Case 3:12-cv SI Document 77 Filed 06/20/14 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#: 1036

Similar documents
Case 3:12-cv SI Document 140 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 138 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 32 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 21 Page ID#: 638 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 64 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 31 Page ID#: 878 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

TOM STEENSON P.O. Box Portland, Oregon

Community Oversight Advisory Board Bylaws

Case 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 8 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 36 Page ID#: 131 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv JO Document 9 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 1

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Case dml11 Doc 6977 Filed 03/13/12 Entered 03/13/12 15:13:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

Office of the Compliance Officer and Community Liaison (COCL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH UTCR CONFERRAL STATEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Office of the Compliance Officer and Community Liaison (COCL)

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6

mg Doc 597 Filed 05/11/16 Entered 05/11/16 15:27:15 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 127 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:14-cv KMW Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2014 Page 1 of 7

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 163 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 7

is to establish a mechanism for meaningful community participation in the enforcement of any

Case 4:05-cv Y Document 86 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 7 PageID 789 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

Case Doc 334 Filed 01/20/17 Entered 01/20/17 16:47:13 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

Case 1:10-cv ESH -TBG -HHK Document 51 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

smb Doc 308 Filed 08/12/16 Entered 08/12/16 17:49:16 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

Case 6:15-cv JR Document 72 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 16

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

Case 4:05-cv TSL-LRA Document 224 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 12

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 460 Filed: 09/25/15 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15864

Case GMB Doc 498 Filed 06/14/14 Entered 06/14/14 14:39:47 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11

Case 1:99-cv EGS Document 685 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOINT STATUS REPORT

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case Document 593 Filed in TXSB on 03/16/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Oral Argument Requested

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) 21st CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 1 ) Case No (RDD) ) Reorganized Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) )

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:14-cv ADB Document 575 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * * * * * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:13-cv Document 995 Filed in TXSD on 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Martha J. Toy, by her attorney, William B.

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:10-cv Agence France Presse v. Morel. Document 259.

mew Doc 1288 Filed 09/01/17 Entered 09/01/17 14:35:05 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 3:14-cv MMH-MCR Document 33 Filed 02/16/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID 171

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

In The Supreme Court of the United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEBTOR S SIXTY-THIRD OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO CERTAIN CLAIMS

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

Case 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Defendant Jason Reis has moved to dismiss this matter pursuant to M.R. Civ. P.

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 6:13-cv MC Document 12 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 5 Page ID#: 60

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Case: LTS Doc#:1315 Filed:09/15/17 Entered:09/15/17 16:38:01 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 17

Case KRH Doc 628 Filed 10/08/15 Entered 10/08/15 13:37:03 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2011 Page 1 of 8

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 7

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON. To: Thomas M. Christ, John A. Bennett, Margaret S. Olney and Gregory A.

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 29 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

Case 1:06-cv JR Document 25 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77 Filed 06/20/14 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#: 1036 TRACY POOL REEVE, Oregon State Bar ID Number 891123 City Attorney Email: tracy.reeve@portlandoregon.gov DAVID WOBORIL, Oregon State Bar ID Number 824347 Senior Deputy City Attorney Email: david.woboril@portlandoregon.gov ELLEN OSOINACH, Oregon State Bar ID Number 024985 Deputy City Attorney Email: ellen.osoinach@portlandoregon.gov Office of City Attorney 1221 SW 4th Avenue, Rm 430 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: (503) 823-4047 Facsimile: (503) 823-3089 Attorney for Defendant City of Portland UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, v. THE CITY OF PORTLAND, DEFENDANT. Case No. 3:12-cv-02265-SI JOINT MOTION TO ENTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL OF ACTION Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) Plaintiff United States, Defendant City of Portland, and Intervener-Defendant Portland Police Association ( Parties ) by and through their counsel, jointly move the Court to enter the proposed stipulated Order attached as Exhibit A. The order approves the Settlement Agreement (Docket 4-1) ( Agreement ) and conditionally dismisses the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). The Parties stipulate to certain conditions upon dismissal including the Court s retention of jurisdiction to enforce the Agreement between the United States and City as well as the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Parties; annual conferences at which the Page 1 JOINT MOTION TO ENTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL OF ACTION PORTLAND CITY ATTORNEY S OFFICE 1221 SW 4TH AVENUE, RM 430 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 (503) 823-4047

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77 Filed 06/20/14 Page 2 of 2 Page ID#: 1037 Court will receive information from the Compliance Officer and Community Liaison (COCL); and timely submission to the Court of the COCL s quarterly reports. The conditional dismissal will be followed by final dismissal with prejudice upon performance of the Agreement. The Parties request that the Court place the case on the Court s inactive docket subject to recall to the active docket should enforcement of the Agreement or the MOA become necessary. The Parties and Enhanced Amicus 1 request that the current briefing schedule of June 24 remain in effect should the Court deny the motion. DATED :June 20, 2014. For the United States: S. AMANDA MARSHALL United States Attorney District of Oregon /s/ David W. Knight DAVID W. KNIGHT Special Assistant U.S. Attorney ADRIAN L. BROWN BILLY J. WILLIAMS Assistant U.S. Attorneys For the City of Portland: /s/ Tracy Pool Reeve TRACY POOL REEVE City Attorney Respectfully submitted, JOCELYN F. SAMUELS Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division JONATHAN M. SMITH Chief, Special Litigation Section /s/ Laura L. Coon LAURA L. COON Special Counsel /s/ R. Jonas Geissler R. JONAS GEISSLER /s/ Michelle A. Jones MICHELLE A. JONES Senior Trial Attorneys For the Portland Police Association: /s/ Anil Karia ANIL KARIA 1 United States and City conferred with counsel for Enhanced Amicus. Enhanced Amicus does not support this motion and intends to file a brief today in support of its position. The Parties do not object to Enhanced Amicus filing such a brief. Page 2 JOINT MOTION TO ENTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL OF ACTION PORTLAND CITY ATTORNEY S OFFICE 1221 SW 4TH AVENUE, RM 430 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 (503) 823-4047

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77-1 Filed 06/20/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 1038 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Case No. 3:12-cv-02265-SI PROPOSED STIPULATED ORDER ENTERING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Defendant. S. Amanda Marshall, United States Attorney; Adrian L. Brown and Billy J. Williams, Assistant United States Attorneys, David W. Knight, Special Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney s Office, District of Oregon, 1000 S.W. Third Avenue, Suite 600, Portland, OR 97204. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff. Jocelyn Samuels, Acting Assistant Attorney General; Jonathan M. Smith, Chief; Laura Coon, Special Counsel, R. Jonas Geissler and Michelle Jones, Senior Trial Attorneys, Special Litigation Section; Civil Rights Division, United States Department of Justice, 50 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20530. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff. Tracy Reeve, City Attorney; David Woboril, Senior City Attorney; Ellen Osoinach, Deputy City Attorney, Office of the City Attorney, 1221 S.W. Fourth Avenue, Room 430, Portland, OR 97204. Of Attorneys for Defendant. Anil S. Karia, Tedesco Law Group, 3021 N.E. Broadway, Portland, OR 97232. Of Attorneys for Intervener-Defendant Portland Police Association. Michael H. Simon, District Judge. The United States of America ( Plaintiff or United States ) brought this lawsuit against the City of Portland ( Defendant or City of Portland ) under 42 U.S.C. 14141. The United States and the City of Portland have entered into a proposed Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement ) and have jointly moved the Court to accept the Settlement Agreement and enter the Settlement Agreement as an Order of the Court. Both the United States and the City of Portland agree that entering into the Settlement Agreement, rather than engaging in contested litigation, is the best way to Page 1 Order Entering Settlement Agreement

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77-1 Filed 06/20/14 Page 2 of 8 Page ID#: 1039 resolve the claims brought by the United States in this matter, which concern policing practices in the City of Portland. Both the United States and the City of Portland further agree that it will likely take several years for the City of Portland substantially to comply with all of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. In addition, both the United States and the City of Portland jointly ask the Court to retain jurisdiction over this action for all purposes until the City of Portland has substantially complied with all provisions of the Settlement Agreement and maintained substantial compliance with all provisions for one year. At the Court s request, the United States, the City of Portland, Intervener- Defendant Portland Police Association ( PPA ), Enhanced Amicus Curiae Albina Ministerial Alliance Coalition for Justice and Police Reform ( AMA Coalition ) engaged in mediation. The mediation produced two separate agreements: a Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA ) between the United States, the City of Portland, and the PPA; and a Collaborative Agreement between the United States, the City of Portland, and the AMA Coalition. The MOA is intended to facilitate implementation of the Settlement Agreement with the support of PPA while preserving [its] ability to protect its members collective bargaining rights. The United States, City of Portland, and the PPA ask the Court to retain jurisdiction over the MOA for the purpose of resolving certain disputes according to the procedures set forth therein. As a result of the MOA and the Collaborative Agreement, the PPA and the AMA Coalition withdrew their objections to the Court s acceptance of the Settlement Agreement. Page 2 Order Entering Settlement Agreement

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77-1 Filed 06/20/14 Page 3 of 8 Page ID#: 1040 The question before the Court is whether the Settlement Agreement, as a whole, is fair, adequate, and reasonable as a means of resolving the claims raised in the Complaint. To assist the Court in answering that question, the Court held a Fairness Hearing on February 18 and 19, 2014, and received both pre-hearing and post-hearing written submissions and oral testimony from the United States, the City of Portland, the PPA, the AMA Coalition, and numerous members of the public. The Court raised concerns regarding its ability to receive timely information regarding implementation of the Settlement Agreement. Under the Agreement, a Compliance Officer / Community Liaison (COCL) will possess the information needed by the court. The COCL will have expertise in police practices, community engagement and crisis intervention methods. The Agreement requires that the COCL be independent of any City office and the police bureau and responsive to the entire City Council, the public, and the United States. The Agreement requires the COCL to synthesize data related to PPB s use of force and report to the United States, City Council and the public. The COCL is also required to gather input from the public related to the City s compliance with the Agreement. The COCL will issue quarterly reports following review and comment by a Community Oversight and Advisory Board (COAB). The COCL will present the quarterly report drafts in open town hall meetings where any member of the public, including individuals and organizations associated with the AMA Coalition, will have the opportunity to comment and raise concerns. During a 30-day comment period, members of the public will also have an opportunity to submit comments to the COAB about the draft report. The COAB is responsible for gathering this input from the public at large, as well as documenting the comments received at the Page 3 Order Entering Settlement Agreement

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77-1 Filed 06/20/14 Page 4 of 8 Page ID#: 1041 town hall meeting, and presenting all this input to the COCL along with its comments to the draft report. Having the COCL appear annually and share information with the Court on the status of the City s compliance would keep the Court timely informed of the progress of implementation, any obstacles or impediments to achieving substantial compliance, and a broad range of public sentiment regarding implementation. After reviewing the Settlement Agreement and considering the views of the Parties and all public comments received, the Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair, adequate, and reasonable to address the claims raised in the Complaint and, accordingly, hereby: ORDERS that the Settlement Agreement shall be and is entered as an Order of the Court; RECOGNIZES that this Order approving the Settlement Agreement is entered with the consent of Plaintiff United States, Defendant City of Portland and Intervener- Defendant PPA and any modification to this Order related to the Settlement Agreement must also be with the consent of these Parties; RECOGNIZES that the portion of the Order retaining jurisdiction over the MOA is entered with the consent of the United States, the City of Portland, and the PPA and any modification to this Order related to the MOA must also be with the consent of the United States, the City of Portland, and the PPA; ORDERS that the Complaint is conditionally dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), subject to the terms consented to by the Parties and that the Court considers proper as set forth below; Page 4 Order Entering Settlement Agreement

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77-1 Filed 06/20/14 Page 5 of 8 Page ID#: 1042 ORDERS that when requested by the United States or upon a joint request from the United States and the City of Portland, the Court shall issue a final judgment with prejudice dismissing the action and terminating the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and subject to 28 U.S.C. 1291; or, if, the United States does not find the City of Portland is in substantial compliance for a period of one year, and the City of Portland contends it has maintained substantial compliance for a period of one year, the City of Portland may request a final judgment dismissing the action and terminating the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and subject to 28 U.S.C. 1291, and the Court shall issue a final judgment with prejudice only upon the City of Portland s showing by preponderance of evidence that the City of Portland is in substantial compliance and has maintained substantial compliance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement for one year; ORDERS that the Court retain jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1345, to enforce any provision of the Settlement Agreement upon motion of the United States or City of Portland as provided for in paragraph 183 of the Settlement Agreement and to enforce the MOA between the United States, the City of Portland, and the PPA as provided for in paragraph 12 of the MOA; ORDERS that only the United States or the City of Portland may bring an enforcement action under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, as referenced in the above paragraph, and that absent such an action by the United States or the City of Portland, no such order to enforce the Settlement Agreement may be issued; ORDERS that only the United States, the City of Portland, or the PPA may bring an enforcement action under the terms of the MOA, as referenced in the above paragraph, Page 5 Order Entering Settlement Agreement

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77-1 Filed 06/20/14 Page 6 of 8 Page ID#: 1043 and that absent such an action by the United States, the City of Portland, or the PPA no such order to enforce the MOA may be issued; ORDERS the City of Portland to direct the Compliance Officer/Community Liaison ( COCL ) to appear before the Court in open session approximately annually to make a presentation to the Court on the status of the City of Portland s compliance with the Settlement Agreement and to describe any obstacles or impediments toward that end and to respond to questions from the Court about compliance, subject to the following conditions: 1. Absent a motion to enforce the Settlement Agreement by the United States or the City of Portland, the Court will not use the annual report appearance to sua sponte order the Parties to administer, enforce, or construct the Settlement Agreement in any particular way; 2. Absent a motion to enforce the MOA under paragraph 12 of the MOA, the Court will not use the annual report appearance to sua sponte order the Parties to administer, enforce, or construct the MOA in any particular way; 3. The appearance by the COCL is intended to be an opportunity for the Court to satisfy its need for information about the status of compliance and not subject to any adversarial process. To that end, the Court is unrestricted in its inquiry as to compliance, but the Parties and Enhanced Amicus will not participate in the exchange between the Court and the COCL, submit briefing or questions, engage in argument or make presentations to the Court. 4. Other than the COCL s presentation and any supporting documents the COLC chooses to provide, no witnesses, proffers of evidence, briefs, written Page 6 Order Entering Settlement Agreement

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77-1 Filed 06/20/14 Page 7 of 8 Page ID#: 1044 submissions, or testimony from the Parties, Enhanced Amicus, individuals, or organizations are permitted at the report appearance; ORDERS the City of Portland to submit to the Court in a timely fashion the COCL s final quarterly reports, which are referenced in paragraphs 162-164 of the Settlement Agreement, including any comments thereto from the United States or the Community Oversight and Advisory Board ( COAB ); ORDERS that the City of Portland will not be required to undertake any additional actions or create any additional reports absent an enforcement action by the United States and either a finding of noncompliance or a successfully mediated resolution; and ORDERS that for all other purposes, this civil action is placed on the Court s inactive docket subject to recall to the active docket should the United States move to enforce the Settlement Agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of June, 2014. Michael H. Simon United States District Judge Page 7 Order Entering Settlement Agreement

Case 3:12-cv-02265-SI Document 77-1 Filed 06/20/14 Page 8 of 8 Page ID#: 1045 Presented by: For the United States: S. AMANDA MARSHALL United States Attorney District of Oregon /s/ David W. Knight DAVID W. KNIGHT Special Assistant U.S. Attorney ADRIAN L. BROWN BILLY J. WILLIAMS Assistant U.S. Attorneys For the City of Portland: /s/ Tracy Pool Reeve TRACY POOL REEVE City Attorney JOCELYN F. SAMUELS Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division JONATHAN M. SMITH Chief, Special Litigation Section /s/ Laura L. Coon LAURA L. COON Special Counsel /s/ R. Jonas Geissler R. JONAS GEISSLER /s/ Michelle A. Jones MICHELLE A. JONES Senior Trial Attorneys For the Portland Police Association: /s/ Anil S. Karia ANIL S. KARIA /s/ David Woboril DAVID WOBORIL Senior Deputy City Attorney /s/ Ellen C. Osoinach ELLEN C. OSOINACH Deputy City Attorney Page 8 Order Entering Settlement Agreement