President Trump And America s 2020 Presidential Election: An Analytical Framework

Similar documents
2018 MIDTERMS PRE- ELECTION OVER VIEW OCTOBER 2018

Rising American Electorate & Working Class Women Strike Back. November 9, 2018

Rising American Electorate & White Working Class Strike Back. November 27, 2018

American Dental Association

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

Trump, Populism and the Economy

The Presidential Election. Paul Beck, The Ohio State University Lifelong Learning Institute December 7, 2016

Charlie Cook s Tour of American Politics

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Generic Pharmaceutical Association February 10, 2015

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

An Election Year Like No Other:

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Moral Values Take Back Seat to Partisanship and the Economy In 2004 Presidential Election

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

This Rising American Electorate & Working Class Strike Back

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

ELECTION UPDATE Tom Davis

Elections and Voting Behavior

An in-depth examination of North Carolina voter attitudes in important current issues. Registered Voters in North Carolina

Rural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 2008

United States: Implications of the Midterm Elections for Economic Policy

GOP leads on economy, Democrats on health care, immigration

The Rising American Electorate & White Working Class Strike Back: Extended memo from post-election research

Washington, D.C. Update

Focus on OUR Concerns

Energized Against Donald Trump, Democrats Reach +14 in the Midterms

A Dead Heat and the Electoral College

The Cook Political Report 2012 Election Outlook

Navigating Choppy Waters

Latinos and the Mid- term Election

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS U.S. SENATE POLL Sept , ,005 Registered Voters (RVs)

NATIONAL: 2018 HOUSE RACE STABILITY

ELECTION OVERVIEW. + Context: Mood of the Electorate. + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward?

The New Shape of the Republican Race

Edging toward an earthquake Report on the WVWV March National Survey

Healthcare and the 2012 Election. October 17 th, 2012

The Stage is set for a Direction Changing November Election

The Battleground: Democratic Perspective September 7 th, 2016

The Morning Call / Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion. Pennsylvania 2012: An Election Preview

New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Findings from Wave 1 of Battleground web-panel & phone survey. May 2018

A Powerful Agenda for 2016 Democrats Need to Give Voters a Reason to Participate

THE TARRANCE GROUP. BRIEFING MEMORANDUM To: Interested Parties. From: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber. Date: November 7, 2006

Consolidating Democrats The strategy that gives a governing majority

Obama s Support is Broadly Based; McCain Now -10 on the Economy

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

NATIONAL: 2016 GOP REMAINS WIDE OPEN

Purposes of Elections

Nevada Poll Results Tarkanian 39%, Heller 31% (31% undecided) 31% would renominate Heller (51% want someone else, 18% undecided)

Union Voters and Democrats

The Battleground: Democratic Perspective April 25 th, 2016

The Battleground: Democratic Analysis March 13 th, 2018

OHIO: GAP NARROWS IN CD12 SPECIAL

Obama vs. Romney: Is It the Economy, Stupid?

Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner 1994=2010. Report on the Democracy Corps and Resurgent Republic bipartisan post election poll

Partisan Preference of Puerto Rico Voters Post-Statehood

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Report from phone survey & web-panel in the 12-state battleground

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

February 23, 2012 Anzalone Liszt Research National Polling Summary

Political Environment and Congressional Breakdown Charts. December 12, 2017

To: Interested Parties From: End Citizens United Date: July 20, 2017 Re: Taking on Money in Politics Can Help You Win

FOR RELEASE: NOVEMBER

Making a Difference In Washington, D.C.

Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Erica Seifert and Scott Tiell, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

***POLITICAL PARTIES*** DEFINITION: A group of politicians, activists, and voters who seek to win elections and control government.

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion 2455 South Road, Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE: MIDSUMMER July 7-14, 2008

Political Report: September 2010

(212) FOR RELEASE: FEBRUARY

Growing the Youth Vote

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Battleground 2016: new game. June 30, 2016

A Journal of Public Opinion & Political Strategy

EXAM: Parties & Elections

METHODOLOGY Public Opinion Strategies recently completed three surveys on behalf of Human Rights First:

A Majority of Likely Voters Approve of President Trump s Decisions.

LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE 2016 ELECTION

CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES

2016 State Elections

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

2016: An Election Year to Remember. Ron Elving Senior Washington Editor National Public Radio

National Tracking Poll

Swing Voters Criticize Bush on Economy, Support Him on Iraq THREE-IN-TEN VOTERS OPEN TO PERSUASION

This report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

The Cook Political Report s Road Map to the 2018 Midterms

May You Live in Interesting Times

Romney Leads in Confidence on Recovery But Obama Escapes Most Economic Blame

In battleground Virginia, Clinton beating all Republicans in 2016 presidential matchups; GOP voters divided, with Bush up, Christie down

Eagleton Institute of Politics Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 191 Ryders Lane New Brunswick, New Jersey


Perry s future looks bleak

The United States Presidential Election Process: Undemocratic?

2018 State Legislative Elections: Will History Prevail? Sept. 27, 2018 OAS Episode 44

From: John Halpin, Center for American Progress Karl Agne, GBA Strategies

Transcription:

President Trump And America s 2020 Presidential Election: An Analytical Framework March 6, 2019

Trump 2020 Meets Trump 2016 Trump 2020 Is A Stronger Candidate Than Trump 2016 Looking purely at Trump s personal standing in 2016 vs. 2020, he is no worse for wear, with the greatest change in his ratings coming from the consolidation of support among Republicans after two years of providing wins for his GOP base (e.g., deregulation, conservative judges) and currently having a strong economy and jobs market But Trump 2016 Was A Weak Candidate (Who Happened To Face Another Weak Candidate) Trump vs. Clinton 2016 matchup had the two most unfavorable candidates in a 60-year span According to the 2016 exit polls, 18 percent of voters who had an unfavorable view of both Clinton and Trump voted for Trump by a 17- point margin those margins were even higher in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Florida Trump was the change candidate, winning voters who wanted change by a 68-point margin Still, Trump only garnered 46.1 percent of the popular vote 1

Trump s Base Not Enough To Win Trump Is A Strong Weak Incumbent Heading Into 2020 Election Trump s political base of support America First nationalists, rural farmers, and evangelical Christians was necessary but insufficient to win in 2016 will still be insufficient to win in 2020 Trump s loyal base of support is around 30 percent of voters, while an even larger base of opposition is around 45 percent of voters Trump s approval ratings remain historically low and in narrow range, with most Americans firmly set in their convictions of the president Trump s low approval ratings a function of America s political divide he remains the most popular politician among GOP electorate little chance of not running for reelection or facing serious primary challenger 2

Race For Independents Trump Won Independents In 2016 Trump won Independents by four points nationally, despite having a 32 percent favorability rating among them key was that Clinton just had similarly low 33 percent favorability rating...but There Are Danger Signs For Him After 2018 Midterms After four years in office, Trump is unlikely to be able to carry the mantle of change among true Independents or dissatisfied voters Trump s approval rating among Independents in first two years averaged 35 percent, but Democrats won them by 12 points nationally in the midterm elections According to 2018 exit polls, 10 percent of voters disapproving of both Democrats and Republicans voted for Democrats by a one-point margin 3

The Electoral College Outlook In 2016, Trump won the electoral college 306 to 232. In the race to 270 in 2020, Democrats start with a 232 to 220 edge, with 86 electoral votes rated as toss-ups The Northern Blue Wall 46 Electoral Votes (PA, MI, WI) The three historically Democratic states Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin were the biggest upsets in 2016 and will likely be biggest determinants of who wins in 2020 The midterms and current 2020 polling in all three states show Trump is in danger of losing these states that he won by less than one percent in 2016 Florida and the Sunbelt 109 Electoral Votes (FL, NC, GA, TX, AZ) Florida continues to be a perennial swing state, with Arizona turning into a toss-up after electing Democratic senator in 2018 for first time in 30 years If Independents swing against Trump and the Democratic base turns out in large numbers, North Carolina, Georgia, and Texas could come into play too 4

Most Critical Election Variable Biggest Variable To Watch: Defining Democratic Nominee Reelections are partially a referendum on the president: Incumbent approval number often matches the popular vote share they receive in reelection sub-40 approval rating gives incumbents little chance even if they have a higher favorability rating than the challenger (e.g., 1980 election) Reelections are also choices, where an incumbent can work to define an opponent as unacceptable even if there is an openness for change (e.g., 2004 election) Trump s current standing is somewhere in between Carter and W. Bush: For Trump to win in 2020, he needs to run against an opponent who has even worse favorability ratings, particularly among Independents If the race is framed more as a referendum on Trump, he likely loses, but if he can sufficiently make the election a choice similar to 2016 there is an avenue for making the Democratic alternative unacceptable Trump s acumen for defining his opponents cannot be underestimated Potential opponents like Joe Biden pose the greatest threat to Trump as he is largely defined and acceptable among the general electorate bigger wildcards and opportunities for Trump are from the relative unknown Democratic candidates 5

Other Key Election Variables Given the inelastic nature of Trump s approval ratings, there are few variables that have affected the standing of the president. Yet, there s always a possibility future variables can have a meaningful impact. These include the following: The Economy Despite strong economic growth and record employment levels in his first two years in office, Trump s approval rating never exceeded 45 percent in the Gallup polls. Few are expecting such economic growth to continue in 2019 or 2020, with greater downside risk to the economic and employment trajectory. Negative economic trajectories or sentiments have quickly eroded political support in past (e.g., H.W. Bush and Carter), though Trump s base will likely give him benefit of the doubt. The Investigations Unless a truly bombshell revelation of direct collusion between Trump and the Russians hits, the Mueller investigation will continue to be an issue viewed through partisan lens, unlikely to sway voters one way or the other. The risk for Trump is overreach in trying to impede other federal and state investigations. The risk for Democrats is overreach in House investigations or impeachment proceedings that could be viewed as presidential harassment. The Trump-Pelosi Dynamic Trump saw declining approval ratings among Independents when he shut down the government over border wall funding. Though his approval numbers quickly recovered after government reopened, the president lost his first battle with the new House speaker. Trump s battles with Pelosi will continue as even bipartisan initiatives fail to gain momentum. 6

The Democratic Field Crowded Democratic Field Creates Uncertainty In crowded field, plurality rules in early primary and caucus states contenders will need to thrive in a certain lane or cobble together a coalition among the Democratic electorate (e.g., progressives, Democratic establishment, moderates, minorities, millennials) At this point in previous election cycles, eventual Democratic primary winners were polling low George McGovern at 5.0 percent, Jimmy Carter at 1.0 percent, Michael Dukakis at 7.5 percent, and Bill Clinton at 1.7 percent As Democrats move leftward, primary process will set progressive policy agenda for potential 2020 Democratic administration (e.g., Medicare For All, Green New Deal, Break Up Big Tech, Wealth Tax) Electability will trump ideological purity tests, as top priority among Democrats is beating Trump, but risk of moving too far left for general electorate remains While not likeliest outcome, given size of the field and frontloading of primaries, there s increased risk of brokered Democratic convention but Democratic nominee does not need to win 50 percent of the primary votes to win the nomination 7