" findings in regard to the following offenses against Tanji Jackson:

Similar documents
Case 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!

) NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

Fr:8 I "TAFJ. Case 2:02-cr DT Document 1541 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION

DONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, is convicted of one or both of the capital offenses relating

Case 5:06-cr TBR-JDM Document 202 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 29

Case 4:14-cr JPG Document 92 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #369 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:05-cr JFW Document 2724 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 5

Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C (a) and. that it believes that the circumstances of this case are such

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GOVERNMENT S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

v. Criminal No [ELECTRONICALLY FILED] JELANI SOLOMON

Do Capital Jurors Understand Mitigation? Why mitigation? 4/13/2011. Aggravation vs. Mitigation

Deadly Justice. A Statistical Portrait of the Death Penalty. Appendix B. Mitigating Circumstances State-By-State.

Terry Lenamon s Collection of Florida Death Penalty Laws February 23, 2010 by Terry Penalty s Death Penalty Blog

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Intended that deadly force would be used in the course of the felony.] (or)

ERRATA SHEET FOR ROBINSON, CRIMINAL LAW: CASE STUDIES & CONTROVERSIES, THIRD EDITION (as of March 25, 2013)

Murder of Eric Smith. Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 3593(a), the United States hereby gives notice that it believes that the

Case 9:06-cr DTKH Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:08-cr wks Document 106 Filed 08/25/2009 U.S. Page DISTRICT 1 of 7 coun: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Law School for Journalists

692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Federal Capital Offenses: An Abridged Overview of Substantive and Procedural Law

FEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEKA SENTENCE OF DEATH

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY LEACH, HAYWOOD, HUGHES AND BLAKE, MAY 8, 2017 AN ACT

Section 9 Causation 291

Death Penalty. Terry Lenamon on the. Terry Lenamon s List of State Death Penalty Mitigation Statutes (Full Text)

1 HB By Representative England. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 12/15/2016. Page 0

CHAPTER House Bill No. 7101

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. the United States of America, by and through the

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. ) No. 4:97CR1~1 ERW (rcm) ) ) ) ) )

- - x OF INTENT TO S~K THE DEATH PENALTY. The United States of America, pursuant to the requirements of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3593(a),

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio,

1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person

G.S. 15A Page 1

Written Materials for Supreme Court Review 8 th Amendment Instructor: Joel Oster

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Provides for the issuance of certain orders for protection. (BDR 3-839)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

As Amended by Senate Committee. SENATE BILL No By Committee on Judiciary 2-6

Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree

or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Provides for the issuance of orders of protection relating to high-risk behavior.

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 6, 2003) SECOND REPRINT A.B. 15. Referred to Committee on Judiciary

Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County

4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014

01 Dt:C I 3 PM 3: 3 I

Missouri Revised Statutes

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :

THE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

In the event you find (have found) the defendant guilty of (name offense), you must then consider and answer the following question:

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT SENATE BILL Chapter 68, Laws of th Legislature 2005 Regular Session SENTENCING REFORM ACT

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 822

I. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i.

For An Act To Be Entitled

Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C

TAB 12: Aggravating & Mitigating Circumstances

Arkansas Sentencing Commission

HOUSE BILL No December 14, 2005, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

CHAPTER 186. (Senate Bill 279) Criminal Law Death Penalty Repeal Evidence

SCMF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

MODEL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS COMMITTEE REPORTER S ONLINE UPDATE. Updated September 3, Introduction

SUBSTITUTE INFORMATION IN LIEU OF INDICTMENT

Age Limits for Juvenile Law. Maneuvering through the labyrinth of the juvenile justice system begins with a

cr. No ,-01,-02(TFH) -03

OVERVIEW OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF STATE COURT CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS. October 11, 2013

Sentencing hearing after conviction for impaired driving; determination of grossly aggravating and aggravating and mitigating factors;

ti:66 alrt I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C URT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT LUBBOCK DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

1 SB By Senators Ward, Fielding, Keahey, Bedford, Whatley, Marsh, 4 Waggoner and Sanford. 5 RFD: Judiciary. 6 First Read: 14-FEB-13

IMPACT OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR HUNTINGDON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON CRIME PREVENTION, CORRECTIONS & SAFETY ANALYSIS

(a) Except as provided in K.S.A Supp and , and amendments thereto, if a

CHAPTER 6 INCEST, CHILD ABUSE AND WRONGS TO CHILDREN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,270. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, BRENT L. ALFORD, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

18 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATURE OF ALASKA FROM THE ALASKA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Florida

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Newport News Division

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 81B 1

INTRODUCTION AND COURSE OF CONDUCT FINDINGS. The Jurors of the Grand Jury of the State of Ohio, duly selected, impaneled, sworn and charged to

Senate Amendment to Senate Bill No. 387 (BDR 3-839) Title: Yes Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship: No Digest: Yes

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No (D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV LH-CG and ALFONSO THOMPSON,

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT. Julie Ann Epps (MS Bar No. 504 East Peace Street Canton, MS (601) facsimile (601)

Supreme Court of Florida

OFFENSES BY PUNISHMENT RANGE

Kidnapping. Joseph & His Brothers - Charges

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and

MIAMI DIVISION. Case No Cr-Gold (s)(s)lbandstra NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY AS TO DEFENDANT IAN ORVILLE AIKEN

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) VS. DUSTIN JOHN HIGGS, Plaintiff, Defendant. ) ) ) ) Case No. PJM-98-0S20 ) SPECIAL VERDICT FORM FOR OFFENSES AGAINST TANJI JACKSON ) ) ) INTRODUCTION This special verdict form is to be used to record the jury's " findings in regard to the following offenses against Tanji Jackson: 1. The first degree premeditated murder of Tanji Jackson; 2. The first degree murder of Tanji Jackson which occurred during perpetration or attempted perpetration of a fe19ny (kidnapping); and death. 3. The kidnapping of Tanji Jackson which resulted in her This special verdict form contains seven sections to record your determinations: (I) AGE OF DEFENDANT; (I I) STATUTORY PROPORTIONALITY FACTORS; (III) STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS; (IV) NON- STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS; (V) MITIGATING FACTORS; (VI) DETERMINATION OF SENTENCE; and (VII) CERTIFICATION. You should advise the court when you have reached a unanimous decision as to the Determination of Sentence, completed the form in its entirety, and individually signed the certification.

SECTION I: AGE OF THE DEFENDANT Instructions: Answer "YES" or "NO" to the following and indicate your answer by placing an "X" in the space provided. This determination applies to all offenses. Age of the Defendant. We, the jury, unanimously find proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was eighteen (18) years of age or older at the time of the offenses. YES (as to all offenses)~ NO (as to a11 offenses) --- Instructions: (Signature of Foreperson) Date: 1?',a~6 If you answered "NO" regarding the age of the defendant,,then you are not to continue deliberations on the defendant's sentence for the offenses against Tanj i Jackson. You should stop your deliberations, cross out Sections II, III, IV, V, and VI, and proceed to Section VII of this form. If you answered "YES" regarding the age of the defendant, then you are to continue deliberations on the defendant's sentence for the offenses against Tanji Jackson. You should continue your deliberations in accordance with the court's instructions and proceed to Section II of this form. 2

SECTION II: STATUTORY PROPORTIONALITY FACTORS Instructions: Answer "YES" or "NO" to the following and indicate your answer by placing an "X" in the space provided. These determinations apply to all offenses. 1. Intentional Acts to Take Life or Use Lethal Force. We, the jury, unanimously find proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally participated in an act, contemplating that the life of a person would be taken or intending that lethal force would be used in connection with a person, other than one of the participants in the offense, and Tanji Jackson died as a direct result of the act. YES (as to all offenses)~ NO (as to all offenses) --- 2. Intentional Acts of Violence Creating a Grave Risk of Death. We, the jury, unanimously find proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally and specifically engaged in an act of violence, knowing that the act created a grave risk of death to a person, other than one of the participants in the 3

offense, such that participation in the act constituted a reckless disregard for human life and Tanji Jackson died as a direct result of the act. YES (as to all offenses)4 NO /q (as to all offenses) I I (Signature of Foreperson) Date: /o#~o. Instructions: If you answered "NO" regarding BOTH of the statutory proportionality factors, then you are not to continue deliberations on the defendant's sentence for the offenses against Tanji Jackson. You should stop your deliberations, cross out Sections III, IV, V, and VI, and proceed to Section VII of this form. If you answered "YES" regarding ONE OR BOTH of the statutory proportionality factors, then you are to continue deliberations on the defendant's sentence for the offenses against Tanji Jackson. You should continue your deliberations in accordance with the court's instructions and proceed to Section III of this form. 4

SECTION III: STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS Instructions: Answer "YES" or "NO" to the following and indicate your answer by placing an "X" in the space provided. These determinations apply to all offenses except as indicated. 1. Death during Commission of Another Crime. We, the jury, unanimously find proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the death or inj uries resulting in death occurred during the commission of, attempted commission of, or during the immediate flight from the commission of, an offense under i8 U.S.C. 1201 (a) (2) (kidnapping) This factor applies only to the two first degree murder offenses (premeditated murder and felony murder) and does not apply to the offense of kidnapping resulting in death. YES (as to both murder offenses) X NO (as to both murder offenses) --- 2. Previous Conviction of Violent Felony Involving Firear.m. We, the jury, unanimously find proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant has previously been convicted of a federal or state offense punishable by a term of imprisonment of more than one year, involving the use, attempted, or threatened use of a firearm (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 921) against another per.son. YES (as to all offenses)~ NO (as to all offenses) --- 5

3. Conviction for Serious Federal Drug Offense. We, the jury, unanimously find proyen beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had previously been convicted of a serious federal drug offense in violation of (Title II or Title III of) the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 801, et seq.) for which a sentence of five or more years imprisonment may be imposed. YES (as to all offenses)~ NO (as to all offenses) --- 4. Multiple Killings. We, the jury, unanimously find proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally killed more than one person in a single criminal episode. YES (as to all offenses)~ NO (as to all offenses) --- Instructions:. (Signature of Foreperson) Date, I* m If you answered "NO" regarding ALL FOUR of the statutory aggravating factors, then you are not to continue deliberations on the defendant's sentence for the offenses against Tanji Jackson. You should stop' your deliberations, cross out Sections IV, V, and VI, and proceed to Section VII of this form. If you answered "YES" to at least ONE of the statutory aggravating factors, applicable to each of the offenses, then you 6

are to continue deliberations on the defendant's sentence for the offenses against Tanji Jackson. You should continue your deliberations in accordance with the court's instructions and proceed to Section IV of this form. 7

SECTION IV: NON-STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS Instructions: Answer "YES" or "NO" to the following and indicate your answer by placing an "X" in the space provided. These determinations apply to all offenses. 1. Victim Impact Evidence. We, the jury, unanimously find proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant caused injury, harm, and loss to Tanj i Jackson and her family because of the effect of the offense on Tanji Jackson, her personal characteristics as an individual human being, and the impact of the death upon Tanji Jackson and her family. YES (as to all offenses)~ NO (as to all offenses) --- 2. Obstruction of Justice. We, the jury, unanimously find proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant obstructed the investigation of the kidnappings and murders of Tanj i Jackson, Mishann Chinn, and Tamika Black in that the defendant tampered or attempted to tamper with evidence and witnesses. YES (as to all offenses)~ NO (as to all offenses) --- fr~-- (Signature of Foreperson) Date, / - GAO Instructions: Regardless of whether you answered "YES" or "NO" regarding ANY or ALL of the non-statutory aggravating factors, you 8

are to continue deliberations on the defendant's sentence for the offenses against Tanji Jackson. You should continue your deliberations in accordance with the court's instructions and proceed to Section V of this form. 9

SECTION V: MITIGATING FACTORS Instructions: You are to record your findings of the number of jurors who find each factor proven by a preponderance of the evidence in the space provided. Extra spaces are provided to write in additional mitigating factors, if any, found by any juror(s). If no additional mitigating factors are found, write "NONE" above the first of the extra spaces and then cross out the extra spaces with a large "X". If more extra spaces are needed, write "CONTINUED" below the last of the extra spaces and then use the reverse side of that page. These determinations apply to any or all offenses. Thus, you may find a mitigating factor to exist, in regard to any offense(s), regardless of whether you find that mitigating factor to exist in regard to any or all other offense(s). 10

A. MITIGATING FACTORS ASSERTED BY THE DEFENDANT Instructions: Indicate in the space provided the number of jurors, if any, who find the following to exist. If no jurors so find, write "NONE" in the space provided. 1. Another defendant or defendants, equally culpable in the crime, will not be punished by death. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) ~A~ 2. Dustin Higgs was not the sole proximate cause of the deaths of Tamika Black, Mishann Chinn, and Tanj i Jackson. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) I~ 3. At the time of the offense Dustin Higgs' thinking and judgment were impaired by alcohol and marijuana. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) 2-4. Dustin Higgs' family history, including the loss of his mother at an early age and abandonment by his father, influenced the direction that his life has taken. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) 5. A sentence of death will have an adverse impact on Dustin Higgs' son. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) --- 11

6. There are other factors in Dustin Higgs' background, record, or character or other circumstances of the offense that mitigate against the imposition of the death sentence. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) ~nc= I (Signature '0ya of Foreperson) () Date, 12

B. EXTRA SPACES FOR ANY ADDITIONAL MITIGATING FACTORS Instructions: Indicate any additional mitigating factors found to exist and the number of jurors, if any, who so find, or if no jurors so find, write "NONE" in the space provided. 1. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) --- 2. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) --- 3. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) -.,--- 4. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) 5. Number of jurors who so find (as to any or all offenses) --- (Signature of Foreperson) Date:, Instructions: Regardless of whether anyone or more juror(s) find(s) anyone or more mitigating factors, you are to continue 13

deliberations on the defendant's sentence for the offenses against Tanji Jackson. You should continue your deliberations in accordance with the court's instructions and proceed to Section VI of this form. 14

SECTION VI: DETERMINATION OF SENTENCE Instructions: You are to consider, separately for each offense, whether all the aggravating factor or factors found to exist sufficiently outweigh all the mitigating factor or factors found to exist to justify a sentence of death, or, in the absence of a mitigating factor, whether the aggravating factor or factors alone are sufficient to justify a sentence of death. Based upon this consideration, you are to determine by unanimous vote, separately for each offense, whether the defendant should be sentenced to death or to life imprisonment without possibility of release. Sections A, B, and C, which follow, are provided for you to make and indicate your determinations separately for each offense. A. FIRST DEGREE PREMEDITATED MURDER OF TANJI JACKSON Instructions: Indicate your determination by placing an "X" in the appropriate space. We, the jury, by unanimous vote, have determined that the defendant should be sentenced to: >< DEATH for this offense. LIFE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF RELEASE Instructions: If you unanimously determined that the defendant should be sentenced to death for this offense, then all of you are to sign your names in the following space. If you 15

unanimously determined that the defendant should be sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of release for this offense, then the foreperson alone is to sign his or her name in the following space. If you should be unable to reach a unanimous decision as to the Determination of Sentence, you should advise the Court of this fact. //;<-------- FORE PERSON Date: /oli'ha I / Instructions: Proceed to the next offense. 16

B. FIRST DEGREE MURDER OF TANJI JACKSON WHICH OCCURRED DURING PERPETRATION OR ATTEMPTED PERPETRATION OF A FELONY (KIDNAPPING) Instructions: Indicate your determination by placing an "X" in the appropriate space. We, the jury, by unanimous vote, have determined that the defendant should be sentenced to: ----X- DEATH for this offense. LIFE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF RELEASE Instructions: If you unanimously determined that the defendant should be sentenced to death for this offense, then all of you are to sign your names in the following space. If you unanimously determined that the defendant should be sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of release for this offense, then the foreperson alone is to sign his or her name in- the following space. If you should be unable to reach a unanimous decision as to the Determination of Sentence, you should advise the Court of this fact. lsi Tj FORE PERSON Date: Instructions: Proceed to the next offense. 17 /t>/2-~ 7 /

C. KIDNAPPING OF TANJI JACKSON WHICH RESULTED IN HER DEATH Instructions: Indicate your determination by placing an "X" in the appropriate space. You are not to consider the aggravating factor "Death during Commission of Another Crime" in determining the punishment for this offense. We, the jury, by unanimous vote, have determined that the defendant should be sentenced to: >< DEATH for this offense. LIFE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF RELEASE Instructions: If you unanimously determined that the defendant should be sentenced to death for this offense, then all of you are to sign your names in the following space. If you unanimously determined that the defendant should be sentenced'to life imprisonment without possibility of release for this offense, then the foreperson alone is to sign his or her name in the following space. If you should be unable to reach a unanimous decision as to the Determination of Sentence, you should advise the Court of this fact. /5/ FOREPERSON A ~ Date: /t> Z ~ D 7 / 18

SECTION VII: CERTIFICATION By signing below, each juror certifies that consideration of the race, color, religious beliefs, national origin, or sex of the defendant or any victim was not involved in reaching his or her individual decision and that the individual juror would have made the same determination regarding a sentence for the crime in question no matter what the race, color, religious beliefs, origin, or sex of the defendant or any victim may be. FOREPERSON ~ Date: /() g,,100 7 7 19