Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Similar documents
Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/24/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 2:07-cv RCJ-GWF Document 1 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 1:06-cv DFH-TAB Document 11 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 24

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv TSZ Document 15 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 03/05/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

Case 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv document 1 filed 09/30/15 page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 31 Filed: 03/09/18 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:165

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv HRH Document 37 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Transcription:

Case: 1:13-cv-01455 Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CASCADES STREAMING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BIG TEN NETWORK, LLC, Civil Action No. 13-cv-1455 Honorable Thomas M. Durkin JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff, Cascades Streaming Technologies, LLC. ("Cascades") alleges the following: PARTIES 1. Cascades is an Illinois limited liability company having its principal place of business at 500 Skokie Boulevard, Suite 250, Northbrook, Illinois 60062. 2. Defendant Big Ten Network, LLC ("BTN") is a limited liability company having its principal place of business at 600 W Chicago Avenue # 875, Chicago, IL 60654-2531. It is owned by Fox Entertainment Group (News Corporation) and the Big Ten Conference. JURISDICTION 4. Cascades' claim for patent infringement against BTN arises under the patent laws of the United States, including 35 U.S.C. 271. Consequently, this Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over this suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338. 5. BTN is subject to the specific and general personal jurisdiction of this Court because, among other things, it has established continuous and systematic contacts with Illinois and with this judicial district, it has committed acts within Illinois and this judicial

Case: 1:13-cv-01455 Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:131 district giving rise to this action, and it has minimum contacts with the forum such that the exercise of jurisdiction over it would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. For instance, BTN is headquartered in this district. BTN has established distribution networks offering video services that infringe Cascades' patent into the stream of commerce such that those products flow into Illinois and this district. BTN has also committed acts of patent infringement and/or contributed to others' acts of patent infringement, or induced those acts, within this district. 6. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and/or 1400(b). PATENTS AT ISSUE 7. On April 10, 2012, United States Patent No. 8,156,236 B2 (the "'236 patent"), entitled "Audio-Video Data Switching and Viewing System," was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of this patent is attached as Exhibit A. Cascades owns the exclusive license and right to sue for past, present and future infringement of the '236 patent. The inventors of the '236 patent are the patent owners who granted Cascades its exclusive license. The inventors benefit financially from successful licensing of the '236 patent. 8. BTN is now and has been directly infringing and/or contributorily infringing or inducing infringement of the '236 patent, literally and under the doctrine of equivalents, by, among other things, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or receiving systems and products that infringe one or more claims of the '236 patent. Such infringing products include, but are not limited to, video on-demand products such as BTN s BTN2GO product offerings. Specifically, BTN infringes at least claims 16-22, 25-31 and 34 of the 236 patent - 2 -

Case: 1:13-cv-01455 Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:132 through its BTN2GO product offerings as set forth in Exhibit B. Other claims are believed to be infringed as well. 9. BTN is aware of the 236 patent. Cascades placed BTN on notice of its infringement at least as of October 23, 2012. Representatives for Cascades and BTN engaged in multiple conversations thereafter, but the parties did not reach any agreement regarding the asserted claims. Thus, Cascades was compelled to bring suit. 10. Cascades has been and continues to be damaged by BTN s actions. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Cascades prays for the following relief: A. A judgment finding that BTN has infringed and contributorily infringed, or induced the infringement of, the '236 patent; B. A judgment finding that BTN has willfully infringed the 236 patent; B. A judgment that the '236 patent is valid and enforceable; C. A permanent injunction enjoining BTN, its agents, officers, assigns and others acting in concert with them, from infringing, inducing infringement of and/or contributing to infringement of the '236 patent; D. An award of damages adequate to compensate Cascades for the infringement of the '236 patent that has occurred; E. An award of pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest on the damages awarded; F. A determination that this is an exceptional case and an award of Cascades' attorneys' fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285 and any other applicable statute or law, and an award of Cascades' of its costs; and, - 3 -

Case: 1:13-cv-01455 Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:133 G. Such other relief as the Court deems equitable under the circumstances. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues triable to a jury. /s/ Joseph N. Hosteny Raymond P. Niro (rniro@nshn.com) Arthur A. Gasey (gasey@nshn.com) Paul C. Gibbons (gibbons@nshn.com) NIRO, HALLER & NIRO 181 W. Madison, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 236-0733 Fax: (312) 236-3137 Attorneys for Cascades Streaming Technologies, LLC - 4 -

Case: 1:13-cv-01455 Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:134 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 13, 2013 the foregoing: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court for the Northern District of Illinois using the Court s Electronic Case Filing System, which will send notification to the registered participants of the ECF System as listed: participants. Brent A. Hawkins McDermott Will & Emery LLP 227 West Monroe Street 44 th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 bhawkins@mwe.com Yar R. Chaikovsky (pro hac vice) Bryan K. James (pro hac vice) Darryl J. Ong (pro hac vice) McDermott Will & Emery LLC 275 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 ychaikovsky@mwe.com bjames@mwe.com Attorneys for BIG TEN NETWORK, LLC I certify that all parties in this case are represented by counsel who are CM/ECF /s/ Joseph N. Hosteny Attorney for CASCADES STREAMING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC