Online Appendix of When the Stakes are High, by Annemarie Walter, Wouter van der Brug and Philip van Praag, accepted for publication by CPS

Similar documents
Negative campaigning in Western Europe: beyond the vote-seeking perspective Walter, A.S.

2 DUTCH CAMPAIGN COVERAGE ( ) 2

Towards the next Dutch general election: the issue opportunity structure for parties

Economy and culture in the 2010 Dutch election

GENERAL ELECTION IN THE NETHERLANDS 15 th March European Elections monitor. Analysis. Corinne Deloy

L Europe des populistes. Dominique Reynié

DeHavilland Information Services Ltd

To link to this article:

GENERAL ELECTION IN THE NETHERLANDS 15 th March European Elections monitor. Analysis. 1) Analysis : Page 01 2) Results : Page 06.

A populist Zeitgeist? The impact of populism on parties, media and the public in Western Europe Rooduijn, M.

Comparing spaces of electoral and parliamentary party competition

The dimensionality of voting behaviour in two European parliaments

THE NETHERLANDS AND RIGHT-WING PARTIES: AN UNEASY RELATIONSHIP

NOTE: For the CDU, #201, there are no factional changes to code. Dominant Faction/Coalition Change

Hans Vollaard en Bartho Boer, EU Studies, Leiden University, the Netherlands

Measuring the Political Sophistication of Voters in the Netherlands and the United States

University of Groningen. The Netherlands Otjes, Simon; Voerman, Gerrit. Published in: European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook

Draft Version, please do not cite

Measuring the Political Sophistication of Voters in the Netherlands and the United States

Huib Pellikaan, Sarah L. de Lange and Tom W.G. van der Meer*

Euro Area Political Risks Rise To The Fore

NATIONAL PARLIAMENT REASONED OPINION ON SUBSIDIARITY

The performance of four possible rules for selecting the Prime Minister after the Dutch Parliamentary elections of June 2010

Cohort, Life-Cycle and Period Effects in a Period. of Partisan Dealignment

Politicizing immigration in Western Europe

Germany: Merkel does not stand out but holds

ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF ELECTION PROGRAMMES

Centre for European Studies (CES)

Behind Austerity. Transnational Think Tank Networks. Dieter Plehwe WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Germany. December, 2016

Mapping European Democracy Assistance Tracing the Activities and Financial Flows of Political Foundations

The predictive power of subjective probabilities: probabilistic and deterministic polling in the Dutch 2017 election

Application of the Borda Fixed Point voting rule to the Dutch Parliamentary elections 2006

The Political Centre under Pressure: Elections in the Netherlands

Multiparty electoral competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A model based on multinomial probit

Documentation of Indicators

University of Groningen. Declining cleavages and political choices Graaf, Nan Dirk de; Heath, Anthony; Need, Ariana. Published in: Electoral Studies

AND LANDS THE RISE OF MAINSTREAM NATIONALISM AND XENOPHOBIA IN DUTCH POLITICS. Dirk Witteveen. Introduction

Adrift or adroit? A panel study in 58 waves on the sources of electoral volatility in the Netherlands,

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3: Macro Report June 05, 2006

Inequality and Anti-globalization Backlash by Political Parties

A populist Zeitgeist? The impact of populism on parties, media and the public in Western Europe Rooduijn, M.

From the press to politics and back: When do media set the political agenda and when do parties set the media agenda? van der Pas, D.J.

How Populist are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters

The Ukraine-EU Association Agreement after the Dutch referendum

Matching voters to parties: Voting advice applications and models of party choice

Dataset of New Parties and Party System Innovation in Western Europe since 1945

Regarding the Dutch Nee to the European Constitution

Representation vs. Responsiveness: How ideology and votes shape party policy change

Bridging the Gap? Representation by Mainstream and Niche Parties in Dutch Local Politics

Distinguishing welfare state reform and income redistribution. A two-dimensional approach to the Dutch voter space on economic issues

EU issue voting and the 2014 EP election campaign: a dynamic perspective

DEMOCRACY STARTS WITH DIALOGUE

Belgium: Far beyond second order

ROUND TABLE PAPER A CASE FOR THE STATE FUNDING OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN PAKISTAN

Using faith to exclude: The role of religion in Dutch populism

DEMOCRACY STARTS WITH DIALOGUE

Failed promises of modernization: Religion, Postmaterialism and Ethnonationalist attitudes in the Netherlands

Supporting Information for Inclusion and Public. Policy: Evidence from Sweden s Introduction of. Noncitizen Suffrage

How democratic are Dutch parties?

Coalition governments and party competition: Political communication strategies of coalition parties

Vox populismus: a populist radical right attitude among the public? Rooduijn, M.

Appendix for: The Electoral Implications. of Coalition Policy-Making

INTEGRATION AT THE CROSSROADS

1 In 2040 in many Dutch municipalities one third of the population will be 65 years or over. Photo: Alphons Nieuwenhuis

What did you just call me? A study on the demonization of political parties in the Netherlands between 1995 and 2011 van Heerden, S.C.

The heartland of the PVV. An overall examination of the electoral success of the PVV in the province of Limburg

Letter from the Frontline: Back from the brink!

THE POLITICAL SITUATION IN GERMANY BEFORE THE GENERAL ELECTION ON 22 SEPTEMBER 2002

Published online: 26 Feb 2013.

The Age of Migration website Minorities in the Netherlands

ALLIED CONTROL AND GERMAN FREEDOM

Appendix. Table A1: Radical Right Parties in Europe,

Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism

EU Related Referendums = Second-Order Elections? A Dutch single case study

Congruence in Political Parties

GERMANY : Macro-level data. General context of the German CNEP study

Funding political parties in emerging African democracies: What role for Norway?

Declining Party Membership A Positive Development?

Explaining Variation in Protester Commitment

Election 2010: Where the Women Candidates Are

Defining and measuring niche parties. Markus Wagner, Department of Methods in the Social Sciences, University of Vienna. Forthcoming in Party Politics

Bulletin of the Institute for Western Affairs

The micro-foundations of electoral dealignment 1. Romain Lachat Institute of Political Science University of Zurich

Journal of Contemporary European Research

Shifting the blame. Populist politicians' use of Twitter as a tool of opposition

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report August 12, 2014

THE EU CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY IN THE NETHERLANDS

A Benchmarking Forecast of the 2013 Bundestag Election. Mark Kayser and Arndt Leininger. Hertie School of Governance, Berlin.

ELECTION SHOCK AND COALITION OPTIONS DISRUPTING MARKETS YET AGAIN?

Final Results 2016 GLA ELECTIONS ELECTION OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY MEMBERS

National Dimensions of Political Conflict and the. Mobilization of Euroscepticism by the Extreme. Left and Right

Value Orientations and Party Choice - A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Five Countries

Understanding shifts in voting behaviour away from and towards radical right populist parties: The case of the PVV between 2007 and 2012

example, that the party of the prime minister has disproportionate influence on the policy-making

Market Bulletin. The European political project at a crossroads? 23 February 2017 MARKET INSIGHTS IN BRIEF

Online supplement to:

Deliberative qualities of generic news frames: Assessing the democratic value of strategic game and contestation framing in election

Political parties and style of representation:

Party Competition and Party Behavior:

The Spitzenkandidaten campaigns in 2014: assessing the importance of information and news exposure for preference formation of citizens

Transcription:

Online Appendix of When the Stakes are High, by Annemarie Walter, Wouter van der Brug and Philip van Praag, accepted for publication by CPS Table A.1. Distribution of Party Election Broadcasts included for Political Party 1983 1987 1992 1997 2001 2005 Conservatives (CON) 5 5 5 5 5 4 Labour (LAB) 5 5 5 5 5 5 Liberal Democrats (LDP) 3 5 4 5 4 4 Total 13 15 14 15 14 13 Note: Total of 84 party election broadcasts. Source: Leeds University Election Broadcast Archive, British Film Institute, private collection of Dr. Margaret Scammell (London School of Economics) and transcripts of Dr. Michael Pearce (University of Sunderland) Table A.2. Distribution of Party Election Broadcasts included for Germany Political Party 1980 1983 1987 1990 1994 1998 2002 2005 Christian Democratic Union (CDU) 8 7 5 3 3 2 1 1 Christian Social Union (CSU) 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 Free Democratic Party (FDP) 5 6 3 1 5 5 6 2 The Greens (Die Grünen) * 4 3 10 5 1 3 5 Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS) - - - * 1 1 1 1 Social Democratic Party of Germany 4 8 7 4 6 5 2 5 (SPD) Total 23 26 19 20 22 15 14 17 Note: Total of 156 party election broadcasts. - Party did not exist at that time. *Party election broadcasts for this party were available, but are not included as the party was not represented in parliament during the election campaign. Source: Archive of Social Democracy of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Archive of Liberalism of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation, the Green Memory Archive of the Heinrich Böll Foundation, the Archive of Christian Democratic Politics of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Archive of Democratic Socialism of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, Archive for Christian Social Politics of the Hans Seidel Foundation and production company Trialon. 1

Table A.3. Distribution of Party Election Broadcasts included for the Netherlands Political Party 1981 1982 1986 1989 1994 1998 2002 2003 2006 General Old People Party (AOV) - - - - * - - - - Centre Party/Centre Democrats (CD) * * N/A 5 3 4 - - - Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA) N/A 1 1 2 4 2 1 2 2 Communist Party in the Netherlands N/A N/A 1 - - - - - - (CPN) Christian Union (CU) - - - - - - 2 1 1 Democrats 66 (D66) N/A N/A 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 Democratic Socialists 70 (DS 70) 1 N/A - - - - - - - Evangelical People s Party (EVP) N/A N/A N/A - - - - - - Green Left (GL) - - - 2 3 1 1 1 1 Reformed Political League (GPV) 1 1 1 4 3 1 - - - List Pim Fortuyn (LPF) / List Five - - - - - - * 2 1 Fortuyn (LVF) Liveable Netherlands (LN) - - - - - - - 2 - Radical Party (PPR) N/A N/A 4 - - - - - - Pacifist Socialist Party (PSP) 1 1 1 - - - - - - Labour Party (PvdA) 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 Animal Party (PvdD) - - - - - - - - * Freedom Party (PVV) - - - - - - - - * Reformed Political Federation (RPF) N/A N/A 3 5 4 N/A - - - Socialist Party (SP) N/A N/A * * * 1 1 1 1 Liberal Party (VVD) 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 Union 55+ - - - - * 1 - - - Total 6 6 17 24 26 13 11 15 19 Note: Total of 137 party election broadcast, several party election broadcasts have not been saved in archives. - Party did not exist at that time. N/A= Not available, as several party election broadcasts have not been saved. The Political Reformed Party (SGP) that is represented in the Dutch Parliament does not make us of the free allocated broadcast time, due to religious objections. In 2002 the campaign ended prematurely due to the assassination of LPF first candidate Pim Fortuyn, thereby reducing the number of different party election broadcasts aired. Source: The Netherlands Institute of Sound and Vision, Documentation Centre Dutch Political Parties, collection Communication Sciences University of Nijmegen, The Historical Documentation Centre for Dutch Protestantism, The Archives and Documentation Center of the Reformed Churches (liberated) in the Netherlands, International Institute of Social History, Archive Socialist Party (SP), YouTube channel Christian Democrats (CDA), YouTube channel Green Left (GL). 2

Table A.4. Descriptive Statistics Main Independent Variables Variables Mean Std. Dev. Min. Max. Party x Election Level (N=141) Opposition Party (dummy) 0.58 0.49 0 1 Party Loss in the Polls 1.89 0.48 0.00 3.36 Government Experience 0.39 0.31 0 1 Median Party Distance 1.58 0.82 0.04 3.75 Election Level (N=23) Size Electoral Market 10.60 7.49 2.00 31.10 Closeness Election 9.95 7.19 0.30 27.00 Continuation Government (dummy) 0.77 0.42 0 1 Coalition Loss (dummy) 0.37 0.48 0 1 Continuation Government* Coalition Loss 0.31 0.46 0 1 3

Table A.5. The Effects of Party Characteristics on Negative Campaigning in Western Europe Base Model Model 1 Party Characteristics Model2 Challenger Status Model 3 Loss in Polls Intercept 28.569* 16.396* 6.694 20.878* (5.095) (4.947) (4.751) (5.093) Opposition Party 6.297* 13.920* 6.804* (0.474) (0.396) Loss in Polls 3.233* 2.894* -0.092 (0.360) (0.462) Government Experience -4.512* -3.446* -2.695 (1.622) (1.683) Median Party Distance 3.004* 0.903* (0.390) (0.396) Opposition Party* -19.603* (0.727) Loss in Polls* 8.846* (0.732) GovernmentExperience* Median Party Distance* 11.558 12.486 29.926* -5.264 (10.964) (10.311) (9.913) (10.718) Germany -14.145-11.394-9.964-11.517 (9.469) (8.915) (8.550) (9.175) σ² Party x Election 130.654* 114.074* 121.711* (2.011) (1.756) (1.873) σ² Party 342.909* 301.235* 278.523* 320.894* (95.053) (83.438) (77.380) (8.883) σ² Election 50.776* 46.535* 41.404* 47.741* (16.220) (12.322) (13.209) (15.274) Model 4 Gov. Experience 17.780* (4.870) 5.426* (0.421) 3.265* (0.374) -9.957* (2.109) 0.702 (0.402) 13.785* (3.202) Model 5 Median Party Distance 12.945* (4.995) 7.697* (0.451) 3.039* -0.598 (1.790) 2.008* (0.429) -7.117* (1.098) 9.533 19.229 (10.154) (10.412) -9.781-12.418 (8.766) (8.958) 123.606* 123.228* (1.903) (1.897) 291.674* 304.215* (81.042) (84.245) 43.920* 46.814* (14.015) (14.998) Deviance (-2LL) 65714.676 65257.794 64559.388 65113.114 65239.323 65215.878 Note: Level 1: Parties in elections N=129 Level 2: Parties N=27/Elections N=23. Standard errors within parentheses. * means significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed). For the country dummies the reference category is the Netherlands. 4

Table A.6. The Effects of Party and Election Characteristics on Negative Campaigning in Western Europe Model 1 Party Characteristics Model6 Size Electoral Market Model 7 Closeness Model 8 Continuation Government Model 9 Coalition Loss Intercept 16.396* 22.204 16.058* 16.424* 17.469* (4.947) (5.733) (5.043) (5.201) (5.087) Opposition Party 6.297* 6.284* 6.298* 6.297* 6.295* Loss in Polls 3.233* 3.215* 3.237* 3.233* 3.232* Government Experience -4.512* -4.625* -4.489* -4.512* -4.489* (1.689) (1.691) Median Party Distance 0.944* Size Electoral Market -0.350 (0.182) Closeness Election 0.085 (0.252) Continuation Government -0.085 (4.853) (1.689) 0.965* Model 10 Interaction 18.109* (5.526) 6.295* 3.228* -4.503* -0.628 (5.586) Coalition Loss -2.436 (2.862) -5.037 (5.816) Continuation Government * Coalition Loss -0.628 (5.586) 12.486 (10.311) 10.345 (10.273) 11.497 (10.715) 12.544 (10.807) 12.220 (10.290) 11.976 (10.811) Germany -11.394 (8.915) -14.044 (8.925) -11.983 (9.078) -11.338 (9.480) -11.269 (8.891) -11.626 (9.443) σ² Party x Election 123.847* 123.847* σ² Party 301.235* (83.438) 300.957* (83.226) 300.960* (83.416) 301.115* (83.447) 300.911* (83.454) 300.876* (83.476) σ² Election 46.535* (12.322) 39.488* (12.666) 46.266* (14.788) 46.536* (14.888) 44.954* (14.358) 44.391* (14.168) Deviance (-2LL) 65257.794 65254.384 65257.684 65257.801 65257.080 6525.816 Note: Level 1: Parties in elections N=129 Level 2: Parties N=27/Elections N=23. Standard errors within parentheses. * means significant at the 0.05 level (twotailed). For the country dummies the reference category is the Netherlands. 5