THE INDEX OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM AT 25

Similar documents
Economic Freedom: Global and Regional Patterns

MIDDLE EAST NORTH AFRICA

Studies in Applied Economics

Economic Growth, Foreign Investments and Economic Freedom: A Case of Transition Economy Kaja Lutsoja

THE AMERICAS. The countries of the Americas range from THE AMERICAS: QUICK FACTS

APPENDIX 1: MEASURES OF CAPITALISM AND POLITICAL FREEDOM

Investments and growth SEE and NIS

The results of the 2015 Index of Economic Freedom

The Impact of the Global Economic Crisis on Central and Eastern Europe. Mark Allen

Business environment analysis of Romania

Belarus. Freedoms. Business and Economy. Human Capital. Social Dimension. Security

2018 Social Progress Index

GLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS WEF EXECUTIVE OPINION SURVEY RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2017

Charting Cambodia s Economy, 1H 2017

Pacific. Ocean. Northern Mariana. Islands. Marshall. Guam. Islands. Micronesia. Papua New. Votes coinciding with U.S. Islands. American. Samoa.

Equity and Excellence in Education from International Perspectives

HAPPINESS, HOPE, ECONOMIC OPTIMISM

VISA POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

B E L A R U S. in Global Ratings

THE POWER OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM

Benchmarking SME performance in the Eastern Partner region: discussion of an analytical paper

The Global State of Corruption Control. Who Succeeds, Who Fails and What Can Be Done About It

Current Situation and Outlook of Asia and the Pacific

SEVERANCE PAY POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

Former Centrally Planned Economies 25 Years after the Fall of Communism James D. Gwartney and Hugo M. Montesinos

The Economies in Transition: The Recovery

China Nunziante Mastrolia

HOW ECONOMIES GROW AND DEVELOP Macroeconomics In Context (Goodwin, et al.)

31% - 50% Cameroon, Paraguay, Cambodia, Mexico

Overview of Demographic. Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Change and Migration in. Camille Nuamah (for Bryce Quillin)

REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ECONOMIC FREEDOM Average levels of economic freedom vary

The 2015 Index of Economic Freedom assesses

Moldova Country Gender Action Plan (CGAP)

Figure 2: Range of scores, Global Gender Gap Index and subindexes, 2016

Knowledge Economy Index (KEI) 2008 Rankings

Thinking Like a Social Scientist: Management. By Saul Estrin Professor of Management

REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ECONOMIC FREEDOM A levels of economic freedom vary

The rankings in the 2016 Index of Economic

WEEK 1 - Lecture Introduction

Since the second half of 2008, the world. Economic Freedom in Uncertain Times. Chapter 1. Ambassador Terry Miller. Countries on Diverging Paths

9 th International Workshop Budapest

LMG Women in Business Law Awards - Europe - Firm Categories

VOICE OF THE PEOPLE GOVERNMENT INDEX*

A GAtewAy to A Bet ter Life Education aspirations around the World September 2013

The 2012 Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index (GEDI) Country Rankings Excerpt: DENMARK

The Transition Generation s entrance to parenthood: Patterns across 27 post-socialist countries

Introduction to the 2013 Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index

The Global State of Corruption Control. Who Succeeds, Who Fails and What Can Be Done About It

Poverty and Shared Prosperity in Moldova: Progress and Prospects. June 16, 2016

This is the 14th edition of The Heritage

The Economics of Minimum Wages in South Africa and Brazil

Geoterm and Symbol Definition Sentence. consumption. developed country. developing country. gross domestic product (GDP) per capita

The Economies in Transition: The Recovery Project LINK, New York 2011 Robert C. Shelburne Economic Commission for Europe

Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention

Analyzing the Location of the Romanian Foreign Ministry in the Social Network of Foreign Ministries

WEF GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS REPORT: GEORGIA

Institute for Development of Freedom of Information. World Governance Indicators

Since the Vietnam War ended in 1975, the

Child poverty in Europe and Central Asia region: definitions, measurement, trends and recommendations. Discussion paper UNICEF RO ECAR

INDEX MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE INDEPENDENT MEDIA IN EUROPE AND EURASIA. tajikistan bosnia & herzegovina bulgaria uzbekistan

What factors have contributed to the significant differences in economic outcomes for former soviet states?

On a worldwide basis, the advance of economic

Chapter 2: Economic Systems Section 3

The Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1

BRICS NATIONS: AN IDEAL BREEDING GROUND FOR CORRUPTION?

Stuck in Transition? STUCK IN TRANSITION? TRANSITION REPORT Jeromin Zettelmeyer Deputy Chief Economist. Turkey country visit 3-6 December 2013

Gender in the South Caucasus: A Snapshot of Key Issues and Indicators 1

Stimulating Investment in the Western Balkans. Ellen Goldstein World Bank Country Director for Southeast Europe

Commemorating Milton Friedman s 100th Birthday with the Index of Economic Freedom

11/7/2011. Section 1: Answering the Three Economic Questions. Section 2: The Free Market

Emerging Market Consumers: A comparative study of Latin America and Asia-Pacific

GIA s 41 Annual Global End of Year Survey: ECONOMICALLY MORE DIFFICULT YEAR TO COME

Shaping the Future of Transport

World Inequality Report 2018 : Indian economic inequality widened since 1980

Global assessments. Fifth session of the OIC-STATCOM meeting May Claudia Junker. Eurostat. Eurostat

HAPPINESS, HOPE, ECONOMIC OPTIMISM

OECD Strategic Education Governance A perspective for Scotland. Claire Shewbridge 25 October 2017 Edinburgh

AFTERMARKET STRUCTURE & NETWORK SYSTEM IN EUROPE AND EMERGING COUNTRIES

The global and regional policy context: Implications for Cyprus

Individualized education in Finland

Identifying Emerging Markets using UK NARIC data. Ian Bassett Head of Commercial Group UK NARIC

The Future of Central Bank Cooperation

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.

Measuring Social Inclusion

WILL CHINA S SLOWDOWN BRING HEADWINDS OR OPPORTUNITIES FOR EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA?

Supplementary information for the article:

WORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE FINANCIAL ASSETS

Millennium Profiles Demographic & Social Energy Environment Industry National Accounts Trade. Social indicators. Introduction Statistics

VACATION AND OTHER LEAVE POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

: Sustainable Development (SD) : Measures to eradicate extreme poverty in developing nations : Lara Gieringer :

II BRIC Summit - Joint Statement April 16, 2010

Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights

International Business 9e

Lecture II North Korean Economic Development: from 1950s to today

RESTRICTED. COUNCIL Original: English/ 12 May 1993 French/ Spanish

The struggle for greater economic freedom

The EU on the move: A Japanese view

Progress For People Through People: Perspectives from CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation

SKILLS, MOBILITY, AND GROWTH

2017 Social Progress Index

Transcription:

CHAPTER 1 THE INDEX OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM AT 25 What makes an economy grow and prosper? Since its inception in 1995, the Index of Economic Freedom has provided powerful evidence that economic freedom, measured in the Index by factors related to the rule of law, limited government, regulatory efficiency, and open markets, is the answer to that simple yet profoundly consequential question. Nations with higher degrees of economic freedom thrive because they capitalize more fully on the ability of individuals to innovate and prosper when unfettered by heavy-handed government regulation and taxation. The free-market system encourages the most efficient allocation of resources and generates a dynamic environment that maximizes the choices available for work and consumption. Freedom itself is an important value, and economic freedom is a vital engine for generating the wealth that makes possible the wide range of important economic and social achievements by which we measure the advance of human society. THE RISE OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC FREEDOM Over the past 25 years, the global average economic freedom score has increased by 3.2 points, with a significant number of countries joining the ranks of those considered at least moderately free. The global average economic freedom score in the 2019 Index is.8, the third-highest level in the 25-year history of the Index. This represents a 5.6 percent increase in global economic freedom from 1995 a notable gain, particularly considering the fact that the fall of the Soviet Union and the rejection of Communism by its European satellites had already been five years in the past when the Index was first produced. The growth in economic freedom over the past 25 years has been steady and purposeful rather than revolutionary or convulsive. The cause of global economic freedom has advanced since 1995, and in its wake has come unprecedented global prosperity. The world economy has grown during the past 25 years from about $39.2 trillion to well over $80 trillion, bringing a better standard of living to billions of people. Countries that have opened themselves to the productivity-boosting competition of the global marketplace while adopting or adhering to the principles of limited government, regulatory efficiency, and the rule of law have experienced startling bursts of growth, prosperity, and overall socioeconomic development. In 2019, the Index results show clearly that the principles and lessons of economic freedom have been widely understood, accepted, and implemented in practice by a significant number of countries around the globe. Indeed, there is compelling evidence that economic freedom and economic prosperity go hand in hand. For the relatively few countries that continue to follow a state-centered or socialist path, the negative consequences have been readily apparent 1

GLOBAL ECONOMIC FREEDOM Average Score in the Index of Economic Freedom 62 58 56 1995 57.6 56.9 59.2 2000 2005.2 59.4 2010 SOURCE: Terry Miller, Anthony B. Kim, and James M. Roberts, 2019 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2019), http://www./index. Chart 1 2015 61.1.8 2019 in their faltering economic performance and a corresponding fall in their Index rankings. Certainly, there have been setbacks for economic freedom over the past 25 years. Some of them were quite severe as in the aftermaths of the 1997 Asian financial crisis and the 2008 global financial turmoil. Nevertheless, countries that have acknowledged the limits of government and continued their commitment to sustaining economic freedom have reaped tangible rewards of swift economic rebound and renewed dynamism. By contrast, those that have relinquished economic freedom with short-sighted interventionist and populist policies have prolonged the crises and fallen into the trap of economic stagnation and greater uncertainty. The real examples within the Index of the consequences of the rise and fall of economic freedom in countries around the globe demonstrate unmistakably that economic prosperity is not a national birthright. Rich economies can fall into self-inflicted stagnation all too quickly, while long-suffering underdeveloped nations can ascend from poverty to economic dynamism in a matter of years. UNEVEN PROGRESS IN THE FOUR PILLARS OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM As the Index has documented, the most critical variable in sustaining the economic dynamism and wealth of nations is economic freedom, which is really about dispersing economic power and decision-making throughout an economy and most important empowering ordinary people with greater opportunity and more choices. More specifically, lasting prosperity is a result of a persistent commitment to low tax rates, monetary stability, limited government, strong private property rights, openness to global trade and financial flows, and sensible regulation. Together, these factors empower the individual and induce dynamic entrepreneurial activity. The Index findings over the past two-anda-half decades have validated a number of important policy ramifications, including that: Private ownership and the protection of free enterprises by the rule of law encourage effort and initiative far more than do collectivism and socialism. Governments that dominate their countries economies tend to impoverish their citizens through economic stagnation. Competition, facilitated by overall regulatory efficiency, promotes greater productivity and a more efficient allocation of resources than does central planning. Countries that have adopted and practiced open-market policies in the areas of trade, investment, and banking do better than those that are protectionist or that shun economic linkages with others. 2 2019 Index of Economic Freedom

FOUR PILLARS OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM Changes from 1995 to 2019 80 48 46.2 63.8 69.1 64.1 66 55.4.2 40 20 0 1995 2019 1995 2019 1995 2019 1995 2019 RULE OF LAW GOVERNMENT SIZE REGULATORY EFFICIENCY OPEN MARKETS SOURCE: Terry Miller, Anthony B. Kim, and James M. Roberts, 2019 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2019), http://www./index. Chart 2 Implementing policies that address these four interwoven aspects effectively creates an entrepreneurial environment that is conducive to practical solutions to a wide range of economic and social challenges that are faced by most of the world s societies. The free-market system that is rooted in economic freedom has fueled unprecedented economic growth and development around the world. However, advances in economic freedom have not occurred evenly across all of the factors measured in the Index. Chart 2 shows the changes in average scores over the life of the Index for the four pillars of economic freedom. The growth in overall economic freedom has been driven primarily by advances in policies related to limited government and open markets and to a lesser extent by gains in regulatory efficiency. Since 1995, countries interested in improving their economic performance and their Index rankings as well have engaged in a sort of competition to adopt lower tax rates, eliminate burdensome regulations, tame inflation, advance free trade, and open their markets for greater investment. On the other hand, the absence of progress in advancing the rule of law is alarming. A majority of the world s countries score below 50 on the three factors related to this critical institutional aspect of economic freedom, with significant shortfalls apparent in governments commitments to enhancing property rights, judicial effectiveness, and government integrity. The rule of law, especially for developing countries, continues to be the pillar of economic freedom that is most important in laying the foundations for economic growth, and in advanced economies, deviations from the rule of law may be the first signs of serious problems that will lead to economic decline. There is plenty of evidence that rule of law is a critical factor in empowering individuals, ending discrimination, and enhancing competition. In the never-ending struggle to improve the human condition and achieve greater prosperity, the Index has shown over the past 25 years that policies that promote the rule of law may well deserve a claim of precedence over other desirable objectives. 3

COUNTRIES MAKING HUGE STRIDES IN ECONOMIC FREEDOM Overall Scores in the Index of Economic Freedom Georgia First Year 2019 44.1 75.9 30 40 50 70 80 Lithuania Rwanda Bulgaria Romania Armenia Albania Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Serbia Cabo Verde Samoa Bosnia & Herz. Croatia Montenegro 38.3 48.6 42.9 42.2 30.0 41.7 46.6 47.6 29.4 48.0 46.6 74.2 71.1 69.0 68.6 67.7 66.5 65.4 65.4 63.9 63.1 62.2 61.9 61.4.5 SOURCE: Terry Miller, Anthony B. Kim, and James M. Roberts, 2019 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2019), http://www./index. Chart 3 OUTPERFORMERS AND UNDERPERFORMERS Globally, 132 countries have improved their economic freedom scores relative to the first year in which they were rated in the Index, while 47 countries have recorded score declines. More notably, 15 developing countries across the globe that were rated as repressed in the first year they were graded in the Index have successfully leaped forward into the ranks of the moderately free or mostly free. This is quite a geographically and economically diverse group, encompassing African countries, Eastern European countries, and members of the former Soviet Union. It is also notable that the Baltic States have tried to follow the Hong Kong and Singapore example as small nations that open themselves to capital and competition, and they have largely prospered because of it. Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, all of which have become mostly free economies, have reformed their economies, shrunk the size of their governments, opened their markets, and let the talents of their people emerge. On the other end of the scale, three countries Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela have dropped into the ranks of the repressed over the past 25 years. These economies were rated more highly in the first years they were graded 4 2019 Index of Economic Freedom

in the Index but since then have steadily lost economic freedom. The BRICS economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) have shown little or no progress in economic freedom. All of them are economically mostly unfree. South Africa s score has actually declined, causing the country to drop out of the status of moderately free in the 2019 Index for the first time. Despite the global progress since 1995, the number of people living in economically unfree countries remains very high: 4.5 billion, or about 65 percent of the world s population. More than half of these people live in just two countries: China and India. Even in those countries, however, significant gains in economic freedom over the years (6.4 points for China and 10.1 points for India) have helped hundreds of millions of people to escape from poverty. THE INDEX BEYOND 25: TIME TO STAY ON COURSE It is no happenstance that the increase of economic liberty over the past 25 years has coincided with a massive reduction in worldwide poverty, disease, and hunger. The link between economic freedom and development is unequivocal: People in economically free societies live longer. They have better health. They are able to be better stewards of the environment, and they push forward the frontiers of human achievement in science and technology through greater innovation. A recurring theme of human history has been resilience and revival. As the Index has shown over the past 25 years, economic freedom underpinned by free-market capitalism has enabled countries to grow, develop, and prosper. No other systems that have been tried have come close in terms of providing broadbased prosperity. Perhaps the most critical lesson of the 25 years of Index history is that the fundamental superiority and value of economic liberty must be retaught to each new generation of political leaders, either by their peers who have lived in less free systems and less free times or by their own citizens, who understand instinctively that when individuals are allowed to decide for themselves how best to pursue their dreams and aspirations, their collective achievements can add up to a better society for all. It is too soon to know how the coming years will play out. Nonetheless, if the past 25 years are a guide, it is safe to predict that countries that find the political will to advance economic freedom will see their citizens prosper greatly in the years ahead. 5