AGENDA MEMORANDUM. Executive Summary

Similar documents
Town of Lyons, Colorado Board of Trustees BOT Agenda Cover Sheet Agenda Item No: VIII-1, 2 & 3 Meeting Date: May 15, 2017

AGENDA MEMORANDUM. Item #12. Meeting Date: September 16, 2014

Expedited Type 2 Annexations: Petitions By All Property Owners With or Without Consent of Municipality & Township(s)

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION

Intergovernmental Agreement. For Growth Management. City of Loveland, Colorado and Larimer County, Colorado

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Expedited Type 3 Annexations: Petitions By All Property Owners For Undertaking A Significant Economic Development Project

DOUGLAS COUNTY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION Article 7C Subdivision Plat Vacation 8/25/99

Municipal Annexation, Incorporation and Other Boundary Changes

Municipal Annexation, Incorporation and Other Boundary Changes

Expedited Type 1 Annexations: Petitions by All Property Owners With Consent of All Parties

PROCEDURES RE: VACATION OF PLATTED ALLEY OR STREET IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF ELKHART COUNTY, INDIANA (As of January 1, 1991)

Authority The BoCC is authorized to review and comment on annexations pursuant to C.R.S and

Washington County King City Urban Planning Area Agreement

ORDINANCE NO (2011)

Title 20 ANNEXATIONS. Chapters: ANNEXATIONS LOT BOUNDARIES. Page 1 of 14

BOUNDARY COMMISSION St. Louis County, Missouri RULES

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON,

AGENDA REQUEST AGENDA ITEM NO: IV.B.5. Consent Agenda No. 2. July 21, 2014 BY City Attorney Robert Fournier City Attorney Fournier SUBJECT:

NC General Statutes - Chapter 153A Article 16 1

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION

CHAPTER 442A SANITARY DISTRICTS

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES for REZONINGS and COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM

Kent Studebaker, Mayor Members of the City Council. Paul Espe, Associate Planner. Ordinance Annexing Property at 5022 Upper Drive (AN )

INSTRUCTIONS VACATION REQUEST

ACTION FORM BRYAN CITY COUNCIL

MUNICIPAL ANNEXATIONS

SOS ; Turner Trust, Consent to Vacate Portion of Interurban Street

ORDINANCE NO DRAFT

ZONING CHANGE APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

REGULATORY PROCEDURES SECTION 12 REGULATORY PROCEDURES

ORDINANCE NO

This form to be filed in triplicate. *Please schedule a pre-submittal meeting with the Planning Department prior to submitting your petition.

ROADS. Scioto County Engineer Darren C. LeBrun, PE, PS INFORMATION COMPILED FROM OHIO REVISED CODE CHAPTER 5553

PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

ORDINANCE F. WHEREAS, the petition bears the signature of all applicable parties; and

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2016

CHAPTER 7 ANNEXATION Chapter Outline

HOUSE BILL No AN ACT concerning city-county consolidation; authorizing the consolidation of the city of Wichita and Sedgwick county.

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF SHELBYVILLE ANNEXATION PACKET SHELBYVILLE PLAN COMMISSION 44 WEST WASHINGTON STREET SHELBYVILLE, INDIANA OFFICE

UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD P.O. BOX 2187 UPPER CHICHESTER, PA (610)

NC General Statutes - Chapter 160A Article 23 1

TITLE 14 ZONING AND LAND USE CONTROL

RESOLUTION NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

BEFORE THE MUNICIPAL BOARD OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Gerald J. Isaacs Robert W. Johnson Thomas J. Simmons Gerald Tiedeman Rosemary Ahmann

CITY OF HOOD RIVER PLANNING APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

1. General City Annexation and Detachment Policies and Standards.

CHAPTER House Bill No. 1603

-Section Contents Intent Standards for Approval

CITY OF NEW MEADOWS ORDINANCE NO

ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS AND PROCEDURES. -Section Contents-

A Citizen's Guide to Annexations by Cities

The following application has been scheduled for hearing by the Council on July 19, 2011:

ORDINANCE NO E AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO THE CITY OF FISHERS, HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO)

CITY OF GIG HARBOR RESOLUTION NO. 479

VACATIONS UNDER O.R.S. CHAPTER 368

ARTICLE X. AMENDMENT PROCEDURE*

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES LOCAL BILL STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

ZONING PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION

A. enacts and amends land use ordinances, temporary land use regulations, zoning districts and a zoning map;

Ordinance 2755 Annexing Property at and Boones Ferry Road (AN )

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

acknowledged by each person or entity having an interest in the territory proposed for

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

SOUTH OGDEN CITY ANNEXATION POLICY PLAN (2008) PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2015 AREAS 1and 3

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

VACATION APPLICATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION (If a corporation, list all principals) Name.

SPECIAL BILLBOARD PERMITS (Sec. 1268)

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. scale comprehensive plan amendments, exceeding the requirements in Florida Statutes 163.

VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PROCEDURES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 2E 1

CITY OF BILLINGS CITY OF BILLINGS MISSION STATEMENT: TO DELIVER COST EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SERVICES THAT ENHANCE OUR COMMUNITY'S QUALITY OF LIFE

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION THE VILLAGE BOARD AND VILLAGE CLERK OF THE VILLAGE OF WADSWORTH, LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

ARTICLE 18 AMENDMENTS

Pinellas County. Staff Report

2.1.1 Powers and Duties The Board of County Commissioners powers and duties under this Land Development Code are set out in this subsection.

CITY OF HYATTSVILLE ANNEXATION RESOLUTION

Article 1: General Administration

Jeremy Craig, Interim Assistant City Manager/Director of Finance & IT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM

FINDINGS, ORDER AND DECREE CREATING THE DEER CREEK WATER DISTRICT

LEAGUE ANNEXATION MANUAL UPDATE (Current as of 6/18/2013)

Right-of-Way Vacation Policy and Procedures Prepared by Kevin Cowper, Assistant City Manager May 13, 2008 Updated May 21, 2014

IC Chapter 2.3. Electricity Suppliers' Service Area Assignments

CHAPTER 5. REVISION HISTORY

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Article XI of the Charter requires the City Commission to place the charter review committee s proposals on the ballot; and

ARKANSAS ANNEXATION LAW DRAFT #4 (1/1/2013) Subchapter 1 General Provisions [Reserved]

ANNEXATION AGREEMENT

ANNEXATION 28E AGREEMENT

49TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2009

Treasurer's Report Mr. Bell presented the Fiscal Recap for March The report was approved.

CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CHARTER

CITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCEDURES MANUAL

ST. CLOUD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING May 26, 2016 City Hall Council Chambers 1300 Ninth Street 6:30 PM Agenda

RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATIONS Applications are available at:

ARTICLE 26 AMENDMENT PROCEDURES

Transcription:

AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: From: Title: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council Kathy Marx, Senior Planner, Development Services Resolution No. 2016- : A Resolution of the Castle Rock Town Council Making Required Statutory Findings Concerning the Eligibility of Certain Property for Annexation (Alexander Place Annexation) Executive Summary Staff is seeking Town Council approval finding the proposed 8.36 acre Alexander Place Annexation is in compliance with the required State statutory findings concerning the eligibility for annexation into the Town of Castle Rock. Council found the Annexation petition to be in Substantial Compliance with State requirements for annexation on July 19, 2016, and now Staff recommends that the Town Council approval a resolution making statutory findings that the property is eligible for annexation (Attachment B). The Eligibility Hearing is procedural; this hearing only determines whether the proposed annexation meets State requirements and makes findings on whether or not an election is required. The Eligibility criteria are: The proposed annexation complies with Section 30, Article II of the Colorado Constitution, and as applicable 31-12- 104 and 105, Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.), More than 50% of the landowners in the area to be annexed, owning more than 50% of the area to be annexed have petitioned for annexation, Adjacent Uses Page 1

A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town, the area to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future, and the area to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the Town, At least 1/6 of the perimeter of the property to be annexed is contiguous with the Town boundary; No additional terms and conditions are to be imposed; and No election is required because 100% of the private property owners signed the annexation petition. Only after the request is found to be eligible can the Town hold a hearing to determine whether the property should be annexed. The legal description of the property in question is attached (Attachment B, Exhibit A). Staff finds that the proposed annexation meets State of Colorado requirements and recommends approval. Notification and Outreach Efforts The Town has published notice of the Eligibility Hearing in the Douglas County News- Press for four consecutive weeks prior to the hearing date. The Town also provided notice to all tax entities within the proposed annexation, as well as to the Douglas County Commissioners and the Douglas County Attorney s Office. History of Past Town Council, Boards & Commissions, or Other Discussions On July 19, 2016, Town Council found that the application was in substantial compliance with the State of Colorado requirements for annexation requests and scheduled the Eligibility Hearing for September 6, 2016. Discussion The Property The proposed 8.36 acre annexation is located east of the Alexander Place and Allen Street intersection. It is currently the site for one single-family residence. The Alexander Place property is designated an area of growth and annexation by the Douglas County / Town of Castle Rock Intergovernmental Development Agreement. Substantial Compliance and Eligibility The applicant s petition for annexation was filed with the Town Clerk on May 17, 2016. On July 19, 2016, Town Council approved Resolution 2016-069 finding the annexation petition to be in substantial compliance with relevant State Statutes regarding annexation and setting the Eligibility Hearing for September 6, 2016. There are three steps required in the annexation process. The first two steps, Substantial Compliance and Eligibility, are procedural; the Town can only determine whether or not an annexation request meets State requirements, as set forth in the Colorado Revised Page 2

Statutes regarding annexations. The third step is when the Town determines whether a request complies with the Town s Vision, Comprehensive Master Plan, and Municipal Code through advertised public hearings at Planning Commission and Town Council. Those hearings will be scheduled for future meetings. Analysis The Resolution presented does not commit the Town to annexing the property, but only declares that the land is eligible to be annexed. Town Council is required to set forth its findings of fact, and its conclusion thereon, based on the requirements found in Section 31-12-110 C.R.S.: 1. Whether or not the requirements of the applicable parts of 31-12-104 and 31-12- 105 C.R.S. have been met; 2. Whether or not an election is required under 31-12-107(2) C.R.S; 3. Whether or not additional terms and conditions are to be imposed. Staff recommends that Town Council accept and make the findings that the following conditions are true: 1. The requirements of 31-12-104 and 31-12-105 C.R.S. exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one sixth (1/6) of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the existing boundaries of the Town of Castle Rock, Colorado (Attachments A & B Exhibit A). This requirement is met in that 76% of the boundary of the proposed annexation is contiguous with the existing boundaries of the Town of Castle Rock. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Castle Rock, Colorado. The Town of Castle Rock and Douglas County Land Use Intergovernmental Agreement designates this area for future growth and annexation. c. The proposed area to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future, and the area to be annexed is integrated with, or is capable of being integrated with, the Town of Castle Rock, Colorado. The Town of Castle Rock s Comprehensive Master Plan identifies this property for future residential neighborhood. Page 3

Neighborhoods may include complementary uses and provide facilities and a land use pattern that would allow residents to walk or bicycle to obtain goods and services. d. In establishing the boundaries of the territory to be annexed, no land held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner(s) thereof, unless such tracts or parcels are separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. The petitioners own 100 percent of the privately held land proposed to be annexed. The petitioners did not provide any evidence that their land has been divided into separate tracts or parcels without their consent. e. In establishing the boundaries of the area to be annexed, no land held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate, or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, comprising 20 acres or more (together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has a valuation for assessment in excess of $200,000.00 for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation) is included in the proposed area and is included without the written consent of the land owners. All private landowners have consented to the annexation. f. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for the annexation of part or all of the property to another municipality. This is a true statement. g. The territory proposed to be annexed by the Town of Castle Rock has not been the subject of an election for annexation to the Town within the preceding twelve (12) months. No annexation election has been held in the preceding twelve (12) months. h. The territory proposed to be annexed is not presently a part of any incorporated city, city and county, or town. The territory proposed for annexation is currently in unincorporated Douglas County. i. The area proposed for annexation will not result in the detachment of area from any school district or the attachment of the same to another school district. Page 4

This is a true statement; the proposed annexation area will remain under the Douglas County School District. j. The area proposed for annexation will not have the effect of extending the municipal boundary of the Town of Castle Rock, Colorado more than three miles in any direction from any point of such municipal boundary within one year. This annexation will not extend the boundary of the Town of Castle Rock more than three miles. k. In establishing the boundaries of the area for annexation, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of said street or alley has been included in the area to be annexed. The annexation area does not include any partial streets or alleys. 2. No election is required. The Town of Castle Rock did not receive a petition from qualified electors requesting an annexation election so no election is required. 3. Additional terms or conditions will not be imposed. No additional terms or conditions will be unilaterally imposed on the area proposed for annexation. Budget Impact The finding of eligibility does not have any financial impact. Financial impacts will be addressed through the annexation hearing process, the third and final step in the annexation process. Staff Recommendation Based on the findings above, the proposed annexation area is eligible per State Statute and staff recommends that Town Council approve the Resolution finding the property eligible for annexation. Proposed Motion I move to approve the Resolution No. 2016 - as introduced by title. Attachments Attachment A: Vicinity Map Attachment B: Resolution Exhibit A: Legal Description Page 5

Attachment C: Annexation Plat T:\Development Review\Alexander Place Annexation\Substantial Compliance - Eligibility\Alexander Place Eligibility\Amended Page 6