3E-RJ- MODEL Record and Assessment Tool on RJ: RECORD QUESTIONNAIRE - B.3 RJ at Court level separately for Juveniles

Similar documents
2. The table in the Annex outlines the declarations received by the General Secretariat of the Council and their status to date.

30/ Human rights in the administration of justice, including juvenile justice

European judicial systems

Consultation on Remedies in Public Procurement

Practice sheet on RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

Table C: Early release from determinate sentences of imprisonment in Europe 1

14328/16 MP/SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

Prisoner transfer in the EU with the aim of enhancing social rehabilitation prospects.

Equality between women and men in the EU

Alaska Criminal Rule 11(i) Restorative Justice Programs.

Working Group on Bribery: 2014 Data on Enforcement of the Anti-Bribery Convention

Restorative Justice: An International Perspective

Identification of the respondent: Fields marked with * are mandatory.

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN AUGUST 2015

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN MAY 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN AUGUST 2016

2015 Data on Enforcement of the Anti-Bribery Convention

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN MARCH 2016

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN SEPTEMBER 2015

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN DECEMBER 2016

AGENDA. Topic. 3. Continued discussion of developing a pretrial risk assessment tool and monitoring unit

Continuity of learning for newly arrived refugee children in Europe

Economic and Social Council

Material detention conditions, execution of custodial sentences and prisoner transfer in the EU

European Union Passport

Factual summary Online public consultation on "Modernising and Simplifying the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)"

Did you know? The European Union in 2013

European patent filings

Sentencing and the Correctional System. Chapter 11

INVESTING IN AN OPEN AND SECURE EUROPE Two Funds for the period

LMG Women in Business Law Awards - Europe - Firm Categories

In partnership with. Sponsored by. Project publisher. With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union

EUROPEAN LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN CONSTITUTION

A/C.3/60/L.53. General Assembly. United Nations. Situation of human rights in Myanmar * * Distr.: Limited 2 November 2005.

Draft Recommendation CM/Rec (2018) XX of the Committee of Ministers to member States concerning restorative justice in criminal matters

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Tables "State of play" and "Declarations" Accompanying the document

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION FOR THE COORDINATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS. Main conclusions of the 347 th meeting of the Administrative Commission

NEGOTIATIONS ON ACCESSION BY BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

THE RECAST EWC DIRECTIVE

EFSI s contribution to the public consultation Equality between women and men in the EU

III. (Preparatory acts) COUNCIL

The diversity of Agricultural Advisory Services in Europe

13955/16 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

8193/11 GL/mkl 1 DG C I

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN THE VICTIMS DIRECTIVE

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN FACTS & FIGURES

The Penalty of Life Imprisonment in the Light of European Penitentiary Statistics

3.1. Importance of rural areas

Work-life balance, gender inequality and health outcomes

1. Why do third-country audit entities have to register with authorities in Member States?

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION

Limited THE EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter referred to as the "Union" THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC,

General Assembly. United Nations A/C.3/62/L.41. Situation of human rights in Myanmar. Distr.: Limited 2 November 2007.

INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

Italy Luxembourg Morocco Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania

ANNEX III FINANCIAL and CONTRACTUAL RULES

EUROPEAN UNION. What does it mean to be a Citizen of the European Union? EU European Union citizenship. Population. Total area. Official languages

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 9 APRIL 2018, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

Final Scientific Report of the project

General Assembly. United Nations A/C.3/62/L.41/Rev.1. Situation of human rights in Myanmar. Distr.: Limited 15 November 2007.

OECD Strategic Education Governance A perspective for Scotland. Claire Shewbridge 25 October 2017 Edinburgh

Europe in Figures - Eurostat Yearbook 2008 The diversity of the EU through statistics

THE CHILD JUSTICE BILL FROM A RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE

Pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

Improving the measurement of the regional and urban dimension of well-being

The High Cost of Low Educational Performance. Eric A. Hanushek Ludger Woessmann

établi par le Bureau Permanent * * *

Supplementary Rules 1

THE PROMOTION OF CROSS-BORDER MOBILITY OF CIVIL SERVANTS BETWEEN EU MEMBER STATES PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. 2nd HRWG MEETING. BRUSSELS, 23th April 2008

Valencia, Spain 15 to 17 February 2017

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

GALLERY 5: TURNING TABLES INTO GRAPHS

ARTICLE 95 INSPECTION

Fertility rate and employment rate: how do they interact to each other?

IPEX STATISTICAL REPORT 2014

Ouagadougou Declaration and Plan of Action on Accelerating Prisons. and Penal Reforms in Africa

Romania's position in the online database of the European Commission on gender balance in decision-making positions in public administration

The Markets for Website Authentication Certificates & Qualified Certificates

Collective Bargaining in Europe

EMA Residency 2006/07 Supporting Information

European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB79.5) ONE YEAR TO GO TO THE 2014 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS Economic and social part DETAILED ANALYSIS

Enrolment Policy. PART 1 British/Domestic Students

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

> Please tick the applicable situation

5859/3/15 REV 3 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

Foreigners in European prisons

Ad Hoc Query on refusal of exit at border crossing points and on duration of stay. Requested by SI EMN NCP on 5 th August 2011

EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR THE EFFICIENCY OF JUSTICE (CEPEJ) PILOT-SCHEME FOR EVALUATING JUDICIAL SYSTEMS

Homeless, Destitute and Stranded Persons

INTERNATIONAL CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE OF NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ICC)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Agenda Item 9 CX/EURO 02/9

A Skyrocketing Prison Population

CONSUMER PROTECTION IN EU ONLINE GAMBLING REGULATION

Organisation of Provision. Cor J.W. Meijer, Director. European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education

Access to Foreign Law in Civil and Commercial Matters

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2013: A Further Decline

INFORMATION LEAFLET - Cross-border placement of children Placement of children abroad by German courts and authorities general advice

Transcription:

Specific Programme Criminal Justice European Commission Directorate-General Justice Directorate B: Criminal Justice INSTITUTE OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION SOFIA - BULGARIA 3E-RJ- MODEL Record and Assessment Tool on RJ: RECORD QUESTIONNAIRE - B.3 RJ at Court level separately for Juveniles 3E RJ-MODEL The 3E Model for a Restorative Justice Strategy in Europe Greece, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, Poland, Spain (including research also in Turkey, the Netherlands, Denmark, Germany) JUST/2010/JPEN/AG/1534 November 2011

Country concerned: User s name: General and Procedural Characteristics of RJ at COURT LEVEL separately for (B.3) Concerning the reference country and according to your professional experience (please colorize the answer of your preference): Record_Question. B.3: At court level: (either pre-trial stage or pre-sentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial Question 1 1. a. Are there RJ measures and procedures that are expressis verbis provided in legislation? i. YES, WIDELY YES, MODERATELY i YES, LIMITED iv. NO, NOT PROVIDED 1. b. Are there RJ programmes and practices that are implemented without being provided expressis verbis in legislation, either by using opportunities of legislation and legal system or the discretion of competent JJ authorities and officials? i. YES WIDELY YES, MODERATELY If answering is i, ii or iii, please, mention briefly some of the most important examples. If answering is iv, go on by ignoring the sub-questions which the second part of their indicative number is the same as in the sub-question concerned. ( a or b )/ You may also add any Comment ( ( i YES LIMITED iv. NO, NOT IMPLEMENTED 2

Record_Question. B.3: Question 2 If answering is ii or iii, please, mention briefly some of the most important examples/you may also add any Comment At court level: (either pre-trial stage or pre-sentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial 2. a. RJ measures and procedures that are expressis verbis provided in legislation: i. are general, concerning all categories of crimes. are special, concerning only specific categories of crimes. i are both general and special (some measures are provided generally for any category of crime and others are provided only for specific categories of crimes). ( you may refer to an annex that could be added at the end by pointing out ) 2. b. RJ programmes and practices that are usually implemented without being provided in legislation: i. are general, concerning all categories of crimes. are special concerning only specific categories of crimes. iii are both general and special (some practices are implemented generally to any category of crime and others are implemented only to specific categories of crimes). ( you may refer to an annex that could be added at the end by pointing out 3

Record_Question. B.3: Question 3 If answering is ii or iii, please, mention briefly some of the most important examples/you may also add any Comment At court level: (either pre-trial stage or pre-sentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial 3. a. RJ measures and procedures that are expressis verbis provided in legislation: i. are general, concerning all groups of juvenile offenders. are special, concerning only specific groups of juvenile offenders. i are both general and special (some measures are provided for any group of juvenile offenders and others are provided only for specific groups). you may refer to an annex that could be added at the end by pointing out 3. b. RJ programmes and practices that are usually implemented without being provided in legislation: i. are general, concerning all group of juvenile offenders. are special, concerning only specific group of juvenile offenders. i are both general and special (some practices are implemented generally to all groups of juvenile offenders and others are implemented only to specific groups). you may refer to an annex that could be added at the end by pointing out 4

Record_Question. B.3: Question 4 If answering is ii or iii, please, mention briefly some of the most important examples/ You may also add any Comment At court level: (either pre-trial stage or pre-sentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial 4. a. RJ measures and procedures that are expressis verbis provided in legislation: i. are general, concerning all groups of victims. are special, concerning only specific group of victims. i are both general and special (some measures are provided for any group of victim and others are provided only for specific groups). you may refer to an annex that could be added at the end by pointing out 4. b. RJ programmes and practices that are usually implemented without being provided in legislation: i. are general, concerning all groups of victims. are special, concerning only specific group of victims. i are both general and special (some practices are implemented generally to all group of victims and others are implemented only to specific groups). you may refer to an annex that could be added at the end by pointing out 5

Record_Question. B.3: At court level: (either pre-trial stage or presentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial Question 5 5. a. RJ procedures that are provided in legislation are used rather: i. AS ALTERNATIVES (e.g. by suspension of sentencing) EITHER AS ALTERNATIVES OR AS COMPLEMENTS i AS COMPLEMENTS to the traditional JJ procedures of this level. 5. b. RJ programmes and practices which are implemented without being provided are usually: i. ALTERNATIVES (e.g. by suspension of sentencing) EITHER ALTERNATIVES OR COMPLEMENTS You may also add any Comment i COMPLEMENTS to the traditional JJ procedures of this level. 6

Record_Question. B.3: At court level: (either pre-trial stage or presentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial Question 6 6. a. The referral to RJ process is expressis verbis provided as: i. COMPULSORY FOR THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES (according to provided legal criteria) COMPULSORY IN SOME CASES AND PART OF THEIR DISCRETION IN SOME OTHERS i PART OF THEIR DISCRETION (according to provided general standards) 6. b. The referral to RJ procedss is usually implemented (in programmes and practices that are not provided in legislation) as: i. COMPULSORY FOR THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES (according to provided legal criteria) COMPULSORY IN SOME CASES AND PART OF THEIR DISCRETION IN SOME OTHERS According to your answer, please give namely the legal criteria or the general standards for referral to RJ procedures/you may also add any Comment i PART OF THEIR DISCRETION (according to general standards) 7

Record_Question. B.3: Question 7 Question 8 (You may choose more than one question) At court level: (either pre-trial stage or presentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial 7. a. The competent authority for the referral to the RJ process is: i. THE PROSECUTION AUTHORITY THE COURT i A SPECIALIZED JJ AUTHORITY/SERVICE (namely) : iv. OTHER (please also specify the legal nature of it, if it is a public, municipal or private agency etc):.according to expressis verbis provisions. 7. b. The competent authority for the referral to the RJ process is usually: i. THE PROSECUTION AUTHORITY i : THE COURT A SPECIALIZED JJ AUTHORITY/SERVICE (namely) iv. OTHER (please also specify the legal nature of it, if it is a public, municipal or private agency etc): when it is implemented (in programmes and practices that are not expressis verbis provided in legislation). 8. a. The referral to RJ process can be derived by an initiative of: i. THE PROSECUTOR i iv. A JJ OFFICIAL(namely): THE VICTIM THE OFFENDER v. THE PARENTS OF THE JUVENILE vi. THE LEGAL COUNSEL/DEFENCE LAWYER v OTHER: vi NOT PROVIDED expressis verbis provisions. according to 8. b. The referral to RJ process can be derived by an initiative of: i. THE PROSECUTOR i iv. A JJ OFFICIAL(namely): THE VICTIM THE OFFENDER v. THE PARENTS OF THE JUVENILE vi. THE LEGAL COUNSEL/DEFENCE LAWYER v OTHER: when it is implemented. vi NOT IMPLEMENTED 8

Record_Questio n. B.3: At court level: (either pre-trial stage or presentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a non-custodial Question 9 (you may choose more than one answer) 9. a. After the referral, the actual process of RJ - provided is delivered and managed by: i. A SPECIALIZED JJ AUTHORITY/SERVICE (namely): A SPECIALIZED SOCIAL PUBLIC AGENCY: i A NGO or A SOCIAL PRIVATE AGENCY iv. A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN (e.g. i+ii or ii+iii or iii+iv or i+ii+iii ): v. OTHER: 9. b. After the referral, the actual process of RJ schemes implemented is usually delivered and managed by: i. A SPECIALIZED JJ AUTHORITY/SERVICE (namely): A SPECIALIZED SOCIAL PUBLIC AGENCY: i A NGO or A SOCIAL PRIVATE AGENCY iv. A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN (e.g. i+ii or ii+iii or iii+iv or i+ii+iii ): v. OTHER: Question 10 (You may choose more than one question) 10. a. The involvement of: i. A JJ OFFICIAL(namely): LEGAL COUNSELS/LAWYERS i THE PARENTS OF THE JUVENILE iv. TRAINED MEDIATORS/FACILITATORS v. SOCIAL WORKERS vi. THE VICTIM v THE COMMUNITY (local authorities, neighbours etc): vi OTHER (e.g. teachers, professors, colleagues etc):...is expressis verbis provided at the actual process. 10. b. The involvement of: i. A JJ OFFICIAL(namely): LEGAL COUNSELS/LAWYERS i THE PARENTS OF THE JUVENILE iv. TRAINED MEDIATORS/FACILITATORS v. SOCIAL WORKERS vi. THE VICTIM v THE COMMUNITY (local authorities, neighbours etc): vi OTHER (e.g. teachers, professors, colleagues etc): is usually implemented at the actual process. 9

Record_Question. B.3: Question 11 Question 12 At court level: (either pre-trial stage or pre-sentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial 11. a. RJ procedures are supervised by: i. THE PROSECUTION AUTHORITY THE COURT i A SPECIALIZED JJ AUTHORITY/SERVICE (namely) : iv. OTHER (please also specify the legal nature of it, if it is e,g, a public, municipal or private agency):.according to expressis verbis provisions. vi. SUPERVISION NOT PROVIDED 11. b. RJ programmes are supervised by: i. THE PROSECUTION AUTHORITY THE COURT i A SPECIALIZED JJ AUTHORITY/SERVICE (namely) : iv. OTHER (please also specify the legal nature of it, if it is e,g, a public, municipal or private agency): when implemented. vi. SUPERVISION NOT IMPLEMENTED 12. a..the evaluation of implementation of the procedure and the follow-up of each case is made by: i. THE PROSECUTION AUTHORITY THE COURT i A SPECIALIZED JJ AUTHORITY/SERVICE (namely) : iv. OTHER (please also specify the legal nature of it, if it is e,g, a public, municipal or private agency):.according to expressis verbis provisions. v. EVALUATION NOT PROVIDED 12. b. the evaluation of implementation of the programme and the follow-up of each case is made by: i. THE PROSECUTION AUTHORITY THE COURT i A SPECIALIZED JJ AUTHORITY/SERVICE (namely) : iv. OTHER (please also specify the legal nature of it, if it is e,g, a public, municipal or private agency): when implemented. vi. EVALUATION NOT IMPLEMENTED 10

Record_Question. B.3: Question 13 (you may choose more than one answer) 13. a. RJ measures and procedures that are provided may include the following forms: i. VICTIM OFFENDER MEDIATION or CONCILIATION COMMUNITY BOARDS/CONFERENCING i FAMILY GROUP CONFERENCING iv. PEACE CIRCLES or HEALING/SENTENCING CIRCLES v. REPARATIVE PROBATION vi. ALL THE ABOVE TYPES At court level: (either pre-trial stage or presentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial v OTHER: vi NOT PROVIDED 13.b. RJ programmes and schemes that are implemented usually include the following forms: i. VICTIM OFFENDER MEDIATION or CONCILIATION COMMUNITY BOARDS/CONFERENCING i FAMILY GROUP CONFERENCING iv. PEACE CIRCLES or HEALING/SENTENCING CIRCLES v. REPARATIVE PROBATION vi. ALL THE ABOVE TYPES v OTHER: 11

Record_Question. B.3: Question 14 (you may choose more than one answer) 14. a. RJ measures and procedures that are provided at this level could include as part or as a result/outcome of the actual process: i. A DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE VICTIM AND THE OFFENDER A WRITTEN APOLOGY i AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEM iv. COMMUNITY PUNISHMENT v. A. COMPENSATION vi. MAKING COMMITMENTS v THE COMPLETION OF AN EDUCATION OR OTHER PROGRAMME At court level: (either pre-trial stage or pre-sentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial vi ALL THE ABOVE TYPES ix. OTHER: x. NOT PROVIDED 14.b. RJ programmes and practices that are implemented at this level usually include as part or as a result/outcome of the actual process: i. A DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE VICTIM AND THE OFFENDER A WRITTEN APOLOGY i AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEM iv. COMMUNITY PUNISHMENT v. A. COMPENSATION vi. MAKING COMMITMENTS v THE COMPLETION OF AN EDUCATION OR OTHER PROGRAMME vi ALL THE ABOVE TYPES ix. OTHER: 12

Record_Question. B.3: Question 15 Question 16 I. After the referral, does the offender or the victim have the right to interrupt the RJ process and remain only within the traditional JJ one? If the actual process is not successful, in what way this could affect the JJ process? At court level: (either pre-trial stage or pre-sentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial i. ONLY THE JUVENILE OFFENDER HAS THE RIGHT ONLY THE VICTIM HAS THE RIGHT i NO ONE HAS THIS RIGHT iv. BOTH OF THEM HAVE THE RIGHT II. Under what terms and conditions could this right been exercised? 13

Record_Question. B.3: At court level: (either pre-trial stage or presentence, or during and post-sentence as an incarceration, as part of or in addition to a noncustodial Question 17 I. Are the cases referred to RJ process recorded officially? i. YES NO II. Since when? III. Are there sufficient statistical data for the last five years? i. YES NO If answering is yes to the previous question, please try to give the information bellow. How many cases have been referred to the RJ procedures and programmes of court level during the last five years? Out of how many cases in total? How many cases have been evaluated as successful referral? Out of how many referred cases in total? Question 18 Question 19 At the specific level level, the time needed for the RJ process to be completed is longer or shorter in compare to the traditional JJ one? i. LONGER SHORTER i EQUAL iv. NOT ABLE TO COMPARE v. NOT COMPARABLE THE ONE TO OTHER How much time is in average needed for the actual process of RJ to be completed? At the specific level, the total financial cost for the RJ process is higher or lower in compare to the JJ ones? I. For the state: i. HIGHER LOWER i EQUAL iv. NOT ABLE TO COMPARE v. NOT COMPARABLE THE ONE TO OTHER II. For the victim: i. HIGHER LOWER i EQUAL iv. NOT ABLE TO COMPARE v. NOT COMPARABLE THE ONE TO OTHER III. For the offender: i. HIGHER LOWER i EQUAL iv. NOT ABLE TO COMPARE v. NOT COMPARABLE THE ONE TO OTHER 14

ANNEX COMMENT TO THE QUESTIONS QUESTION 1 COMMENT: QUESTION 2 COMMENT: QUESTION 3 COMMENT: QUESTION 4 COMMENT: 15