UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv RGS Document 10 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv DSC Document 1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv TSZ Document 15 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:14-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 1 Filed 12/08/08 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EXERGEN CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. KAZ USA, INC. a JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. EXERGEN CORPORATION S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Exergen Corporation ( Exergen for its Complaint against defendant Kaz USA, Inc. alleges as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Exergen Corporation ( Exergen is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and having its principal place of business at 400 Pleasant Street, Watertown, Massachusetts, within this judicial district. 2. Defendant Kaz USA, Inc. ( Kaz is, upon information and belief, a corporation organized under the laws of Massachusetts having its principal executive offices at 250 Turnpike Road, Southborough Massachusetts, and doing business in this judicial district, including business related to the claims asserted in this Complaint.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This action is for patent infringement. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a. 4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant. Defendant is a Massachusetts corporation. Defendant has conducted and solicited and continues to conduct and solicit business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Defendant has caused and is continuing to cause tortious injury in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Upon information and belief, Defendant, directly or through intermediaries, uses, offers for sale, imports, or distributes to others for such purposes, infrared thermometers, in the United States and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 5. Venue in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b and (c and 1400(b, as inter alia, Defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction in this district. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 6. On August 31, 2010, United States Patent No. 7,787,938 ( the 938 Patent, entitled Temporal Artery Temperature Detector, was lawfully issued. 7. A copy of the 938 Patent is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein. 8. Exergen is the sole owner of the 938 Patent and all rights of recovery thereunder. 9. The 938 Patent has not expired and is in full force and effect. 10. Exergen has marked its products in connection with the 938 patent in compliance with 35 U.S.C. 287(a. 11. On September 18, 2001, United States Patent No. 6,292,685 ( the 685 Patent, entitled Temporal Artery Temperature Detector, was lawfully issued. 12. A copy of the 685 Patent is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein. 2

13. Exergen is the sole owner of the 685 Patent and all rights of recovery thereunder. 14. The 685 Patent has not expired and is in full force and effect. 15. Exergen has marked its products in connection with the 685 Patent in compliance with 35 U.S.C. 287(a. 16. Kaz has made and is making, has used and is using, has offered and is offering to sell, and/or has sold and is selling infrared thermometers the use of which infringes the 938 Patent and the 685 Patent including but not limited to, by selling thermometers sold under the name Vicks Forehead Thermometer. 17. The instructions provided to consumers with the Vicks Forehead Thermometer explicitly instruct users to use the product in an infringing manner. A copy of the instruction manual has been attached as Exhibit C and is incorporated herein. 18. Defendant has been aware of the existence of the 938 Patent since at least as early as about March 13, 2013. 19. Defendant has been aware of the existence of the 685 Patent since at least as early as about April 2007. herein. COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF THE 938 PATENT 20. Exergen incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-19 above as though fully set out 21. On information and belief, Defendant has been and is contributorily infringing and/or actively inducing others, including end users, to infringe the 938 Patent, and sells the infringing thermometers with the knowledge and intent that they will be used by end users and that such use infringes the 938 Patent, and the intent that such thermometers are especially 3

designed to be and are used in a manner which infringes the 938 Patent. Said thermometers are not staple items of commerce and have no substantial noninfringing use. 938 patent. 22. Kaz is a direct competitor of Exergen with respect to the subject matter of the 23. On information and belief, Defendant was aware of the existence of the 938 Patent and its infringement of the 938 Patent has been intentional, deliberate, and willful. 24. By reason of the aforesaid infringement, Exergen is damaged and is entitled to damages adequate to compensate for Defendant s infringement. 25. Defendant s infringement of the 938 Patent has caused and is causing irreparable injury to Exergen, for which Exergen has no adequate remedy at law. Defendant will continue its unauthorized conduct unless enjoined by this Court. herein. COUNT II INFRINGEMENT OF THE 685 PATENT 26. Exergen incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-25 above as though fully set out 27. On information and belief, Defendant has been and is contributorily infringing and/or actively inducing others, including end users, to infringe the 685 Patent, and sells the infringing thermometers with the knowledge and intent that they will be used by end users and that such use infringes the 685 Patent, and the intent that such thermometers are especially designed to be and are used in a manner which infringes the 685 Patent. Said thermometers are not staple items of commerce and have no substantial noninfringing use. 685 Patent. 28. Kaz is a direct competitor of Exergen with respect to the subject matter of the 4

29. On information and belief, Defendant was aware of the existence of the 685 Patent and its infringement of the 685 Patent has been intentional, deliberate, and willful. 30. By reason of the aforesaid infringement, Exergen is damaged and is entitled to damages adequate to compensate for Defendant s infringement. 31. Defendant s infringement of the 685 Patent has caused and is causing irreparable injury to Exergen, for which Exergen has no adequate remedy at law. Defendant will continue its unauthorized conduct unless enjoined by this Court. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Exergen respectfully requests this Court to grant the following relief, and any other relief the Court may deem proper: 1. Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that Kaz induces infringement of, and has induced infringement of, the 938 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(b; 2. Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that Kaz induces infringement of, and has induced infringement of, the 685 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(b; 3. Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that Kaz contributorily infringes, and has contributorily infringed, the 938 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(c; 4. Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that Kaz contributorily infringes, and has contributorily infringed, the 685 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(c; 5. Permanently enjoin Kaz and its officers, agents, divisions, affiliate, subsidiaries, successors, employees, and representatives, and all those controlled by or acting in concert or privity with them from infringing, inducing the infringement, and/or contributing to the infringement of the 938 Patent; 5

6. Permanently enjoin Kaz and its officers, agents, divisions, affiliate, subsidiaries, successors, employees, and representatives, and all those controlled by or acting in concert or privity with them from infringing, inducing the infringement, and/or contributing to the infringement of the 685 Patent; 7. Award Exergen damages in an amount to be determined at trial; and 8. Award Exergen treble damages for willful infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Exergen hereby demands a trial by jury. Date: March 18, 2013 Respectfully submitted, EXERGEN CORPORATION By its attorneys, /s/ Meredith L. Ainbinder Kerry L. Timbers (BBO # 552293 Robert M. Asher (BBO # 22865 Meredith L. Ainbinder (BBO # 661132 SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110-1618 Tel: (617 443-9292 Fax: (617 443-0004 Email: mainbinder@sunsteinlaw.com 03577/00508 1791884.1 6