WILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Similar documents
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

WILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 8-1 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

President Obama s FOIA Memorandum and Attorney General Holder s FOIA Guidelines. Creating a "New Era of Open Government"

Case 1:06-cv CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Knowledge, Skills & Abilities. FOIA Redaction Workshop Denver, Colorado. Instructors. Scott Hodes, Esq.

THEMATIC COMPILATION OF RELEVANT INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THE UNITED STATES ARTICLE 10 UNCAC PUBLIC REPORTING

Regulatory Coordinating Committee

UNCLASSIFIED INSTRUCTION

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST

Freedom of Information Act Request (Expedited Processing Requested)

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Comments of EPIC 1 Department of Interior

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

April 18, 2017 FEE WAIVER

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE FDA

Case 6:07-cv MAT-MWP Document 1 Filed 08/15/07 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv RMU Document 25 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

AP3. APPENDIX 3 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

Case 1:11-cv JDB Document 3 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

December 13, Dear FOIA Officers:

Re: Freedom of Information Act Request (Expedited Processing Requested)

Notes on how to read the chart:

February 9, 2017 By

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Rights & Responsibilities: The Rights of Requesters and the Responsibilities of Town of Victoria Under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act

Frank Vera III. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY Telephone:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the

Regulatory Coordinating Committee

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Executive Order 12958, as amended "National Classified Information" Current Version - Final Version

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

APPEALS, LITIGATION and WORKING WITH THE GENERAL COUNSEL

Judicial Watcli Decciuse no one is above the law!

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Re: Request under the Freedom of Information Act. Dear Mr. Marquis,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rights & Responsibilities: The Rights of Requesters and the Responsibilities of Richmond County under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act

May 7, 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES. Designation and Sharing of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION PROCEDURE Amended 12/14/00 - FA Amended 06/02/15 FA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

August 23, BY U.S. MAIL AND Freedom of Information Act Request Request for Expedited Processing

Re: Freedom of Information Act Request (Expedited Processing Requested)

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Making a Request for Records from Mathews County Public Schools

BILLS PENDING AS OF 9/11/13 THAT RELATE TO NSA SURVEILLANCE

Case 1:16-cv TSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:17-cv RCL Document 11-7 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 12

Middlebury Township Freedom of Information Act Policy Resolution

Case 1:13-cv AT Document 18 Filed 03/03/14 Page 1 of 8 ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 1:13-cv JEB Document 39 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

LIVINGSTON COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY (LCCMHA) FOIA Policies, Procedures and Guidelines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Amendments to the Commission s Freedom of Information Act Regulations

Case 1:16-cv KBJ Document 15 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JUN Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request No Fee Waiver Denial

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

I. PURPOSE To establish procedures and guidelines governing the release of public records pursuant to Public Act 442 of 1976, as amended.

CITY OF GROSSE POINTE FARMS WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES

Washington, D.C June 2004

HOUGHTON COUNTY. FOIA Procedures and Guidelines

Plaintiffs-Appellants, Docket Nos (L), 445(Con) DECLARATION OF SARAH S. NORMAND. SARAH S. NORMAND, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1746, declares as

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

You have the right to request to inspect or receive copies of public records, or both.

Re: Expedited Request for Information under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

Case 0:12-cv WJZ Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/27/2017 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CITY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Comments to the Social Security Administration

I. The Requesting Organization Idaho Progressive Student Alliance

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A POLICY REGARDING REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Opinion L , Public Law FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, 2017

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 8

CITY OF ESCANABA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 I. BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT

CITY OF GRAND HAVEN FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES

Case 1:15-cv PKC Document 20 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10. Plaintiffs, 15 Civ (PKC) DECLARATION OF PAUL P. COLBORN

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

RULE PROPOSALS INTERESTED PERSONS

Citizen Advocacy Center Guide to Illinois Freedom of Information Act

Freedom of Information Act Request: Greater Sage-Grouse Order and Memorandum

Case 2:08-cv CW-DBP Document 7 Filed 11/11/08 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

WILLIAM J. OLSON (VA, D.C.) JOHN S. MILES (VA, D.C., MD OF COUNSEL) HERBERT W. TITUS (VA OF COUNSEL) JEREMIAH L. MORGAN (D.C., CA ONLY) ROBERT J. OLSON (VA, D.C.) WILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 370 MAPLE AVENUE WEST, SUITE VIENNA, VIRGINIA 180-5615 TELEPHONE (703) 356-5070 FAX (703) 356-5085 E-MAIL: wjo@mindspring.com http://www.lawandfreedom.com 11 CREEKSIDE LANE W INCHESTER, VA 60-9 TELEPHONE (50) 50-8777 FAX (50) 50-8771 April, 016 via fax to (703) 613-3007 Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 0505 Re: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST of United States Justice Foundation Dear FOIA Processing Officials: We represent United States Justice Foundation ( USJF ), and submit this Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ) request on its behalf. USJF is a nonprofit educational organization, exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. USJF s tax-exempt mission and purposes include education and litigation to protect civil liberties including, but not limited to, information and issues regarding freedoms and rights guaranteed by the First Amendment, Second Amendment, and Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and proper interpretation of federal and state constitutions, statutes, and regulations. USJF s principal office is located at 93 D Street, Suite, Ramona, California 9065 (http://www.usjf.net/). Obama Administration Principles of Disclosure In making this request to the Central Intelligence Agency ( CIA ), we want to call your special attention to the message of President Obama, in his January 1, 009 Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, and the President s following directive: The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails... [i]n responding to requests under the FOIA, executive branch agencies... should act promptly and in a spirit of cooperation, recognizing that such agencies are servants of the public. All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA, and to usher in a new era of open Government. The presumption of disclosure should

be applied to all decisions involving FOIA. [7 Fed. Reg. 683-8 (Jan. 6, 1 009) (emphasis added). ] In accordance with this Presidential directive, we look forward to the CIA s processing this FOIA request promptly, and with a presumption in favor of disclosure. See also Attorney General Holder s Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies (March 19, 009) (issued pursuant to the President s January 1, 009 FOIA Memorandum, underscoring our nation s fundamental commitment to open government). Principles to Apply to this Request In an effort to simplify this request and avoid any possible confusion, the following principles clarify and govern this FOIA request: 1. Records, as used herein, means and includes, without limitation, any information that is an agency record subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act, in any format, including in electronic format.. If an exemption is claimed with respect to a particular record, please state particularly the exemption claimed and the reason for claiming it. Please provide any part or parts of such record for which an exemption is not claimed, along with a general description of the part withheld. 3. If the Agency is aware of the existence of records sought by this request but is not in the possession of those records, please state specifically what person(s) or agency(ies) have possession of those records. Background After conducting an investigation of the events of September 11, 001, in December 00, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence issued a joint report entitled Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 001, issued both as S. Rept. No. th 3 107-351 and H. Rept. No. 107-79 (107 Cong., d Sess.) (December 00). That report was released with certain important redactions. 1 http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_ office/freedomofinformationact/. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/009/06//foia-memomarch009.pdf. 3 http://fas.org/irp/congress/00_rpt/911rept.pdf.

3 The George W. Bush Administration classified 8 pages of the joint report (Part Four, beginning on page 395) which reportedly discussed the involvement of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with the events of 9-11. Efforts to force the declassification of those pages of this report have been led by Congressmen Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-MA) who introduced H.Res. 1 on January 6, 015. It is reported that this document is being reviewed for possible declassification at this time efforts supported by the United States Justice Foundation, which requests disclosure of these pages at this time. However, there are many other portions of the report, in addition to those 8 pages, that were redacted or revised before the report was released. The report s Foreword identifies two types of changes to the original report language. First, certain information was redacted in the version that was released, as the Foreword states: Where necessary, information that the Intelligence Community has identified as classified for national security purposes has been deleted. Such deletions are indicated with brackets and a strikethrough [-------------------------]. [Report Foreword (emphasis added).] H.Res. 1 is limited to this 8 page redaction: Urging the president to release information regarding the September 11, 001, terrorist attacks upon the United States. Whereas President George W. Bush classified 8 pages of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 001; Whereas the contents of the redacted pages are necessary for a full public understanding of the events and circumstances surrounding the September 11, 001, attacks upon the United States; Whereas the executive branch s decision to maintain the classified status of these pages prevents the people of the United States from having access to information about the involvement of certain foreign governments in the terrorist attacks of September 001; and Whereas the people of the United States and the families of the victims of the September 11, 001, terrorist attacks deserve full and public disclosure of the results of the Joint Inquiry: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that (1) the President should declassify the 8-page section of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 001; and () the families of the victims and the people of the United States deserve answers about the events and circumstances surrounding the September 11, 001, attacks upon the United States. [Emphasis added.]

Second, certain information was revised in the version that was released, as the Foreword states: In other portions of the report, alternative language that the Intelligence Community has agreed is unclassified has been substituted for the original report language which remains classified. Paragraphs that contain alternative language, whether one word or several sentences, have been identified by brackets at the beginning and end of the paragraph. [Id. (emphasis added).] It appears that release of these redacted or revised original report language of the report were not sought by H.Res. 1, or by the many other efforts to obtain declassification, which have focused on the 8 pages, but release of those records containing the original report language is now sought by this FOIA request. To summarize USJF requests release of a completely unredacted copy of the report containing the original report language. This request seeks disclosure of all of the redacted portions of the report, not limited to the entirely redacted 8 pages. And this request seeks disclosure of the original report language wherever that language many have been revised. Should any of the original report language continue to be withheld, the basis for withholding those portions needs to be identified for the American people. Record Request Pursuant to the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 55, and the CIA s implementing regulations, 3 C.F.R. 1900.01, et seq., we hereby request copies of the following records: (1) A complete and unredacted copy of the Report of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence entitled Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 001, S. Rept. No. 107-351, H. Rept. No. th 107-79 (December 00) (107 Cong., d Sess.) (hereinafter the Report ), specifically including: (a) (b) The original report language of the 8-page section (Part Four, beginning on page 395) of the Report, which was redacted when the Report was released, having been classified by the George W. Bush Administration, together with any footnotes and appendices that may be related thereto. The original report language for portions of the Report other than Part Four, which were redacted for any reason from the report as released.

5 (c) The original report language of all portions of the Report where alternative language was substituted for original report language. Fee Waiver Request We request that the search, review, and copying fees be waived as provided under section 5 U.S.C. 55(a)()(A) and 3 C.F.R. 1900.13(b)(). USJF is a nonprofit educational organization seeking the requested documents to educate the public on a matter of great public importance, by releasing information that in addition to contributing to public understanding regarding the workings of government may have great effect on substantive policy discussions relating to the national defense. The fees should be waived because release of the requested documents is in the public interest, and the requested information is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government. The requested documents pertain to the workings of the U.S. intelligence community, and the protection of the United States against terrorist attacks. The release of the requested documents is not primarily for any commercial interest or purpose, including any commercial interest of USJF. USJF intends to disseminate to the general public, free of charge, any important information it obtains as a result of this request. If USJF s waiver request is denied, we would appreciate an estimate of the costs involved in procuring any of the requested documents if such costs exceed $50. If the costs do not exceed $50, however, we do not need an estimate, and we will guarantee payment. Prompt Handling Requested The findings of the U.S. Congress about the events of September 11, 001, is a public policy issue of great importance to all Americans. Although the report being sought is now more than a decade old, they are of continuing concern to the United States. The issue of the portions of the report being withheld has received significant attention in the media, as United States leaders, and the American people, debate national security policy. All of these factors lead us to request that the 0-day response time imposed by 3 C.F.R. 1900 be adhered to strictly. Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. Sincerely yours, WJO:mm William J. Olson cc: United States Justice Foundation