Appendix B: Input Survey Results

Similar documents
CITY USER PROFILE 15 ADELAIDE CITY COUNCIL RESEARCH REPORT

Miami Township Resident Perception Survey

How would you describe Libertyville as a community?

Gatesville Comprehensive Plan Community Survey Results

Denver, CO Community Livability Report

2016 Public Input Survey

Denver, CO Community Livability Report

FOND DU LAC VISION & STRATEGIC PLAN Community Workshop Tuesday, February 24, 2015

PARK WEST A WEST VALLEY GEM

COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF MIGRANTS AND IMMIGRATION

7 Willow Street, Suite 200 Annapolis, Maryland (410) Fax: (410)

Social Indicators 2017 Queensland

Denver, CO Community Livability Report

NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY: LABOUR FORCE, EMPLOYMENT, AND INCOME

City of Bellingham Residential Survey 2013

4. How would you describe the area where you live? Would you say you live in...

Middlesex County Resident Life Survey TM

NEIGHBORHOOD GATHERING PLACE A Multicultural Center REPORT & RECOMMENDATIONS

Downtown Cincinnati Perceptions Survey

LOGANSPORT SURVEY. I nform ing Our Local Decision Making Process

Appendix A: Economic Development and Culture Trends in Toronto Data Analysis

City of Carrollton. Final Report. February 6, Prepared by The Julian Group

East Peoria, Illinois Quality of Life Survey

weyburn saskatchewan AN INVESTOR S GUIDE TO THE OPPORTUNITY CITY

KITCHENER: A VIEW TOWARD THE FUTURE ENVIRONICS

NEXT STEPS: IMMIGRATION AND SETTLEMENT TO CAPE BRETON ISLAND

Position Announcement. State Courts Administrator Missouri Office of State Courts Administrator

Streetcar Community Attitudes Survey - Community Development and Transportation Principles

Community perceptions of migrants and immigration. D e c e m b e r

Riverside Labor Analysis. November 2018

Cumru Township Zoning Ordinance of 2009

The National Citizen Survey

R 42, % New Americans in Alexandria. Immigrant share of the population, The immigrant population increased by 22.2%.

City of Toronto Casino Consultation Final Consultation Report. February 22, 2013

Survey Results Summary

Welcoming Community Roadmap

1. Where is your company located? Please check all that apply.

Interviews will be held on 26 th and 30 th June Section A. East Asia Teacher Recruitment Team. Recruitment Responsibility

Property, of the City's Planning and Zoning Code and that this proposed amendment is in compliance with the comprehensive plan of the City.

Market Research Report

NOVEMBER visioning survey results

Office of State Courts Administrator. State of Missouri

Madison s Central Business Improvement District (BID)

AN ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTS ATTITUDES TOWARDS TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN MARSHALL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

Californians. healthy communities. ppic statewide survey FEBRUARY in collaboration with The California Endowment CONTENTS

Table A2-1. Civilian Labor Force, Sanford/Springvale Labor Force Unemployed Unemployment Rate 5.8% 5.

Background. Response Rate and Age Profile of Respondents. Community Facilities and Amenities. Transport Issues. Employment and Employment Land Issues

San Gabriel. City With A Mission. Vibrant City Grand Opportunities Business Friendly

Community Survey. Report of Survey Results. April City Manager s Office

The City of Cape Coral, Florida

International Education in the Comox Valley: Current and Potential Economic Impacts

Rural Pulse 2016 RURAL PULSE RESEARCH. Rural/Urban Findings June 2016

CITY OF BELLINGHAM RESIDENTIAL SURVEY REPORT

Rural Pulse 2019 RURAL PULSE RESEARCH. Rural/Urban Findings March 2019

The Planning & Development Department recommends that Council receive this report for information.

San Francisco Economic Strategy Update: Phase I Findings

THE CORPORATION OF HALDIMAND COUNTY. By-law No1441/14

ATTACHMENT: 4 REPORT TO GENERAL PLAN 2040 STEERING COMMITTEE

ORD WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice so require;

Shaping the Cape s Future

Global Immigration Consultancy Services. Immigration, Study and Work temporarily in Canada

2. Challenges and Opportunities for Sheffield to 2034

Survey of Tourism Attitudes of Residents Prepared by Market Research & Development, Inc. June 2017

Regina City Priority Population Study Study #1 - Aboriginal People. August 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Economic Prosperity Element

FOLA Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)

UTS:IPPG Project Team. Project Director: Associate Professor Roberta Ryan, Director IPPG. Project Manager: Catherine Hastings, Research Officer

Population and Dwelling Counts

Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour September Profile of the New Brunswick Labour Force

5201 WEST WAR MEMORIAL DRIVE, PEORIA, ILLINOIS

Community Economic Impact Study of the Proposed Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM) Commuter Rail

SALARY SURVEY January 2009

Economic Linkages and Impact Analysis for the Oregon Sea Grant Programmed and Operated Hatfield Marine Science Center Visitor Center

Fort Collins, Colorado: An Expectation of Public Engagement

2012 Residential Survey Results

STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Summary of Rural Ontario Community Visits

V I SA A F F LU E N T ST U DY

MMM Parking Study Comparison Chart: Consultant Recommendations and Existing Zoning Standards Commercial/ Non-residential Land Use Category

Visit Sarasota County

R 799, % New Americans in San Diego A Snapshot of the Demographic and Economic Contributions of Immigrants in the County 1

Feasibility Study. The city of Lebanon, Illinois

The Brookings Institution

BLUE STAR HIGHWAY COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY REPORT

Immigrants strengthen Colorado s economy, generating $42 billion of activity in 2011

APPENDIX E COMMUNITY COHESION SURVEY

Local Law Number 5 Of County Of Ulster

Peterborough Public Library Board Meeting Agenda

Le Sueur County Demographic & Economic Profile Prepared on 7/12/2018

Submission by Monaghan County Council in Response to the Draft National Planning Framework

FOR FARMER' S MARKETS AND PROVIDING THAT FARMER' S 6 MARKETS ARE A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE IN THE GENERAL 7 COMMERCIAL, TOURIST COMMERCIAL AND HIGHWAY

Yukon Labour Market Supply and Migration Study

R 4.5% 28,228. New Americans in Fort Wayne and Northeast Indiana. Immigrant share of the population, 2016

QUALITY OF LIFE IN TALLINN AND IN THE CAPITALS OF OTHER EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES

Community Profile for Growing Together operational area

Western Sydney Job Deficit Analysis. Final Report

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

3.1 HISTORIC AND FORECASTED POPULATION FIGURES

Awards of Excellence KANSAS PRESS ASSOCIATION C A L L F O R E N T R I E S

The State of Rural Minnesota, 2019

SESSION 8 A TEEN LEADER'S COMMUNITY How wonderful it is that nobody need wait one single moment before starting to improve the world.

Transcription:

Appendix B: Input Survey Results Introduction As part of the public participation process, a Public Input Survey and Student Input Survey were created to gather community and student input. The public survey was available, starting May 4th until June 5th. Households in the 46504 Bourbon Zip Code were notified via mail that the survey was online, and those who were unable to access the internet could fill out the survey at the Bourbon Public Library or Town Hall. A total of 139 respondents took the Public Input Survey to provide comments on how they view and define Bourbon as well as identifying future land uses. The Steering Committee wanted to engage young people in the planning process and garner their thoughts on their values, likes, and dislikes about living in Bourbon. A Total of 292 students responded to the Student Input Survey and provided valuable input on the qualities they thought would make Bourbon a more attractive place to live. Public Input Survey Defining Bourbon Respondents were asked several questions that addressed why they live in Bourbon, how well the Town of Bourbon provides various services, important issues facing the Town, and their views on a series of statements about their community. In general, the majority of respondents stated they live in Bourbon because it is a good place to raise a family (65%). Other top reasons to live in Bourbon include low crime (55%), being raised there (47%), and proximity to family (45%). One of the lower responses, and something Bourbon in attempting to change, is that only 19% of respondents said they came to Bourbon for a job, see Figure B.1. B-1 Envision Bourbon: A 2030 Comprehensive Plan

Figure B.1: Reasons for Living in the Town of Bourbon Respondents believe the community provides a high level of service for schools and quality of life amenities, but respondents would like to see an increase in commercial and retail services and improved economic stability, as shown in Figure B.2. A common trend throughout the surveys was the desire for residents to have a wider variety of choices when it comes to stores, restaurants, and jobs. Figure B.2: Level of Service Provided by the Town of Bourbon Appendix B: Input Survey Results B-2

Table B.1, summarizes respondents views on a variety of statements about the Town. Respondents were asked to indicate their level of agreement on a scale from 1 to 5; 1-strongly disagree to 5-strongly agree. On average, most agree that there is a shortage of quality retail business and dining, but would support local businesses with their shopping dollars if more services were offered. Most also agreed that Bourbon had a great school system. Many respondents disagreed that the Town had an abundance of amenities including art and entertainment venues, good employment options, recreational opportunities, health care choices, and housing options. Table B.1: Level of Agreement on Statements about Bourbon Statements AVERAGE LEVEL OF AGREEMENT Bourbon has an abundant supply of art and entertainment venues. 1.7 STRONGLY DISAGREE (1) There are good employment options in Bourbon. 2.0 Bourbon has an abundant supply of leisure and recreational options. 2.2 Most of my healthcare needs are offered in Bourbon. 2.2 Bourbon should be a quiet retirement community. 2.4 DISAGREE (2) Bourbon has an abundant supply of housing options. 2.6 Bourbon has a clear vision and organized plan for the future. 2.7 Bourbon has an abundant supply of well-maintained sidewalks. 2.8 Bourbon spends enough resources on infrastructure. 3.0 Bourbon has become a better place to live over the past 10 years. 3.0 Bourbon should be a thriving commercial center. 3.0 I have access to quality healthcare services. 3.1 Bourbon is headed in the right direction. 3.1 NEUTRAL (3) Bourbon is capable to handle modest growth. 3.3 There is good community support. 3.6 Population growth is important to the community. 3.7 Bourbon' rural character should be preserved. 3.8 Bourbon needs more walking and biking trails. 4.0 Protecting agriculture and natural resources is important. 4.0 Bourbon has an abundant supply of religious institutions. 4.1 The Bourbon Community School Corporation is a great school system. 4.1 AGREE (4) Bourbon has a shortage of quality dining. 4.2 Bourbon has a shortage of quality retail business. 4.3 I would support new, locally-owned retail business with my shopping dollars. 4.3 B-3 Envision Bourbon: A 2030 Comprehensive Plan

Figure B.3: Most Important Issues Facing Bourbon Figure B.3, shown above, visualizes similar findings. An overwhelming majority of respondents believe the top two issues or problems facing Bourbon are: job/employment opportunities (78%), lack of growth (70%). About a third of respondents (35%) agreed that adequate supply of housing options and capabilities to handle growth were also one of the top three issues facing Bourbon. Business & Development Business and development are important for a community s growth and success. As seen in previous sections of the survey, many respondents expressed concern for the lack of commercial establishments and industries. The following tables and figures provide more insight on the respondent s desires in the Town of Bourbon, as well as where appropriate locations for future growth should occur. The most desired commercial establishments were identified as a locally-owned retail business, sit-down dining, and grocery stores. The least desired commercial developments were household services such as laundry mats and large-box retail stores such as Wal-Mart or Lowes (see Table B.2) Table B.2: Level of Desire for Commercial Establishments COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS Locally-owned Retail Businesses AVERAGE LEVEL OF DESIRE 4.3 Sit-down Dining 4.2 Grocery Stores 4.2 Pharmacy 3.8 Fast Food Dining 3.4 Professional Office Space Household Services (Laundry) Large-box Retail Stores (Wal-Mart, Lowes, etc.) 3.1 2.7 2.2 1 2 3 4 5 LEAST DESIRED MOST DESIRED Appendix B: Input Survey Results B-4

Overall, the respondents did not express a strong average level of desire for any particular industry sector. Education, Manufacturing, Technology and Healthcare were identified as the most desired industries they would like to recruit to Bourbon. Lowest desire industries include agriculture, travel/tourism, and the automotive industry. (See Table B.3) Table B.3: Level of Desire for Industry Sectors INDUSTRY AVERAGE LEVEL OF DESIRE Education 3.8 Manufacturing 3.8 Technology 3.8 Healthcare 3.7 Light Industry 3.6 Professional Facilities 3.5 Metal Fabrication 3.5 Distribution Warehousing 3.3 Food Processing 3.2 Agriculture/Farming/ Equipment Sales 3.1 Travel/Tourism 3.0 Automotive Industry 3.0 1 2 3 4 5 LEAST DESIRED MOST DESIRED Figure B.4 (map and chart) to the right indicates how respondents envision where land use types such as businesses, single-family homes, multi-family homes, and agricultural land preservation should locate. The map was divided into 7 sections for respondents to decide where the desired use should locate. The majority of responses indicated that business development should take place within the town limits and north of town in Section 1 (54%), Section 2 (54%) and Section 3 (50%). Responses indicated that single-family homes should locate in the east and north east of the town center in Section 3 (53%) and Section 4 (52%), followed closely by Section 2 (47%) northwest of the town center. Section 4 was identified by the most respondents as a good place for multifamily residential home construction to take place (48%). Lastly, respondents believe agricultural preservation should take place in Sections 6 and 7 (81%). B-5 Envision Bourbon: A 2030 Comprehensive Plan

Figure B.4: Location for Future Land Uses Appendix B: Input Survey Results B-6

About Respondents The last set of questions had participants use the map from Figure B.4 to answer general questions (Figures B.5 through B.9) about themselves to develop a community profile. Majority of respondents live in Section 1 (58%) which is most of the town limits. The remainder of respondents live in adjacent sections (31%), or areas outside the outlined sections (12%) (Figure B.5). Figure B.5: Where Respondents Live Figure B.6: Age of Respondents Most respondents for the Bourbon public survey are over the age of 45 (57%) (Figure B.6) and has been a longtime resident of Bourbon, living in Town for over 15 years (71%). Only 7% have lived in Bourbon for less than 4 years (Figure B.7). Respondents are also more likely to own their home (91%) than to rent. Figure B.7: Years Lived in Bourbon Figure B.8: Where Respondents Work The average respondent commutes elsewhere for work, with only 1/4 of them having jobs in the city. 44% of respondents commute to Warsaw, Plymouth, Nappanee or South Bend for work (Figure B.8). B-7 Envision Bourbon: A 2030 Comprehensive Plan

Lastly, Figure B.9 depicts household income respondents reported. The majority have a household income of between $50,000 and $149,999 (60%). Figure B.9: Household Income Public Survey Summary The public survey highlighted a trend for more local stores in Bourbon. These stores could be retail or restaurants, but respondents made it clear there is a lack of availability in town. The stores could also serve as a catalyst for growth and job opportunities in the area, two of the largest issues pointed out by the survey respondents. The respondents also support refilling the vacant buildings in town with grocery stores, pharmacies, and hardware stores, as they lost these types of businesses over the years. They don t want to leave Bourbon to shop if they don t have to, and would rather spend money in their own town than others. Something that many also pointed out was their need for more forms of entertainment in the town. There was an agreement on the survey that showed Bourbon doesn t provide many entertainment and leisure needs. Suggestions to improve this included new trails and improved sidewalks, more nightlife, and year round activities that could be enjoyed by everyone. Respondents want more businesses and activities to come to Bourbon, without giving up the small town lifestyle. Appendix B: Input Survey Results B-8

Student Input Survey High school students at Triton School Corporation were asked to participate in a survey geared towards them, asking an assortment of question based on what students thought to be aspects of an ideal town, their interests and future plans, and how they felt about the Town of Bourbon. When student were asked what makes a community an attractive place to live, the answers were a mix between what they would like to see in their own community to improve it, what they like about their community now, and aspects of their perfect community. Many highlighted that a sense of community with friendly and welcoming people was attractive. Students thought that park spaces, dining establishments, and quality stores were also characteristics of an attractive community. Figure B.10 shows that the majority of students enjoyplaying sports (67%) or eating food (62%) in there free time. This also is similar to what amenities they would like to see in a community. Figure B.10: Free-time Activities Similarly, students highlighted that they would stay in Bourbon after high school or college graduation if the Town offered more attractions, and entertainment and dining establishments. Many also mentioned that the ability to obtain a well paying job near Bourbon would be a deciding factor for if they stay in Bourbon. B-9 Envision Bourbon: A 2030 Comprehensive Plan

Since this question was open ended, giving the chance for students to provide reason why they would or would not stay, a sentimental test was run on the answers to show if responses were negative or positive in nature. Overall, about 56% of responses were negative compared to 44% that would positive. This highlights the general trend that there needs to be more in town to draw students back to the area. Figures B.11 through B.14 provide a summary of students level of agreement on a variety of statements about Bourbon. When asked whether Bourbon provided them opportunities to give back and invest in the community, around 47% neither agree or disagreed. However, 37% agreed or strongly agreed that Bourbon does provide this opportunity (Figure B.11). Figure B.11: Bourbon provides ample opportunities to give back and invest in the community Over a third of students (43%) agreed or strongly agreed that Bourbon provided enough places to build relationships with neighbors. A majority (58%) however remained neutral or disagreed with that statement (Figure B.12). Figure B.12: Bourbon has enough places to interact and build relationships with neighbors Appendix B: Input Survey Results B-10

A majority (64%) of students believed that Bourbon welcomes all kinds of people (Figure B.13). Similarly, 53% agreed that Bourbon is a charming place to live (Figure B.14). Less than 15% of students disagreed or strongly disagreed that Bourbon was welcoming and a charming community. Figure B.13: Bourbon is welcoming to all kinds of people Figure B.14: Bourbon is a charming place to live In Figure B.15 and Figures B.16, shown to the right, students were asked to rank a list of ten factors that had to do with what was important to them when finding a place to live 10 years from now. While there were no clear trends, half of students identified low crime and a safe family-friendly community in the top 3, followed by proximity to family (41%), and affordable and diverse types of housing (35%), (Figure B.15). The bottom 3 factors (Figure B.16) that ranked the least important by the highest percentage of students included entrepreneurial opportunities (50%), availability of good paying jobs (37%), and diversity in things to do (23%). While these factors ranked lowest cumulatively between a 1/4 to a 1/3 of students still ranked these factors in the top 3. The majority of students (60%) saw themselves owning a home in 10 years, while 36% saw themselves living in an apartment or condo by themselves or with roommates (Figure B.17) Figure B.17: Living situation in 10 years

Figure B.15: Percentage of students ranking factors in the top 3 Figure B.16: Percentage of students ranking factors in the bottom 3 Appendix B: Input Survey Results B-12