CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Electoral Engagement Among Latino Youth

Similar documents
CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Youth Voting in the 2004 Battleground States

THE 2004 YOUTH VOTE MEDIA COVERAGE. Select Newspaper Reports and Commentary

The Youth Vote in 2008 By Emily Hoban Kirby and Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg 1 Updated August 17, 2009

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

The Latino Electorate in 2010: More Voters, More Non-Voters

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

Youth Voter Turnout has Declined, by Any Measure By Peter Levine and Mark Hugo Lopez 1 September 2002

Inside the 2012 Latino Electorate

The Youth Vote 2004 With a Historical Look at Youth Voting Patterns,

Hispanics, Immigration and the Nation s Changing Demographics

1615 L Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC (main) (fax)

The New U.S. Demographics

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

YOUNG VOTERS and the WEB of POLITICS. Pathways to Participation in the Youth Engagement and Electoral Campaign Web

HISPANIC MEDIA SURVEY Topline - National

The Effect of North Carolina s New Electoral Reforms on Young People of Color

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

Share of Children of Immigrants Ages Five to Seventeen, by State, Share of Children of Immigrants Ages Five to Seventeen, by State, 2008

Young Voters in the 2010 Elections

The Reshaping of America. The Reshaping of America. The Reshaping of America. The Reshaping of America 9/17/2014

Chapter 8. Political Participation and Voting

Latinos in the 2016 Election:

REPORT ON POLITICAL ATTITUDES & ENGAGEMENT

Latinos and the Future of American Politics. Marc Rodriguez, History Department, Portland State

Release #2345 Release Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010

The Rising American Electorate

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 29, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Latinos and the 2008 Presidential Elections: a Visual Data Base

LATINOS IN CALIFORNIA, TEXAS, NEW YORK, FLORIDA AND NEW JERSEY

Illegal Immigration: How Should We Deal With It?

Assimilation, Gender, and Political Participation

POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THE LATINO VOTE By NALEO Educational Fund

Community College Research Center

Demographic, Economic and Social Transformations in Bronx Community District 4: High Bridge, Concourse and Mount Eden,

National Latino Leader? The Job is Open

Annual Flow Report. of persons who became LPRs in the United States during 2007.

The Rising American Electorate

Young Elected Leaders are Few and Familiar

Peruvians in the United States

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 6: An Examination of Iowa Absentee Voting Since 2000


Selected National Demographic Trends

Latinos and the 2008 Presidential Election: A Visual Database

GOP Makes Big Gains among White Voters

Children of Immigrants

CLACLS. Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Bronx Community District 5:

NBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll Iowa September 20, 2012 Presidential Election Questionnaire

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

PPIC Statewide Survey Methodology

Attitudes toward Immigration: Findings from the Chicago- Area Survey

An Awakened Giant: The Hispanic Electorate Is Likely to Double by 2030

ESTIMATES OF INTERGENERATIONAL LANGUAGE SHIFT: SURVEYS, MEASURES, AND DOMAINS

THE 2004 NATIONAL SURVEY OF LATINOS: POLITICS AND CIVIC PARTICIPATION

AARP Pre-First-Debate National Survey Miami, September 30, 2004

Bush 2004 Gains among Hispanics Strongest with Men, And in South and Northeast, Annenberg Data Show

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

A New Conventional Wisdom for the Latino Vote: Trends in and Predictions for

William C. Velásquez Institute

If you are under 18 years of age, can you provide required proof of Yes No your eligibility to work?

Redefining America: Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey

HEALTH CARE EXPERIENCES

Immigration and Language

Voter Turnout by Income 2012

1 18 in 08 Educational Guide

THE DEMOGRAPHY OF MEXICO/U.S. MIGRATION

Co-Sponsor and Support Swift Passage of the Raise the Wage Act

Ecuadorians in the United States

LATINOS IN AMERICA: A Demographic Profile

Characteristics of People. The Latino population has more people under the age of 18 and fewer elderly people than the non-hispanic White population.

An analysis and presentation of the APIAVote & Asian Americans Advancing Justice AAJC 2014 Voter Survey

The Inland Empire in Hans Johnson Joseph Hayes

Survey Overview. Survey date = September 29 October 1, Sample Size = 780 likely voters. Margin of Error = ± 3.51% Confidence level = 95%

December 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections

Electoral Politics. John N. Lee. Summer Florida State University. John N. Lee (Florida State University) Electoral Politics Summer / 12

Moral Issues and Catholic Values: The California Vote in 2008 Proposition 4

1998 LATINOATINO VOTEOTE IN CALIFORNIA RESEARCH EDUCATION & CHARACTER/ ETHICS TOPS ON LATINO VOTER CONCERNS

How s Life in the United States?

The New Latinos: Who They Are, Where They Are

Hispanics and the Changing Racial Demographics of the Intermountain West

Asian American Survey

A A P I D ATA Asian American Voter Survey. Sponsored by Civic Leadership USA

December 12, City of Oxnard Consideration of By-District Elections

Hispanic Market Demographics

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH NEW BEDFORD, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TEXAS EDUCATION FUND. Engaging Hispanics. No Small Minority!

GENERAL DESCRIPTION & METHODOLOGY

2006 Civic and Political Health Survey Spring Data Codebook By Mark Hugo Lopez, Research Director. Methodology.

2016 Appointed Boards and Commissions Diversity Survey Report

Latino Voter Registration and Participation Rates in the November 2016 Presidential Election

How Have Hispanics Fared in the Jobless Recovery?

I had an incredible summer as a research intern for the. Center for Voting and Democracy (also known as FairVote), and am

Why Are Millions of Citizens Not Registered to Vote?

Florida Republican Presidential Primary Poll 3/14/16. Fox 13 Tampa Bay Fox 35 Orlando Florida Times-Union

ESPIRITO SANTO PARISH FALL RIVER, MA. EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

The California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief

Chapter 6: Women-Owned and Minority-Owned Businesses

POLL RESULTS: AZ-02 CONSTITUENTS STRONGLY OPPOSE LIFTING PUBLIC LANDS PROTECTIONS

Transcription:

FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement Electoral Engagement Among Youth By Mark Hugo Lopez, Research Director 1 March 2003 There are many ways to measure electoral engagement. In this fact sheet, information on three main measures, voter turnout, voter registration, and political engagement is presented with specific emphasis on Youth between ages 18 and 30. Population Estimates In 2000, there were an estimated 4.2 million young citizens 2 between the ages of 18 and 30, and another 10.4 million citizens between the ages of 0 and 17. Approximately 51.7 percent of young citizens were female. This compares to an estimated 30.5 million young non- white citizens ages and 6.4 million young African citizens year olds. 3 Table 1 Citizen Youth Population Estimates, In thousands Ages Ages 18-19 Ages 20-21 Ages 22-24 Ages 25-30 Ages 0-17 1974 1,780 361 326 404 690 *** 1976 2,005 397 339 453 816 *** 1978 1,862 309 346 431 776 *** 1980 2,216 383 360 532 942 *** 1982 2,279 427 364 554 934 *** 1984 2,506 439 367 582 1,118 *** 1986 2,983 454 482 644 1,403 *** 1988 2,941 471 439 668 1,363 *** 1990 2,822 428 443 600 1,350 *** 1992 2,808 417 457 621 1,313 *** 1994 3,525 655 551 762 1,557 8,641 1996 3,785 654 663 857 1,611 9,350 1998 4,113 840 656 952 1,665 9,912 2000 4,229 839 723 954 1,713 10,358 Source: Current Population Survey, November Supplements, 1974-2000. School of Public Affairs 2101 Van Munching Hall University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742-1821 P: 301 405 2790 F: 301 314 9346 W: www.civicyouth.org CIRCLE was founded in 2001 with a generous grant from The Pew Charitable Trusts and is based in the University of Maryland's School of Public Affairs.

2 Voter Turnout As reported in our fact sheet Youth Voter Turnout has Declined by Any Measure, voter turnout, using the CIRCLE method, 4 for young people ages has declined steadily since 1972 with spikes in voter turnout among all young people in 1992, and a large spike in 1984 for African youth. In all years however, voter turnout among young s trails significantly behind young African s and young non- whites. Graphs 1 and 2 show the trend in youth voter turnout among citizens ages 18-30. Graph 1: Voter Turnout Presidential Years Among year old Citizens, by Race/Ethnicity Graph 2: Voter Turnout Midterm Election Years Among year old Citizens, by Race/Ethnicity 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 NH Asian NH Native Source: Current Population Survey, November Supplements, 1972-2000. NH Asian NH Native Source: Current Population Survey, November Supplements, 1972-2000. All s are not the same, and there are likely to be differences in voter turnout (or any other measure of civic engagement) across ethnic groups. For voter turnout in 2000, young s of Cuban origin are significantly more likely to turnout than their young Mexican, Puerto Rican, or Central counterparts. Table 2 Voter Turnout Among Citizens by Ethnicity, 2000 31 and older Mexican 32.7% 53.6% Puerto Rican 31.7% 58. Cuban 50.1% 72.6% Central 39.2% 64.6% African 50.4% 71.5% White 48.7% 73.8% Note: All results are for citizens only. All results are based on Author s tabulation from the Current Population Survey, November Supplement 2000.

3 Voter Turnout in Select States and Metropolitan Areas in 2000 Voter turnout in 2000 among young s varied between a low of 28.6 percent in Arizona to a high of 47.4 percent in Illinois. However, across all states, young s were less likely to vote than their non- white and African counterparts. Furthermore, adults in 2000 were less likely to vote than their non- white and African counterparts. Table 3 Voter Turnout Among Citizens in Select States, 2000 5, African, White, All Young People s 31 and older All Adults 31 and older Arizona 28.6% *** 38.6% 32.8% 50.6% 65. California 37.6% 57.6% 53.5% 48.7% 61.7% 72.3% Florida 37.8% 50.7% 48.4% 47.1% 62.4% 70.9% Illinois 47.4% 71.2% 49.6% 53.1% 64.6% 74.6% New 31.1% *** 46.5% 36.5% 55.8% 65.4% Mexico New York 39.7% 50.9% 51.2% 48.8% 61.1% 72.7% Texas 31.1% 51.9% 44.4% 41.2% 52. 67.4% National 34.9% 50.4% 48.7% 47.2% 57.5% 72. Note: All results are for citizens only. There were too few African respondents from Arizona and New Mexico to provide reliable estimates of voter turnout. For youth voter turnout state by state, see Voter Turnout in the States, 1998 and 2000. All results are based on Author s tabulations from the Current Population Survey, November Supplement 2000. In select metropolitan areas, young voter turnout trailed that of non- whites and African s in 2000. Table 4 Voter Turnout Among Citizens in Select Metropolitan Areas, 2000, African, White, All Young People s 31 and older All Adults 31 and older Chicago 50.5% 76.4% 57.2% 60.1% 64.3% 76.1% Dallas/Ft 20.1% 47.1% 40.5% 38.5% 53.4% 65.9% Worth Houston 31.1% 50. 51.6% 46.7% 43.6% 69.4% Los 40.1% 53.5% 56. 51.1% 65.9% 73.6% Angeles Miami 43. 66.2% 54.5% 52. 64.7% 71.8% New York 40.6% 50.2% 53.9% 50.4% 64.5% 74.4% National 34.9% 50.4% 48.7% 47.2% 57.5% 72. Note: All results are for citizens only. All results are based on Author s tabulation from the Current Population Survey, November Supplement 2000.

4 Views on Voting Graph 3: African Youth Ages 15-25 are Most Likely to View Voting as Important In a survey of 1,500 young people among 15-25 year olds, young s are least likely to view voting as an important activity. 51% 48% 56% 44% 46% 53% Important Not Important National Youth Survey, Jan 2002 Among young people, approximately 30 percent view voting as a right, with a similar view of voting evident across young whites, young African s, and young s, though young s are less likely than their non- African and non- white youth to view voting as a right and more likely to view voting as a choice. Graph 4: How do you describe voting Among 18-25 year olds, by Race/Ethnicity 33% 26% 25% 25% 22% 21% "a right" "a responsibility" 35% 32% 32% 9% 13% 13% "a choice" "a duty"

5 Graph 5: A Majority of Youth Ages 15-25 Feel They Can Make Little Difference in Solving the Problems of Their Communities Young people feel they can make little difference in solving the problems of their community, with young African s and Young s feeling less efficacious than their young non- white counterparts. 51% 48% 41% 58% 58% great deal/some a little/almost no/no Youth Survey, Jan 2002. Graph 6: Talked About Politics with Parents, Young People Ages 15-25 As Keeter, Zukin, Andolina, and Jenkins have shown in their report The Civic and Political Health of the Nation: A Generational Portrait, whether or not parents discuss politics with their children can be an important factor in determining the civic engagement of young people later in life. 53% 47% 46% 54% 42% 58% Among young people, young s are least likely to have discussed politics with their parents. often/sometimes not often/never National Youth Survey, Jan 2002.

6 9 Graph 7: How Difficult is it for people like you to actually vote? Among 18-25 year olds, by Race/Ethnicity 12% 14% difficult 23% 77% not difficult 67% When it comes to casting a vote, most youth say it is not necessarily difficult. However, young s are least likely to say it is not difficult to vote.

7 Registering to Vote Voter registration rates among young people have remained relatively flat over the past 30 years, though since 1984 voter registration rates among young African s are statistically indistinguishable from those of whites. Young s continue to lag behind their young African and white counterparts in voter registration rates. 6 Graph 8: Voter Registration Presidential Years Among year old Citizens, by Race/Ethnicity Graph 9: Voter Registration Midterm Election Years Among year old Citizens, by Race/Ethnicity 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 NH Native NH Asian NH Native NH Asian Source: Current Population Survey, November Supplements, 1972-2000. Source: Current Population Survey, November Supplements, 1972-2000. Across ethnicities, young Cuban s are more likely to be registered to vote than their counterparts in 2000. Table 5 Registration Rates Among Citizens by Ethnicity, 2000 31 and older Mexican 50.8% 69.1% Puerto Rican 47. 70.1% Cuban 70.6% 81.1% Central 48.9% 73.2% African 68.3% 82.2% White 65.7% 83.5% Note: All results are for citizens only. All results are based on Author s tabulation from the Current Population Survey, November Supplement 2000.

8 Voter Registration Rates in Select States and Metropolitan Areas in 2000 Voter registration rates among young s varied between a low of 35.9 percent in Arizona to a high of 61.8 percent in Illinois in 2000. However, no matter what state one considers, young s were less likely to be registered to vote than their non- white and African counterparts in 2000. Table 6 Voter Registration Among Citizens in Select States, 2000, African, White, All Young People s 31 and older All Adults 31 and older Arizona 35.9% *** 49.9% 42.6% 62.5% 72.9% California 49.9% 69.9% 69.4% 62.6% 71.8% 80.6% Florida 54.4% 68.7% 62.8% 62.8% 71.4% 81.3% Illinois 61.8% 85.8% 69.1% 70.7% 75.1% 85.7% New 48.8% *** 59.6% 50.2% 67.2% 74.3% Mexico New York 52.3% 65.7% 70.9% 66.8% 72.6% 82.1% Texas 58.5% 72.7% 71. 67. 72.5% 82.1% National 51.6% 68.3% 65.8% 64.2% 70.9% 82.1% Note: All results are for citizens only. There were too few African respondents from Arizona and New Mexico to provide reliable estimates of voter registration. All results are based on Author s tabulations from the Current Population Survey, November Supplement 2000. In select metropolitan areas, young voter registration rates trailed those of non- whites and African s in 2000. Table 7 Voter Registration Among Citizens in Select Metropolitan Areas, 2000, African, White, All Young People s 31 and older All Adults 31 and older Chicago 65.3% 85.6% 74.8% 74.7% 75.1% 85. Dallas/Ft 58.2% 72.9% 65.1% 64.4% 67.7% 80.1% Worth Houston 60.3% 67.9% 77.3% 70.9% 64. 79.8% Los 50.9% 67.1% 72. 64.7% 74.9% 81.4% Angeles Miami 56.5% 87.2% 75. 70.3% 73.8% 82.6% New York 52.2% 64.6% 70.7% 66.1% 76.1% 83.5% National 51.6% 68.3% 65.8% 64.2% 70.9% 82.1% Note: All results are for citizens only. All results are based on Author s tabulation from the Current Population Survey, November Supplement 2000.

9 9 Graph 10: How Difficult is it for People Like You to Register to Vote? Among 18-25 year olds, by Race/Ethnicity 17% 13% difficult 26% 74% 66% not difficult Young s are most likely to find it difficult to register to vote, though a sizeable majority of all youth claim it is not difficult to register to vote. Strong majorities of young people feel their vote will count, though young African s are least likely to feel their vote makes a difference. 10 9 Graph 11: My Vote Counts, Youth Ages 18-25 88% 81% 84% 12% 18% 15% agree disagree.

10 Voter Turnout Among the Registered An alternative measure of voter turnout is turnout among those who are already registered to vote. Among registered voters, youth voter turnout has also declined, though at a slower rate than overall voter turnout. Furthermore, there is little distinction in voter turnout among registered young voters across race and ethnicity. Graph 12: Voter Tunrout Among the Registered, Presidential Years Among year old Citizens, by Race/Ethnicity Graph 13: Voter Turnout Among the Registered, Midterm Election Years Among year old Citizens, by Race/Ethnicity 10 10 9 9 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 NH Asian NH Native Source: Current Population Survey, November Supplements, 1972-2000. NH Asian NH Native Source: Current Population Survey, November Supplements, 1972-2000. In 2000, young s of Cuban origin were more likely to be registered to vote than their counterparts. Table 8 Voter Turnout Among Registered Citizens by Ethnicity, 2000 31 and older Mexican 66.8% 79.2% Puerto Rican 71.1% 83.1% Cuban 69.6% 91. Central 80.9% 89.3% African 76.6% 88. White 75.8% 89.2% Note: All results are for citizens only. All results are based on Author s tabulation from the Current Population Survey, November Supplement 2000.

11 Voter Turnout Among Registered Citizens in Select States and Metropolitan Areas in 2000 In 2000, voter turnout among registered young s varied from a low of 67.2 percent in New Mexico to a high of 80.3 percent in Arizona. Table 9 Voter Turnout Among Registered Citizens in Select States, 2000, African, White, All Young People s 31 and older All Adults 31 and older Arizona 80.3% *** 77.8% 78. 81.6% 89.8% California 77.7% 86.8% 79.2% 80.2% 86.3% 90.4% Florida 70.8% 74.7% 78.1% 76. 87.9% 87.8% Illinois 77.5% 84.7% 74.3% 77.3% 86. 88. New 67.2% *** 79. 74.7% 84.2% 88.9% Mexico New York 80. 83.5% 75.7% 77. 85.6% 90.1% Texas 55.8% 73.2% 63.3% 63. 74. 84. National 70. 76.6% 75.8% 75.5% 82.4% 88.6% Note: All results are for citizens only. There were too few African respondents from Arizona and New Mexico to provide reliable estimates of voter turnout. All results are based on Author s tabulations from the Current Population Survey, November Supplement 2000. In select metropolitan areas, voter turnout among registered young s trailed voter turnout rates among registered non- whites and African s in 2000. Table 10 Voter Turnout Among Registered Citizens in Select Metropolitan Areas, 2000, African, White, All Young People s 31 and older All Adults 31 and older Chicago 78. 90. 77.9% 81.7% 85.6% 90.2% Dallas/Ft 34.6% 67.6% 63.3% 61.1% 73.7% 85.3% Worth Houston 57.8% 75.4% 67.3% 67.2% 70.1% 88.4% Los 79.8% 85.4% 80. 81.2% 88.9% 91.1% Angeles Miami 74.6% 75.9% 73.7% 73.9% 88.6% 87.4% New York 81.6% 82.5% 79. 79.5% 86.6% 90.6% National 70. 76.6% 75.8% 75.5% 82.4% 88.6% Note: All results are for citizens only. All results are based on Author s tabulation from the Current Population Survey, November Supplement 2000.

12 Trust in Government Graph 14: Trust in Government Youth Ages 15-25 65% 59% 56% African and youth express less trust in government than their white counterparts. Trust in government is highest among young women 34% 42% a lot/some a little/not at all. Graph 15: Trust in Government, by Gender, Youth Ages 15-25 59% 72% 56% 62% 52% 59% 43% 37% 45% 27% Male Female Male Female Latina a lot/some a little/not at all.

13 Trust in Others Graph 16: Can you trust others, Among 18-25 year olds, by Race/Ethnicity Young s are more likely to say that you can t be too careful when it comes to trusting others. 44% 39% 36% 55% 57% Across gender, young Latinas are more likely than either s or non- whites or African s to say that when it comes to trusting other people, you can t be too careful. most people can be trusted you can't be too careful Graph 17: Can You Trust Others, Among 18-25 Year Olds, by Race/Ethnicity & Gender 41% 51% 48% 49% 56% 55% 54% 39% 36% 36% 33% male female male most people can be trusted female you can't be too careful Latina

14 Political Party Identification Graph 18: Political Party Identification, Youth Ages 18-25 32% 28% 41% 21% 27% 36% 25% 29% Young African s are most likely to identify themselves as Democrats. This is particularly true for young female African s. Among s, young males are more likely to identify as Democrats than their female counterparts, who are evenly split across political parties. Democrat Independent Republican. Graph 19: Political Party Identification, By Gender, Youth Ages 18-25 27% 33% 32% 32% 26% 39% 44% 41% 24% 23% 21% 21% 21% 29% 34% Male Female Male Female Latina Democrat Independent Republican.

15 Views of Government, Politics and Elections Graph 20: Government Addresses the Needs of Young People, Among 18-25 Year Olds, by Race/Ethnicity Young s are more likely to disagree with the statement Government Addresses the Needs of Young People than their white or African counterparts. 56% 47% 49% 43% 43% 55% agree disagree Young s are also more likely to say that political leaders pay little to no attention to the needs of young people. Graph 21: How Much do Political Leaders Pay Attention to the Needs of Young People, Among 18-25 Year Olds, by Race/Ethnicity 54% 51% 41% 47% 44% 55% a lot/some a little/not at all

16 Graph 22: Politics and Elections Address the Needs of Young People, Among 18-25 Year Olds, by Race/Ethnicity 53% 52% 45% 43% 38% In contrast however, young s are more likely to say that Politics and Elections address the needs of young people than their young white or African counterparts. agree disagree With regards to politics and candidates, young s have a generally more negative opinion of political candidates than their white or African counterparts. Specifically, young s are more likely to say that they disagree with the statement Candidates take young people seriously than their young non- counterparts. Graph 23: "Candidates Take Young People Seriously," Among 18-25 Year Olds, by Race/Ethnicity 52% 46% 42% 46% 51% 53% agree disagree

17 Graph 24: "Candidates Never Come to My Community," Among 18-25 Year Olds, by Race/Ethnicity 55% 47% 49% 47% 38% Furthermore, young s are more likely to say that Candidates never come to my community than their non- counterparts. agree disagree Finally, young s are most likely to agree with the statement that Candidates would rather talk to wealthier/older voters than young non- whites and African s. 9 Graph 25: "Candidates Would Rather Talk to Wealthier/Older Voters," Among 18-25 Year Olds, by Race/Ethnicity 67% 65% 77% 31% 34% 23% agree disagree

18 Notes 1 I thank Michael Olander for excellent research assistance. I also thank Emily Kirby for helpful comments on previous drafts of this fact sheet. All errors in fact or interpretation are my own. 2 There are approximately 3.3 million young s between the ages of 18 and 30 who are not citizens of the U.S. When taken together with the number of citizens, the total estimated population in 2000 of young s between the ages 18 and 30 is 7.5 million. 3 These figures are estimates of the number of non-institutionalized young people in the U.S. Estimates are based on the 2000 November supplement of the Current Population Survey. 4 Data for Voter Turnout rates and Registration rates are taken from the 1972 to 2000 November Supplements of the Current Population Survey. Each survey is completed within two weeks of the November elections, and interviews over 50,000 noninstitutionalized individuals. Calculation of the voter turnout rate by the CIRCLE method excludes survey participants who did not answer the voting question or the registration question. Inclusion of no answers would result in a lower turnout rate than that reported here. For this fact sheet, voter turnout and voter registration rates are calculated for U.S. citizens only. For example, Voter Turnout among citizens is given as: Voter_ Turnout citizens_ no_ miss = (# of _ self reported _ voters) (# _ of _ U. S. Citizens_ over_ age_18_ who_ answered _ the_ voting_ question). 5 States were selected based on the sample size of citizens. If the sample size was below 50, results were not reported. 6 Similar to the measure for voter turnout, the measure of voter registration has been adjusted to reflect registration rates among U.S. citizens only, and non-responses to the question of voter registration.