PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Circuit

Similar documents
USCA UNITED STATES Case COURT # OF APPEALS Document # Filed: 04/01/2013 Page 1 of 22 PETITION FOR REVIEW

ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

\{."--, Under Section 307 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b), Section 706 of

NITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECEIVEHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PETITION FOR REVIEW

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Respondents. CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015. DISTRICT OF COWMBAaijh 1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION OF AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

CLERK RECEIVED. JTW OR UiSThICT ØF OL tikbta. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRC1 lit ETSY, INC., Petitioner

ReCEIVED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU CLERK

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP: AJllS--~---- PETITION FOR REVIEW. and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15( a), the Mozilla Corporation

Case 1:13-cv KBJ Document 46 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCLED^^SSSmi^

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

B t NA L. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAl. wr FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU] f FOR DITRIT Q QCLJMHA ILtUIt

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

FOR DISTRIGT OF COLUMBIA 9fHE UNITED STATES COURT OF URAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION; BASIN ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE; EAST

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

18 105G. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT Oi, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMB &!IPANIC MEDIA COALITION, Petitioner CASE NO. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD DECEMBER 10, 2013 DECIDED APRIL 15, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petition for Review

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 402(a), 28 U.S.C. 2342(1) and 2344, and Federal

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Case 1:17-cv RMC Document 12 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 03/24/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) )

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 08/28/2018 Page 1 of 15 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2 AND 3, 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No ORAL ARGUMENT HELD JUNE 1, 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ALEXIS DEGELMANN, et al., ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS INC.,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:14-cv N/A Document 6 Filed 08/26/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND, LLC Patent Owner

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., BRIEF OF FIVE U.S. SENATORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 7, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. MARK HOHIDER, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No In The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEFEENDANT-APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING. The undersigned hereby certifies that she is a member of the Bar of the

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. ELOUISE PEPION COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 44-1 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFl~~~~~:~~'; i~~~~~~~~~~d E(~ O(~t: TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ICG HAZARD, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MOTION TO INTERVENE IN PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv JDB Document 3 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

A OD COUNCIL, AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS Petitioners, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, v. Respondent. No. PETITION FOR REVIEW Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Circuit Rule 15, and section 307(b of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b, the American Wood Council ("AWC", American Forest & Paper Association ("AF&PA", Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and National Association of Manufacturers ("NAM" hereby petition this Court to review the final rule of the respondent United States Environmental Protection Agency entitled, "Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units: Reconsideration and Final Amendments; Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste," published at 78 Fed. Reg. 9112 et seq. (February 7, 2013.

Respectfully submitted, t~[j;?~ William. Wehrum Scott J. Stone HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 (202 955-1500 wwehrum@ hunton.com sstone@ hunton.com Counsel for American Wood Council, American Forest & Paper Association f if Quentin R~.., -t'l Vice President, Litigation & Deputy General Counsel NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS 733 loth Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001 (202 637-3000 qriegel @nam.org Counsel for National Association of Manufacturers 2

Wo<ZJ~ Rachel L. Brand Sheldon Gilbert NATIONAL CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER, INC. 1615 H Street N.W. Washington, DC 20062 (202 463-5337 Counsel for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Dated: April 8, 2013 Of Counsel: Jan Poling Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION 1111 19th Street, N.W. Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202 463-2590 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 8th day of April2013, one copy of the foregoing Petition for Review and Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statements of Petitioners American Wood Council, American Forest & Paper Association, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and National Association of Manufacturers was served by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on each of the following: Robert Perciasepe Acting Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Mail Code 4101M Washington, D.C. 20460 Eric H. Holder, Jr. Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Brenda Mallory Acting General Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Mail Code 231 OA Washington, D.C. 20460

...- u~~~~:iis1i\rlis cou~r o~ APPEAl FOR o1str1ct or co~m s D STATES COURT OF APPEALS!STRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRC\11 FOR ill APR _s 2013 1, \!====~~~-------! ME {~~\VG&b CIL,, REST & PAPER ASSOCIATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS Petitioners, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, v. Respondent. No. 13-1123 RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF PETITIONER AMERICAN WOOD COUNCIL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CLERK Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Circuit Rule 26.1, Petitioner American Wood Council ("AWC" makes the following declarations: The American Wood Council (A WC is the voice of North American traditional and engineered wood products, representing over 75% of the industry. From a renewable resource that absorbs and sequesters carbon, the wood products industry makes products that are essential to everyday life and employs over onethird of a million men and women in well-paying jobs. AWC's engineers, technologists, scientists, and building code experts develop state-of-the-art

engineering data, technology, and standards on structural wood products for use by design professionals, building officials, and wood products manufacturers to assure the safe and efficient design and use of wood structural components. A WC also provides technical, legal, and economic information on wood design, green building, and manufacturing environmental regulations advocating for balanced government policies that sustain the wood products industry. No parent corporation or publicly held company has a ten percent ( 10% or greater ownership interest in A WC. Respectfully submitted, Dated: April 8, 2013 Williani'L Wehrum Scott J. Stone HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 (202 955-1500 wwehrum @hunton.com sstone@ hunton.com Counsel for American Wood Council

Petitioners, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, v. Respondent. No. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ALED APR - 8 20\3 13-1123 CLERK RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF PETITIONER AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Circuit Rule 26.1, Petitioner, American Forest & Paper Association ("AF&PA", makes the following declarations: AF&P A is the national trade association of the forest products industry, representing pulp, paper, packaging and wood products manufacturers, and forest landowners. Our companies make products essential for everyday life from renewable and recyclable resources that sustain the environment. The forest products industry accounts for approximately 5 percent of the total U.S. manufacturing GDP. Industry co~panies produce about $175 billion in products

annually and employ nearly 900,000 men and women, exceeding employment levels in the automotive, chemicals and plastics industries. The industry meets a payroll of approximately $50 billion annually and is among the top 10 manufacturing sector employers in 47 states. No parent corporation or publicly held company has a ten percent ( 10% or greater ownership interest in AF&P A. Respectfully submitted, Dated: April 8, 2013 Scott J. Stone HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 (202 955-1500 wwehrum @hunton.com sstone@ hunton.com Counsel for American Forest & Paper Association

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT '.....-- ~- --;::~~:(;~~:,~~:::_: Petitioners, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, v. Respondent. No. L---_.-.~ -..,.,.,.,1 \.._ CLERK ip 13-1123 - RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF PETITIONER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Circuit Rule 26.1, the undersigned Petitioner, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (the "Chamber", makes the following declarations: The Chamber is a non-profit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the District of Columbia. The Chamber is not a publicly held corporation and no corporation or other publicly held entity holds more than 10% of its stock. The Chamber is the world's largest business federation. The Chamber represents 300,000 direct members and indirectly represents the interests of more

than 3 million companies and professional organizations of every size, in every industry, from every region of the country. An important function of the Chamber is to represent the interests of its members in matters before the courts, Congress, and the Executive Branch. Many of the Chamber's members are subject to the regulations at issue in this matter. Dated: April 8, 2013 Respectfully submitted,. tj ;( 1J_J.(o!' Rachel L. Brand Sheldon Gilbert NATIONAL CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER, INC. 1615 H Street N.W. Washington, DC 20062 (202 463-5337 Counsel for Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America

., Fuo~r~,~f~~~~Fcg~~s::~mii ED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU~UN~rrRJmmm~'Ffg -iufl;fiiii[i9 ---11---..cu...l~~.u...Liol-t---+-----'------ FP'L~Ier~F OOWMBrA etft odqouncil, L...a~i;W'Y~~ts-U:~~» & PAPER.IJ.EO, ~_w~- ~... - ------~ ASSOCIATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, No. 13-1123 Respondent. RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF PETITIONER THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Circuit Rule 26.1, Petitioner, the National Association of Manufacturers ("NAM", makes the following declarations: The NAM is the nation's largest industrial trade association, representing small and large manufacturers in every industrial sector and in all 50 states. The NAM' s mission is to enhance the competitiveness of manufacturers by shaping a legislative and regulatory environment conducive to U.S. economic growth and to increase understanding among policymakers, the media and the general public

about the vital role of manufacturing to America's economic future and living standards. The NAM has no parent company, and no publicly held company has a 10% or greater ownership interest in the NAM. Dated: April8, 2013 Respectfully submitted, ' ~lt1j. ~ f: ("'"Quentin Riegel ~ Vice President, Litigation & Deputy General Counsel NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF. MANUFACTURERS 733 loth Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001 qriegel @nam.com (202 637-3000 Counsel for National Association of. Manufacturers