Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Similar documents
Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: Miami, Florida Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. Michael R. Averett

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York First Republic Securities Company, LLC

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

Attached is the Award in Wachovia Securities v. Brucker, Case no for discussion in the Employment Break-Out Section at the Annual Meeting.

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

AWARD FINRA Dispute Resolution. vs. Case Number: Hearing Site: Chicago, Illinois Names of Respondents NATURE OF THE DISPUTE

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FiNRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc.

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

RECEiVED. WELLINGTON SHIELDS & Co. LLC MEMBER NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE FEB 2 21U8

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

AWARD NASD Dispute Resolution REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES. CASEINFORl\1ATION

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution. Santanu Bhattacharya and Gargi Dasgupta (Claimants) vs. Chicago Investment Group LLC and Mitesh Shere (Respondents)

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

ICDR INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION ARBITRATION RULES

Investment Consulting Agreement

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

MEDIATION AGREEMENT TREVERRICK HOUSE NEWQUAY CORNWALL TR8 4PP. This Mediation Agreement (the Agreement ) is made on..

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST DECLARES FEBRUARY CASH DISTRIBUTION. Current Month Distribution 1,205,000 39,000 $3.52 (b)

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Defendants.

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution. Claimant Case Number: Karl Austin Pettijohn REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES

PAMS ARBITRATION RULES

Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx

JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to

NASD CODE OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURE FOR INDUSTRY DISPUTES

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: Houston, Texas Raymond, James & Associates, Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc.

2007 PA Super 177. OPINION BY DANIELS, J.: Filed: June 11, These are Consolidated Appeals from the Order of the lower court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Binding Mediation Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxx

CLIENT SERVICES AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes)

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

ARTICLE 25 ARBITRATION

GUTSCHE FAMILY INVESTMENTS (PTY) LIMITED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

CITY OF PROSSER REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. To Provide. On Call Electrical Services. Located at: TH STREET PROSSER, WASHINGTON 99350

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

following in the above-referenced cause of action : COMMON ALLEGATIONS times material herein was a resident of Polk County, Iowa.

The Above Blank Space Is for Recording Purposes.

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

CHAPTER 17. UNINCORPORATED NONPROFIT ASSOCIATIONS

6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY A Property and Liability Program for Public Agencies


Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of

Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :42:05 PM

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION

Agency # RULES FOR HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT PROCEDURE Effective July 10, 2003

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

CODE OF PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

THE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES (IN EFFECT AS OF 31 JULY 2015)

Registration Form Please Check: Boy Girl Age: Camper s Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)

THIS INDEPENDENT ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT (this Independent Engineer's Agreement) is made on [ ]

POLE ATTACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT SKAMANIA COUNTY PUD

MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY BY-LAWS. As adopted April 8, 2015

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

2016CI21911 CAUSE NO. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. COMES NOW GRUPO INTEGRADORA SOLAR, SAPI DE CV (hereinafter, GIS ),

Registration Form Please Check: Boy Girl Age: Camper s Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code:

P.O. Box Dublin, OH Toll-Free: (877) Settlement Website:

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Issued Date: 3 January 2011

Regulatory Notice 17-33

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

GENERAL ARBITRATION RULES AND PROCEDURES Revised March 15, 2016 Copyright by CDRS 2016 all rights reserved

ARBITRATION RULES. Commercial Brokers Association

Updated October 1, 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Filing # E-Filed 07/11/ :27:15 PM

Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution for Domain Names ( ERDRP )

CHAPTER EIGHT INVESTMENT. Section A Investment. 1. This Chapter shall apply to measures adopted or maintained by a Party relating to:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 168 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018

Transcription:

In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Award Names of the Claimants Case Number: 04-05690 Sylvia Purisch Arthur Purisch Ttee FBO Sylvia Purisch Rev Trust Arthur Purisch, IRA Arthur Purisch Ttee FBO Arthur and Neil Purisch Names of the Respondents Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., f/k/a Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. Jack B. Grubman Hearing Site: Orlando, Florida Nature of the Dispute: Customer vs. Member and Associated Person. REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES For Sylvia Purisch Arthur Purisch Ttee FBO Sylvia Purisch Rev Trust; Arthur Purisch, IRA; and, Arthur Purisch Ttee FBO Arthur and Neil Purisch, hereinafter collectively referred to as "Claimants": Michael B. Lynch, Esq., Hooper & Weiss, L.L.C., Orlando, Florida. For Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., f/k/a Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. ("Citigroup") and Jack B. Grubman ("Grubman"), hereinafter collectively referred to as "Respondents": Ricardo Gonzalez, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, Florida. CASE INFORMATION Statement of Claim filed on or about: August 4, 2004. Claimants signed the Uniform Submission Agreements: August 4, 2004. Statement of Answer filed by Respondents on or about: November 1, 2004. Respondent Citigroup did not file an executed Uniform Submission Agreement. Respondent Grubman did not file an executed Uniform Submission Agreement. CASE SUMMARY Claimants asserted the following causes of action: omission to state material facts and conflicts of interest in violation of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; omission to state material facts and conflicts of interest in violation of Chapter 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act; omission to state material facts and conflicts of interest in violation of NASD Rule 2210(d)(l) s Communications with the Public-General Standards; breach of fiduciary duty; and, respondeat superior. The causes of action relate to Claimants' investments in WorldCom stock and Targeted Growth - Enhanced Term Securities Trust.

Arbitration No; 04-05690 Award Page 2 of 5 Unless specifically admitted in their Answer, Respondents denied the allegations made in the Statement of Claim and asserted various defenses. RELIEF REQUESTED Claimants requested rescissionary damages in the amount of $16,112.58, an unspecified amount of punitive damages, interest, costs, attorneys' fees and such other relief as deemed appropriate by the undersigned arbitrator (the "Arbitrator"). Respondents requested that Claimants' Statement of Claim be denied in its entirety, and dismissed with prejudice, with attorneys' fees and costs assessed against Claimants. OTHER ISSUES CONSIDERED AND DECIDED Respondents Citigroup and Grubman did not file with properly executed Uniform Submission Agreements but are required to submit to arbitration pursuant to the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure (the "Code") and are bound by the determination of the Arbitrator on all issues submitted. On or about April 4, 2005, the parties jointly requested that the Arbitrator make a final determination of this matter on the papers in lieu of conducting an evidentiary hearing, following submission by the parties of final hearing briefs. On or about April 13, 2005, the Arbitrator issued an Order granting the parties' request. On or about July 13, 2005, Claimants filed a notice with representing that Claimants had complied with the procedure for opting out of the class action filed in court, entitled In Re WorldCom Securities Litigation. On or about August 15,2005, Claimant filed a voluntarily dismissal of the portion of the Statement of Claim relating to the Targeted Growth-Enhanced Term Securities Trust. AWARD After reviewing the documentation provided, including the legal arguments of counsel for all parties, the Arbitrator has decided in full and final resolution of the issues submitted for determination as follows: Claimants purchased or acquired publicly traded stock, bonds, or notes of WorldCom, Inc. during the period of April 29,1999 through and including June 25, 2002. Claimants timely filed a written request for exclusion from the class action suit (in effect, opting out of the action) styled WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Case N. 02-CIV.3288 (DLC), and are, therefore, entitled to pursue this claim for rescissionary damages and other relief.

Arbitration No. 04-05690 Award Page 3 of 5 < Claimants are therefore entitled to rescissionary damages for the purschase of common stocks in WorldCom, Inc. purchased during the calendar year 2000 in the amount of $6,660.39. Claimants are entitled to damages for "spinoff stocks" objected to by Respondents, because those "spinoff stocks" represent real damages to Claimants and, therefore, Respondents are not entitled to a setoff in the amount of Two Hundred Ninety-Three and 43/100 ($293.43), as requested. Claimants elected to file a Proof of Claim and Release in regard to the Targeted Growth- Enhanced Term Securities Trust, and did so in writing on June 11,2005. Claimants are therefore estopped from claiming restitution for any damages sustained for the purchase of the Targeted Growth-Enhanced Term Securities Trust. Respondents, jointly, profited by the actions of Respondent Grubman, and did so even after Respondent Citigroup knew of problems associated with Respondent Grubman's "analysis" of the securities purchased by Claimants, which gives rise to Claimants' action. Respondent Citigroup either intentionally ignored the repeated warnings it was given about the actions of Respondent Grubman, or it was so grossly negligent in its duty to investors such as Claimants in this cause, that an award of punitive damages, jointly and severally against Respondents is appropriate. Respondents are jointly and severally liable on the following claims: omission to state material facts and conflicts of interest in violation of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; omission to state material facts and conflicts of interest in violation of Chapter 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act; omission to state material facts and conflicts of interest in violation of NASD Rule 2210(d)(l), Communications with the Public-General Standards; breach of fiduciary duty; and, respondeat superior. IT IS, THEREFORE, AWARDED as follows: Respondents are jointly and severally liable and shall pay to Claimants rescissionary damages in the amount of $6,660.39, plus pre-judgment interest at the Florida statutory rate, accruing from June 1, 2002 through payment of the Award. Respondents are jointly and severally liable and shall pay to Claimants punitive damages in the amount of $19,981.17, representing three times the actual damages awarded. Attorneys' fees to be awarded in accordance with Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction against both Respondents, jointly and severally. Any and all relief not specifically addressed herein is denied. FEES Pursuant to the Code, the following fees are assessed:

Arbitration No! 04-05690 Award Page 4 of 5 Filing Fees will retain or collect the non-refundable filing fees for each claim: Initial claim filing fee = $125.00 Member Fees Member fees are assessed to each member firm that is a party in these proceedings or to the member firm(s) that employed the associated person(s) at the time of the event(s) giving rise to the dispute. Accordingly, Citigroup is a party and a member firm. Member surcharge =$425.00 Total Member Fees = $425.00 Adjournment Fees Adjournments granted during these proceedings for which fees were assessed: There were no adjournment fees assessed during these proceedings. Three-Day Cancellation Fees Fees apply when a hearing on the merits is postponed or settled within three business days before the start of a scheduled hearing session: There were no three-day cancellation fees assessed during these proceedings. Injunctive Relief Fees Injunctive relief fees are assessed to each member or associated person who files for a temporary injunction in court. Parties in these cases are also assessed arbitrator travel expenses and costs when an arbitrator is required to travel outside his or her hearing location and additional arbitrator honoraria for the hearing for permanent injunction. These fees, except the injunctive relief surcharge } are assessed equally against each party unless otherwise directed by the Panel. There were no injunctive relief fees assessed during these proceedings. Forum Fees and Assessments The Arbitrator has assessed forum fees for each session conducted. A session is any meeting between the parties and the arbitrator(s), including a pre-hearing conference with the arbitrator(s), that lasts four (4) hours or less. Fees associated with these proceedings are: One (1) Pre-hearing session with the Arbitrator @ $450.00/session = $450.00 Pre-hearing conference: March 21, 2005 1 session Total Forum Fees = $450.00 The Arbitrator has assessed the total forum fees of $450.00 to Respondents, jointly and severally.

Arbitration No. 04-05690 Award Page 5 of 5 ~ * Administrative Costs Administrative costs are expenses incurred due to a request by a party for special services beyond the normal administrative services. These include, but not limited to, additional copies of arbitrator awards, copies of audio transcripts, retrieval of documents from archives, interpreters, and security. There were no administrative costs incurred during these proceedings. Fee Summary Claimants are jointly and severally liable for: Initial Filing Fee =$125.00 Total Fees =$125.00 Less payments =$125.00 Balance Due = $ 0.00 Respondent Citigroup is solely liable for: Member Fees = S425.0Q Total Fees =$425.00 Less payments = $425.00 Balance Due = $ 0.00 Respondents Citigroup and Grubman are jointly and severally liable for: Forum Fees = $450.00 Total Fees = $450.00 Less payments = $ 0.00 Balance Due = $450.00 All balances are payable to and are due upon receipt pursuant to Rule 10330(g)oftheCode. ARBITRATOR Kevin S. Doty, Esq. - Public Arbitrator Arbitrator's Signature /s/ October 3, 2005 Kevin S. Doty, Esq. Signature Date Public Arbitrator October 3. 2005 Date of Service (For office use only)

FILE. No.743 10/03 '05 12=37 PHbfc bv t> Arbitration No, 04-05690 Award Page S of 5 Administrative Costs Administrative costs are expenses incurred due to a request by a party for special services beyond the normal administrative services. These include, but not limited to, additional copies of arbitrator awards, copies of audio transcripts, retrieval of documents from archives, interpreters, and security. There were no administrative costs incurred during these proceedings. Fee Summary Claimants are jointly and severally liable for: Initial Filing Fee _,_ ^S125.00 Total Fees!- -$125.00 Less.payroents _ ; =$125.00 Balance Due = $ 0.00 Respondent Citigroup is solely liable for: Member Fees _ j _ =$425.00 Total Fees! =$425,00 Less payments _ =$425.00 Balance Due = $ 0,00 Respondents Citigroup and Grubman are jointly and severally liable for: Forum Fees _ [ = S450.00 Total Fees =$450.00 Less payments _ ;_ ;_ - S Q.QQ Balance Due ~ $450.00 All balances are payable to and are due upon receipt pursuant to Rule 10330(g)oftheCode. ARBITRATOR Kevin S. Doty, Esq. - Public Arbitrator Arbitrator's Sinature Kevin S. Doty, Esq. f\ -, Signature Date Public Arbitrator Date of Service (For office use only)