* CASE NO: 633 * * * ORIGINAL ACTION IN MANDAMUS

Similar documents
[Cite as State ex rel. Montgomery Cty. Pub. Defender v. Siroki, 108 Ohio St.3d 207, 2006-Ohio- 662.]

12PREM;^O ^, Q^0 APR CLERK OFCOURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed April 02, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

[Cite as State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. Maurer, 91 Ohio St.3d 54, 2001-Ohio-282.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation : (REGULAR CALENDAR) and Correction, : Respondent. : D E C I S I O N

C. The City s public records policy is located in the City s policies and procedures manual.

JUDGE BARBARA GORMAN,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed August 28, Case No

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. HIGHLAND LOCAL SCHOOLS ) Case No BOARD OF EDUCATION, Original Action in Mandamus and Relator,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

CLERK OF COURT SURREME COURTOFOHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. [State ex. rel.] Jenkins Smith, Case No Original Action in Mandamus

DISTRICT COURT, PUEBLO COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 320 West 10th Street Pueblo, Colorado 81003

0"IO'AfAl CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO State of Ohio, ex rel. Johnny Holloway, Jr.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

DOCKET NO.: HEARING DATE : SIR: at nine o clock in the forenoon or as

WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS)

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

[Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Heath, 121 Ohio St.3d 165, 2009-Ohio-590.]

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV

HAMILTON MUNICIPAL COURT 345 HIGH STREET, HAMILTON, OHIO Hamiltonmunicipalcourt.org EVICTION PROCEDURE CLERK OF COURTS

MATERIALS TRANSFER AND EVALUATION LICENSE AGREEMENT. Carnegie Mellon University

IMM FED 13 Z013 CLERK OF COURT SUPR^ME COURT F 0H1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. FRANCESCA STEINHART, et al., CASE NO

TRI-CITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY. As used in this Policy, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

MAY MARCIA J MEII4GEL, CLERK SUPREME COUR'f OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Appellee, KEVIN JOHNSON

Virginia Freedom of Information Act ( VFOIA ) Complaint Template

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO RESPONDENT OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS

O P I N I O N ... and one count of unlawful restraint after a jury trial. Smith was sentenced to fifteen

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

SLIP OPINION NO OHIO-115 THE STATE EX REL. O SHEA & ASSOCIATES COMPANY, L.P.A., APPELLEE,

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed September 03, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed February 26, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Now comes the Respondent, the Honorable James M. Burge, Judge of the Lorain

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 08, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

p L DD 0q^^/41, CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State ex rel., McGRATH Case No

AUG CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS University of Cincinnati and The Ohio State University

GDE G"E.^V ED. 0*q G/^^4 MAR QB 2091 CLERK OF COURT ISUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No vs-

By-Laws and Rules of the Citizens Police Review Board of the City of Albany, New York

RESOLUTION NO

Case: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1

OSWEGO COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. Purchasing Director Purchasing Clerk Purchasing Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I. APPLICABILITY

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON. v. CCA No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

Request for Proposals for Homeless Outreach Services

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC Lower Tribunal Consolidated Case Nos. 3D and 3D01-665

California University of Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Policy

The State s brief in response to the Cafaro defendants motion to enlarge time, previously filed under seal, shall be unsealed. The Cafaro defendants

EXECUTIVE ORDER (Revised )

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

POLICY PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS OF THE ALBANY COUNTY LAND BANK

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN CIVIL - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE &C Page 2

STATE OF FLORIDA Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida

State's Objections to Discovery and Motion for Protective Order

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AFTAB PUREVAL HAMILTON COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS

TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE. Petitioners, by their attorneys, Elizabeth Stein, Esq. and Steven M. Wise, Esq.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MOTION TO INTERVENE OF OSTER CONSTRUCTION, INC., BEVAT INVESTMENTS, LLC, AND K. HOVNANIAN OSTER HOMES, LLC

MERIT BRIEF OF APPELLEE, STATE OF OHIO EX REL. KEVIN B. TODD

25 8/15/05 2 7/ /17/06 3 4/ /24/06 4 4/ /21/06 5 8/ /1/07 6 1/22/ /21/08 7 1/22/ /18/09 8 1/26/98

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. 92,885 RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS

Gottschlich & Portune, LLP

CHAPTER 5.14 PUBLIC RECORDS

ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Renewable Energy Transmission Authority ( Authority ). [ NMAC - N, 12/15/2011]

FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF ORLANDO AND BIKE/WALK CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC. RE: BEST FOOT FORWARD FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY

BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 9 Filed: 09/15/10 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 117

In The SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Chapter 86 GAMES OF CHANCE. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Liberty by L.L. No ] GENERAL REFERENCES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

NO PARMA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/01/10 Page: 1 of 21 PAGEID #: 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

APPLICATION FOR VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF COUNCIL-AT-LARGE. Per Article IV, Section 5, of the Charter of the City of Avon, Ohio:

RULES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE (ALL CAMPUSES)

HAMILTON COUNTY GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT PUBLIC RECORDS POLICY Adopted February 14, 2011 by the Hamilton County Board of Health

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF NEWTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS CIVIL DIVISION THE ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY COMMISSION'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF APPEAL

6. Finding on the mortgage or lien, including priority and entitlement to foreclose.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD. Finance Docket No

RETURN: This summons may not be served later than three (3) days before the date of appearance. Dated NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF

RESTATED BYLAWS MADERA COUNTY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. AMERICAN TAX FUNDING, LLC., : et al. Plaintiff-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO.

12 O74 i. IAY 10^^^^ RK OF COURT r^^rt OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB. Plaintiff-Appellee,

APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Appellant, Lorien Bourne, then a student at Bowling Greene State University,

RECITALS. 1. The State Service Contract Legislation, comprised of. Section 16 of Chapter 314 of the Laws of 1981,

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE ex rel. WHIO-TV-7 (MIAMI VALLEY BROADCASTING CORPORATION) 1414 Wilmington Avenue Dayton, Ohio 45420 * CASE NO: 633 * * * ORIGINAL ACTION IN MANDAMUS vs. Relator SHERIFF KEVIN O'LEARY Shelby County Sheriff 555 Gearhart Road Sidney, Ohio 45365-8734 Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------ MOTION OF RELATOR, WHIO-TV-7 FOR PEREMPTORY, ALTERNATIVE AND PERMANENT WRIT OF MANDAMUS UNDER OHIO PUBLIC RECORDS ACT - R.C. 149.43 Robert E. Portune (Ohio Reg. 0018098) (Counsel of Record) Martina M. Dillon (Ohio Reg. 0066942) Gottschlich & Portune, LLP 201 East Sixth Street Dayton, Ohio 45402 Phone: 937-824-2811 Fax: 937-824-2818 Email:buzz@gplawdayton.com Counsel for Relator WHIO-TV-7 (Miami Valley Broadcasting Corporation) -1- APR 11 2t197 MARCIA J MEMGEL, CLERK SUPREME C(JtJRT OF Ol?iq

MOTION OF RELATOR, WHIO-TV-7 FOR PEREMPTORY, ALTERNATIVE AND PERMANENT WRIT OF MANDAMUS UNDER OHIO PUBLIC RECORDS ACT - R.C. 149.43 Now comes Relator, Miami Valley Broadcasting Corporation which operates a television station under the name WHIO-TV-7 (hereinafter "WHIO") serving the Miami Valley, including viewers in Shelby County, Ohio and moves this Court for an Order granting Peremptory, Alternative and/or Permanent Writs of Mandamus directing Respondent Shelby County Sheriff Kevin O'Leary to permit immediate inspection and copying of all recorded 911 calls made to the Shelby County Sheriff dispatch center by Victoria Eilerman and members of her family in connection with Ms. Eilerman's recent kidnapping and murder. Despite being public records to which access is guaranteed under R.C. 149.43, Sheriff O'Leary is refusing to promptly permit inspection and copying. Such denial violates rights guaranteed to WHIO under the Ohio Open Records Act and relief in mandamus is being sought from this Court. A Memorandum in Support is appended hereto. Robert E. Portune (Ohio Reg. 0018098) Martina M. Dillon (Ohio Reg. 0066942) Gottschlich & Portune, LLP 201 East Sixth Street Dayton, Ohio 45402 Phone: 937-824-2811 Fax: 937-824-2818 Email:buzz@gplawdayton.com Attorneys for Relator WHIO-TV-7 Miami Valley Broadcasting Corporation

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT 1. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This original action in mandamus seeks access under the authority of the Ohio Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43 to all recorded 911 calls made to the Shelby County Sheriff dispatch center by Victoria Eilerman and members of her family in connection with Ms. Eilerman's recent kidnapping and murder. Although Respondent Shelby County Sheriff Kevin O'Leary has been advised by the Shelby County Prosecutor that these 911 tapes are public records, he is refusing to promptly permit inspection and copying, asserting instead that he has a "reasonable period of time" in which to make such records available and intends to take as long as thirty (30) days to do so. Relators ask this Court to find that that these 911 tapes are public records that must be promptly disclosed under R.C. 149.43 and to issue a peremptory or alternative and permanent writs of mandamus directing Sheriff O'Leary to permit immediate inspection and copying. II. JURISDICTION Mandamus is the appropriate remedy to seek compliance with the Public Records Act under R.C. 149.43. See, State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. Bond (2002), 98 Ohio St.3d 146, 160. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to allow a writ of mandamus, peremptory and alternative writs. See, Ohio Constitution Art. IV 2(B)(1)(b) and R.C. 2731.02, and SCt R. X.

As the custodian of the 911 tapes recorded by the Shelby County Sheriff's dispatch center, Shelby County Sheriff O'Leary is the proper party to whom a writ of mandamus to compel production should issue under Revised Code 149.43(B). Ill. BACKGROUND On Thursday, April 5, 2007, Victoria M. Eilerman, an 84 year old resident of Shelby County, Ohio was kidnapped and murdered. Prior to her death she made one or more phone calls using the "911" system to the Shelby County Sheriff Dispatch Center. Other 911 calls were made by Ms. Eilerman's family. Thereafter, on Friday, April 6 and Monday, April 9, 2007, WHIO reporters Jill Del Greco and Steve Baker and WHIO Managing Editor Caryn Golden made public records requests to Sheriff O'Leary to inspect and copy the 911 calls. When these requests were denied, Robert E. Portune, attorney for WHIO contacted Sheriff O'Leary's office as well as the office of Shelby County Prosecutor Ralph Bauer and followed up with a written public records request dated April 9, 2007. (See, paragraph 6 of WHIO's Verified Complaint and Exhibit A attached thereto.) On Tuesday, April 10, 2007, Sheriff O'Leary advised WHIO that while he acknowledge that the 911 tapes were "public records" under Ohio Rev. Code Section 149.43, he contended that he had a "reasonable period of time" in which to permit them to be inspected and copies and that he intended to take as long as thirty (30) days to comply with WHIO's request - a delay which is contrary to his obligation to "promptly permit inspection" as required by the Ohio Public Records Act.

IV. RELATORS HAVE A CLEAR LEGAL RIGHT TO INSPECT AND COPY THE 911 TAPES A. The Public Records Act Relators have a clear legal right to inspect the 911 tapes generated in connection with the Eilerman matter by virtue of the Ohio Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43. The Public Records Act requires that "all public records shall be promptly prepared and made available for inspection to any person at all reasonable times during regular business hours." R.C. 149.43(B). The Ohio Supreme Court has consistently construed the Public Records Act as guaranteeing the broadest possible access to public records, which public records include copies of audiotapes of 911 emergency calls.. See, State ex rel. Cincinnati Enauirer v. Hamilton Countv. Ohio (1996), 75 Ohio St. 3d 374 wherein the Court stated at 376: [W]e hold that 911 tapes in general, as well as the particular 911 tapes requested in these cases, are public records which are not exempt from disclosure. (emphasis supplied). V. Providing Access To Public Records Within A Reasonable Time. The Public Records Act permits public offices, a "reasonable time" to respond to a public records request. R.C. 149.43(B)(1). Relators submit that more than a reasonable amount of time has already passed and that the 911 tapes should be made available immediately for inspection and copying. Requests have been pending since Friday, April 6, 2007 and Sheriff O'Leary is now asserting that he will not comply for up to an additional thirty (30) days, apparently asserting that a delay in disclosure of sensitive, tragic information would be best for the community. But see, State ex. Rel. Consumer News Services, Inc. v. Worthington City Board of Education, (2002), 97 Ohio

St.3d 58, wherein this court determined that the reasons for a six (6) day delay in complying were meritless stating at 66: It is not within the province of a public office or officer to determine for the requester when a requester's purpose in obtaining public records would best be served. Brooks' purpose in requesting to inspect and copy public records is irrelevant.' (Emphasis supplied) See also, State ex rel. Wadd v. City of Cleveland, (1998) 81 Ohio St. 3d 50 where a delay of 23 days was found to be a violation of R.C. 149.43, holding instead that an eight (8) day period was reasonable under the facts of that case.z In the instant action, the tapes are available and could be inspected immediately except for Sheriff O'Leary's improper interpretation of the term "reasonable" and reluctance to provide WHIO with prompt access and copying. Relators are entitled to immediate access to the requested records. VI. WHIO's Entitlement To A Peremptory Writ Ohio Rev. Code Section 2731.06 states: When the right to require the performance of an act is clear and it is apparent that no valid excuse can be given for not doing it, a court, in the first instance, may allow a peremptory mandamus. In all other cases an alternative writ must first be issued on the allowance of the court, or a judge thereof. WHIO submits that Sheriff O'Leary has no valid excuse for not permitting prompt inspection and copying by WHIO. A peremptory writ requiring Sheriff O'Leary to comply is appropriate. 'It should be noted that just because WHIO accesses these 911 tapes that it will necessarily broadcast them. It may well agree with the Sheriff that they should not be aired. However that editorial and broadcasting right is a privilege reserved to WHIO. It is not the Sherifrs decision to make under R.C. 149.43 or the First Amendment. Z The court noted at n. 2 that it might have considered an even shorter period than 8 days had Relator so requested. Id. at. 54, n. 2. -6-

VII. Conclusion Sheriff O'Leary lacks the authority to refuse to disclose a public record unless the record falls within a specifically enumerated exception contained in R.C. 149.43. In this case, the 911 tapes are public records, not qualifying under any exceptions, and must be promptly prepared upon request for inspection by the media and the public atlarge. Relator WHIO respectfully requests that peremptory or alternative and permanent writs of mandamus be issued to Respondent Sheriff O'Leary directing the disclosure of all recorded 911 calls made to the Shelby County Sheriff dispatch center by Victoria Eilerman and members of her family in connection with Ms. Eilerman's recent kidnapping and murder. WHIO also submits that the refusal to comply by Respondent supports an award of reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred herein. Reectfully submitte Robert E. PortdneTOhio Reg. 0018098) Martina M. Dillon (Ohio Reg. 0066942) Gottschlich & Portune, LLP 201 East Sixth Street Dayton, Ohio 45402 Phone: 937-824-2811 Fax: 937-824-2818 Email:buzz@gplawdayton.com Attorneys for Relator WHIO-TV-7 Miami Valley Broadcasting Corporation

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This shall certify that a true copy of the foregoing was hand delivered or sent by first class mail, postage prepaid to the following parties and courtesy copies delivered to other counsel as follows this 11th day of April, 2007: Sheriff Kevin O'Leary Shelby County Sheriff 555 Gearhart Road Sidney, Ohio 45365-8734 Ralph Bauer, Esq. Shelby County Prosecutor 126 North Main Street Sidney, Ohio 45365