IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation. Meeting with the IRT ICANN October 2015

Similar documents
Background to and Status of Work on Protections for Names and Acronyms of the Red Cross movement and International Governmental Organizations (IGOs)

DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

Final Issue Report on IGO-INGO Access to the UDRP & URS Date: 25 May 2014

DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

Historical unit prices - Super - Australian Shares

Final GNSO Issue Report on the Protection of International Organization Names in New gtlds

21 December GNSO Council Review of the Hyderabad GAC Communiqué. From: James Bladel, GNSO Chair To: Steve Crocker, ICANN Board

Tariff 9900: OHD Percentage Based Fuel Cost Adjustment Historical Schedule ( )

Annex to NGPC Resolution NG01. NGPC Scorecard of 1As Regarding Non- Safeguard Advice in the GAC Beijing Communiqué

Agenda. New gtld Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Avri Doria and Jeff Neuman. Introduction and Timeline Eleeza Agopian

Cairns Airport financial year passenger totals.

GNSO Report. Dr Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council ICANN Board Public Forum Marrakech, June 28, 2006

Submission of Adopted GNSO Council Review of the Johannesburg GAC Communiqué

The Governmental Advisory Committee

NGPC Agenda 28 September 2013

New gtld Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Face-to- Face Session (Work Track 5) ICANN60 1 November 2017

Global Amendment to the Base New gtld Registry Agreement. Amanda Fessenden Registry Services & Engagement Manager 7 February 2017

11:00 Los Angeles; 14:00 Washington; 19:00 London; 23:00 Islamabad; (Thursday 28 June) 03:00 Tokyo; 04:00 Hobart

30- December New gtld Program Committee:

Issues Report IDN ccpdp 02 April Bart Boswinkel Issue Manager

GAC Communiqué Buenos Aires, Argentina

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17 AT 12:30 PM

Joint SO/AC Working Group (WG) Charter

Proposed Next Steps Readiness for post-transition Bylaws 15 May 2018

PUBLIC MEETINGS. Please see the City of Geneva Public Meeting Guide for more information regarding City Council and Committee of the Whole meetings.

FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2 AT 2 PM

TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?

7 May Questions 1-16 released separately

2018 Election Calendar Wyoming Secretary of State s Office Election Division -

GNSO Working Session on the CWG Rec6 Report. Margie Milam 4 December 2010

2018 Election Calendar Wyoming Secretary of State s Office Election Division -

Insert title here (75 characters maximum) PRE-ICANN60 POLICY OPEN HOUSE

Working Group Charter

Monthly Trading Report Trading Date: Feb Monthly Trading Report February 2018

thewholething learning and development success Public Course Calendar UK Beyond Business Growth Consulting and Training

WEST VOLUSIA AMATEUR RADIO SOCIETY, INC. A FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION PROPOSED AMENDED BYLAWS. Including Rule Changes Voted on During 2018

2- Sep- 13. Dear ICANN and Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), Re: Community Priority Evaluation Guidelines

4-H Secretary s. Record Book

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

REFUGEE AND IMMIGRATION LAW SERVICES: SERVICE SUSPENSION CONSULTATION

American Government. Chapter 11. The Presidency

Standing Selection Mailing list archives: Committee Mailing List:

Rep Dem Party Party DK/NA

Agenda and resolutions ccnso Council Meeting 18 January 2018

Welcome to Pre-ICANN62 Policy Webinar PRE-ICANN63 POLICY OPEN HOUSE 11 OCTOBER 2018

TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Charles Schumer is handling his job as United States Senator? (* High also 69%)

FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY, JULY 22 AT NOON

2015 COURT CALENDAR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Week of Working Group I Report Working Group II Report Working Group III Report Synthesis Report

The situation of refugees in Austria. WAPES Conference, Integration of refugees into the labour market

Amended Charter of the Customer Standing Committee (CSC) Date of Adoption from ccnso and GNSO Councils: 27 June 2018 version 2

Role of Governments in Internet Governance. MEAC-SIG Cairo 2018

Zoning Text Amendment Application. 1. Identify the specific section(s) number(s) of the Zoning Ordinance sought to be amended.

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY FEBRUARY 17 at 6:00 a.m. ET

Canadian Citizenship

Somalia NGO Consortium Drought-Update. Informal Humanitarian Donor Group February 15, 2017

The Who, What, Why, How and When of the Rejection Action Process

Approved by the Board on March 27, 2014 Page 1

The State of Multi-stakeholderism in International Internet Governance Internet Governance Task Force September 11, 2014 Chicago

1. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president? Republicans 28% Democrats 84% 10 6

EUROPE REFUGEES & MIGRANTS EMERGENCY RESPONSE NATIONALITY OF ARRIVALS TO GREECE, ITALY AND SPAIN

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

OFFICE OF THE ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT JUDGES Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court Boone County Courthouse 705 E. Walnut St. Columbia, MO 65201

Development of the NASA Science Plan

TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job?

2. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Congress is doing?

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON BATTLEGROUND POLL

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2016 MINUTES 15:15 16:45 LOCAL IN-PERSON MEETING. MEETING IPC Public Meeting, Part 1 CHAIR FOR MEETING MINUTES TAKEN BY

QUALITY. MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 2015/2016 SABS Training Academy

Office of Development Effectiveness

Revised ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law

ASYLUM STATISTICS 2016

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

From: Rafik Dammak Date: Friday, October 19, 2018 To: Cherine Chalaby Subject: NCSG Comment on UAM

The William C. Davis Collection. Records, (Predominantly, ) 6.5 linear feet

United States Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs VISA BULLETIN IMMIGRANT NUMBERS FOR OCTOBER 2015 REVISED SEPTEMBER 25, 2015

Schedule DM Sheet 3 MULTIFAMILY ACCOMMODATION - RESIDENTIAL HOTEL - QUALIFYING RV PARK. (Continued)

Do you feel things in the country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track? 67% 56% 51% 51% 49% 49%

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS JUNE 2013 POLITICAL SURVEY FINAL TOPLINE June 12-16, 2013 N=1,512

EURid s. Quarterly update 2015 Q4 PROGRESS REPORT

Geneva, 1 January 1982

(READ AND RANDOMIZE LIST)

MI-WIC update. Release 4.7 December 10, Web Cast 11/30/10

Geneva, 1 December 1970

2. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Congress is doing? Sep 08 17% 73 9 Democrats 28% Sep 08 23% 68 8 Republicans 10% 87 3

AGENDA. a. International Airport Board Commission April 25, 2018 minutes approval.

BDS Terms and Conditions Guide Effective: 07/25/2011 Page 1 of 6

26 th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference

Apr 13 Partisan Dem Dem Ind Ind Gop Gop

4-H in CANADA. Strengthening the Movement

13 May Questions 1-14 released separately

6. 9. How frustrated and upset are you with [ITEM] these days? (RANDOMIZE)

Beijing s Taiwan Policy After the 2016 Elections

Summary of Changes to New gtld Registry Agreement. (Proposed Draft 5 February 2013)

Geneva, 1 February 1978

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

United States Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs VISA BULLETIN IMMIGRANT NUMBERS FOR DECEMBER 2017

IEEE Maintenance IEEE 802.3ax Link Aggregation IEEE 802.3ay Revision. Agenda and General Information

Schoolbelles 4747 West 160 th Street Cleveland, OH December 1, Dear Applicant:

Transcription:

IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation Meeting with the IRT ICANN 54 21 October 2015

Agenda 1 2 3 Background on Policy and Current ICANN Work on IGO/INGO Protections Presentation of Approach and Status of Implementation Discussion of Open Questions and Challenges 15 min 20 min 40 min 2

Background

Scope of IGO/INGO Identifiers Red Cross Red Crescent Movement - Scope 1: "Red Cross", "Red Crescent", "Red Lion and Sun, "Red Crystal" (UN6) - Scope 2 : 189 recognized National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; International Committee of the Red Cross; International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; (English + respective national languages) ICRC, CICR, CICV, MKKK, IFRC, FICR (UN6) International Olympic Committee olympic, olympiad (UN6, + German, Greek, and Korean) International Governmental Orgnanizations (IGO) - Scope 1: GAC List (22 March 2013) - Full Name (Up to two languages) - Scope 2: GAC List (22 March 2013) - Acronym (Language: Up to two languages) International Non-Governmental Orgnanizations (INGO) - Scope 1: ECOSOC List, General Consultative Status (English only) - Scope 2: ECOSOC List, Special Consultative Status (only) 4

Recent ICANN work on IGO/INGOs Protections 20 Nov. 2013 GNSO Council Resolution 30 Apr. 2014 Board Resolution Today IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation (GDD, IRT) Protection of IGO/INGO Indentifiers in All gtlds PDP WG Consideration of IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Recommendations Inconsistent with GAC Advice (NGPC, GAC, GNSO) 5 June 2014 GNSO Resolution Initiation of PDP IGO/INGO Currative Rights Protection Mechanism PDP WG (GNSO) 5

Recent ICANN work on IGO/INGOs Protections 20 Nov. 2013 GNSO Council Resolution 30 Apr. 2014 Board Resolution Today IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation (GDD, IRT) Protection of IGO/INGO Indentifiers in All gtlds PDP WG Consideration of IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Recommendations Inconsistent with GAC Advice (NGPC, GAC, GNSO) 5 June 2014 GNSO Resolution Initiation of PDP IGO/INGO Currative Rights Protection Mechanism PDP WG (GNSO) Policy Development Board Consideration Policy Implementation 6

Scope of this IRT - Eventually 20 Nov. 2013 GNSO Council Resolution 30 Apr. 2014 Board Resolution Today IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation (GDD, IRT) Protection of IGO/INGO Indentifiers in All gtlds PDP WG Future Board Resolution on Outstanding INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Recommendations 5 June 2014 GNSO Resolution Initiation of PDP IGO/INGO Currative Rights Protection Mechanism PDP WG (GNSO) Policy Development Board Consideration Policy Implementation 7

Board Resolution 30 April 2014 Adopted Recommendations Under Reconciliation Top Level Protections & Exception Procedures RCRC Scope 1 Full Name IOC Names Name IGOs Scope 1 Full Name INGOs G. List Full Name RCRC Scope 2 No protection vs. Second Level Protections & Exception Procedures RCRC Scope 1 Full Name IOC Names Name IGOs Scope 1 Full Name INGOs G. List 90 day claims INGOs C. List 90 day claims RCRC Scope 2 90 days claim vs. reservation IGOs Scope 2 90 days vs. Perm. claims 8

Scope of this IRT - Currently 20 Nov. 2013 GNSO Council Resolution 30 Apr. 2014 Board Resolution Today IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation (GDD, IRT) Protection of IGO/INGO Indentifiers in All gtlds PDP WG Consideration of IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Recommendations Inconsistent with GAC Advice (NGPC, GAC, GNSO) 5 June 2014 GNSO Resolution Initiation of PDP IGO/INGO Currative Rights Protection Mechanism PDP WG (GNSO) Policy Development Board Consideration Policy Implementation 9

Focus of Current Implementation Work Adopted Recommendations Under Reconciliation Top Level Protections & Exception Procedures RCRC Scope 1 Full Name IOC Names Name IGOs Scope 1 Full Name INGOs G. List Full Name RCRC Scope 2 No protection vs. Second Level Protections & Exception Procedures RCRC Scope 1 Full Name IOC Names Name IGOs Scope 1 Full Name INGOs G. List 90 day claims INGOs C. List 90 day claims RCRC Scope 2 90 days claim vs. reservation IGOs Scope 2 90 days vs. Perm. claims 10

Approach & Current Status of Implementation

Implementation Review Team Call for Volunteers sent to PDP WG mailing list, RySG, and RrSG - July 2015 Volunteers to date - 4 Registry representatives (3 organizations) - 6 IPC Representatives (4 organizations) - Participation remains open to anyone interested Expected input from the IRT over the course of the implementation - Review of draft procedures and draft policy language - Contributions on Open Issues and Challenges - Review of lists of Identifier labels - Review of draft Response to public comments (eventually) Resources available for IRT work - Mailing list, conference calls and face to face meetings with Staff - Montly Meetings, generally on Tuesdays at 16:00 UTC - Workspace: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageid=54694212 12

Implementation Deliverables Consensus Policy Outline Draft Released for discusison - Draft Consensus Policy Language for IRT review - Public Comment Period - Final Consenus Policy Language Implementation Procedures Currently drafting - Top-level reservation and exception procedure - 2 nd Level reservation and exception procedure - 2 nd Level 90-claims implementation procedures Lists of Identifier Labels & other pre-requisite for implementation - RCRC Scope 1 indentifiers Almost Complete (quality issues) - IOC indentifiers Complete - IGOs Scope 1 indentifiers Challenged (missing add. 2 languages) - INGOs identifiers - Challenged (non responsiveness) - INGOs Contact Data - Challenged (non responsiveness) 13

Current Timeline Assumptions ICANN 54 ICANN 55 (A) ICANN 56 (B) ICANN 57 (C) ICANN 58 (A) ICANN 59 (B) ICANN 60 (C) Text Drafting of Implementation Plan IRT Meetings Release of Draft Implementation Plan for Public Comment Public Comments on Draft Implementation Plan Finalization of Implementation Plan with IRT Announcement of Policy Effective Date Implementation by Affected Parties & ICANN Policy Effective Date Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 2016 2017

Draft Consensus Policy Outline Please Refer to document: iiip-draft-consensus-policy-v1-19oct15.docx/pdf Structure of the Document - Protection at the Top-Level - Protection at the Second-Level Reserved Names - Protection at the Second-Level Claims Services - Lists of Protected Identifiers Please Note: - The policy seeks protection of identifiers; Implementation of these protections will require a defined list of DNS labels - Identifiers related to GNSO Recommendations that are being reconciled are not included in the Draft, only placeholders 15

Draft Consensus Policy Outline List of current open items 1.1 Alignment of reservation at the top-level with intent of the Policy 1.2 Documentation standards for exception procedure at the top-level 2 3 Implementation of exception procedure at the 2 nd Level (PDP Final Report 3.7, 3.8) Implementation of Claims Service for INGO identifiers 4.1 Identifiers-to-labels matching rules 4.5 Definition of DNS labels specification for IGO/INGO 4.6 Maintenance of protected identifiers lists (PDP Final Report 3.4) 16

Discussion

Draft Consensus Policy Outline List of current open items 1.1 Alignment of reservation at the top-level with intent of the Policy 1.2 Documentation standards for exception procedure at the top-level 2 3 Implementation of exception procedure at the 2 nd Level (PDP Final Report 3.7, 3.8) Implementation of Claims Service for INGO identifiers 4.1 Identifiers-to-labels matching rules 4.5 Definition of DNS labels specification for IGO/INGO 4.6 Maintenance of protected identifiers lists (PDP Final Report 3.4) 18

Consideration for IRT in Policy Recommendations Proposed Options for Exception Procedure at the 2 nd Level [Final Report 3.8 p.27] Goal: Where a prospective registrant claims a legitimate interest in a protected name, provide a procedure to determine whether registration should proceed Principles - notification to applicant and protected organization upon request - channel of communication between applicant and protected organization - objective, expeditious, and inexpensive determination on legitimate interest of applicant Option 1: Conditionnal Refusal > Declaration by applicant to registry > 10 days for protected org. to object > independent examination Option 2: Entity allowed to register a protected name if it commits to prevent confusion with IGO/INGO Identifier Notable Public comments: - RySG in support of Option 2, not Option 1 - ALAC: doubts on effectiveness, procedures must be inexpensive and fast - Valideus: should reflect co-existence principles for legitimate third party use 19

Consideration for IRT in Policy Recommendations gtlds delegated prior to 2012: 2 nd Level Protection only [Final Report 3.7 p.25] - Names matching a protected identifier under the Policy shall: - Be reserved from registration if not already registered - Become non transferable if registered before policy cutoff date - Become ineligible for registration after expiration (and termination of relevant grace periods) if registered before policy cutoff date - A mechanism to guard against front running should be defined Protection of INGO Identifiers (Claims Services) [Final Report 3.4 p.15] - How will ICANN be notified of changes to the ECOSOC List? - How is the protection implemented when a string exceeds 63 characters? - How will contact information be acquired and validated for bulk entry? 20

Current Issues and Challenges Policy-related Perimeter of protections: Identifiers vs. DNS labels - Final Report: consensus principle of exact match not further defined - Should protections include transliterations where relevant? Impact of oustanding Policy Recommendations on Claims implementation Implementation-related Choice of 2 languages by IGOs on GAC List Management of Identifiers and Contact data for INGOs - List of Indentifiers unavailable in processable format - UN ECOSOC CSONet (identified as key partner) not responsive 21

IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation Meeting with the IRT ICANN 54 21 October 2015