Wisconsin Marijuana Arrests

Similar documents
Connecticut Marijuana Arrests

Vermont Marijuana Arrests

Oregon Marijuana Arrests

Maryland Marijuana Arrests

Washington Marijuana Arrests

Arkansas Marijuana Arrests

Pennsylvania Marijuana Arrests

Louisiana Marijuana Arrests

Illinois Marijuana Arrests

Missouri Marijuana Arrests

WISCONSIN SOCIETY FOR RESPIRATORY CARE BYLAWS

Oklahoma Marijuana Arrests

BY - LAWS GROWERS DIVISION WISCONSIN POTATO & VEGETABLE GROWERS ASSOCIATION, INC. As Amended February 2007

Tennessee Marijuana Arrests

CONSTITUTION AS ADOPTED AT THE MAY 21, 2016 CONVENTION. (Approved by AFSCME International on August 10, 2016)

Case: 3:15-cv bbc Document #: 124 Filed: 05/09/16 Page 1 of 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

WQHA Bylaws Article I Name and Purpose This organization shall be known as the Wisconsin Quarter Horse Association, Inc., hereinafter referred to in

Poverty and Food Security in Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin

Georgia Marijuana Arrests

Photo credit: Joe Brusky Report Fixing Wisconsin Sheriff Policies on Immigration Enforcement

Sons of The American Legion. Detachment of Wisconsin. Constitution and Bylaws

Marquette Law School Poll February 18-21, 2016 Results for Registered Voters

Practice and Procedure Before the Wisconsin Public Service Commission in Contract Motor Carrier Matters

Shyam S. Bhatia and Kazimierz J. Zaniewski. Department of Geography. University of Wisconsin - Oshkosh

CONSTITUTION of the HO-CHUNK NATION

50+ Wisconsin Advocacy Groups Call on State Senate to Pass Bills Increasing Access to Civil Legal Aid

excerpt from report by our friend Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.

THE AMERICAN LEGION DEPARTMENT OF WISCONSIN

The Best Escape Anyone Can Have WSSA Annual Conference 2018 June 13 & 14, 2018 Chula Vista, Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin

CONSTITUTION & BYLAWS OF THE

WSSA Annual Conference 2019 Building for the Future June 6 & 7, 2019 Chula Vista, Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin

WISCONSIN CORONERS AND MEDICAL EXAMINERS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MEETING JUNE 3, 2008 HEIDEL HOUSE, GREEN LAKE Approved June 9, 2009 Annual Meeting

Charter & ByLaws of the DEPARTMENT OF WISCONSIN Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States

TURNOUT FOR TRANSPORTATION MEDIA OVERVIEW

Gregory J. Eggum, CFI Fire Investigator

MIGRATION CHALLENGES

WISCONSIN CORONERS AND MEDICAL EXAMINERS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MEETING JUNE 9, 2009 SLEEP INN, EAU CLAIRE, WI (CHIPPEWA COUNTY) ===APPROVED===

UNIFIED AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROGRAM

Historical Trends in Wisconsin Poverty, This report is the first in a series of briefings on the results of recent.

This handbook sets forth general. information on the topics. addressed and does not. constitute legal advice. You should contact your county s

2012 Review and a Few Other Notes from your SEC

VOTE! APR. 5 THE WISCONSIN

Mid-State Technical College District PLAN OF REPRESENTATION March 2014

Wisconsin Legislative Directory by Head Start Program Session

Trends in the Racial Distribution of Wisconsin Poverty, This report is the second in a series of briefings on the results.

DIRECTOR OF STATE COURTS P.O. BOX 1688 MADISON, WISCONSIN

Community Economic Impact Study of the Proposed Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM) Commuter Rail

Consolidated Court Automation Programs (CCAP) 1

Nebraska s Foreign Born and Hispanic/Latino Population

DIRECTOR OF STATE COURTS P.O. BOX 1688 MADISON, WISCONSIN

Plan for the Talk. Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin: A Presentation to the Sentencing Commission. Pamela Oliver

THURSDAY, MARCH 27, 2014

Key Facts. There are 2,057 secure detention beds in Florida. 55,170 youth were admitted to secure detention.

June 29, Ms. Joan Woldt Bank First National 101 City Center Oshkosh, WI Dear Ms. Woldt:

DETENTION SERVICES. There are 2,057 secure detention beds currently in operation in the State of Florida.

MOVING FORWARD. planned parenthood of wisconsin newsletter. Spring/Summer 2013

Current Trends in Juvenile Incarceration. Presented by Barry Krisberg April 25, 2012

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

WI RLCA NEWS October 2013

Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts three new cases

DETENTION SERVICES. Detention Services. detention facilities with 1,302. beds in operation in the State. of Florida.

BYLAWS. As Revised, March 2014 FOX VALLEY REGION, PORSCHE CLUB OF AMERICA, INC. FVR-PCA ARTICLE I: NAME

DETENTION SERVICES Detention Services. Julia Strange Assistant Secretary for Detention Services (850)

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

pro sese pro se pro se PRO SE PRO PROSE PRO SE LITIGATION meeting the challenge of self-represented litigants in Wisconsin DECEMBER 2000

COOLIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT. Monthly Activity Report

Produced by: SAFE City Program Interpersonal Violence Prevention Team February 2003 (907)

Dane County Trends. Dane County Trends

WASHINGTON COALITION OF MINORITY LEGAL PROFESSIONALS

The Impact of Drug and Marijuana Arrests Within the Largest Cities of Massachusetts

BYLAWS OF THE LAKE WINNEBAGO AREA LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION

The Civil War Era in Wisconsin. A Look at Society During These Changing Times

La Crosse School District Social Studies Curriculum

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts ten new cases

Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons A Presentation to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice

Probation and Parole in the United States, 2015

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

The Wisconsin Historical Records Survey, Then and Now

CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY AND THE ENVIRONMENT MAY 2007

[NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-25290; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Inventory Completion: Wisconsin Historical Society, Madison, WI

1615 L Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC (main) (fax)

COUNTY FUNDING OF PUBLIC LIBRARIES

Prisoners in Bulletin. Bureau of Justice Statistics

MEMO (IN LIEU OF TESTIMONY) OF HARRY G. LEVINE. Department of Sociology, Queens College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York

Fox Valley Regional Trauma Advisory Committee Administrative Description and Bylaws

STATE OF WISCONSIN BEFORE THE WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION. Complainant,

The Constitution of The Ho-Chunk Nation

2018 Questionnaire for Prosecuting Attorney Candidates in Washington State Introduction

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

The Minnesota Governor s Race 1

ATTACHMENT 16. Source and Accuracy Statement for the November 2008 CPS Microdata File on Voting and Registration

What Travel Trends Might Tell Us About the Future

Pulling Open the Sticky Door

Private Sector Commission

LSP In-Class Activity 5 Working with PASW 20 points Due by Saturday, Oct. 17 th 11:59 pm ANSWERS

Educational Resource Officer Report through School Years

County Detention Facilities Average Inmate Population. Table of Contents

Florida County Detention Facilities Average Inmate Population August 2018

Maine Statistical Analysis Center. USM Muskie School of Public Service.

Transcription:

Working to Reform Marijuana Laws The NORML Almanac of Marijuana Arrest Statistics Wisconsin Marijuana Arrests Marijuana Arrests 1995-2002 (Summary) Marijuana Possession Arrests-2002 (Demographics) Marijuana Sales Arrests-2002 (Demographics) Marijuana Arrests by County 1998-2002

Introduction The NORML Almanac of Marijuana Arrest Statistics provides detailed data on the distribution and composition of marijuana arrests to supplement the analysis and data contained in NORML s 2005 report Crimes of Indiscretion: Marijuana Arrests in the United States. The data used for these tables were produced by the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) program of the Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation. Local police agencies report data to state agencies, which compile and report it to the national program office. Some local agencies do not participate in the program, and neither do some states. Florida, Illinois, and Washington D.C. did not report data to the UCR program in 2002, though some Illinois data was obtained directly from the state for this report. This report relies on two UCR data sets. UCR County Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data have been used to generate state and county level arrest totals and rates, generally for the years 1995 to 2002. Countylevel data are reported along with codes that indicate 9 categories of population sizes. Generally the largest arrest rates reported are for small jurisdictions with significant numbers of arrests of non residents, such as in a popular vacation area. The UCR Age, Sex, and Race file has been used along with US Census population data to produce arrest rates by demographic category for marijuana possession and sales arrests in 2002. The four categories used for race based data in the UCR program are White, Black, Indian (Native American), and Asian. The race based data are also subdivided by general age group: adult, juvenile, and all. Age/sex data are presented in two formats. The primary presentation utilizes five year age categories for males, females, and both. Age/sex data are also presented using single year categories for age 15 to age 24 to highlight the impact of marijuana arrests on these specific age groups. All arrest rates reported in these tables are per 100,000 population. Some arrests rates may vary due to differences in the data sets; for example the arrest rate for possession derived from the county level file may be 200 while the same arrest rate derived from the age, sex and race file may be 192. Data reported in these tables may also differ from reports from state criminal justice agencies; UCR files are frequently updated at the state level. State sections include the following additional data: marijuana arrests as a percentage of drug arrests, marijuana arrests as a percentage of all arrests, the 2002 Census population, 2002 reporting coverage for demographic data, and the maximum state penalties for possession or sale of 1 ounce of marijuana. Marijuana arrests as a percentage of all drug arrests indicate the resources marijuana offenses take away from other drug control efforts. Marijuana arrests as a percentage of all arrests provide an index of the cost of marijuana enforcement in a state; the percentage of all arrests indicates a general percentage of overall criminal justice costs that can be attributed to marijuana. The maximum penalties indicate the potential severity of punishment for marijuana offenses; these data also help characterize the potential cost of state marijuana laws under conditions of maximum enforcement. Jon B. Gettman, Ph.D. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 1

Key to Almanac Tables Marijuana Arrests 1995 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: County level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data. [Computer File] All: Both adults and juveniles. Adults: Age 18 and older. Juvenile: Under age 18. Arrests: Total marijuana arrests, possession and sales arrests combined. Rate: The arrest rate per 100,000 for all marijuana offenses is calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the coverage population and multiplying the result by 100,000. Pct of Drug Arrests: The percent of drug arrests represented by marijuana arrests. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of marijuana arrests by the number of all arrests for drug offenses. Pct of All Arrests: The percentage of all arrests represented by marijuana arrests. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of marijuana arrests by the number of arrests for all criminal offenses. Marijuana Sales/Possession Arrests 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race. [Computer File] Population: The total population estimated by the U.S. Census. population. This figure is calculated by dividing the coverage population by the census population for a region. Poss. Max: The maximum penalty for possession of 1 ounce of marijuana. Sales. Max: The maximum penalty for sales of one ounce of marijuana. Arrest Rate: The arrest rate per 100,000 population, calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the population served by the arresting police agencies and multiplying the result by 100,000. Adults: Individuals age 18 and older. Juveniles: Individuals under the age of 18. Rate: The demographic composition of coverage populations has been estimated using U.S. Census data and used to calculate arrest rates for marijuana offenses per 100,000 population for specific demographic groups. Arrest Pct.: The percentage of arrests for the offense accounted for by the demographic group. Pop. Pct.: The estimated percentage of the regional population accounted for by the demographic group. Ratio: The ratio produced by dividing Arrest Pct by Pop. Pct. by the population percentage. A group that accounts for equal shares of marijuana possession arrests and the general population will have a ratio of 1.0. Coverage: The percentage of the total population represented by the coverage Page 2 www.norml.org

Marijuana Arrests by County 1998 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: County level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data. [Computer File] Population Size: Nine categories are used to distinguish counties of similar population size. Special circumstances are more likely to disproportionately affect arrest rates in counties with smaller resident populations, such as high numbers of vacation visitors for beach and mountain resort areas. Arrests: Total marijuana arrests, possession and sales arrests combined. Arrest Rates: The arrest rate per 100,000 for all marijuana offenses is calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the coverage population and multiplying the result by 100,000. Rank (Rates): Ranking among all the counties in the State, from highest (1) to lowest. Population Size Codes Size 1 Population < 2,500 Size 2 Population 2,500 to 9,999 Size 3 Population 10,000 to 24,999 Size 4 Population 25,000 to 49,999 Size 5 Population 50,000 to 99,999 Size 6 Population 100,000 to 249,999 Size 7 Population 250,000 to 499,999 Size 8 Population 500,000 to 999,999 Size 9 Population 1,000,000 + Notes on the Calculation of Age and Race Specific Arrest Rates at the County, State, and National Level 1. County level Totals and Arrest Rates. Local agency data from the UCR Age, Sex, and Race file are combined to produce county level totals and arrest rates for the overall population. While the agency level file provides data on the number of blacks arrested by each agency, for example, it does not provide data on the local black population. However calculation of the arrest rate for blacks can take place at the county level through the use of Census Bureau data on county level populations. 2. State, and National Level Totals and Arrest Rates. County level data are combined to produce state, and national level totals of coverage populations and arrests by offense, providing a basis for calculating the arrest rate for the overall coverage population. 3. Demographic based Arrest Rates. The coverage population for Blacks in each region, for example, can be estimated using Census data on the overall Black population of the region. If Blacks comprise 65% of the population of a county, for example, these tables are based on the premise that Blacks also comprise 65% of the coverage population reported in the UCR data for that county. The estimation of the Black population within the overall coverage population provides a basis for calculating the arrest rates for Blacks in the region. 4. Coverage Indicators. A comparison of the coverage population of the reporting local agencies and the overall census population produces a coverage indicator indicating the extent the reported data represents a particular region and its diversity. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 3

Wisconsin Marijuana Arrests 1995 1996 1997 2002 All Arrests 13,165 14,309 15,204 17,322 All Rate 256.98 277.31 294.08 318.35 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 65.64% 67.12% 70.62% 65.90% All Pct. Of All Arrests 3.03% 3.11% 3.24% 3.92% Adult Arrests 9,928 10,669 11,326 13,306 Adult Rate 193.79 206.76 219.07 244.54 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 49.50% 50.05% 52.61% 50.62% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 2.28% 2.32% 2.41% 3.01% Juvenile Arrests 3,233 3,638 3,876 4,012 Juvenile Rate 63.11 70.50 74.97 73.73 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 16.12% 17.07% 18.00% 15.26% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.74% 0.79% 0.82% 0.91% Wisconsin Marijuana Possession Arrests 1995 1996 1997 2002 All Arrests 11,092 12,236 13,156 14,857 All Rate 216.51 237.13 254.47 273.05 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 55.31% 57.40% 61.11% 56.52% All Pct. Of All Arrests 2.55% 2.66% 2.80% 3.36% Adult Arrests 8,276 9,042 9,682 11,280 Adult Rate 161.55 175.23 187.27 207.31 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 41.26% 42.42% 44.97% 42.91% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 1.90% 1.96% 2.06% 2.55% Juvenile Arrests 2,813 3,193 3,473 3,573 Juvenile Rate 54.91 61.88 67.18 65.67 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 14.03% 14.98% 16.13% 13.59% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.65% 0.69% 0.74% 0.81% Wisconsin Marijuana Sales Arrests 1995 1996 1997 2002 All Arrests 2,073 2,073 2,048 2,465 All Rate 40.46 40.17 39.61 45.30 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 10.34% 9.72% 9.51% 9.38% All Pct. Of All Arrests 0.48% 0.45% 0.44% 0.56% Adult Arrests 1,652 1,627 1,644 2,026 Adult Rate 32.25 31.53 31.80 37.23 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 8.24% 7.63% 7.64% 7.71% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 0.38% 0.35% 0.35% 0.46% Juvenile Arrests 420 445 403 439 Juvenile Rate 8.20 8.62 7.79 8.07 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 2.09% 2.09% 1.87% 1.67% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.10% 0.10% 0.09% 0.10% Page 4 www.norml.org

Wisconsin Marijuana Possession Arrests - 2002 Population 5,441,196 Arrest Rate Adults White Black Indian Asian Coverage 97.64% Rate 252.16 600.01 812.51 79.97 Poss. Max. 6 months 2001 235.52 Arrest Pct. 62.83% 10.74% 2.15% 0.32% Sales Max. 54 months 2002 271.82 Pop. Pct. 69.42% 3.68% 0.61% 1.20% Ratio 0.91 2.92 3.52 0.27 All White Black Indian Asian Juveniles White Black Indian Asian Rate 245.42 792.63 962.71 72.45 Rate 274.59 276.25 522.20 93.50 Arrest Pct. 83.95% 12.97% 2.76% 0.55% Arrest Pct. 21.13% 2.23% 0.60% 0.23% Pop. Pct. 90.29% 5.86% 0.92% 1.86% Pop. Pct. 20.87% 2.19% 0.31% 0.66% Ratio 0.93 2.21 3.00 0.30 Ratio 1.01 1.02 1.94 0.35 Total Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 1,523.73 956.13 438.62 261.56 189.74 139.47 81.21 32.73 9.84 1.40 Arrest Pct. 42.02% 25.48% 9.70% 6.45% 5.29% 4.26% 2.30% 0.81% 0.19% 0.02% Pop. Pct. 7.50% 7.24% 6.01% 6.70% 7.58% 8.30% 7.69% 6.73% 5.16% 4.02% Ratio 5.60 3.52 1.61 0.96 0.70 0.51 0.30 0.12 0.04 0.00 Male Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 2,453.62 1,602.15 734.97 423.68 298.94 216.78 137.61 47.79 18.41 1.93 Arrest Pct. 34.64% 21.72% 8.34% 5.30% 4.18% 3.31% 1.96% 0.60% 0.17% 0.01% Pop. Pct. 3.84% 3.68% 3.09% 3.40% 3.80% 4.15% 3.87% 3.39% 2.56% 1.95% Ratio 9.02 5.90 2.70 1.56 1.10 0.80 0.51 0.18 0.07 0.01 Female Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 548.44 287.24 126.08 94.21 79.76 62.15 24.12 17.46 1.44 0.91 Arrest Pct. 7.38% 3.76% 1.36% 1.14% 1.11% 0.95% 0.34% 0.21% 0.01% 0.01% Pop. Pct. 3.66% 3.56% 2.93% 3.30% 3.78% 4.15% 3.82% 3.34% 2.61% 2.07% Ratio 2.02 1.06 0.46 0.35 0.29 0.23 0.09 0.06 0.00 0.00 Total Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 842.43 1,284.57 1,604.38 2,039.21 1,843.07 1,398.43 1,073.60 866.18 795.57 599.06 Arrest Pct. 4.60% 7.10% 9.00% 11.22% 10.10% 7.68% 5.96% 4.77% 4.12% 2.94% Pop. Pct. 1.48% 1.50% 1.52% 1.50% 1.49% 1.49% 1.51% 1.50% 1.41% 1.34% Ratio 3.10 4.73 5.90 7.50 6.78 5.14 3.95 3.19 2.93 2.20 Male Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 1,274.38 2,064.72 2,581.60 3,313.89 3,031.95 2,344.10 1,793.48 1,452.13 1,334.72 1,014.99 Arrest Pct. 3.57% 5.83% 7.43% 9.30% 8.50% 6.51% 5.07% 4.06% 3.53% 2.55% Pop. Pct. 0.76% 0.77% 0.78% 0.76% 0.76% 0.75% 0.77% 0.76% 0.72% 0.68% Ratio 4.69 7.60 9.50 12.19 11.15 8.62 6.60 5.34 4.91 3.73 Female Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 386.13 469.07 573.57 713.46 597.52 431.10 327.55 262.82 232.37 164.32 Arrest Pct. 1.02% 1.27% 1.56% 1.93% 1.60% 1.17% 0.89% 0.71% 0.59% 0.39% Pop. Pct. 0.72% 0.73% 0.74% 0.73% 0.73% 0.74% 0.74% 0.74% 0.69% 0.65% Ratio 1.42 1.73 2.11 2.62 2.20 1.59 1.21 0.97 0.85 0.60 National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 5

Wisconsin Marijuana Sales Arrests - 2002 Population 5,441,196 Arrest Rate Adults White Black Indian Asian Coverage 97.64% Rate 32.48 244.63 114.61 20.25 Poss. Max. 6 months 2001 75.61 Arrest Pct. 53.79% 25.97% 2.09% 0.46% Sales Max. 54 months 2002 45.10 Pop. Pct. 69.42% 3.68% 0.61% 1.20% Ratio 0.77 7.06 3.43 0.38 All White Black Indian Asian Juveniles White Black Indian Asian Rate 34.81 317.46 155.28 17.33 Rate 24.72 122.21 36.01 25.50 Arrest Pct. 65.27% 31.92% 2.35% 0.84% Arrest Pct. 11.48% 5.95% 0.25% 0.38% Pop. Pct. 90.29% 5.86% 0.92% 1.86% Pop. Pct. 20.87% 2.19% 0.31% 0.66% Ratio 0.72 5.45 2.55 0.45 Ratio 0.55 2.72 0.81 0.58 Total Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 210.68 186.08 98.62 47.76 28.06 22.91 12.48 3.36 2.92 0.47 Arrest Pct. 35.02% 29.88% 13.15% 7.10% 4.72% 4.22% 2.13% 0.50% 0.33% 0.04% Pop. Pct. 7.50% 7.24% 6.01% 6.70% 7.58% 8.30% 7.69% 6.73% 5.16% 4.02% Ratio 4.67 4.13 2.19 1.06 0.62 0.51 0.28 0.07 0.06 0.01 Male Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 369.37 323.90 170.17 76.88 43.06 38.55 18.48 6.67 5.89 0.00 Arrest Pct. 31.43% 26.46% 11.64% 5.80% 3.63% 3.55% 1.59% 0.50% 0.33% 0.00% Pop. Pct. 3.84% 3.68% 3.09% 3.40% 3.80% 4.15% 3.87% 3.39% 2.56% 1.95% Ratio 8.18 7.19 3.77 1.71 0.96 0.86 0.41 0.15 0.13 0.00 Female Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 44.25 43.38 23.16 17.70 12.96 7.26 6.40 0.00 0.00 0.91 Arrest Pct. 3.59% 3.42% 1.50% 1.29% 1.09% 0.67% 0.54% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% Pop. Pct. 3.66% 3.56% 2.93% 3.30% 3.78% 4.15% 3.82% 3.34% 2.61% 2.07% Ratio 0.98 0.96 0.51 0.39 0.29 0.16 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.02 Total Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 82.47 140.36 227.26 295.63 306.97 272.37 208.24 181.03 147.08 111.36 Arrest Pct. 2.71% 4.67% 7.68% 9.81% 10.14% 9.02% 6.97% 6.01% 4.59% 3.30% Pop. Pct. 1.48% 1.50% 1.52% 1.50% 1.49% 1.49% 1.51% 1.50% 1.41% 1.34% Ratio 1.83 3.11 5.04 6.56 6.81 6.04 4.62 4.01 3.26 2.47 Male Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 150.65 250.12 396.98 525.58 523.43 476.30 387.12 319.67 230.30 187.55 Arrest Pct. 2.55% 4.26% 6.89% 8.89% 8.85% 7.97% 6.59% 5.38% 3.67% 2.84% Pop. Pct. 0.76% 0.77% 0.78% 0.76% 0.76% 0.75% 0.77% 0.76% 0.72% 0.68% Ratio 3.34 5.55 8.80 11.65 11.61 10.56 8.58 7.09 5.11 4.16 Female Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 10.44 25.63 48.22 56.46 80.19 63.77 22.85 38.28 60.14 31.71 Arrest Pct. 0.17% 0.42% 0.79% 0.92% 1.29% 1.04% 0.38% 0.63% 0.92% 0.46% Pop. Pct. 0.72% 0.73% 0.74% 0.73% 0.73% 0.74% 0.74% 0.74% 0.69% 0.65% Ratio 0.23 0.57 1.07 1.25 1.78 1.41 0.51 0.85 1.33 0.70 Page 6 www.norml.org

Wisconsin Marijuana Arrests by County Rank Population Arrests Arrest Rate (Rates) Size 2002 2002 2002 Adams 3 12 63.51 69 Ashland 3 89 520.16 7 Barron 4 65 142.51 61 Bayfield 3 86 564.67 5 Brown 6 705 293.43 31 Buffalo 3 13 92.83 64 Burnett 3 74 465.38 11 Calumet 4 27 92.90 62 Chippewa 5 49 90.65 62 Clark 4 11 31.37 63 Columbia 5 327 612.47 3 Crawford 3 35 200.09 47 Dane 7 1,211 279.83 34 Dodge 5 249 302.77 28 Door 4 56 197.43 45 Douglas 4 127 289.21 28 Dunn 4 133 328.93 18 Eau Claire 5 359 372.31 14 Florence 2 0 0.00 55 Fond du Lac 5 305 319.80 19 Forest 3 25 245.85 34 Grant 5 129 255.24 30 Green 4 64 188.14 40 Green Lake 3 62 318.49 19 Iowa 3 70 304.85 23 Iron 2 31 445.40 11 Jackson 3 96 495.43 6 Jefferson 5 207 251.24 27 Juneau 3 23 93.24 44 Kenosha 6 725 477.79 6 Kewaunee 3 46 224.62 31 La Crosse 6 485 446.31 8 Lafayette 3 24 147.31 36 Langlade 3 100 475.31 6 Lincoln 4 70 232.79 28 Manitowoc 5 216 255.89 22 Marathon 6 249 197.29 28 Marinette 4 95 215.86 27 Marquette 3 55 342.44 11 Menominee 2 76 1,642.18 1 Milwaukee 8 3,068 321.64 11 Monroe 4 252 607.38 2 Oconto 4 63 174.29 25 Oneida 4 207 554.84 2 Outagamie 6 533 325.78 8 Ozaukee 5 108 129.49 26 National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 7

Wisconsin Marijuana Arrests by County Rank Population Arrests Arrest Rate (Rates) Size 2002 2002 2002 Pepin 2 13 177.67 22 Pierce 4 44 110.87 25 Polk 4 120 286.28 15 Portage 5 162 237.70 18 Price 3 38 236.75 18 Racine 6 467 243.79 17 Richland 3 34 186.99 17 Rock 6 491 317.70 9 Rusk 3 45 289.04 11 St Croix 5 306 495.81 2 Sauk 5 196 350.53 6 Sawyer 3 22 133.90 15 Shawano 4 170 412.57 4 Sheboygan 6 330 288.78 8 Taylor 3 34 170.31 11 Trempealeau 4 86 313.86 6 Vernon 4 41 144.06 10 Vilas 3 100 468.67 2 Walworth 5 1,168 1,216.77 1 Washburn 3 40 245.90 7 Washington 6 519 435.40 1 Waukesha 7 921 251.65 5 Waupaca 5 155 287.20 4 Waushara 3 10 42.73 4 Winnebago 6 558 351.16 1 Wood 5 240 311.41 2 State Total 17,322 318.35 Page 8 www.norml.org