UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. : Count One: 26 U.S.C (Tax Evasion)

Similar documents
Case 1:05-cr PLF Document 167 Filed 10/08/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:07-cr ESH Document 12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 54. No UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CRS Report for Congress

Jerry Gidner Janeen Birckhead LULAC Conference, September 16-17, 2014

Lobbyist Laws and Rules. Fiscal Year

Abramoff: Lobbying Congress

Ethics and Lobbying. Continuing Ethical Scandals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

1E!4 SEGAL HUVELLE, ES

CREE, INC. Compensation Committee Charter

CHEROKEE PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. RECORDS INSPECTION AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURE. Effective Date: January 1, 2013

DEPUTIZATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE AND THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT

ATTACHMENT A FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PLEA OF ROBERT W. NEY. From January 1995 to the present, ROBERT W. NEY, served as an elected member of

NAVAJO NATION DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WORKDAY, INC. (September 20, 2017)

2018 Proposed Constitutional Amendments

In this chapter, the following definitions apply:

Jamestown S Klallam Tribe

PHYSICAL THERAPY LICENSURE COMPACT

THE INTERSTATE COMPACT FOR JUVENILES ARTICLE I PURPOSE

Testimony of. Before the. United States House of Representatives Committee on Rules. Lobbying Reform: Accountability through Transparency

S 0808 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

The United States Supreme Court

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATION OF LOBBYISTS IN OAKLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER Chapter THE CITY OF OAKLAND LOBBYIST REGISTRATION ACT

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange, California, ordains as follows:

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

THE CANCER PREVENTION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE BYLAWS

a federally chartered corporation RECITALS

GRAND LEDGE AREA YOUTH FOOTBALL- INC. BY LAWS ARTICLE I. NAME ARTICLE II. ADDRESS AND OFFICE ARTICLE III. RESIDENT AGENT ARTICLE IV.

The University of Texas System System Administration Internal Policy. Procedures for the Handling of an Allegation of Retaliation

CHAPTER 27 STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE TRIBAL LAW REVENUE ALLOCATION PLAN

Approved March 2014 Latest revision: March 10, 2016 BYLAWS OF CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM ARTICLE I. MEMBERS

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 5, 2016

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES. 1. Selection of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Professional Responsibility: Beyond Pure Ethics and Circular 230 (Outline)

Constitution. And. By-Laws. Local Health Professionals and Allied Employees AFT/AFL-CIO

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER OF SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. 18 u.s.c. 981, 982, 1001, 1014 I 1028A, 1343, 1503 I 1519, 1957 and 2; 28 u. s.c.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

CONSTITUTION ADOPTED NOVEMBER 15, 2012

A BASIC GUIDE TO LOBBYING REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE IN THE CITY OF IRVINE. Prepared by the City Clerk March 2006 Updated January 2018

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED ARTICLE I NAME

Bylaws of C. R. Anderson Foundation

INTERSTATE COMPACT FOR THE SUPERVISION OF ADULT OFFENDERS PREAMBLE

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS REAL PROPERTY SECTION OF THE STATE BAR OF NEVADA ARTICLE I NAME AND PRINCIPAL OFFICE

A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 25 - INDIANS CHAPTER 42 AMERICAN INDIAN TRUST FUND MANAGEMENT REFORM

Case 1:18-cr ABJ Document 38 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA : : : : : : :

U.S. Constitution and Impeachment

LAKE COUNTY ETHICS ORDINANCE

Lobbying 101 Factsheet Human Services Leadership Council, prepared by the HSLC Advocacy Committee

7112. Authority to execute compact. The Governor of Pennsylvania, on behalf of this State, is hereby authorized to execute a compact in substantially

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR

Proper Business Practices and Ethics Policy

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

Case 1:18-mj KMW Document 7 Filed 04/13/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CODE OF PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT - A (PC-A) COMMITTEES University of Nebraska-Lincoln TABLE OF CONTENTS

Advisory. Government. Relations. Senate Passes Ethics and Lobbying Reform Bill. F e b r u a r y 1,

Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy. Intouch Holdings Plc

Accountants Liability. An accountant may be liable under common law due to negligence or fraud.

07.01 Ethics Policy, TAMUS Employees

Policy Governing Lobbying Activities

CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TINTRI, INC. (Adopted on May 26, 2017; Effective as of March 26, 2017)

Policies of the REALTORS Political Action Committee of New Mexico Prohibited Contributions Board Membership Application Procedures for Trusteeships

Approved Amendments by Corporate Membership September 18, 2010 AMENDED & RESTATED BY LAWS OF AMERICAN BAPTIST HOMES OF THE WEST

FEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation

BYLAWS PROPOSED BY SPECIAL RESOLUTION MAY 2017 RINGETTE CALGARY ASSOCIATION BYLAWS

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

Southern Ute Indian Tribe

H 6178 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED APRIL 27, 1998

MEMORANDUM NEW ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT LEGISLATION FOR INDIAN COUNTRY SUMMARY

Colorado Constitution Article XXVIII (Amendment 27) Campaign and Political Finance

INDIANA UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedures on Research Misconduct DRAFT Updated March 9, 2017

CONSTITUTION & RULES

Estate Planning, Trust & Probate Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 208th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 14, 1998

BY-LAWS OF THE. American Council for Technology

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. VSB Docket No , , , ORDER OF REVOCATION

OMBUDSMAN BILL, 2017

Dakota Real Estate Investment Trust (A North Dakota Trust) Bylaws ARTICLE I OFFICES ARTICLE II SHAREHOLDERS

NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT POLICY MANUAL

TRANSUNION COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER. Effective June 25, 2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Executive Order 12898

Request for Proposals: State Lobbying Services RFP-CMUA Proposals are due at 5:00 p.m., local time, Monday, January 22, 2018

REGISTRAR, LOBBYISTS ACT OFFICE OF THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER PROVINCE OF ALBERTA

TRIBAL LABOR RELATIONS ORDINANCE September 14, 1999

International Association of Chiefs of Police CONSTITUTION

CONSTITUTION Adopted Proposed February 072, 20179

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal Number: VIOLATIONS: v. : Count One: 26 U.S.C. 7201 (Tax Evasion) ITALJA FEDERICI, : Count Two: 18 U.S.C. 1505 Defendant. : (Obstruction of U.S. Senate Proceedings) INFORMATION THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CHARGES THAT: Unless specified otherwise, at all times relevant to this Information: Introduction 1. The defendant, ITALTA FEDERICI, was the founder and President of the Council of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy ("CREA"), which was originally founded in Colorado in or about 1997 as the "Coalition of Republicans for Environmental Activists." After initially operating from proceeds FEDERICI received from an inheritance, CREA thereafter operated primarily through donations. 2. In or about 1998, defendant FEDERICI, relocated CREA to Washington, D.C., with the substantial assistance of J. Steven Griles, who was then a Washington, D.C., lobbyist. Griles took an active interest in CREA and thereafter assisted in raising funds for CREA. 3. On or about September 14, 2000, CREA was formally incorporated in Washington, D.C., as an Internal Revenue Code Section 501 (c)(4) organization. Since that time, CREA also had a vice president, whose responsibilities included overseeing CREA's day-to-day

financial management. From in or about March 2001, through in or about May 2003, CREA received approximately $723,500 through donations and advocacy work. herein. Count One (Tax Evasion, 26 U.S.C. 7201) 4. Paragraphs 1 through 3 of this Information are realleged as though frilly set forth CREA's Financial Operation and Business Practices From in or about 2001, through in or about 2003, defendant FEDERICI and CREA's vice president relied primarily on cash, including ATM transactions, to handle the finances of CREA. As a result, CREA failed to maintain proper financial books and records of its bank and business accounts. This extensive use and reliance on cash by CREA continued throughout this period despite admonitions from CREA's accountants who were engaged to prepare CREA's Forms 990. 6. From in or about 2001, through in or about 2003, CREA was operated in such a manner that the personal finances of the officers and the finances of CREA were not properly segregated. In lieu of taking a regular salary, defendant FEDERICI and CREA'svice president obtained funds from CREA by directly withdrawing cash from CREA's bank account through ATM and teller transactions. The defendant and CREA' s vice president also received checks from CREA. 7. From in or about 2001, through in or about 2003, CREA's accountant issued Forms 1099 to defendant FEDERICI and CREA's vice president in an effort to account for the money the officers withdrew from CREA's bank accounts. Despite admonitions to CREA from CREA's accountant, the improper issuance of Forms 1099 to report compensation to officers, instead of Forms W-2 and payroll reporting, continued during this period. -2-

8. For Tax Year 2001, $51,613 in income from CREA was reported to defendant FEDERICI on a Form 1099. 9. On or about April 15, 2002, a request for an extension of time within which to file the U.S. Individual Income Tax Return for 2001 was filed on behalf of defendant FEDERICI, to extend the filing deadline for her 2001 tax return to August 15, 2002. The defendant did not include payment of taxes due and owing with the extension request as required by law. 10. On or about August 15, 2002, defendant FEDERICI willfully failed to timely file a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, or pay the taxes due and owing, of $16,614. 11. For Tax Year 2002, $92,201 in income from CREA was reported to defendant FEDERICI on a Form 1099. 12. On or about April 15, 2003, a request for an extension of time within which to file the U.S. Individual Income Tax Return for 2002 was filed on behalf of defendant FEDERICI, to extend the filing deadline for her 2002 tax return to August 15, 2003. The defendant did not include payment of taxes due and owing with the extension request as required by law. 13. On or about August 15, 2003, defendant FEDERICI willfully failed to timely file a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, or pay the taxes due and owing, of $32,846. 14. For Tax Year 2003, $90,145 in income from CREA was reported to defendant FEDERICI on a Form 1099. 15. On or about April 15, 2004, a request for an extension of time within which to file the U.S. Individual Income Tax Return for 2003 was filed on behalf of defendant FEDERICI, to extend the filing deadline for her 2003 tax return to August 15, 2004. The defendant did not include payment of taxes due and owing with the extension request as required by law. -3-

16. On or about August 15, 2004, a second request for an extension of time within which to file the U.S. Individual Income Tax Return for 2003 was filed on behalf of defendant FEDERICI, to extend the filing deadline for her 2003 tax return to October 15, 2004. The defendant did not include payment of taxes due and owing with the extension request as required bylaw. 17. On or about October 15, 2004, defendant FEDERICI willfully failed to timely file a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, or pay the taxes due and owing, of $31,178. Defendant's Tax Evasion 18. During the calendar years 2001 through 2003, the defendant, ITALIA FEDERICI, a resident of the District of Columbia, had and received taxable income in the sum of $233,955 upon which there was owing to the United States of America an income tax of $77,243; well-knowing and believing the foregoing facts, ITALIA FEDERICI, on or about April 15, 2002, April 15, 2003, and April 15, 2004, respectively, in the District of Columbia, did willfully attempt to evade and defeat the income tax due and owing by her to the United States for the calendar years 2001 through 2003 by failing to make a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return on or before the above due dates as extended, as required by law, to any proper officer of the Internal Revenue Service; by failing to pay to the Internal Revenue Service said income tax; by failing to cause taxes to be withheld from her salary; by failing to file Forms 941; by using ATM cash transactions and other cash withdrawals as salary; by causing her income to be reported on Forms 1099 instead of Forms W-2, when she was in fact an employee; and by failing to file Forms 1099 in a timely fashion. ALL IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 26, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 7201. -4-

Count Two (Obstruction of U.S. Senate Proceedings, 18 U.S.C. 1505) 19. Paragraphs 1 through 3 of this Information are realleged as though fully set forth herein. Federici' s Communications with Jack A. Abramoff and J. Steven Griles 20. On or about March 8, 2001, Griles was nominated to be the Deputy Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior ("DOT"), the second-highest ranking official within DOT. DOT was the Federal agency responsible for, among other things, such Native American matters as tribal recognition, gaming compacts and applications to place land into trust for gaming purposes, and distributing Federal program funds. 21. On or about March 1, 2001, one week before Griles' nomination, the defendant, ITALIA FEDERICI, introduced Griles to Jack A. Abramoff, a Washington, D.C., lobbyist who represented Native American tribal governments and other entities subject to DOT oversight. Abramoff and his clients had a substantial and recurring interest in decisions made by DOT and its officials. During their meeting, the three discussed a variety of issues, including Griles' impending nomination, Abramoff's interests in DOT issues and recommending colleagues for high-level DOT positions, and CREA's funding. Shortly thereafter, Abramoff, personally and through his clients, became a substantial contributor to CREA. In fact, from in or about March 2001, through in or about May 2003, Abramoff and his clients donated approximately $500,000 to CREA. 22. On or about July 12, 2001, Griles was confirmed by the United States Senate, and he thereafter served as DOT Deputy Secretary until he resigned on or about January 31, 2005. -5-

23. During much of Griles' tenure as DOl Deputy Secretary, defendant FEDERICT served as a conduit for information between Abramoff and Griles in order to foster Abramoff's and his client's interests. In such a role, the defendant would communicate in-depth with Abramoff about his clients and the issues and concerns applicable to them, and then communicate in-depth with Griles about these issues and/or forward to Griles white papers and other information and documents Abramoff supplied. The defendant also met with Abramoff and Griles in order to speak substantively and directly about these issues. The United State Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Investigation 24. In or about the Fall of 2004, the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs ("Senate Committee") began an official investigation into allegations of misconduct by Abramoff and others made by several Native American tribes. As part of the Senate Committee's investigation, defendant FEDERICI submitted to a voluntary investigative interview conducted by Senate investigators on or about October 7, 2005. The defendant then testified before members of the Senate Committee during a public hearing conducted on or about November 17, 2005. 25. During both the October 7, 2005 investigative interview and the November 17, 2005 public hearing, the Senate Committee focused on, among other areas of inquiry, the extent to which defendant FEDERICI, Abramoff, and Griles communicated about issues pending before DOT that directly affected Abramoffs clients while Griles served as DOT Deputy Secretary. The defendant was aware of the scope of the Senate Committee's inquiry before her October 7, 2005 interview began. -6-

26. During both the October 7, 2005 investigative interview and the November 17, 2005 public hearing, defendant FEDERICI was questioned about, among other things, the extent to which she, Abramoff, and Griles communicated about issues pending before DOT that directly affected Abramoff' s clients while Griles served as DOT Deputy Secretary. It was material to the Senate Committee's investigation that the Senators and Senate investigators who questioned the defendant learned the truth about the extent of the communication involving her, Abramoff, and Griles during Griles' DOT tenure. Defendant's Obstruction of Proceedings Before the United States Senate 27. From on or about October 7, 2005, through on or about November 17, 2005, in the District of Columbia, the defendant, ITALTA FEDERTCT, did knowingly and corruptly influence, obstruct, and impede, and endeavor to influence, obstruct, and impede the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which an investigation and review was being had by the United States Senate and a Committee of the United States Senate. That is, during her October 7, 2005 interview with investigators working for the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, and during her November 17, 2005 testimony at a public hearing held before members of the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, defendant FEDERICT knowingly and intentionally made a series of materially false and fictitious declarations to, and withheld material information from, Senators and Senate investigators in response to questions about the extent to which she, Abramoff, and Griles communicated about issues pending before DOI that directly affected Abramoff' s clients while Griles served as DOT Deputy Secretary. ALL IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1505. -7-

FOR THE UNITED STATES WILLIAM M. WELCH, II Chief Public Integñty Section United States Department of Justice Criminal Division BRUCE M. SALAD Chief Southern Criminal Enforcement Section United States Department of Justice Tax Division KARTIK K. RAMAN Trial Attorney Public Integrity Section - ARMANDO 0. BONThLA Trial Attorney Public Integrity Section June 5', 2007-8-