COMPLIANCE AND CONTROL AUDIT REPORT

Similar documents
PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT

PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT 100-Hour Audit

PERFORMANCE AUDIT R,EPORT Executive Summary

LIMITED-SCOPE PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT

O L A STATE OF MINNESOTA

OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR

O L A. Office of the Secretary of State January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2006 OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF MINNESOTA

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK 12236

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK June 6, 2014

Peace Officer Standards and Training Board July 1, 1997, through June 30, 2000

LA14-20 STATE OF NEVADA. Performance Audit. Judicial Branch of Government Supreme Court of Nevada. Legislative Auditor Carson City, Nevada

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT ON APPLYING AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES

COMPLIANCE AND CONTROL AUDIT REPORT

Judicial Expense Fund for the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans

August 16, 2007 FS 07-06

Office of the Register of Wills Carroll County, Maryland

O L A. Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board July 1, 1997, through June 30, 2002 OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF MINNESOTA

INDIANTOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA April 8, 2019

Minnesota Racing Commission Four Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 1999

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Internal Controls and Compliance Audit. July 2012 through March 2015

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Laboratories Administration

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA

Office of the Attorney General

Standard Operating Procedures Manual

VFD Audit November Building 1, Room W Kanawha Boulevard, East Charleston, WV Phone: (304) Fax: (304)

Office of Inspector General Florida Independent Living Council (FILC)

UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA SYSTEM STATE OF LOUISIANA

O L A Professional/Technical Contract Expenditures

ACADIA PARISH POLICE JURY

LOUISIANA BOARD OF DRUG AND DEVICE DISTRIBUTORS (FORMERLY LOUISIANA BOARD OF WHOLESALE DRUG DISTRIBUTORS) STATE OF LOUISIANA

NJ Chapter ASHRAE MOP Fourth Revision Approved at 11/7/2002 BOG Meeting

GRASSROOTS SCIENCE PROGRAM

O L A. Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF MINNESOTA. Fiscal Years 2005, 2006, and 2007

THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS OFFICE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INSPECTOR GENERAL LETTER AUDIT REPORT

GREENE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

WASHINGTON COUNTY Job Description. JOB TITLE: Victim Restitution Coordinator/Intern Coordinator

DEPARTMENT OF CULTURE, RECREATION AND TOURISM STATE OF LOUISIANA

Office of the Register of Wills Frederick County, Maryland

Office of the Governor. Internal Controls and Compliance Audit. January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2010

<SHOW LIST OF FRAUDULENT CHECKS>

DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES STATE OF LOUISIANA

GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA NON-MINISTRY. PATI Information Statement

UTPB STEM Academy Legal Policy Framework

State of Tennessee SPECIAL INVESTIGATION CHUCKEY UTILITY DISTRICT CROSS ANCHOR UTILITY DISTRICT JULY 1, 2011, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

Office of the Register of Wills Montgomery County, Maryland

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA ANSON COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT

Internal Controls and Compliance Audit. July 2013 through March 2015

PROPOSED REVISION TO GOVERNING REGULATIONS: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

The Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges

CHAMPION S RESERVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING, AUDIT COMMITTEE & PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 7, 2018

MERCER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Alabama Chapter of the American Planning Association

TABLE OF CONTENTS. ARTICLE I Introduction Background Authority Mission Commissioners.. 1. ARTICLE II Officers

III. For which Fiscal Year (FY) is this recommendation being made: Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Date

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Summer Special Milk Program Program Agreement

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

ROUTINE ACCESS POLICY. For the Nova Scotia Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal. October 2003 (Revised April 2005)

Definition of Officers Definition of Committees Executive Committee Financial Checklist

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA

THE BROOKWOOD PARK SOCIAL CLUB CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS REVISED APRIL 2016

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA WARREN COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA

Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court Carroll County, Maryland

Office of the Public Defender

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER - NEW ORLEANS LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM STATE OF LOUISIANA

ISACA Orange County Chapter Bylaws Updated on July 21 st, 2014

Plano Senior High School Cross Country - Track Booster Club

BYLAWS OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 7450, INC. As amended November 9, 2012 A Pennsylvania Not-for-profit Corporation

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BY-LAWS

State of Minnesota Department of Finance

GAO. FINANCIAL AUDIT U.S. Commission on Improving the Effectiveness of the United Nations

Audit of the Legislative Assembly s

d. Pinellas County, Florida Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2010.

Constitution Of the M I N N E S O T A C R I C K E T A S S O C I A T I O N

Maryland Department of Planning

LA14-24 STATE OF NEVADA. Performance Audit. Department of Public Safety Office of Director Legislative Auditor Carson City, Nevada

Department of State Protection of Citizens Rights Programs

Call for 2018 Board Nominations Michigan Reading Association

CHAMPION S RESERVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING, LANDOWNERS ELECTION & REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 27,

REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2004 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Office of the State Auditor

DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA STANLY COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT

Office of the Register of Wills Anne Arundel County, Maryland

Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court Anne Arundel County, Maryland

FIRST VISION FINANCIAL, INC North Jackson Street Tullahoma, Tennessee 37388

GOVERNOR S OFFICE OF ELDERLY AFFAIRS EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT STATE OF LOUISIANA

BY-LAWS. of the LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY. As amended October 24, 2018

External Audit Report. The University of Texas at Austin s Center for Transportation Research TxDOT Compliance Division

Administrative Guidelines for the Establishment and Operation of University of California Foreign Affiliate Organizations

O L A. Professional/Technical Services Contracts OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF MINNESOTA. Financial Audit Division Report

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

University System of Maryland University of Maryland, College Park

NORTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY STATE OF LOUISIANA

Department of the Treasury Office of the Public Defender

Short title. (1969) Statute text Sections through NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Audit Act."

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA ADMINISTRATIVE RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROYAL BANK OF CANADA

Transcription:

COMPLIANCE AND CONTROL AUDIT REPORT Juvenile Correctional Facilities A Report to the Legislative Post Audit Committee By the State of Kansas 05-B

Legislative Post Audit Committee The Legislative Post Audit Committee and its audit agency, the, are the audit arm of Kansas government. The programs and activities of State government now cost about $11 billion a year. As legislators and administrators try increasingly to allocate tax dollars effectively and make government work more efficiently, they need information to evaluate the work of government agencies. The audit work performed by Legislative Post Audit helps provide that information. We conduct our audit work in accordance with applicable government auditing standards set forth by the U. S. GovernmentAccountability Office. These standards pertain to the auditor's professional qualifications, the quality of the audit work, and the characteristics of professional and meaningful reports. These audit standards have been endorsed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and adopted by the Legislative Post Audit Committee. The Legislative Post Audit Committee is a bipartisan committee comprising five senators and five representatives. Of the Senate members, three are appointed by the President of the Senate and two areappointed by the Senate Minority Leader. Of the representatives, three are appointed by the Speaker of the House and two are appointed by the House Minority Leader. As part of its audit responsibilities, the Division is charged with meeting the requirements of the Legislative Post Audit Act which address audits of financial matters. Those requirements call for two major types of audit work. First, the Act requires an annual audit of the State's financial statements. Those statements, prepared by the Department of Administration's Division of Accounts and Reports, are audited by a certified public accounting firm under contract with the. The firm is selected by the Contract Audit Committee, which comprises three members of the Legislative Post Audit Committee (including the Chairman and Vice-Chairman), the Secretary of Administration, and the Legislative Post Auditor. This audit work also meets the State's audit responsibilities under the federal Single Audit Act. Second, the Act provides for a regular audit presence in every State agency by requiring that audit work be conducted at each agency at least once every three years. Audit work done in addition to the annual financial statement audit focuses on compliance with legal and procedural requirements and on the adequacy of the audited agency's internal control procedures. These compliance and control audits are conducted by the Division's staff under the direction of the Legislative Post Audit Committee. LEGISLATIVE POST AUDIT COMMITTEE Representative John Edmonds, Chair Representative Tom Burroughs Representative Peggy Mast Representative Bill McCreary. Representative Tom Sawyer Senator Les Donovan, Vice-Chair Senator Anthony Hensley Senator Nick Jordan Senator Derek Schmidt Senator Chris Steineger LEGISLATIVE DIVISION OF POST AUDIT 800 SW Jackson Suite 1200 Topeka, Kansas 66612-2212 Telephone (785) 296-3792 FAX (785) 296-4482 E-mail : LPA@Ipa.state.ks.us Website: http://kslegislature.org/postaudit Barbara J. Hinton, Legislative Post Auditor The supports full access to the services of State government for all citizens. Upon request, Legislative Post Audit can provide its audit reports in large print, audio, or other appropriate alternative format to accommodate persons with visual impairments. Persons with hearing or speech disabilities may reach us through the Kansas Relay Center at 1-800-766-3777. Our office hours are 8:00a.m. to 5:00p.m., Monday through Friday.

LEGISLA TURE OF KANSAS LEGISLATIVE DIVISION OF PosT A unit 800 SOUTHWEST JACKSON STREET, SUITE 1200 T OPEKA, KANSAS 666 12-221 2 T ELEPHONE (785) 296-3792 FAx (785) 296-4482 E-MAIL: lpa@lpa.statc.ks.us July 15, 2005 To: Members, Legislative Post Audit Committee Representative John Edmonds, Chair Representative Tom Burroughs Representative Peggy Mast Representative Bill McCreary Representative Tom Sawyer Senator Les Donovan, Vice-Chair Senator Anthony Hensley Senator Nick Jordan Senator Derek Schmidt Senator Chris Steineger This report contains the findings, conclusions, and recommendations from our completed compliance and control audit of the State's juvenile correctional facilities. We would be happy to discuss this report with any legislative committees, individuallegislators, or other State officials. Legislative Post Auditor

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LEGISLATIVE DIVISION OF POST AUDIT Question 1: Have the Juvenile Correctional Facilities Handled Their Locally Administered Moneys Appropriately? The juvenile correctional facilities generally had adequate procedures............. page 2 to ensure appropriate handling of locally administered moneys, but financial reporting by some facilities didn 't fully meet applicable requirements. The audit looked at canteen, trust, benefit, work-therapy, and employee-use funds. While procedures generally were appropriate, financial reporting for canteen funds at 3 of the facilities wasn 't always as required by the Division of Accounts and Reports. The Larned Juvenile Correctional Facility ended up using work-thera-...... page 4 py fund moneys for an unallowed purpose. Work-therapy fund moneys are to be used for operating vocational training programs. During fiscal year 2004, the Facility paid about $8,500 for physician's liability insurance with those moneys. Those moneys were used as an "emergency" source of funds to be repaid later from an appropriate source, but the repayment was disallowed. Appendix A: Agency Response.............. page 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Legislative Division of Posl Audit

ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Legislative-Division of Post Audit

Juvenile Correctional Facilities The has conducted compliance and control audit work at the State's juvenile correctional facilities, located at Topeka, Larned, Atchison, and Beloit. Compliance and control audits can identify noncompliance with applicable requirements and poor financial-management practices. The resulting audit findings often identify needed improvements that can help minimize the risk of potential future loss or misuse of State resources. At the direction of the Legislative Post Audit Committee, this audit focused on the facilities' handling of their locally-administered funds. The audit addresses the following specific question: 1. Have the juvenile correctional facilities handled their locally administered moneys appropriately? To answer this question, we reviewed applicable statutes and requirements of the Division of Accounts and Reports, and identified standard financial-management practices. We also interviewed appropriate facility staff members, and reviewed a sample of fund records, reports, and related documents. In conducting this audit, we followed all applicable government auditing standards. COMPLIANCE AND CONTROLA UDJT REPORT 1

Answer in Brief: Question 1: Have the Juvenile Correctional Facilities Handled Their Locally Administered Moneys Appropriately? The procedures used by the States juvenile correctional facilities to handle their locally administered moneys generally were well-designed and operating effectively during the period we reviewed, with one exception. Financial reporting for the canteen funds wasn 't always done as required by the Division of Accounts and Reports. In testing a sample of transactions, we found fund moneys were used for allowable purposes with one exception. One facility ended up making an inappropriate payment from its work therapy fund. These findings are discussed in more detail in the sections that follow. The Juvenile Correctional Facilities Generally Had Adequate Procedures To Ensure Appropriate Handling of Locally Administered Moneys, But Financial Reporting by Some Facilities Didn't Fully Meet Applicable Requirements The juvenile correctional facilities, located at Topeka, Larned, Atchison, and Beloit, are responsible for several different kinds of locally administered funds. A brief description of those funds follows: Canteen Fund- A canteen at each facility sells items such as snacks and personal-care products to residents. The Canteen Fund is used to deposit revenues and pay for inventory and any operating costs. A portion of a canteen's profits may be transferred to a facility's Benefit Fund. Trust Fund - Residents may receive moneys from relatives or work-study earnings. These moneys are deposited into the facility's Trust Fund, and may be used for such things as canteen purchases and restitution payments. Benefit Fund- The Benefit Fund pays the cost of activities or purchases for the residents' entertainment or welfare. A major source of moneys is commissions from pay phones used by the residents. Another source would be transfers of canteen profits. Work-Therapy Fund- The facilities may operate a sheltered workshop or similar activity where residents of the facility work. The Work-Therapy Fund receives revenues from the workshop and pays for the related expenses. Employee-Use Fund- Proceeds from employee fund-raising activities may be deposited into an Employee-Use Fund. Those moneys may be used for activities or purchases that benefit the employees of the facility. 2 During fiscal years 2004, the State's juvenile correctional facilities maintained canteen, benefit, and trust funds. The Larned facility also maintained work-therapy and employee-use funds. Expenditures from each of the facilities' funds for that fiscal year are shown in Figure 1-1. COMPLIANCE AND CONTROL A UDJT REPORT

Figure 1-1 Expenditures from Locally Administered Funds Juvenile Correctional Facilities Fiscal Year 2004 Type of Fund Canteen Fund Benefit Fund Trust Fund Work Therapy Fund Employee Use Fund Topeka Larned Atchison Facility Facility Facility $ 34,966 $ 15,463 $ 5,653 133,898 8,743 2,889 136,981 27,780 5,590 N/A 24,096 N/A N/A 490 N/A Beloit Facility $ 5,843 20,319 18,251 N/A N/A The facilities' are responsible for developing and implementing procedures to ensure that their locally administered moneys are handled appropriately. Such procedures would include the following: accounting for each fund separately designating a fund custodian minimizing cash transactions and keeping moneys in a bank account requiring authorizations and approvals for payments reconciling bank accounts monthly preparing financial reports at least annually To determine the procedures used by each facility, we interviewed appropriate facility officials, reviewed written procedures, examined financial reports, and tested a sample of transactions. We then compared those actual procedures to the applicable best practices and required procedures. In general, the facilities had appropriate and required practices in place. One exception is discussed below. Financial reporting for canteen funds at three of the facilities wasn't always as required by the Division of Accounts andreports. The Division's Policy and Procedures Manual calls for canteen fund financial statements to be presented on the basis ofgenerally accepted accounting principles, which involves a balance sheet and income statement prepared as a business would. The Topeka and Atchison facilities presented those statements, but hadn't accurately reported certain items, such as sales taxes payable and the related sales tax expense. The amounts of the mis-statements weren't large enough to make the statements misleading-on average less than $500. The Larned facility presented only a statement of changes in cash balance, with no balance sheet or income statement. COMPLIANCE AND CONTROLA UDIT REPORT Ju~y 2005 3

The impact of not adhering to generally accepted accounting principles for canteen fund financial statements isn't clear. Nevertheless, adherence is a requirement of the Division of Accounts and Reports. Applicable business office staff either weren't aware of the reporting requirements or weren't sure how to meet them. Those positions generally don't require the education or experience necessary for full understanding of that kind of financial reporting. In addition, the Policy and Procedures Manual doesn't provide the detailed level of guidance needed to allow preparation of the financial statements called for. Recommendation To ensure that the facilities meet applicable financial 'reporting requirements, the facilities' business office staff should work with the Division of Accounts and Reports to either: a. get appropriate guidance for facility staff so that they know how to prepare financial statements on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles, or b. if reporting on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles isn't necessary for the facilities' canteen funds, the Division of Accounts and Reports could exempt the facilities from that requirement or change the requirements of the Policy and Procedures Manual altogether. The Larned Juvenile Correctional Facility Ended Up Using Work-Therapy Fund Moneys for an Unallowed Purpose According to State law, work-therapy fund moneys are for operating a sheltered workshop or other similar vocational-training activity. During fiscal year 2004, the facility used its work therapy fund to pay for physician's liability insurance. The amount of the annual premium was about $8,500. The payment should have been made from the facility's General Fund appropriation, and normally it would have been. Facility officials told us that, because of an extended employee illness in the business office, the insurance premium notice was overlooked until only a few days before its due date. Because the Facility couldn't process the payment quickly enough using normal procedures (processing a warrant through Topeka), it paid the premium out of its Work-Therapy Fund (writing a check on a local bank account). The Facility planned to reimburse the Work-Therapy Fund from its General Fund appropriation. However, when it attempted to do that, the payment was disallowed because the Facility hadn't gotten com- 4 COMPLIA NCE AND CONTROL AUDIT REPORT

petitive bids for the insurance coverage. The Facility appealed that decision, but the appeal was denied. Since that time, the Facility has attempted to informally repay the Work-Therapy Fund by using its General Fund appropriation moneys to purchase items that normally would be purchased from the Work-Therapy Fund. Because it hasn't kept track of those purchases, it's not clear whether the repayment has been made. Because the inappropriate payment from the Work-Therapy Fund was made during a period when a key staff person was ill and not as part of routine processing, it seems to us that no changes in procedures are needed. The Juvenile Correctional Facilities Have Adequately Addressed Findings and Recommendations ofthe Previous Audit The previous audit of the juvenile correctional facilities found that the Topeka and Beloit facilities didn't transfer moneys from their canteen funds to their benefit funds as required by the appropriation acts. For fiscal year 2004, the appropriation acts didn't direct any such transfers. The previous audit also found that the Beloit facility didn't have complete written procedures for handling its locally-administered funds. The cunent audit found that the Beloit facility had a complete set of written procedures that covered each of its funds. COMPLIANCE AND CONTROLAUDIT REPORT Legislative Division of Posl Audit 5

APPENDIX A Agency Response On May 27, 2005, we provided a copy of the draft audit report to the juvenile correctional facilities and the Juvenile Justice Authority, the oversight agency for the facilities. The Authority prepared a joint response, which is included as this Appendix. 6 COMPLIANCE AND CONTROL A UDIT REPORT

JUVENILE JUSTICE AUTHORITY DON JORDAN, ACTING COMMISSIONER June 9, 2005 Ms. Barbara J. Hinton Legislative Post Auditor 800 SW Jackson Street, Suite 1200 Topeka, Kansas 66612-2212 Dear Ms. Hinton: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, GOVERNOR 10) IE «: IE ~ W IE~~ ~~~ JUN 1 3 2005 l~) l LEGISLATIVE lciy<siorl L---- - --- ---- - - ---~ I I itt PO~T ' 1JDIT 1 ~- - -- - ~-- - --:-- - - - ~.. -.. - - - Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the draft copy of your compliance and control audit report addressing the handling oflocally administered funds at the Juvenile Justice Authority's Correctional Facilities. We concur with the findings of the report and would like to provide the following response regarding the findings and recommendations contained in the audit report: Financial reporting for canteen funds at three of the facilities wasn't always as required by the Division of Accounts and Reports. Response: The facilities will take appropriate steps to ensure that canteen funds will be reported in accordance with the Division of Accounts and Reports' Policy and Procedure Manual. Specific to the findings of this report, this will include the generation of an Income Statement and Balance Sheet, and the accurate reporting of items in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Thank you again for this opportunity to respond. If you have any questions or concerns do not hesitate to contact Dennis Casarona, Deputy Commissioner at 785-296-4213. Sincerely, cqjlr- --- Don Jordan Acting Commissioner cc: Dennis Casarona, Deputy Commissioner Michael Dempsey, TJCF/KJCC Superintendent Delbert Montgomery, BJCF Superintendent Robert Rivenburg, LJCF Superintendent Amy Smith, AJCF Superintendent JAYHAWK WALK, 714 SW JACKSON ST, STE 300, TOPEKA, KANSAS 66603 VOICE: 78 5-296-4213 FAX: 785-296-1412 HTTP :1/JJA.STATE.KS. US COMPL!ANCE AND CONTROLA UDJT REPORT 7