Case 3:09-cv N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----,

Similar documents
Case 3:09-cv N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:11-cv JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Bannock Street Denver, CO GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 311 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

Case 1:09-cv EJL Document 5 Filed 02/26/2009 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:09-cv JP Document Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

(--L DEPT i CLEW FILED SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CASE NO.

Case 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case: 5:13-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 132 Filed: 05/24/13 Page: 1 of 27 - Page ID#: 5323

Case 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRA-ORDINARY. PART (II) OF SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (ii) PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA NOTIFICATION

Federal Trade Commission v. Global Marketing Group, Inc., et al. CASE No. 8:06 CV-2272-T-30TGW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE No.: COMPLAINT

Case 8:16-cv BRO-AFM Document 59 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 35 Page ID #:3101 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 17 Filed 05/15/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 499

Case 6:18-cv RBD-DCI Document 107 Filed 09/10/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID 5933

STIPULATED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WITH AN ASSET FREEZE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 0:09-cv MJD-JJK Document 14 Filed 11/23/09 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Sec. 202(a)(1)(C). Disclosure of Negative Risk Determinations about Financial Company.

Case 1:15-cv MGC Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2015 Page 1 of 67 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 2 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, I COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

Case 2:10-cv PA -PJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:10

Sec. 9 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Case 2:13-cv CW Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 11

C V CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) THE DEFENDANTS

Case 0:18-cv CMA Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2018 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-1735-D VS. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

Case 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 10

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

Case 2:13-cv DBP Document 2 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 10

This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Mississippi Credit Availability Act."

Case 2:14-cv CW Document 9 Filed 04/24/14 Page 1 of 26

Case 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

Case 2:16-cv SJO-SS Document 38 Filed 03/24/16 Page 1 of 30 Page ID #:1182

- 1 - Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws

Case 3:10-cv F Document 1 Filed 02/19/2010 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

A DEVELOPMENT IN INSIDER TRADING LAW IN THE UNITED STATES: A CASE NOTE ON CHIARELLA v. UNITED STATES DOUGLAS W. HAWES *

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 11 Filed 09/13/18 Page 1 of 26 Case 1:18-cv RDB *SEALED* Document 3-6 Filed 09/13/18 Page 2 of 27 n

Case 1:15-cv BAH Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard before the undersigned judge on the plaintiff^ State of

Case 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

11? "76WiA, y01\v7-aikt ' DAVID DE

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:17-cv CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:18-cv MMA-NLS Document 11 Filed 06/29/18 PageID.756 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 32 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 616

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE. LCB File No. R016-02

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA DIVISION. Plaintiff,

Case 1:09-cv CMA-MJW Document 82 Filed 04/30/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

ALI-ABA Course of Study Regulation D Offerings and Private Placements

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 [15 OF 1992] [AS AMENDED UP TO DATE] CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:11-cv N Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

IC Chapter 9. Prepaid Funeral Plans and Funeral Trust Funds Established Before 1982

Transcription:

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT OURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF EXAS FEB I 7 2009 DALLAS DIVISION SECURIT~ESAND ~XCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, STANFORD INTERNATIONAL BANK, LTD., STANFORD GROUP COMPANY, STANFORD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, R. ~LLENSJ:ANFORD, JAMES M. DAVIS, and LAURA PENDERGEST-HOLT Defendants. Case No.: C~~RK, u.s. DIST1f!1!..,0URT Deput S-09CV0298 l' -L TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, ORDER FREEZING ASSETS, ORDER REQUIRING AN ACCOUNTING, ORDER REQUIRING PRESERVATION OF DOCUMENTS, AND ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY This matter came before me, the undersigned United States District Judge, this 16th day of February 2009, on the application of Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") for the issuance of a temporary restraining order against Defendants Stanford International Bank, Ltd. ("SIB"), Stanford Group Company ("SGC"), Stanford Capital Management, LLC ("SCM"), R. Allen Stanford ("Stanford"), James M. Davis ("Davis"), and Laura Pendergest-Holt ("Pendergest-Holt") (collectively, "Defendants"), and orders freezing assets, requiring an accounting, prohibiting the destruction ofdocuments, pulling the passports of Stanford, Davis, and Pendergest-Holt, authorizing expedited discovery, and alternative service of process and notice. On the basis of the papers filed by the Commission, and argument of Commission counsel, the Court finds as follows: Defendants. 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 2 of 10 2. The Commission is a proper party to bring this action seeking the relief sought in its Complaint. 3. Venue is appropriate in the Northern District oftexas. 4. There is good cause to believe that Defendants have engaged in, and are engaging in, acts and practices which did, do, and will constitute violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") [15 U.S.c. 77q(a)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. 78j(b)], Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 [17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5], Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") [15 U.S.C. 80b-6(1), (2)], and Section 7(d) ofthe Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Investment Company Act") [15 U.S.C. 80a-7(d)]. 5. There is good cause to believe that Defendants will continue to engage in the acts and practices constituting the violations set forth in paragraph 4 unless restrained and enjoined by an order ofthis Court. 6. There is good cause to believe that Defendants used improper means to obtain investor funds and assets. There is also good cause to believe that Defendants will dissipate assets and that some assets are located abroad. 7. An accounting is appropriate to determine the disposition ofinvestor funds and to ascertain the total assets that should continue to be frozen. 8. It is necessary to preserve and maintain the business records ofdefendants from destruction. 9. This proceeding is one in which the Commission seeks a preliminary injunction. 2

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 3 of 10 10. The timing restrictions offed. R. Civ. P. 26(d) and (f), 30(a)(2)(C) and 34 do not apply to this proceeding in light of the Commission's requested relief and its demonstration of good ~ause. 11. Expedited discovery is appropriate to permit a prompt and fair hearing on the Commission's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. 12. There is good cause to believe that Stanford, Davis, and Pendergest-Holt may seek to leave the United States in order to avoid responsibility for the fraudulent acts alleged herein. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: A. Defendants, their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77q(a)], directly or indirectly, in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use ofthemails.by: (1) employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; or (2) obtaining money or property by means of any untrue statement of material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statement(s) made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (3) engaging in any transaction, practice, or course ofbusiness which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser; B. Defendants, their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are restrained and enjoined 3

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 4 of 10 from violating Section 1O(b) ofthe Exchange Act or Rule lob-5 [15 U.S.C. 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. 240.lOb-5], directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security, by making use of any means or instrumentality ofinterstate commerce, or of the mails, orofany facility ofanynational securities exchange: (1) to use or employ any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of the rules and regulations promulgated by. the Commission; (2) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (3) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (4) to engage in any act, practice, or course ofbusiness which operates orwould operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person; C. Stanford, Davis, Pendergest-Holt, SGC, SCM, their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 206(1) and 206(2) ofthe Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. 80b-6(1), (2)], directly or indirectly, by use ofthe mails or any means or instrumentality ofinterstate commerce, by: (1) employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud any client or prospective client; or (2) engaging in any transaction, practice, or course ofbusiness which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client; 4

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 5 of 10 D. SIB, SGC, their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, are restrained and enjoined from violating Section 7(d) ofthe Investment Company Act [15 U.S.c. 80a-7(d)], directly or indirectly, by use ofthe mails or any means or instrumentality ofinterstate commerce, by: (1) acting as an investment company, not organized or otherwise created under the laws of the United States or of a State, and offering for sale, selling, or delivering after sale, in connection with a public offering, any security ofwhich such company is the issuer; or (2) acting as a depositor of, trustee of, or underwriter for such a company; unless (3) the Commission, upon application by the investment company not organized or otherwise created under the laws ofthe United States or ofa State, issues a conditional or unconditional order permitting such company to register and to make a public offering of its securities by use of the mails and means or instrumentalities ofinterstate commerce. 5. Defendants, their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, and each of them, are hereby restrained and enjoined from, directly or indirectly, making any payment or expenditure of funds belonging to or in the possession, custody, or control of Defendants, or effecting any sale, gift, hypothecation, or other disposition of any asset belonging to or in the possession, custody, or control of Defendants, pending a showing to this Court that Defendants have sufficient funds or assets to satisfy all claims 5

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 6 of 10 arising out of the violations alleged in the Commission's Complaint or the posting of a bond or surety sufficient to assure payment of any such claim. This provision shall continue in full force and effect until further ordered bythis Court and shall not expire. 6. All banks, savings and loan associations, savings banks, trust companies, securities broker-dealers, commodities dealers, investment companies, other financial or depository institutions, and investment companies that hold one or more accounts in the name, on behalf or for the benefit of Defendants are hereby restrained and enjoined, in regard to any such account, from engaging in any transaction in securities (except liquidating transactions necessary to comply with a court order) or any disbursement of funds or securities pending further order ofthis Court. This provision shall continue in full force and effect until further order by this Court and shall not expire. 7. All other individuals, corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, and other artificial entities are hereby restrained and enjoined from disbursing any funds, securities, or other property obtained from Defendants without adequate consideration. This provision shall continue in full force and effect until further order bythis Court and shall not expire. 8. Defendants are hereby required to make an interim accounting, under oath, within ten days of the issuance of this order or three days prior to any hearing on the Commission's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, whichever is sooner: (1) detailing all monies and other benefits which each received, directly or indirectly, as a result of the activities alleged in the Complaint (including the date on which the monies or other benefit was received and the name, address, and telephone number of the person paying the money or providing the benefit); (2) listing all current assets wherever they may be located and by whomever they are being held (including the name and address of the holder and the amount or value of the holdings); and (3) 6

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 7 of 10 listing all accounts with any financial or brokerage institution maintained in the name of, on behalfof, or for the benefit of, Defendants (including the name and address ofthe account holder and the account number) and the amount held in each account at any point during the period from January 1, 2000 through the date of the accounting. This provision shall continue in full force and effect until further order bythis Court and shall not expire. 9. Defendants, their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with them, including any bank, securities broker-dealer, or any financial or depositary institution, who receives actual notice ofthis Order by personal service or otherwise, and each of them, are hereby restrained and enjoined from destroying, removing, mutilating, altering, concealing, or disposing of, in any manner, any books and records owned by, or pertaining to, the financial transactions and assets ofdefendants or any entities under their control. This provision shall continue in full force and effect until further order bythis Court and shall not expire. 10. The United States Marshal in any judicial district in which Defendants do business or may be found, or in which any Receivership Asset may be located, is authorized and directed to make service ofprocess at the request ofthe Commission. 11. The Commission is authorized to serve process on, and give notice of these proceedings and the relief granted herein to, Defendants by U.S. Mail, e-mail, facsimile, or any other means authorized by the Federal Rules ofcivil Procedure. 12. Expedited discovery may take place consistent with the following: A. Any party may notice and conduct depositions upon oral examination and may request and obtain production of documents or other things for inspection and copying from parties prior to the expiration ofthirty days 7

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 8 of 10.after service of a summons and the Plaintiff Commission's Complaint upon Defendants. B. All parties shall comply with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 regarding issuance and service of subpoenas, unless the person designated to provide testimony or to produce documents and things agrees to provide the testimony or to produce the documents or things without the issuance. of a subpoena or to do so at a place other than one at which testimony or production can be compelled. C. Any party may notice and conduct depositions upon oral examination subject to minimum notice ofseventy-two (72) hours. D. All parties shall produce for inspection and copying all documents and things that are requested within seventy-two (72) hours of service of a written request for those documents and things. E. All parties shall serve written responses to written interrogatories within seventy-two (72) hours after service ofthe interrogatories. 13. All parties shall serve written responses to any other party's request for discovery and the interim accountings to be provided by Defendants by delivery to the Plaintiff Commission address as follows: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Fort Worth Regional Office Attention: David Reece Burnett Plaza, Suite 1900 801 Cherry Street, Unit #18 Fort Worth, TX 76102-6882 Facsimile: (817) 978-4927 8

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 9 of 10 and by delivery to other parties at such address(es) as may be designated by them in writing. Such delivery shall be made by the most expeditious means available, including e-mail and facsimile. 14. Stanford, Davis, and Pendergest-Holt shall surrender their passports, pending the determination of the Commission's request for a preliminary injunction, and are barred from traveling outside the United States. 15. Defendants, their directors, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, depositories, banks, and those persons in active concert or participation with anyone or more of them, and each ofthem, shall: (a) take such steps as are necessary to repatriate to the territory of the United States all funds and assets ofinvestors described in the Commission's Complaint in this action which are held by them, or are under their direct or indirect control, jointly or singly, and deposit such funds into the Registry of the United States District Court, Northern District oftexas; and (b) provide the Commission and the Court a written description of the funds and assets so repatriated. 16. Defendants shall serve, by the most expeditious means possible, including e-mail and facsimile, any papers in opposition to the Commission's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and for other relief no later than 72 hours before any scheduled hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Commission shall serve any reply at least 24 hours before any hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction by the most expeditious means available, including facsimile. 9

Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 10 of 10 17. Unless extended by agreement of the parties, the portion of this order that ~ day of constitutes a temporary restraining order shall expire at o'clockfm. on the L &r"k 2009 or at such later date as may be ordered by this Court. All other prov~sions of this order shall remain in full force and effect until specifically modified by further order ofthis Court. Unless the Court rules upon the Commission's Motion for Preliminary Injunction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 43(e), adjudication of the Commission's Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall take place at the United States Courthouse, Mll.::P!l!1..n..:~lliqJ~ J... Texas, on the J day of &A,fc.h,2009, at to o'clock -'L.m. Ii DO Co K"'l.{~(C.5tr-<e+ l)a-l1a.s 1~a..s 1?').4J.. (~tv' 1 Ca.be.lI13IJ~). 2009. EXECUTED AND ENTERED at 0:*0 o'clockql.m, CST this 16 th day of February SEC v. Stanford International Bank, Ltd., et at. 10