activities including the authority to impose and collect related fees and taxes. As of August 1, 2010, even if the proposition is passed, the sale of marijuana will remain illegal under Federal Law via the Controlled Substances Act. Under federal law, possession and sale of marijuana remains illegal. Marijuana is classified as a Schedule I controlled drug and has been determined to have no medical benefits. The United States has confirmed that the Controlled Substances Act, which criminalizes the possession and use of marijuana, is constitutional. See Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005). Because federal law preempts any conflicting state law, the Controlled Substances Act may be enforced by federal authorities against persons who possess, cultivate, or use marijuana, regardless of the protections offered by the state. A similar measure to legalize marijuana in California was on the November 1972 General Election Ballot which failed to pass. The current measure qualified to be on the November ballot in March 2010 and was originated by a marijuana legalization activist and medical marijuana provider based in Oakland, California. The initiative required 433,971 valid petition signatures to qualify for the ballot and the proponents submitted 694,248 signatures which were checked through random sample.

Page 2 REVIEW AND ANALYSIS If passed, Proposition 19 will legalize marijuana in California and limit enforcement of state laws relating to possession, transportation, cultivation, consumption and sale of cannabis as outlined in Attachment A titled Section 3: Lawful Activities. Proponents believe that passage of this measure will benefit the State by increasing tax revenue, lowering jail and prison populations, and reduce criminal activity associated with illegal drug sales. Staff believes that Proposition 19 is a poorly written initiative containing several major flaws or omissions that will have severe, unintended consequences for Californians. Proposition 19 poses a major threat to public safety in California and will make our roads, schools, workplaces, communities and highways less safe. Proposition 19 expressly omits any definition of what constitutes being under the influence of marijuana. Proponents did not include a standard for driving under the influence, and there are no correlative tests between marijuana and driving skills as there are for alcohol. Therefore, a driver may legally drive even if a blood test shows they have marijuana in their system. Proposition 19 states that you cannot use marijuana while driving, but makes it completely permissible to use marijuana just prior to getting behind the wheel. No driver over 21, including bus, taxi, light rail train operators, or everyday commuters can be required to be drug-free while operating a vehicle under Proposition 19. Does not regulate marijuana like alcohol or tobacco. Rather, Proposition 19 leaves to cities and counties the task of individually regulating marijuana within their own borders. This approach will limit, not enhance, California s ability to control marijuana. Would not eliminate the need for illicit marijuana dealers as a large segment of marijuana users are under the age of 21 and therefore will still not be able to legally purchase marijuana. Would forbid school bus drivers from smoking marijuana on schools grounds or while actually behind the wheel, but a bus driver could arrive for work with marijuana in his or her system, thereby placing hundreds of school children at risk on a daily basis. Would place hundreds of employers, including public schools, at risk of violating the Federal Workplace Act of 1988 which mandates the necessity of a drug-free workplace. Public school superintendent John Snavely, Ed.D. warns that Proposition 19 could cost our K-12 schools as much as $9.4 billion in lost federal funding as well as the loss of millions of dollars in federal grants for our state colleges and universities. If passed, licensed marijuana dealers would be able to advertise without restriction, near schools, libraries and parks, just like cigarette companies. This is made possible by a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2001 entitled Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly (US Sup. Ct., Opinion per O Connor) which struck down as unconstitutional a Massachusetts statute which banned tobacco ads within 1000 feet of a school or playground. 2

Page 3 Staff recommends that the City Council adopts the resolution opposing passage of Proposition 19 thus adding the City of Rio Vista to the growing list of opponents below. Opponents to the passage of Proposition 19: Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein Republican California Gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman Democratic Gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown National Black Churches Initiative, representing 35,000 African American Churches nationwide Inter-Faith Based Coalition, representing 3600 inner city Churches in California Fight Crime, Invest In Kids National Association of Drug Court Professionals DARE America Coalition for a Drug-Free California California Narcotics Officers Association Kamala Harris, a candidate for California Attorney General. Chris Kelly, a former candidate for California Attorney General John Eastman, a former candidate for California Attorney General The California Bus Association Mothers Against Drunk Driving California Police Chiefs Association League of California Cities FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS There should not be any additional cost associated with this resolution whether the Council adopts or does not adopt an opposition to Proposition 19 resolution. ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the resolution opposing Proposition 19 which would legalize marijuana in California. Chief of Police City Manager Attachment: Resolution Los Angeles County District Letter (re: Initiative Measure 09-0024) 3

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIO VISTA OPPOSING PROPSITION 19 AN INITIATIVE TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA IN CALIFORNIA WHICH WILL BE ON THE NOVEMBER 02, 2010 GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT WHEREAS, Proposition 19 will prevent private and public employers from complying with federal drug-free workplace rules, resulting in the loss of millions of dollars in federal contracts for California businesses, as well as the loss of federal research grants by California colleges and universities; and WHEREAS, provisions of Proposition 19 will threaten public safety and endanger thousands of innocent Californians through increased drugged driving ; and WHEREAS: Proposition 19 is opposed by Mothers Against Drunk Driving, California Bus Association, California District Attorneys Association, the California Police Chiefs Association and the California Chamber of Commerce. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rio Vista hereby opposes Proposition 19. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rio Vista on the nineteenth day of August 2010 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS ATTEST: Carolyn Parkinson, City Clerk

ATTACHMENT A Section 3: Lawful Activities Article 5 of Chapter 5 of Division 10 of the Health and Safety Code, commencing with section 11300 is added to read: Section 11300: Personal Regulation and Controls (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is lawful and shall not be a public offense under California law for any person 21 years of age or older to: (i) Personally possess, process, share, or transport not more than one ounce of cannabis, solely for that individual's personal consumption, and not for sale. (ii) Cultivate, on private property by the owner, lawful occupant, or other lawful resident or guest of the private property owner or lawful occupant, cannabis plants for personal consumption only, in an area of not more than twenty-five square feet per private residence or, in the absence of any residence, the parcel. Cultivation on leased or rented property may be subject to approval from the owner of the property. Provided that, nothing in this section shall permit unlawful or unlicensed cultivation of cannabis on any public lands. (iii) Possess on the premises where grown the living and harvested plants and results of any harvest and processing of plants lawfully cultivated pursuant to section 11300(a)(ii), for personal consumption. (iv) Possess objects, items, tools, equipment, products and materials associated with activities permitted under this subsection. (b) "Personal consumption" shall include but is not limited to possession and consumption in any form, of cannabis in a residence or other non-public place, and shall include licensed premises open to the public authorized to permit on-premises consumption of cannabis by a local government pursuant to section 11301. (c) "Personal consumption" shall not include, and nothing in this Act shall permit cannabis: (i) possession for sale regardless of amount, except by a person who is licensed or permitted to do so under the terms of an ordinance adopted pursuant to section 11301; (ii) consumption in public or in a public place; (iii) consumption by the operator of any vehicle, boat or aircraft while it is being operated, or that impairs the operator; (iv) smoking cannabis in any space while minors are present. Section 11301: Commercial Regulations and Controls Notwithstanding any other provision of state or local law, a local government may adopt ordinances, regulations, or other acts having the force of law to control, license, regulate, permit or otherwise authorize, with conditions, the following: (a) cultivation, processing, distribution, the safe and secure transportation, sale and possession for sale of cannabis, but only by persons and in amounts lawfully authorized; (b) retail sale of not more than one ounce per transaction, in licensed premises, to persons 21 years or older, for personal consumption and not for resale; (c) appropriate controls on cultivation, transportation, sales, and consumption of cannabis to strictly prohibit access to cannabis by persons under the age of 21; (d) age limits and controls to ensure that all persons present in, employed by, or in any way involved in the operation of, any such licensed premises are 21 or older; (e) consumption of cannabis within licensed premises; 2

(f) safe and secure transportation of cannabis from a licensed premises for cultivation or processing, to a licensed premises for sale or on-premises consumption of cannabis; (g) prohibit and punish through civil fines or other remedies the possession, sale, possession for sale, cultivation, processing, or transportation of cannabis that was not obtained lawfully from a person pursuant to this section or section 11300; (h) appropriate controls on licensed premises for sale, cultivation, processing, or sale and on-premises consumption, of cannabis, including limits on zoning and land use, locations, size, hours of operation, occupancy, protection of adjoining and nearby properties and persons from unwanted exposure, advertising, signs and displays, and other controls necessary for protection of the public health and welfare; (i) appropriate environmental and public health controls to ensure that any licensed premises minimizes any harm to the environment, adjoining and nearby landowners, and persons passing by; j) appropriate controls to restrict public displays, or public consumption of cannabis; (k) appropriate taxes or fees pursuant to section 11302; (1) such larger amounts as the local authority deems appropriate and proper under local circumstances, than those established under section 11300(a) for personal possession and cultivation, or under this section for commercial cultivation, processing, transportation and sale by persons authorized to do so under this section; (m) any other appropriate controls necessary for protection of the public health and welfare. Section 11302: Imposition and Collection of Taxes and Fees (a) Any ordinance, regulation or other act adopted pursuant to section 11301 may include imposition of appropriate general, special or excise, transfer or transaction taxes, benefit assessments, or fees, on any activity authorized pursuant to such enactment, in order to permit the local government to raise revenue, or to recoup any direct or indirect costs associated with the authorized activity, or the permitting or licensing scheme, including without limitation: administration; applications and issuance of licenses or permits; inspection of licensed premises and other enforcement of ordinances adopted under section 11301, including enforcement against unauthorized activities. (b) Any licensed premises shall be responsible for paying all federal, state and local taxes, fees, fines, penalties or other financial responsibility imposed on all or similarly situated businesses, facilities or premises, including without limitation income taxes, business taxes, license fees, and property taxes, without regard to or identification of the business or items or services sold. Section 11303: Seizure (a) Notwithstanding sections 11470 and 11479 of the Health and Safety Code or any other provision of law, no state or local law enforcement agency or official shall attempt to, threaten to, or in fact seize or destroy any cannabis plant, cannabis seeds or cannabis that is lawfully cultivated, processed, transported, possessed, possessed for sale, sold or used in compliance with this Act or any local government ordinance, law or regulation adopted pursuant to this Act. Section 11304: Effect of Act and Definitions (a) This Act shall not be construed to affect, limit or amend any statute that forbids impairment while engaging in dangerous activities such as driving, or that penalizes bringing cannabis to a school enrolling pupils in any grade from kindergarten through 12, inclusive. (b) Nothing in this Act shall be construed or interpreted to permit interstate or international transportation of cannabis. This Act shall be construed to permit a person to transport cannabis in a safe and secure manner from a licensed premises in one city or county to a licensed premises in another city or county pursuant to any ordinances adopted in such cities or counties, notwithstanding any other state law or the lack of any such ordinance in the intervening cities or counties. (c) No person shall be punished, fined, discriminated against, or be denied any right or privilege for lawfully engaging in any conduct permitted by this Act or authorized pursuant to Section 11301 of this Act. Provided 3

however, that the existing right of an employer to address consumption that actually impairs job performance by an employee shall not be affected. (d) Definitions For purposes of this Act: (i) "Marijuana" and "cannabis" are interchangeable terms that mean all parts of the plant Genus Cannabis, whether growing or not; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; concentrated cannabis; edible products containing same; and every active compound, manufacture, derivative, or preparation of the plant, or resin. (ii) "One ounce" means 28.5 grams. (iii) For purposes of section 11300(a)(ii) "cannabis plant" means all parts of a living Cannabis plant. (iv) In determining whether an amount of cannabis is or is not in excess of the amounts permitted by this Act, the following shall apply: (a) only the active amount of the cannabis in an edible cannabis product shall be included; (b) living and harvested cannabis plants shall be assessed by square footage, not by weight in determining the amounts set forth in section 11300(a); (c) in a criminal proceeding a person accused of violating a limitation in this Act shall have the right to an affirmative defense that the cannabis was reasonably related to his or her personal consumption. (v) "residence" means a dwelling or structure, whether permanent or temporary, on private or public property, intended for occupation by a person or persons for residential purposes, and includes that portion of any structure intended for both commercial and residential purposes. (vi) "local government" means a city, county, or city and county. (vii) "licensed premises" is any commercial business, facility, building, land or area that has a license, permit or is otherwise authorized to cultivate, process, transport, sell, or permit on-premises consumption, of cannabis pursuant to any ordinance or regulation adopted by a local government pursuant to section 11301, or any subsequently enacted state statute or regulation. 4