Monterey Edition League of California Cities Eugene P. Gordon 2015 City Attorneys Office of the City Attorney Spring Conference San Diego, California

Similar documents
Officer-Involved-Shootings: Preparing for the Plaintiff s Big Bang Theory

People v. Ross, No st District, October 17, 2000

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

NO. COA14-94 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 September Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 2 August 2013 by

SEVENTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS FRISK OF DRINKING SUSPECT IN HIGH CRIME AREA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Galanda Broadman, PLLC, Occasional Paper

STATE V. GUTIERREZ, 2004-NMCA-081, 136 N.M. 18, 94 P.3d 18 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEMETRIO DANIEL GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit Civil Rights Year in Review. Oregon Chapter of the Federal Bar Association Section 1983 CLE October 15, 2015

STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF D.F. NO CA-0547 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

No. 102,741 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, RICHARD A. BARRIGER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

Mendez and 1983 WILLIAM W. KRUEGER III BENJAMIN J. GIBBS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

STATE OF OHIO, BELMONT COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

APPEALS OF POLICE DISCIPLINE IN CALIFORNIA. Stephanie Campos-Bui, Clinical Supervising Attorney Jacob Goldenberg, Clinical Law Student

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN Record No June 9, 2005

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

United States Supreme Court Term: Cases Affecting Criminal Law and Procedure

Commonwealth Of Kentucky. Court of Appeals

In The Supreme Court of The United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. CRIMINAL No MCA ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

STATE OF OHIO ) CASE NO: CR A ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs. ) ) RAFAEL LABOY ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendant.

No In The Supreme Court of the United States EFRAIN TAYLOR, On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON

Traffic Stop Scenario Jeff Welty October 2016

Analysis of Arizona s Border Security Law. July 6, Summary

EXCESSIVE AND DEADLY POLICE FORCE

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 2:05-cv DDP-RZ Document 132 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:337

Court of Appeals of Ohio

STATE OF OHIO SCOTT WHITE

Supreme Court of the United States

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

WALKER v. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH: CAUSE TO BE WARY OF JUDICIAL SANCTION OF AGGRESSIVE POLICE TACTICS DURING TEMPORARY DETENTIONS

In the Supreme Court of the United States

MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OF LAW. COMES NOW, Defendant, TJB, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

August 24, 2015 PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 11/9/2009 :

) SS: ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ) CAUSE NO. 71D FD MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

m e M o r a n d u M O F L A W

CODE OFFICIAL LIABILITY

No IN THE FIRST JUICIAL DISTRICT. Defendant-Appellant. ) Judge Presiding.

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY. vs. Case No. 12 CF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

MOTION TO SUPPRESS. 1. Approximately 78 grams of marijuana seized from the co-defendants vehicle on

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed July 22, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Odell G.

MICHAEL EUGENE JONES OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR. April 15, 2010 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc. v. ) No. SC APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY Honorable Jack A.L.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner/Appellant, CASE NO. vs. DCA CASE NO. 4D PETITIONER S BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION

2017 Case Law Update

15.4 Did the Officer Act within the Scope of the Seizure?

Follow this and additional works at:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Warrantless Searches. Objectives. Two Types of Warrantless Searches. Review the legal rules Discuss emerging issues Evaluate fact patterns

United States Court of Appeals

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

4. RELEVANCE. A. The Relevance Rule

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County: RAMONA A. GONZALEZ, Judge. Affirmed.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No A IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS Plaintiff-Appellee. vs. MICHAEL D. PLUMMER Defendant-Appellant

In the Supreme Court of the United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * The defendant, George H. Beamon, Jr., was convicted of possession of cocaine

No. 103,472 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, BILLY WHITE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

The Eyes of Texas are upon a Subsurface Trespass Case

Foreign Nationals: What Law Enforcement Needs to Know

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 4:13-CV MPM-JMV

i J ;o COURT JOZ I1 F F FREJ 0 C 98ADEPUTY RO1CECGO SJK. cm SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010

Supreme Court of the United States

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 3:13-cv RBL Document 31 Filed 09/17/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ORDER

TOP 3 FOR OCTOBER 2004

**************************************** I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.

Quick Run thru of the book

Public Sector Employment Law Update League of California Cities 2014 City Attorneys Spring Conference

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

No. 42,089-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * * * * * * *

California Witness Relocation & Assistance Program

v. COURT USE ONLY Defendant: ***** Case Number: **** Attorneys for Defendant:

Case 1:14-cr Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 04/10/15 Page 1 of 8

Supreme Court of the United States

GENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Chapter 10 WHERE THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE DOES NOT APPLY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

Investigative detention.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Granted October 30, 1992 COUNSEL

F I L E D August 19, 2013

United States Court of Appeals

AELE Home Page --- Publications Menu --- Seminar Information. ISSN Cite as: 2017 (7) AELE Mo. L. J. 101

Reversed and Rendered; and Opinion Filed January 16, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.

US SUPREME COURT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT LAW REGARDING ENTRY ONTO PROPERTY IS NOT CLEARLY ESTABLISHED FOR PURPOSES OF DENYING AN OFFICER QUALIFIED IMMUNITY

Transcription:

Monterey Edition League of California Cities 2015 City Attorneys Spring Conference Eugene P. Gordon Office of the City Attorney San Diego, California

1. Application of doctrine of comparative fault to first responders 2. Stop of a vehicle based on mistaken understanding of state law 3. During an investigation, must officers first go to front door of a house before proceeding to other entrances? 4. Immunity, if any, of SWAT officers and public entities for discretionary decisions 5. Investigatory Terry v. Ohio stops vs. arrests 6. May a plaintiff s counsel be liable for defense costs in frivolous actions brought against public entities? 7. Evaluation of police shooting cases under section 1983 8. Elements of California s Bane Act 9. Scope of doctrine of absolute witness immunity under section 1983 10. Application, if any, of ADA to arrests

233 Cal. App. 4th 606 (2015) May first responders to the scene of an accident (such as police officers, paramedics and EMTs) reduce their liability for negligence by asserting that it was the accident victim s own fault for requiring aid in the first place?

Heien v. North Carolina 135 S. Ct. 530 (2014) Can a traffic stop based on a police officer s mistaken but reasonable belief that State law was violated ever support the reasonable suspicion necessary to stop a vehicle under the Fourth Amendment?

Carroll v. Carman 135 S. Ct. 348 (2014) A. Is the Fourth Amendment violated when police officers enter private property to conduct a knock and talk with the occupants at an entrance open to visitors but without having gone to the front door first? Officer Brian Roberts

Carroll v. Carman 135 S. Ct. 348 (2014) B. Were officers entitled to qualified immunity when they conducted a knock and talk at an entrance to a house that was open to visitors rather than going to the front door?

Conway v. County of Tuolumne 231 Cal. App. 4th 1005 (2014) Did a SWAT team s actions in an attempt to make an arrest constitute discretionary decisions that would immunize the County from liability under State law?

United States v. Edwards 761 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2014) Does the pointing of a weapon at a suspect, handcuffing him, ordering him to lie on the ground, or placing him in a police car automatically convert a valid investigatory stop into an arrest?

Suarez v. City of Corona 765 F.3d 1076 (9th Cir. 2014) Does a determination by the Court that an action brought against a city was frivolous authorize an award of defense costs against plaintiff and plaintiff s counsel under Code of Civil Procedure 1038?

Cruz v. City of Anaheim 765 F.3d 1076 (9th Cir. 2014) Were police officers entitled to summary judgment when they shot and killed a suspect where, according to the court, it was unclear whether the suspect reached for the waistband of his pants?

Allen v. City of Sacramento 234 Cal. App. 4th 41 (2015) Does a wrongful arrest or detention, without more, satisfy the elements of the Bane Act (Civil Code 52.1) that an interference with Constitutional rights be by threat, intimidation or coercion?

Lisker v. City of Los Angeles No. 13-55374, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Cir. (March 20, 2015) Does the doctrine of absolute witness immunity which shields police officers from liability for their testimony extend to their pre-trial actions?

Sheehan v. City and County of San Francisco 743 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2014)

The End