Bibliography. Dan S. Felsenthal and Moshé Machover Downloaded from Elgar Online at 04/08/ :15:39PM via free access

Similar documents
SHAPLEY VALUE 1. Sergiu Hart 2

For the Encyclopedia of Power, ed. by Keith Dowding (SAGE Publications) Nicholas R. Miller 3/28/07. Voting Power in the U.S.

On Axiomatization of Power Index of Veto

An Overview on Power Indices

BOOK REVIEW BY DAVID RAMSEY, UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK, IRELAND

Forthcoming in slightly revised version in International Journal of Game Theory, 2007

WARWICK ECONOMIC RESEARCH PAPERS

ESSAYS IN THE THEORY OF VOTING POWER. Dissertation Thesis

1 von :46

Power Indices in Politics: Some Results and Open Problems

Annick Laruelle and Federico Valenciano: Voting and collective decision-making

Standard Voting Power Indexes Do Not Work: An Empirical Analysis

Kybernetika. František Turnovec Fair majorities in proportional voting. Terms of use: Persistent URL:

Standard Voting Power Indexes Don t Work: An Empirical Analysis 1

Who benefits from the US withdrawal of the Kyoto protocol?

DAN S. FELSENTHAL Department of Political Science, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel

Voting power in the Electoral College: The noncompetitive states count, too

Two-dimensional voting bodies: The case of European Parliament

Full Proportionality in Sight?

Power Measurement as Sensitivity Analysis A Unified Approach

Lecture 8 A Special Class of TU games: Voting Games

Lecture 7 A Special Class of TU games: Voting Games

Voting Power in US Presidential Elections under a Modified Popular Vote Plan

Thema Working Paper n Université de Cergy Pontoise, France

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Christian List. 177 Mission Impossible, DPhil-thesis, University of Oxford BIBLIOGRAPHY

The Ruling Party and its Voting Power

An empirical comparison of the performance of classical power indices. Dennis Leech

The distribution of power in the Council of the European Union

CALTECH/MIT VOTING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT A

The Root of the Matter: Voting in the EU Council. Wojciech Słomczyński Institute of Mathematics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

A comparison between the methods of apportionment using power indices: the case of the U.S. presidential election

Trump, Condorcet and Borda: Voting paradoxes in the 2016 Republican presidential primaries

A priori veto power of the president of Poland Jacek W. Mercik 12

This situation where each voter is not equal in the number of votes they control is called:

(10/06) Thomas Marschak. Education:

Coalition formation on major policy dimensions: The Council of the European Union 1998 to 2004

A Theory of Spoils Systems. Roy Gardner. September 1985

Two-Tier Voting: Solving the Inverse Power Problem and Measuring Inequality

Power in Voting Games and Canadian Politics

Fair Representation and a Linear Shapley Rule

SPEAKER: Jesús Mario Bilbao (Applied Mathematics II, University of Seville, Spain) TITLE: The distribution of power in the European cluster game

Annexations and alliances : when are blocs advantageous a priori? Dan S. Felsenthal and Moshé Machover

This situation where each voter is not equal in the number of votes they control is called:

Game Theory. Academic Year , First Semester Jordi Massó. Program

Forum section I. Responses to Albert. Dan S. Felsenthal. Dennis Leech. Christian List. Moshé Machover

Matthew Joseph Gabel

Chapter 2 Descriptions of the Voting Methods to Be Analyzed

Power in German Politics: An Analysis of the German Electoral System

(5/2018) Thomas Marschak. Education:

Interdisciplinary Teaching Grant Proposal. Applicants:

Invariably Suboptimal An attempt to improve the voting rules of Treaties of Nice and Lisbon

JEFFREY R. LAX. Associate Professor Department of Political Science Columbia University February 27, 2015

The Mathematics of Power: Weighted Voting

List of Figures. 5.1 Saari Triangle of the 33-Voter Profile 52

A Simulative Approach for Evaluating Electoral Systems

For each heir, find the fair share, the items received, the amount of cash, and the final settlement. Summarize your results in a matrix.

Sanoussi Bilal Madeleine O. Hosli. Connected Coalition Formation and Voting Power in the Council of the European Union: An Endogenous Policy Approach

The Ruling Party and its Voting Power

Power in Standardisation: The Case of CEN

Volkswagen vs. Porsche. A Power-Index Analysis.

selected core concepts, conceptions, and frameworks in political science.

Apportionment Strategies for the European Parliament

Economics of Governance I: Introduction

The Ruling Party and its Voting Power

Varieties of failure of monotonicity and participation under five voting methods

PENROSE VOTING SYSTEM AND OPTIMAL QUOTA

Introduction to the Theory of Cooperative Games

Brown University Economics 2160 Risk, Uncertainty and Information Fall 2008 Professor: Roberto Serrano. General References

JERRY S. KELLY Distinguished Professor of Economics

Karen Long Jusko. September 12, 2018

Square root voting system, optimal treshold and π

JOHN CHARLES HARSANYI. by John A. Weymark. Working Paper No. 06-W07. March 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY NASHVILLE, TN 37235

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW CAS IR 306

EU Decision-making and the Allocation of Responsibility

CURRICULUM VITAE Randall Calvert (Oct. 18, 2017)

Mika Widgrén The Impact of Council's Internal Decision-Making Rules on the Future EU. Aboa Centre for Economics

Political and Social Theory of Boundaries: Citizenship, Territory, Ethnicity

Rationality of Voting and Voting Systems: Lecture II

Optimizing group judgmental accuracy in the presence of interdependencies*

Karen Long Jusko. Encina Hall West, Room 441, 616 Serra St., Stanford CA (650)

Karen Long Jusko. 25 February, 2018

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Department of Politics V COMPARATIVE POLITICS Spring Michael Laver. Tel:

COVER SHEET. EU institutional reform: Evidence on globalization and international cooperation. Phone: ; Secretary

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Department of Politics. V COMPARATIVE POLITICS Spring Michael Laver Tel:

NATHANIEL L. BECK CURRICULUM VITAE

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF INTEGRATED WORLD SYSTEMS - Vol. I - Systems Analysis of Economic Policy - M.G. Zavelsky

MONETARY POLICY IN EMU: A VOTING-POWER ANALYSIS OF COALITION FORMATION IN THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK*

THE FUTURE OF ANALYTICAL POLITICS...

Karen Long Jusko. February 15, 2017

Winter 2019 PLSC Game Theory I

A Mathematical View on Voting and Power

THE ARITHMETIC OF VOTING

Nicholas R. Miller Department of Political Science University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) Baltimore, Maryland

Curriculum Vitae Frederick G. Whelan

Winter 2019 SOSC Social Science Inquiry: Formal Theory II

JEFFREY R. LAX. Associate Professor Department of Political Science Columbia University February 19, 2017

Coalition formation among autonomous agents: Strategies and complexity. Abstract. Autonomous agents are designed to reach goals that were

Consensus reaching in committees

Philip Edward Jones. CONTACT INFORMATION 347 Smith Hall Newark, DE 19716

Transcription:

Bibliography [1] Albers W, Güth W, Hammerstein P, Moldovanu B and van Damme E (eds) 1997: Understanding Strategic Interaction: Essays in Honor of Reinhard Selten; Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. [2] Amar A R 1984: Choosing representatives by lottery voting, Yale Law Journal 93:1283 1308. [3] AumannRJ1997: Onthestate of the art in game theory: An interview with Robert Aumann, in [1, pp. 8 34]. [4] AumannRJandHartS(eds) 1994: Handbook of Game Theory, Volume 2 ; Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. [5] Banzhaf J F 1965: Weighted voting doesn t work: a mathematical analysis, Rutgers Law Review 19:317 343. [6] 1966: Multi-member electoral districts do they violate the one man, one vote principle, Yale Law Journal 75:1309 1338. [7] 1968: One man, 3.312 votes: a mathematical analysis of the Electoral College, Villanova Law Review 13:304 332. [8] Barrett C and Newcombe H 1968: Weighted voting in international organizations, Peace Research Reviews 2(2):1 110. [9] Barry B 1980: Is it better to be powerful or lucky?, Political Studies 28:183 194, 338 352. [10] Brace P, Harrington C B and King G (eds) 1989: The Presidency in American Politics; New York: New York University Press. [11] Brams S J 1975: Game Theory and Politics; New York: Free Press. [12] 1978: The Presidential Election Game; New Haven CT: Yale University Press. [13] 1985: Rational Politics: Decisions, Games, and Strategy; Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press. 307

308 Bibliography [14] Brams S J and Affuso P J 1976: Power and size: a new paradox, Theory and Decision 7:29 56. [15] 1985: New paradoxes of voting power in the EC Council of Ministers, Electoral Studies 4:135 139. [16] Brams S J, Affuso P J and Kilgour D M 1989: Presidential power: a game-theoretic analysis in [10, pp. 55 74]. [17] Brams S J, Lucas W F and Straffin P D (eds) 1982: Political and Related Models (Vol. 2 in series Models in Applied Mathematics edited by W F Lucas); New York: Springer. [18] Brams S J, Schotter A and Schwödiauer G (eds) 1979: Applied Game Theory; Würzburg Wien: Physica. [19] Calvo E, Lasaga J and van den Nouweland A 1999: Values of games with probabilistic graphs, Mathematical Social Sciences 37:79 95. [20] Coleman J S 1971: Control of collectivities and the power of a collectivity to act in [65, pp. 269 300]; reprinted in [21, pp. 193 225]. [21] 1986: Individual Interests and Collective Action; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [22] Deegan J and Packel E W 1978: A new index of power for simple n-person games, International Journal of Game Theory 7:113 123. [23] 1982: To the (minimal winning) victors go the (equally divided) spoils: a new index of power for simple n-person games in [17, pp. 239 255]. [24] Dixon R G 1968: Democratic Representation: Reapportionment in Law and Politics; New York: Oxford University Press. [25] Dreyer J and Schotter A 1980: Power relationship in the international monetary fund: the consequences of quota changes, Review of Economics and Statistics 62:97 106. [26] Dubey P 1975: On the uniqueness of the Shapley value, International Journal of Game Theory 4:131 140. [27] Dubey P and Shapley L S 1979: Mathematical properties of the Banzhaf power index, Mathematics of Operations Research 4:99 131.

Bibliography 309 [28] Feller W 1957: An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (2nd ed.); New York: Wiley. [29] Felsenthal D S and Machover M 1995: Postulates and paradoxes of relative voting power: a critical re-appraisal, Theory and Decision 38:195 229. [30] 1996: Alternative forms of the Shapley value and the Shapley Shubik index, Public Choice 87:315 318. [31] 1997: The weighted voting rule in the EU s Council of Ministers, 1958 95: intentions and outcomes, Electoral Studies 16:33 47. [32] 1997: Ternary voting games, International Journal of Game Theory 26:335 351. [33] 1998: The product paradox of voting power, Public Choice 96:81 92. [34] 1999: Minimizing the mean majority deficit: the second square-root rule, Mathematical Social Sciences 37:25 37. [35] Models and reality: the curious case of the absent abstention (forthcoming in [48]). [36] Felsenthal D S, Machover M and Zwicker W [S] 1998: The bicameral postulates and indices of a priori voting power, Theory and Decision 44:83 116. [37] Fielding G and Liebeck H 1975: Voting structures and the square root law, British Journal of Political Science 5:249 256. [38] Fischer D and Schotter A 1978: The inevitability of the paradox of redistribution in the allocation of voting weights, Public Choice 33(2):49 67. [39] Fishburn P C 1973: The Theory of Social Choice; Princeton: Princeton University Press. [40] Friedmann W 1965: An Introduction To World Politics 5th edn; New York: St Martin s Press. [41] Grofman B and Scarrow H 1979: Iannucci and its aftermath: the application of the Banzhaf index to weighted voting in the State of New York, in [18, pp. 168 183]. [42] Halsbury s Laws of England 51 4th edn 1986; London: Butterworths.

310 Bibliography [43] Halsbury s Statutes of England and Wales 17 4th edn 1993 Reissue; London: Butterworths. [44] Hartley T C 1988: The Foundations of European Community Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Administrative Law of the European Community 2nd edn; Oxford: Clarendon Press. [45] Herne K and Nurmi H 1993: The distribution of a priori voting power in the EC Council of Ministers and the European Parliament, Scandinavian Political Studies 16:269 284. [46] Holler M J (ed) 1981: Power, Voting, and Voting Power; Würzburg: Physica. [47] 1982: Forming coalitions and measuring voting power, Political Studies 30:262 271. [48] Holler M J and Owen G (eds): Power Indices and Coalition Formation (forthcoming). [49] Hosli M 1993: Admission of European Free Trade Association states to the European Community and Council of Ministers, International Organization 47:629 643. [50] 1995: The balance between small and large: effects of a double-majority system on voting power in the European Union, International Studies Quarterly 39:351 370. [51] International Financial Statistics, vol. L, No. 8, August 1997 ; Washington DC: International Monetary Fund. [52] International Financial Statistics Yearbook 1980 ; Washington DC: International Monetary Fund. [53] Johnson R E 1969: An analysis of weighted voting as used in reapportionment of county governments in New York State, Albany Law Review 34:1 45. [54] Johnston R J 1977: National sovereignty and national power in European institutions, Environment and Planning A 9:569 577. [55] 1978: On the measurement of power: some reactions to Laver, Environment and Planning A 10:907 914. [56] Keynes J M 1921: A Treatise on Probability; London: Macmillan. [57] Kilgour D M 1974: A Shapley value for cooperative games with quarreling in [84, pp. 193 206].

Bibliography 311 [58] Kuhn H W and Tucker A W (eds) 1953: Contributions to the Theory of Games II (Annals of Mathematics Studies 28); Princeton: Princeton University Press. [59] Lambert J P 1988: Voting games, power indices, and presidential elections, UMAP Journal 9:216 277. [60] Lane J-E and Mæland R 1995: Voting power under the EU constitution, Journal of Theoretical Politics 7:223 230. [61] Laruelle A and Widgrén M 1998: Is the allocation of voting power among EU states fair?, Public Choice 94:317 339. [62] Laver M 1978: The problem of measuring power in Europe, Environment and Planning A 10:901 906. [63] Laver M and Schofield N 1990: Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe; Oxford: Oxford University Press. [64] Leech D 1990: Power indices and probabilistic voting assumptions, Public Choice 66:293-299. [65] Lieberman B (ed) 1971: Social Choice; New York: Gordon and Breach. [66] Lucas W F 1982: Measuring power in weighted voting systems in [17, pp. 183 238]. [67] 1992: Fair Voting: Weighted Votes For Unequal Constituencies, HISTOMAP Module 19 ; Lexington, MA: COMAP. [68] Luce R D and Raiffa H 1957: Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey; New York: John Wiley. [69] Mann I and Shapley L S 1964: The a priori voting strength of the electoral college in [98, pp. 151 164]. [70] Morriss P 1987: Power A Philosophical Analysis; Manchester: Manchester University Press. [71] Myerson R B 1991: Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [72] Ordeshook P (ed) 1978: Game Theory and Political Science; New York: New York University Press. [73] Owen G 1971: Political games, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 18:345 355.

312 Bibliography [74] 1975: Multilinear extensions and the Banzhaf value, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 22:741 750. [75] 1978: A note on the Banzhaf Coleman axioms in [72, pp. 451 461]. [76] Palmer N D and Perkins H C 1957: International Relations: The World Community in Transition 2nd edn; Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press. [77] Pennock J R and Chapman J W (eds) 1968: Representation: Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, Nomos X ; New York: Atherton Press. [78] Penrose L S 1946: The elementary statistics of majority voting, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 109:53 57. [79] Peters T 1996: Voting power after the enlargement and options for decision making in the European Union, Aussenwirtschaft 51:223 243. [80] Pollio M C 1992: Weighted voting in Nassau county: an overview. Unpublished paper; Dept. of Politics, New York University. [81] Rae D W 1969: Decision rules and individual values in constitutional choice, American Political Science Review 63:40 56. [82] Raiffa H 1982: The Art and Science of Negotiation: How to Resolve Conflicts and Get the Best Out of Bargaining; Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [83] Rapoport A 1970: N-Person Game Theory: Concepts and Applications; Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [84] (ed) 1974: Game Theory as a Theory of Conflict Resolution; Boston: Reidel. [85] Riker W H 1982: Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice; San Francisco: W H Freeman. [86] 1986: The first power index, Social Choice and Welfare 3:293 295. [87] Riker W H and Shapley L S 1968: Weighted voting: a mathematical analysis for instrumental judgments in [77, pp. 199 216]. [88] Roth A E 1977: Utility functions for simple games, Journal of Economic Theory 16:481 489.

Bibliography 313 [89] (ed) 1988: The Shapley Value; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [90] 1988: Introduction to the Shapley value in [89, pp. 1 27]. [91] Sainsbury R M 1987: Paradoxes; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [92] Schotter A 1981: The paradox of redistribution: some theoretical and empirical results in [46, pp. 324 338]. [93] Selby H A (ed) 1973: Notes of Lectures on Mathematics in the Behavioral Sciences (mimeographed); Williamstown, MA: Mathematical Association of America. [94] Shapley L S 1953: A value for n-person games in [58, pp. 307 317]; reprinted in [89, pp. 31 40]. [95] 1962: Simple games: an outline of the descriptive theory, Behavioral Science 7:59 66. [96] 1973: Political science: voting and bargaining games in [93, pp. 37 92]. [97] Shapley L S and Shubik M 1954: A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system, American Political Science Review 48:787 792; reprinted in [89, pp. 41 50]. [98] Shubik M (ed) 1964: Game Theory and Related Approaches to Social Behavior; New York: John Wiley. [99] Simma B (ed) 1982: The Charter of the United Nations A Commentary; New York: Oxford University Press. [100] Straffin P D 1982: Power indices in politics in [17, pp. 256 321]. [101] 1988: The Shapley Shubik and Banzhaf power indices as probabilities in [89, pp. 71 81]. [102] 1994: Power and stability in politics in [4, pp. 1127 1151]. [103] Taylor A D 1995: Mathematics and Politics: Strategy, Voting, Power and Proof ; New York: Springer. [104] Taylor A [D] and Zwicker W [S] 1992: A characterization of weighted voting, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 115:1089 1094. [105] Simple Games: Desirability Relations, Trading, and Pseudoweightings; Princeton: Princeton University Press (forthcoming).

314 Bibliography [106] Teasdale A L 1996: The politics of majority voting in Europe, Political Quarterly 64:101 115. [107] Treaties Establishing the European Communities Abridged Edition 1987; Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. [108] von Neumann J and Morgenstern O 1944: Game Theory and Economic Behavior; Princeton: Princeton University Press. [109] Weinstein J B 1965: The effect of the federal reapportionment decisions on counties and other forms of local government, Columbia Law Review 65:21 54. [110] Widgrén M 1994: Voting power in the EC decision making and the consequences of two different enlargements, European Economic Review 38:1153 1170. [111] 1995: Probabilistic voting power in the EU Council: the cases of trade policy and social regulation, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97:345 356. [112] 1995: European economic decision-making policy: progress or paralysis?, Economic Policy 21:423 460. [113] World Tables 1995 ; Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. [114] Young H P 1985: Monotonic solutions of cooperative games, International Journal of Game Theory 14:65 72. [115] 1994: Equity In Theory and Practice; Princeton: Princeton University Press.