PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

Similar documents
PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE. General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE. General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction 1. How to Use This Guide 2. Determining Which Theory was Used 5. The Petition 7. The Petition Assertions 8

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE. General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE. General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

FIRST DISTRICT APPELLATE PROJECT

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

ESSAY APPROACH. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY

1 SB By Senators Ward, Fielding, Keahey, Bedford, Whatley, Marsh, 4 Waggoner and Sanford. 5 RFD: Judiciary. 6 First Read: 14-FEB-13

The court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

CALIFORNIA YOUTH OFFENDER PAROLE HEARINGS SB 260

Using Proposition 47 to Reduce Convictions and Restore Rights (Updated March 2016)

All Those Propositions. Copyright 2018 First District Appellate Project. All rights reserved

SENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE

5. If I m in jail and my case is reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor, will I get out of jail?

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

Proposition 57: Overview of the New Transfer Hearing Process

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY LEACH, HAYWOOD, HUGHES AND BLAKE, MAY 8, 2017 AN ACT

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) V. ) Case No. ) ) GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY

A GUIDEBOOK TO ALABAMA S DEATH PENALTY APPEALS PROCESS

SEALING YOUR JUVENILE RECORDS

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

Possibility Of Parole For A Conviction Of Conspiracy To Commit First Degree Murder]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Criminal Records and Expungement. Rhode Island Public Defender

Information Memorandum 98-11*

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

SENATE BILL No Introduced by Senators Lara and Mitchell. February 16, 2018

CALIFORNIA HOMICIDE LAW IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM

I. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i.

DETERMINATE SENTENCING

SUPCR 1104 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM. (Vehicle Code 23152)

Test Bank for Criminal Evidence 8th Edition by Hails

SUPCR 1106 FOR COURT USE ONLY

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

JURISDICTION WAIVER RECENT SENTENCING AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES

Victim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant.

Jackson County Prosecutor s Office Conviction Review Unit

IS MY CLIENT ELIGIBLE TO VACATE AN ADULT CRIMINAL CONVICTION?

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and

Law Library for San Bernardino County (909)

DOWNLOAD PDF STEVENS ON INDICTABLE OFFENCES AND SUMMARY CONVICTIONS

CHAPTER 14. Criminal Law and Juvenile Law

California holds a special distinction in regards to the practice of capital punishment.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY

1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person

Practice Test. Law & the Courts -1-

214 Part III Homicide and Related Issues

Unintended Impacts of AB 109, Proposition 47 & 57

Judicial Branch. Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court?

Chapter 4. Criminal Law and Procedure

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

GUIDE FOR DETAINED IMMIGRANTS

692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

STUDY GUIDE Three Branches Test

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION

80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1007 SUMMARY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :

Judicial Branch 11/11 11/14

Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County

PEOPLE V. HOWARD: ALERT. Reckless Evasion of Police Offense Under Vehicle Code Section Invalidated as a Basis for Second Degree Felony Murder

LA14-25 STATE OF NEVADA. Performance Audit. Fiscal Costs of the Death Penalty Legislative Auditor Carson City, Nevada

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 6, 2003) SECOND REPRINT A.B. 15. Referred to Committee on Judiciary

Sample argument that Estrada retroactivity applies to SB 180

Sealing Your Juvenile Records

Chapter 4-1 Criminal Law

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7035

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A

Stages of a Case Glossary

The Intersection of Immigration Law with CA State Law

Bench or Court Trial: A trial that takes place in front of a judge with no jury present.

Petition for Relief Packet

THE SERVICE OF SENTENCES AND CREDIT APPLICABLE TO OFFENDERS IN CUSTODY OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

The Sources of and Limits on Criminal Law 1

NEW AVENUES FOR REDUCING TIS CONFINEMENT TIME

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee * On Appeal from the Third District Court of Appeals, v. * Shelby County

BUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes

FAQ: Court Jurisdiction and Process

Determining Eligibility for Expungements & Penal Code 17(B) Reductions. Expungements and Prop 47 Clinic Training Training Module 1

Transcription:

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA 94964 Telephone (510) 280-2621 Fax (510) 280-2704 www.prisonlaw.com Your Responsibility When Using the Information Provided Below: When putting this material together, we did our best to give you useful and accurate information because we know that prisoners often have trouble getting legal information and we cannot give specific advice to all prisoners who ask for it. The laws change often and can be looked at in different ways. We do not always have the resources to make changes to this material every time the law changes. If you use this pamphlet, it is your responsibility to make sure that the law has not changed and still applies to your situation. Most of the materials you need should be available in your facility s law library. Director: Donald Specter Managing Attorney: Sara Norman Staff Attorneys: Rana Anabtawi Steven Fama Alison Hardy Sophie Hart Corene Kendrick Rita Lomio Margot Mendelson Thomas Nosewicz Shira Tevah Camille Woods New Laws on Felony Murder and Natural and Probable Consequences Murder (Senate Bill 1437) (updated ) We send this information in response to your request for information concerning the recent changes to California s laws regarding certain types of murder convictions. Unfortunately, we cannot provide individual responses to everyone who contacts us. We hope this letter will help answer your questions. The California Legislature passed a bill (SB 1437) that changes some of the laws for when a person can be convicted of murder. The Governor signed the bill, and it will take effect on January 1, 2019. The new law applies to current and future cases in the trial courts, and it may apply to cases that are still on appeal. The law also provides a way for people who already have convictions to petition a court to have their murder convictions overturned based on the new law. There are still many unknowns about how SB 1437 will be put into effect. I. What Parts of the Murder Laws did SB 1437 Change? California murder laws are complex. There are several legal rules by which a person can be convicted of murder even if they do not personally kill anyone and/or even if they do not intend to kill anyone. SB 1437 changes the law by limiting the legal bases for convicting someone of the crime of murder. Note that even under the new law, some people who do not personally kill and/or who do not intend to kill can still be found guilty of murder. Board of Directors Penelope Cooper, President Michele WalkinHawk, Vice President Marshall Krause, Treasurer Christiane Hipps Margaret Johns Cesar Lagleva Laura Magnani Michael Marcum Ruth Morgan Seth Morris

Prison Law Office Page 2 II. How Can I Know if My Murder Conviction Is Affected by the Change in the Law? The short answer is that it s complicated. Some of the details about the murder laws and the changes made by SB 1437 are discussed in Section VI below. You should try to contact a lawyer who knows your case or is a specialist in criminal law, like your trial or plea attorney, your appeal attorney, or the public defender s office in the county where you were convicted. III. What Should I Do if I Have a Murder Conviction That is Still on Appeal (or Was Recently Decided on Appeal)? Under a rule established in a case called In re Estrada (1965) 63 Cal.2d 740, new laws that reduce punishment usually apply automatically to anyone whose criminal case is not yet final when the law takes effect. A criminal case is not final if a direct appeal is still pending in the court of appeal, a petition for review can still be filed or is pending in the California Supreme Court, or the 90-day timeline for filing a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court has not expired. The In re Estrada rule might not apply to SB 1437, because SB 1437 provides a way for people who have already been convicted of murder to petition to have their convictions vacated. Courts might decide that a person who is already serving a murder sentence must use this petition procedure, even if their case is not yet final. (People v. Martinez (Jan. 24, 2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 719 [people whose cases are not yet final must raise SB 1437 issues in a petition, not on appeal; note that this decision is not yet final as of mid- and may be reheard or reviewed]; see also People v. Conley (2016) 63 Cal.4th 646 ]new three-strikes laws under Prop. 36 did not automatically apply to cases that were still on appeal because Prop. 36 created procedure for people already serving sentences to petition for relief)].) If you have a murder conviction and your case is not yet final, you should contact the attorney who handled or is handling your sentencing and/or your direct appeal for advice and assistance. IV. What Should I Do if I Have a Murder Conviction That is No Longer on Appeal? If your murder conviction is already final (see Section III, above), the best thing to do in the immediate future is to contact the public defender s office in the county where you were convicted, your trial attorney, and/or your appeal attorney to see whether they can give you specific advice about how SB 1437 might affect your case. Depending on the situation, one of those attorneys may be able to help you file a petition about your conviction with a court, as permitted under the new law (see Section V, below). If one of your prior attorneys cannot help you, Re:store Justice, the non-profit organization that helped write SB 1437, has a very detailed information manual about the new law (in both English and Spanish) and a free petition form that people can file to start the process of having their cases considered under SB 1437. Re:store Justice also plans to hold trainings for people in CDCR about SB 1437. The petition form and information guides are available on the Re:store Justice website at www.restorecal.org/sb1437/. You can also contact Re:Store Justice at Re:store Justice, P.O. Box 22096 Oakland, CA 94623 or Re:store Justice, 777 S Alameda Street, 2nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90021

Prison Law Office Page 3 V. What is the Process for Petitioning to Have My Sentence Vacated? Starting January 1, 2019, some people can file a petition asking to have their murder convictions vacated. The process is described in a new statute, Penal Code 1170.95. The law does not set a deadline for filing a petition. You can petition to vacate your murder conviction if (1) the charge against you allowed the district attorney could argue a felony murder or a natural and probable consequences theory of guilt, (2) you were convicted (by either a trial or a plea) of first-degree or second-degree murder, and (3) could not be convicted of murder if you were prosecuted now because of the changes made by SB 1437. See Section VI, below, for an overview of the concepts of felony murder, and natural and probable consequences, and the changes to the law made by SB 1437. As discussed above in Section IV, it is recommended that you contact the public defender s officer in the county where you were convicted, your trial attorney, and/or your appeal attorney to try to get advice or help in filing a petition. If your prior attorney cannot help you, Re:Store Justice may be able provide you with a petition form, information guide and/or training on SB 1437. If you do end up needing to file a petition yourself, you should file the petition in the court that sentenced you and serve copies on the district attorney and the public defender or other attorney who represented you in the sentencing court. The petition should include the court case number and year of the conviction, a declaration stating that you meet the three criteria (see above), and a statement of whether you are requesting appointment of counsel. If the court believes you have made a basic showing of eligibility, the case should go forward and the court should appoint you a lawyer if you requested one. The district attorney will have an opportunity to file a response and your attorney will have an opportunity to file a reply. The court will then decide whether to hold a hearing. The burden will be on the district attorney to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you are not eligible for relief under SB 1437. Both sides may rely on the record of conviction and/or offer new and additional evidence at the hearing. If the prosecutor does not meet their burden of proof, the court should vacate your murder conviction and any attached enhancements (or reduce the murder to the underlying felony that was the basis for the felony murder charge), and you should be resentenced on any remaining counts. The new total sentence cannot be longer than the original total sentence. Note that the law does not allow a court to deny a petition based on a finding of dangerousness (unlike Proposition 36 and Proposition 47 resentencing petitions). If you are resentenced, you should get credit for time served. The judge may require you to serve up to three years parole upon completion of your sentence. VI. Details about the New Murder Law To understand the changes to the law, it s helpful to know the basics about the two legal rules that are affected by SB 1437 -- felony murder and natural and probable consequences :

Prison Law Office Page 4 To be convicted of either first-degree or second-degree murder, a person must act with a mental state (sometimes called by the Latin term mens rea) of malice. Malice can be express, meaning the person actually intended to kill. Malice can also be implied when no considerable provocation appears, or when the circumstances attending the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart. Felony murder is a legal rule by which a person can be convicted of murder if they commit or attempt to commit dangerous felonies and someone is killed in the commission of the crime without the prosecutor having to prove that they actually acted with malice. Instead, for felony murder the law presumes ( imputes ) malice because the person committed some other felony and in the course of that felony someone was killed. Felony murder is first-degree if the underlying felony was arson, rape, carjacking, robbery, burglary, mayhem, kidnapping, train wrecking, or any act punishable under Section 206 [torture], 286, 288, 288a, or 289 [various sex offenses]. Felony murder is second-degree if the underlying felony is some other crime that is inherently dangerous to human life. People can be convicted of murder if they are the actual killer. People can also be convicted of murder if they know that another person intends to commit murder and they aid and abet the killer. The natural and probable consequences rule takes this further by allowing a person to be convicted of second-degree murder if they intended to aid and abet some other type of crime that could reasonably and foreseeably result in someone being killed, and the person they aided and abetted actually did kill someone. SB 1437 limits convictions based on felony murder and natural and probable consequences. A person who does not actually kill now cannot be presumed to have acted with malice just because they participated in a crime. (Penal Code 188(a).) It appears SB 1437 has made the following three changes to the law (note that there may be legal disputes about how SB 1437 is interpreted): First, a person may be convicted of first-degree felony murder only if the prosecutor proves that one of the following is true: the person was the actual killer; OR the person (who was not the actual killer) with the intent to kill, aided, abetted, counseled, induced, solicited, requested, or assisted the actual killer in the commission of murder; OR the person (who was not the actual killer) was a major participant in the underlying felony and acted with reckless indifference to life; OR the victim was a peace officer engaged in the performance of their duties. (Penal Code 189.) Second, a person cannot be convicted of murder as an aider and abettor under a natural and probable consequences theory (unless the prosecutor proves one of the requirements listed in the preceding paragraph). Also, the crime that is aided and abetted must be a felony; it cannot be a misdemeanor.

Prison Law Office Page 5 Third, criminal justice advocates believe there is a good argument that SB 1437entirely eliminates the crime of second degree felony murder, for both actual killers and aider/abettors. If you went to trial, the legal theories that the district attorney used in your case will have been part of the instructions that were given to the jury. However, if you do not have access to the jury instructions, you might not know or remember what theory the district attorney used. Also, sometimes jurors are instructed on more than one theory of murder, and they aren t necessarily required to state which theory they relied on when they reached their verdict. Furthermore, issues like whether you were a major participant might never have been presented to the jury. Similarly, if you entered a plea bargain, the legal theory behind the murder charge might not have been made clear. The bottom line is that, if you think you might possibly benefit from SB 1437, you should take action to get your case reviewed by a lawyer and/or considered by a court.