ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF DECEMBER 1, 1994

Similar documents
ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1995

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 1, 1991

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS MAQUEDA CASE RESOLUTION OF JANUARY 17, 1995

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Genie-Lacayo v. Nicaragua. Judgment of January 27, 1995 (Preliminary Objections)

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ADVISORY OPINION OC-13/93 OF JULY 16, 1993

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of El Amparo v. Venezuela. Judgment of January 18, 1995 (Merits)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2001

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF DECEMBER 1, 2003

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS NEIRA ALEGRIA ET AL. CASE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS JUDGMENT OF DECEMBER 11, 1991

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 12, 2000 CLEMENTE TEHERÁN ET AL. CASE *

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF MAY 26, 2001

BLAKE CASE INTERPRETATION OF JUDGMENT ON REPARATIONS (ARTICLE 67 AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS) JUDGMENT OF OCTOBER 1, 1999

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Durand and Ugarte v. Peru. Judgment of December 3, 2001 (Reparations and Costs)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 12, 2000

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF JANUARY 29, 1999

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2002

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Cesti-Hurtado v. Peru. Judgment of January 26, 1999 (Preliminary Objections)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 29, 1998

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF DECEMBER 2, 2003 * PROVISIONAL MEASURES LUIS UZCÁTEGUI IN THE MATTER OF VENEZUELA

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

WorldCourtsTM. In the Barrios Altos Case,

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ADVISORY OPINION OC-7/85 OF AUGUST 29, 1986

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of May 3, 2008 Provisional Measures with regard to Colombia Case of the Mapiripán Massacre

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. of December 2, 2008

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 22, 2013 PROVISIONAL MEASURES WITH REGARD TO THE REPUBLIC OF PERU MATTER OF WONG HO WING

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Loayza-Tamayo v. Peru. Judgment of January 31, 1996 (Preliminary objections)

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

Inter-American Court of Human Rights Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE ACTING PRESIDENT OF INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOR THIS CASE OF JULY 29, 2013

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE INTER AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. November 16 to 28, PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS. Article 1.

Inter-American Court of Human Rights Mauricio Herrera Ulloa and Fernan Vargas Rohrmoser v. Costa Rica

Case of Trujillo-Oroza v. Bolivia. Judgment of January 26, 2000 (Merits)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF FEBRUARY 21, 2003 PROVISIONAL MEASURES LILIANA ORTEGA ET AL. V. VENEZUELA

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF JUNE 28, 2012 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REGARDING HONDURAS MATTER OF GLADYS LANZA OCHOA

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

Decided by: Dated: 19 June 1998 Citation: Clemente Teheran v. Colombia, Order (IACtHR, 19 Jun. 1998)

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 26, Provisional Measures regarding Guatemala

Suárez Rosero v. Ecuador

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2002

Requested by the Republic of Colombia. Present: Hector Gros-Espiell, President. Hector Fix-Zamudio, Vice-President. Thomas Buergenthal, Judge

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2012 REQUEST FOR PROVISIONAL MEASURES. CASE OF DE LA CRUZ FLORES v.

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

ORDER OF THE ACTING PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS* MARCH 24, 2010.

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) is one of two. bodies in the inter-american system for the promotion and protection of human

TREATY SERIES 1994 Nº 24. Protocol Nº 9 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Inter-American Court of Human Rights Mauricio Herrera Ulloa and Fernan Vargas Rohrmoser v. Costa Rica

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Blake v. Guatemala. Judgment of January 24, 1998 (Merits)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF JUNE 18, CASE OF MOHAMED v. ARGENTINA

I transmit also, for the information of the Senate, the Report of the Department of State with respect to the Treaty.

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Escher et al. v. Brazil. Judgment of November 20, 2009

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF OCTOBER 11, 2000

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST CASE (OLMEDO BUSTOS ET AL. VS. CHILE) JUDGMENT OF FEBRUARY 5, 2001

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ORIGIN, STRUCTURE AND JURISDICTION OF THE COURT A. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COURT B. ORGANIZATION OF THE COURT...

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of the Mapiripán Massacre v. Colombia. Judgment of March 7, 2005 (Preliminary Objections)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS * OF NOVEMBER 22, 2010 CASE OF HERRERA ULLOA V. COSTA RICA SUPERVISION OF COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Suárez-Rosero v. Ecuador. Judgment of November 12, 1997 (Merits)

No UNIVERSITY FOR PEACE and COSTA RICA. Agreement concerning the headquarters of the University for Peace. Signed at San José on 29 March 1982

WorldCourtsTM I. SUMMARY

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of El Amparo v. Venezuela

Comprehensive Agreement on Human Rights

Extradition Treaty between the United States of America and the Argentine Republic

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF MAY 7, 2004 CASE OF GÓMEZ-PAQUIYAURI BROTHERS V. PERU PROVISIONAL MEASURES

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Cantoral-Benavides v. Peru. Judgment of December 3, 2001 (Reparations and Costs)

Restrictions to the Death Penalty (Arts. 4(2) and 4(4) of the American Convention on Human Rights)

WorldCourtsTM I. SUMMARY

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Baena-Ricardo et al. v. Panama. Judgment of November 28, 2003 (Competence)

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Neira-Alegría et al. v. Peru. Judgment of September 19, 1996 (Reparations and Costs)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2013

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of May 3, 2008 Provisional Measures with regard to Peru Case of the Gómez-Paquiyauri Brothers

Inter-American Court of Human Rights Victor Neira-Alegria, Edgar Zenteno-Escobar and William Zenteno-Escobar v. Peru

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2003 HILAIRE, CONSTANTINE AND BENJAMIN ET AL. * V. TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CASE

Order of the. Inter-American Court of Human Rights * of July 6, Case of Cantos v. Argentina

10th Binational Health Week Inaugural Event and Binational Policy Forum on Migrant Health Guanajuato, México 2010

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REGARDING PERU MATTER OF THE GÓMEZ-PAQUIYAURI BROTHERS

Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of the White Van (Paniagua-Morales et al.) v. Guatemala. Judgment of March (Merits)

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS * OF JULY 4, 2006

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 26, 2010 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REGARDING COLOMBIA CASE OF THE 19 TRADESMEN V.

Australia-Malaysia Extradition Treaty

AG/RES (XXXI-O/01) MECHANISM FOR FOLLOW-UP OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION

STATUTE OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 15, 2010 CASE OF KIMEL V. ARGENTINA MONITORING OF COMPLIANCE OF JUDGMENT

Your use of this document constitutes your consent to the Terms and Conditions found at

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL PERSONS FROM ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE. Preamble

4. The Order of the Inter-American Court August 5, 2008, through which, inter alia, the Court decided:

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS * OF OCTOBER 10, 2011 **

Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights * of February 4, 2010 Case of Cesti-Hurtado v. Peru

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 23, 2012 PROVISIONAL MEASURES WITH REGARD TO MEXICO MATTER OF ALVARADO REYES

Transcription:

ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF DECEMBER 1, 1994 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REQUESTED BY THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE MATTER OF GUATEMALA COLOTENANGO CASE The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, composed of the following judges: also present: Rafael Nieto-Navia, President Héctor Fix-Zamudio, Vice-President Alejandro Montiel-Argüello, Judge Máximo Pacheco-Gómez, Judge Hernán Salgado-Pesantes, Judge; Manuel E. Ventura-Robles, Secretary Ana María Reina, Deputy Secretary emits the following decision: 1. On June 20, 1994, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter "the Court") received from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter "the Commission" or "the Inter-American Commission") a request for provisional measures dated June 17, 1994, regarding the "Colotenango" Case (Nº 11.212) against the Government of Guatemala (hereinafter "the Government" or "Guatemala"), which is currently before the Commission. 2. The request for provisional measures is based on Articles 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter "the Conven-tion" or "the American Convention"), 76 of the Regulations of the Com-mission, and 23 and 24 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter "the Rules of Procedure"). 3. After consideration of the arguments and the evidence offered by the Commission, the Court, by virtue of the authority conferred on it by Article 24(4) of the Rules of Procedure, issued a decision dated June 22, 1994, the operative part of which reads as follows: 1. To require the Government of Guatemala to adopt without delay all necessary measures to protect the right to life and the personal integrity of PATRICIA ISPANEL- MEDIMILLA, MARCOS GODÍNEZ-PÉREZ, NATIVIDAD GODÍNEZ-PÉREZ, MARÍA SALES- LÓPEZ, RAMIRO GODÍNEZ-PÉREZ, JUAN GODÍNEZ-PÉREZ, MIGUEL GODÍNEZ-DOMINGO, ALBERTO GODÍNEZ, MARÍA GAR-CÍA-DOMINGO,GONZALO GODÍNEZ-LÓPEZ, ARTURO FEDERICO MÉNDEZ-ORTIZ and ALFONSO MORALES-JIMÉNEZ.

2 2. To request the Government of Guatemala to adopt all necessary measures to ensure that the aforementioned persons may continue to reside at or return to their homes in Colotenango, providing them the assurances that they shall not be persecuted or threatened by agents of the Government or by individuals. 3. To request the Government of Guatemala to guarantee to Attorney Patricia Ispanel-Medimilla the right to exercise her profession without being subjected to undue pressures. 4. To request the Government of Guatemala to inform the Court no later than August 31, 1994, regarding the measures it has adopted to comply with this order. 5. To instruct the Secretariat of the Court to transmit the documents mentioned in the previous paragraph to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The latter shall have until October 7, 1994 to submit its observations thereon. 6. To summon the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Government of Guatemala to the public hearing on this case, to be held at the seat of the Court at 15:00 hours on November 28, 1994. This decision was notified to the Commission and to the Government. 4. On August 31, 1994, the Government of Guatemala informed the Court in writing regarding the measures that were adopted, in compliance with operative point 4 of the above decision. The information included a report from the Presidential Committee to Coordinate the Executive's Policy on Human Rights and a document drawn up at the Office of the Governor of the Department of Huehuetenango. In the above mentioned report, the Government states the following: We assure the President that his decision has been accorded its full weight and importance. As a result, the Government has reiterated the orders issued to the authorities, requiring them to: a) provide concrete and specific protection to the persons listed, allowing them to personally and freely specify the type of protection they require; b) proceed with the arrests ordered by the courts investigating the events relating to consolidated case Nº 11.212; c) the Government Attorney's Office has likewise been requested to take all measures necessary to expedite and improve the effectiveness of the investigation in order to punish the actors already identified.... In compliance with Your Excellency's decision, the Government of Guatemala has tightened security measures in the area of Colotenango, in order to afford better protection to its inhabitants. 5. Pursuant to point 5 of the Court's decision, the Secretariat of the Court transmitted the information received from the Government to the Inter-American Commission and granted the latter until October 7, 1994 to present its observations. On October 6, 1994, the Commission submitted its observations and requested that the measures ordered be maintained and expanded to include protection of Mrs. Francisca Sales-Martín, and that "the civil defense patrols (currently the Voluntary Civil Defense Committees) be disarmed and demobilized and that that decision be made public in order to restore calm to the population." The Commission also requested that the Government be required "to use all legal means necessary for compliance and to report to that Honorable Court as soon as possible on the steps taken and their results." 6. On November 28, 1994, a public hearing was held at the seat of the Court in San José, Costa Rica, to hear the arguments of the Commission and the Government of Guatemala in this matter.

3 There appeared before the Court: For the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: Leo Valladares-Lanza, Delegate Manuel Velasco-Clark, Attorney Milton Castillo, Attorney José Miguel Vivanco, Adviser Viviana Krsticevic, Adviser For the Government of Guatemala: Jorge Cabrera-Hurtarte, Agent Mario Marroquín-Nájera, Adviser Julio Gándara-Valenzuela, Adviser At the public hearing, the Government requested that the provisional measures adopted pursuant to the decision of June 22, 1994, be extended for whatever period the Court considers advisable, adding Mrs. Francisca Sales-Martín to the list of persons under its protection; it also requested that the beneficiaries of the provisional measures be urged to cooperate with the Government to enable the latter to put the security measures into effect as efficiently as possible and that the Commission's contention that the Court address the matter of the Voluntary Civil Defense Committees be rejected. At the public hearing, the Commission supported the Government's request to maintain the provisional measures adopted on June 22, 1994 and to expand them to include Mrs. Francisca Sales-Martín. The Commission also asked the Government to enforce the arrest warrants issued against the 13 patrol members charged as suspects in this case, which involves the criminal events that occurred on August 3, 1993 in Colotenango and is currently before the Second Trial Court of Huehuetenango. WHEREAS: 1. Guatemala ratified the American Convention on May 25, 1978, and accepted the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court on March 9, 1987, pursuant to Article 62 of the Convention; 2. Article 63(2) of the Convention provides that in cases of extreme gravity and urgency, and when necessary to avoid irreparable damage to persons, the Court may, at the request of the Commission, adopt such provisional measures as it deems pertinent in matters not yet submitted to its consideration; 3. Article 1(1) of the American Convention sets forth the obligation of the States Parties to respect the rights and liberties recognized in that treaty and to ensure their free and full exercise to all persons subject to their jurisdiction; 4. The Court issued a decision dated June 22, 1994, regarding the provisional measures requested of Guatemala by the Inter-American Com-mission in the Colotenango Case;

4 5. The measures on behalf of the persons listed in the Court's decision of June 22, 1994 must be not only extended, because the conditions that gave rise to them continue to prevail, but also expanded to include Mrs. Francisca Sales-Martín. The Commission and the Government were both in agreement on these points at the hearing. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, based on Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and exercising the authority conferred on it by Article 24 and 45 of the Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. To extend the provisional measures adopted pursuant to the decision of June 22, 1994 on the Colotenango Case for a term of six months from today, and to expand them to include Mrs. Francisca Sales-Martín. 2. To require the Government of Guatemala to use all the means at its disposal to enforce the arrest warrants issued against the 13 patrol members charged as suspects in the case before the Second Trial Court of Huehuetenango involving the criminal acts which took place on August 3, 1993, in Colotenango. 3. To request the Government of Guatemala to inform the Court every 90 days regarding the measures it has adopted to comply with this order. 4. To request the Commission to inform the Court of any fact or circumstance that it deems important to the implementation of such measures. 5. To instruct the Secretariat of the Court to transmit the information it receives from the Government of Guatemala to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in order that the latter may submit its observations to the Court within the following 30 days. Likewise, to transmit to the Government of Guatemala any reports it receives from the Commission in order to have the Government's observations within a similar period. 6. To request the Government and the Commission to urge the beneficiaries of the measures referred to in points 1 and 2 of the Court's decision of June 22, 1994, to cooperate with the Government in order to enable the latter to more efficiently adopt the relevant security measures. 7. Upon expiration of the extended deadline and unless the Court receives credible information that the circumstances of extreme gravity and urgency continue to prevail, the measures ordered by the Court shall cease to be in effect. Done in Spanish and English, the Spanish text being authentic, at the seat of the Court in San José, Costa Rica, this first day of December, 1994. Rafael Nieto-Navia President

5 Héctor Fix-Zamudio Alejandro Montiel-Argüello Máximo Pacheco-Gómez Hernán Salgado-Pesantes Manuel E. Ventura-Robles Secretary