IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GREENE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Similar documents
IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JASPER COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

CAUSE NO. COME NOW, Raymond Gilbert (REDACTED) and Daniela (REDACTED), Individually, and

IN THE STATE COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

4. Plaintiff, Valerie Battle-Dugger, is an adult individual, residing at all times relevant

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

CAUSE NUMBER DC H. DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs

: : : : : : FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. COMES NOW TIANNA SMITH, Plaintiff in the above-captioned action, and hereby INTRODUCTION

CAUSE NO. v. FALLS COUNTY, TEXAS I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. COMES NOW Plaintiff against the above-named defendants, and states and alleges

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

Truck Accident Litigation in the SML Footprint:

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

DC NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONROE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO. Judge

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FLOYD COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF HAMPTON ) CASE NO.: 2019-CP-25-

IN THE STATE COURT OF CLAYTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION. No. 3:13-CV-0755

associated with the previously dismissed action have been paid pursuant to

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

r c: Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION No. : D5 ~V ~ g7s~ and respectfully state their c f- vs. ~ "" :; m Defendants. -j C'

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, JUDICIAL DISTRICT v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

IN THE STATE COURT OF BRYAN COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, Lloyd Dan Murray, Jr. ( Plaintiff ) brings this action against ILG

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

Case 1:16-cv MEH Document 1 Filed 09/20/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to Answer the Complaint, a copy of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, Number:

Case 2:10-cv WOB-JGW Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 6

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

BIRTH CERTIFICATE AMENDMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

CAUSE NO. C J

9/29/2017 1:57:26 PM 17CV42542 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:07-cv WLS Document 145 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHER DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

Case 2:17-at Document 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 9

Application for Employment

Cobb v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 1 1) ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT

Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Case 1:14-cv ODE-LTW Document 1-1 Filed 10/30/14 Page 2 of 10. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON co~fju;q01~!1f~~ffl STATE OF GEORGIA

Kyles v. Celadon Trucking Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session

Customer will bring an action against Businessman under a negligence theory.

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Question 1. On what theory or theories might damages be recovered, and what defenses might reasonably be raised in actions by:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

MINNESOTA TRUCK CRASH LAW OVERVIEW

Case 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

SUPERIOR COURT OF CHATHAM COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA DEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017 EXHIBIT E

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/25/ /09/ :37 12:27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2016

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE FOR THE THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT MEMPHIS

D-1-GN Cause No. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

Summary of Contents. PART I. INTRODUCTION Chapter 1. An Introduction to the Restatement of Torts... 2

Plaintiff, MARK JOHNSON, currently incarcerated at Bayside State. Prison, 4293 Route 47, P.O. Box F-2, in the Town of Leesburg, County of

Insurance - Is the Liability Carrier Liable for Punitive Damages Awarded by the Jury?

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON,

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/06/ :01 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/06/2018

Case: 4:17-cv AGF Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/23/17 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Transcription:

TAMMY XXXX and MAURICE DION XXXX, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GREENE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO.: v. GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, PINSON TRUCKING CO., INC., LUMBER TRANSPORT, INC., and MARCUS TERRELL BOATWRIGHT, Defendants. COMPLAINT COME NOW the Plaintiffs in the above-styled action and hereby shows the Court the following: PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE Plaintiff, Tammy XXXX, is a resident of Pelham, Mitchell County, 2. Georgia. Maurice Dion XXXX is a resident of Ocilla, Irwin County, Georgia. 3. Defendant Great West Casualty Company ( Great West Insurance ) is a foreign corporation located at 1100 West 29 th Street, South Sioux City, Nebraska and process may be served on its registered agent for service of process in Cobb County, Georgia, by serving its registered agent, Alexander T. Galloway, III, 326 Roswell Street, Marietta, Ga. 30060. 4. Defendant Pinson Trucking Co., Inc. ( Pinson Trucking ) is a Georgia corporation with its principal business address located at 667 Madison Rd., Eatonton, Ga. 31024. Pinson Trucking maintains a registered agent for service of process in Putnam County, Georgia, Bradley V. Carswell, who may be served with legal process at 667 Madison Rd., Eatonton, Ga. 31024. 5. Defendant Lumber Transport, Inc. ( Lumber Transport ) is a Georgia corporation with its principal business address located at Highway 23 North, Cochran, Ga. 31014. Defendant Lumber Transport maintains a registered agent for service of process in Bleckly County, Georgia,

Roy E. Hamrick, who may be served with legal process at Highway 23 N, Cochran, Ga. 31014. 6. Defendant Marcus Terrell Boatwright is a resident of White Plains, Greene County, Georgia with a last known residence address of 1361 Shlia Road, White Plains, Green County, Georgia 30678, where he may be served with legal process. 7. On August 8, 2011 Defendant Boatwright caused injuries to the Plaintiffs when he slammed the tractor-trailer he was driving into the rear of several vehicles that were stopped for construction work on Ga. Highway 32 in Irwin County, Georgia at approximately 1:14 p.m. Defendant Boatwright was a tractor-trailer for his employers, Pinson Trucking and Lumber Transport at the time of the wreck. The rig Defendant Boatwright was driving was insured by Great West Insurance. 8. The claims asserted by Plaintiffs against Defendants in this civil action arise out of the collision described in the preceding paragraph. 9. Defendant Great West is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court because it transacts business and has sufficient minimum contacts within the State of Georgia. 10. Defendant Pinson Trucking is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court because it is authorized to and does transact business in the State of Georgia. 11. Defendant Lumber Transport is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court because it is authorized to and does transact business in the State of Georgia. 12. Defendant Boatwright is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court because he is a resident of Georgia. 13. Venue is proper in this Court with respect to Defendant Great West Insurance pursuant to O.C.G.A. 9-10-93, O.C.G.A. 33-4-1, and/or O.C.G.A. 46-7-12. 14. Venue is proper in this Court with respect to Defendant Pinson Trucking because it has its registered agent for service of process in Putnam County, Georgia. 15. Venue is proper in this Court with respect to Defendant Lumber Transport because it is a joint tortfeasor with Pinson Trucking. 16. Venue is proper with respect to Defendant Boatwright because he is a joint tortfeasor with Defendant Pinson Trucking. OPERATIVE FACTS 17. At approximately 1:14 p.m. on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs XXXX and XXXX, in two separate vehicles, were sitting stopped in construction traffic on Ga. Hwy. 32. 18.

As XXXX and XXXX and the other vehicles were sitting stopped, Defendant Boatwright was driving a tractor-trailer and approaching the stopped traffic from the rear. 19. Defendant Boatwright however failed to slow his rig as he approached the stopped traffic and slammed into the line of stopped vehicles. The force of the collision caused serious personal injuries and property damage to Plaintiffs and their vehicles. 20. At the time of the collision, Defendant Boatwright was an employee of Pinson Trucking. 21. At the time of the collision, Defendant Boatwright was acting in the course and scope of his employer for Pinson Trucking. 22. At the time of the collision, Defendant Boatwright was also an employee of Lumber Transport. 23. At the time of the collision, Defendant Boatwright was also acting in the course and scope of his employment for Lumber Transport. 24. Defendant Pinson Trucking is a motor common carrier for hire. 25. Defendant Lumber Transport is a motor common carrier for hire. 26. Defendant Great West Insurance provided liability insurance to Defendant Pinson Trucking under policy number GWP80693B. 27. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants Boatwright, Pinson Trucking and Lumber Transport negligence, Plaintiffs were seriously injured. 28. Plaintiff did nothing wrong that caused or contributed to this wreck or their injuries in any way. 29. As a result of the subject collision, Plaintiffs suffered and continue to suffer serious and painful injuries, both physical and mental. 30. As a result of the collision, Plaintiffs have incurred past medical expenses and will likely incur future medical expenses. Plaintiffs continue to be disabled from their work and labor, has sustained a loss of income, and their physical health and quality of life have been significantly impaired. 31. Defendant Boatwright s actions demand punitive damages for his entire want of care in operating his tractor-trailer in a construction zone without due regard for other traffic on the road. Defendants Pinson Trucking and Lumber Transport are vicariously liable for said punitive

damages. LIABILITY OF THE DEFENDANTS 32. Defendant Pinson Trucking is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the tortious acts and omissions of its agent and employee, Defendant Boatwright. 33. Defendant Lumber Transport is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the tortious acts and omissions of its agent and employee, Defendant Boatwright. 34. Defendant Boatwright is liable for the following tortious acts and omissions, which include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: (a) Violating O.C.G.A. 40-6-49 with such violation, and others, amounting to negligence per se; (b) Failing to operate the tractor-trailer he was driving in a safe and prudent manner; (c) Traveling at a speed that was too fast under the circumstances; (d) Failing to keep a proper lookout for other traffic; and (e) Punitive damages. 35. The conduct of Defendants Pinson Trucking, Lumber Transport and Boatwright, individually and in concert with each other, proximately caused the collision and resulting damages. 36. Defendant Great West Insurance entered into a policy and contract of insurance with Defendant Pinson Trucking to provide liability coverage in the event of a motor vehicle accident involving Pinson Trucking, its employees and/or agents, and Defendant Boatwright. 37. Plaintiffs are third-party beneficiaries under said contracts or policies of insurance and are entitled to receive payments from Defendant Great West Insurance for the negligence of Defendants Pinson Trucking and Boatwright. DAMAGES CLAIMED 38. The damages claimed by Plaintiffs were proximately caused by the tortious acts and omissions of Defendants Pinson Trucking, Lumber Transport and Boatwright, for which they are liable jointly and severally. 39. As a result of the above-described collision, Plaintiffs have sustained serious and painful injuries to their bodies and mind and continue to suffer mentally and physically. Plaintiffs likewise have incurred medical bills and lost income, and will continue to lose income and benefits in the future as a result of the collision. 40.

Plaintiffs claim general damages for all elements of the mental and physical suffering they endured, endure, and will endure in the future, as defined by Georgia law and to be determined by the enlightened conscience of a fair and impartial jury. 41. Plaintiffs claim as special damages their lost earnings, income and other benefits that they have incurred and will incur in the future because of this collision. 42. Plaintiffs also claim as special damages their past and future medical expenses that have been incurred and will be incurred as a result of the injuries they sustained, in such amounts as the jury deems to be the reasonable value of those services. 43. Plaintiffs also claim punitive damages against Defendants Pinson Trucking, Lumber Transport and Boatwright. PRAYER FOR RELIEF 44. WHEREFORE Plaintiffs pray for the following relief: (a) That summons issue requiring the Defendants to appear as provided by law to answer this Complaint; (b) That the Plaintiffs have a trial by jury; (c) That Plaintiffs have and recover all damages for all losses compensable under Georgia law as set forth above; (d) That all costs be cast against the Defendants; and For such other and further relief as the Court shall deem just and appropriate. This 22 nd day of August, 2011. [signatures on next page] submitted, Respectfully MCDONALD, CODY & COOK, LLC By: Matthew E. Cook

Georgia Bar No. 184399 P. Gerald Cody Jr. Georgia Bar No.172765 P.O. Box 396 Cornelia, Ga. 30531 (706) 778-7178 and K. TODD BUTLER, P.C. K. Todd Butler Georgia Bar No. 099730 P.O. Box 668 Cairo, Georgia 39828 Tel: 229-377-1683 RAMSEY & NORMAN Boris N. Ramsey Georgia Bar No. 59377 Michael E. Norman Georgia Bar No. 545993 3400 Peachtree Road, Suite 1311 Atlanta, GA 30326 Tel: (404) 975-4444 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS