Case 3:17-cv WHO Document Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT 1

Similar documents
Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 76-1 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 19 EXHIBIT 1

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 78 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT 1

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 108 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 99 Filed: 10/13/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1395 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 75 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 5

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees,

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) LEGAL SERVICES PROVIDERS AMICI CURIAE BRIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 153 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 71-1 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 18

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 51 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 14

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 10-2 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. ) Civil No.

IMMIGRATION ISSUES Sanctuary Cities and Schools

See Appendix. Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (Alexandria Division) Plaintiff, 1:07cv846 JCC/TRJ Judge Cacheris

(See Next Page For Additional Counsel) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI I

Case 3:05-cv B-BLM Document 783 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:11-cv NMG Document 53 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case: , 02/06/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 26-1, Page 1 of 9. No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:06-cv LFO Document 18 Filed 04/17/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., CASE NO. C JLR.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

Case4:09-cv CW Document195 Filed07/20/09 Page1 of 10

Case5:11-cv LHK Document Filed12/02/13 Page1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

SAMPLE RESPONSE TO OJP REQUEST FOR 8 USC 1373 CERTIFICATION

Freezing Out Justice. How immigration arrests at courthouses are undermining the justice system

Case 3:17-cv WHA Document 230 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:17-cv SK Document 82 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case5:11-cv LHK Document902 Filed05/07/12 Page1 of 7

Case 2:16-cr SRB Document 250 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 19

U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv JDB

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 597 Filed 04/09/2009 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case3:01-cv TEH Document2826 Filed12/01/14 Page1 of 2

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 151 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 8

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2014. Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 174 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 6

NOS , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNDER SEAL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:11-cv LHK Document 3322 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:17-cv VC Document 48 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 139 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 7

(See Next Page For Additional Counsel) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

8:13-cv JFB-TDT Doc # 51 Filed: 10/08/13 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1162 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Case 3:16-cv M Document 44 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID 257 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document Filed 10/04/17 Page 1 of 18

What Should I Tell My NIJC Pro Bono Client About the Immigration Executive Orders?

Attorneys for Movant Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-1294 v.

Case 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 122 Filed: 10/24/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:590

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION. vs. Civil Action 1:15-cv RP

Case 5:16-cv EJD Document 22 Filed 12/13/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:13-cv Document 46 Filed in TXSD on 10/03/13 Page 1 of 5

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Case4:10-cv CW Document68 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 9

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 189 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CaseM:06-cv VRW Document716 Filed03/19/10 Page1 of 8

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 145 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 9

Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv TJK Document 16 Filed 11/15/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA : : : : : Plaintiffs,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv DRH-RJD Document 26 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #432

Case 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 41 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 189

Case 1:11-cv BAH Document 16-1 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. Civil Action No.

Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-who Document - Filed 0// Page of EXHIBIT

Case :-cv-00-who Document - Filed 0// Page of 0 JAMIE S. GORELICK jamie.gorelick@wilmerhale.com CATHERINE M.A. CARROLL catherine.carroll@wilmerhale.com CLAIRE M. BERGERON claire.bergeron@wilmerhale.com SHEILA E. MENZ sheila.menz@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) - Attorneys for Amici Curiae UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, Attorney General of the United States, DOES -00, Defendants. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, JOHN MICHAEL MICK MULVANEY, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and DOES -0, Defendants. Case No. :-cv-00-who Case No. :-cv-00-who PROPOSED BRIEF FOR TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER, ET AL. AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick Case Nos. :-cv-00-who; :-cv-00-who

Case :-cv-00-who Document - Filed 0// Page of 0 0 INTERESTS OF AMICI CURIAE The Tahirih Justice Center ( Tahirih ) and other Amici are direct-services and policyadvocacy organizations working on behalf of immigrant women survivors of gender-based violence. As detailed in their March, 0 Amicus Brief filed in support of Plaintiffs motions for a preliminary injunction ( Brief ), Amici have a special understanding of the direct and severe impact that the January, 0 Executive Order, Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States, No.,, Fed. Reg. (the Executive Order ), is having on immigrant survivors by limiting their access to protection from and treatment for the effects of gender-based violence. ARGUMENT I. The Court Should Consider Amici s Prior Arguments in Support of Plaintiffs Oppositions to Amici reiterate all arguments made in their earlier Brief and respectfully request that the Court also consider these arguments in support of the Plaintiffs Oppositions to Defendants Motions to Dismiss. Amici s prior arguments outlining both the harms caused by the Executive Order, and the benefits that flow to our communities as a result of so-called sanctuary policies, continue to be relevant and consequential in the context of. The Brief provides specific examples of the concrete injuries that the County of Santa Clara ( Santa Clara ), City and County of San Francisco ( San Francisco ) and similarly situated jurisdictions have faced as a result of the Executive Order. As the Brief explained, the Executive Order has already deterred survivors of gender-based violence from accessing essential protection services and from reporting abuse, rendering immigrant women and their larger communities less safe. See Brief at -. San Francisco, Santa Clara, and similarly situated jurisdictions are already experiencing the detrimental effects of Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs Motions for Preliminary Injunctions, No. :-cv-00-who, Dkt. -; No. :-cv-00-who, Dkt. -. See Plaintiff County of Santa Clara s Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss, No. -cv- 00-WHO (June, 0), Dkt. ; Plaintiff City and County of San Francisco s Opposition to Defendants Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, No. :-cv-00-who (June 0, 0), Dkt.. See Defendants Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Point and Authorities, City and County of San Francisco v. Trump, No. :-cv-00-who (June, 0) Dkt. at 0; Defendants Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Point and Authorities, County of Santa Clara v. Trump, No. :-cv-00-who (June, 0), Dkt. at. Case Nos. :-cv-00-who; :-cv-00-who

Case :-cv-00-who Document - Filed 0// Page of 0 0 the Executive Order even before its enforcement. See Brief at -; cf. Valle del Sol Inc. v. Whiting, F.d 00, 0 (th Cir. 0) (Plaintiff does not have to await the consummation of threatened injury to obtain preventive relief. ). II. The Executive Order s Chilling Effects on Immigrant Victims of Gender-Based Violence Continue to Be Felt Nationwide Since Amici filed their Brief in March, even more evidence has come to light demonstrating how the Executive Order and related efforts to entangle federal and local immigration enforcement are deterring survivors of gender-based violence from reporting crime. In an April survey of more than 00 legal advocates and legal-services organizations nationwide, three out of four respondents reported that their clients had expressed concerns about contacting the police or about going to court for matters related to their victimization. Case Nos. :-cv-00-who; :-cv-00-who As one advocate explained: [C]lients are afraid of calling the police because they believe that they will be deported if they do, especially if their abuser is a U.S. citizen. They think law enforcement will listen to someone who is a citizen of this country more than an undocumented person. Additional reports similarly make clear that more and more survivors are hesitant to apply for legal protections from abuse, such as temporary restraining orders or U visas, out of fear that doing so may prompt adverse immigration consequences. One domestic violence survivor even gave up custody of her daughter to her former abuser out of fear that a protracted litigation battle would expose her to a risk of deportation. These accounts demonstrate how the Executive Order and related efforts bolster abusers power to silence immigrant survivors by threatening to reveal a survivor s immigration status to law enforcement, and impede survivors from obtaining legal remedies available to them under the law including remedies that Congress created for the express Report, 0 Advocate and Legal Service Survey Regarding Immigrant Survivors (April 0), http://www.tahirih.org/wp-content/uploads/0/0/0-advocate-and-legal-service-survey-key- Findings.pdf. Id. 0 Advocate and Legal Service Survey Regarding Immigrant Survivors; Virginia Fay, Back Into the Shadows: Immigrants Retreat from Needed Services as Deportation Fears Loom, SAN FRANCISCO GATE (Jun., 0 : AM), http://blog.sfgate.com/inthepeninsula/0/0//backinto-the-shadows-immigrants-retreat-from-needed-services-as-deportation-fears-loom. Manya Brachear Pashman, Immigrant Women Fear Deportation Under Trump if They Report Domestic Abuse, Advocates Say, CHICAGO TRIBUNE, (Jun., 0, : AM), http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/immigration/ct-domestic-violence-immigration-met- 00-story.html.

Case :-cv-00-who Document - Filed 0// Page of purpose of preventing further exploitation and abuse. See Brief at -. Following the recent 0 0 passage of a state law to promote local enforcement of immigration laws, a Tahirih client aptly noted: This is exactly what [my abuser] has been waiting for. Likewise, a growing body of evidence indicates that the Executive Order and similar measures are undermining community safety by damaging trust between law enforcement and immigrant communities. According to the Police Executive Research Forum, police chiefs are worried that the national mood about immigration has made undocumented immigrants reluctant to report crimes. 0 After Amici s Brief was filed, the San Francisco Police Department reported a percent decrease in reports of domestic violence by Hispanic women compared to the same threemonth period last year. Case Nos. :-cv-00-who; :-cv-00-who In Houston, Texas, the Police Chief noted that, over the same three-month period, reports by Hispanics of sexual assault dropped by percent and reports by Hispanics of robberies and aggravated assaults declined by percent. Similarly, police records in New Jersey s Camden County indicate a percent decrease this year in service calls from communities with primarily undocumented residents. Without community reporting and involvement, law enforcement and prosecutors are less effective at maintaining community safety. As the United States Commission on Civil Rights See, e.g., 0 Advocate and Legal Service Survey Regarding Immigrant Survivors, April 0 ( A -year-old survivor attempted suicide because she was concerned that her offender would report her and her family to ICE ); Fay, supra note ( Maria, paralyzed with fear, shrunk into herself as her abusive husband told a judge hearing her restraining order case that she s an illegal immigrant[.] ); Natasha Chen, More ICE Agents Seen Waiting Around Local Courthouses to Intercept People, KIRO (Mar., 0 : PM), http://www.kiro.com/news/local/more-iceagents-seen-waiting-around-local-courthouses-to-intercept-people/00 ( Jay Stratton, an immigration attorney, said domestic violence victims who are undocumented are particularly at risk. He said they have been afraid to report crimes and walk into a courthouse to file for a protection order, for fear of encountering ICE. ). Tahirih Urges House Judiciary Committee to Oppose the Harmful Davis-Oliver Act, Tahirih Justice Center (0), http://www.tahirih.org/news/tahirih-urges-house-judiciary-committee-to-oppose-theharmful-davis-oliver-act/ (last visited Jun., 0). 0 Lindsey Bever, Hispanics Are Going Further Into the Shadows Amid Chilling Immigration Debate, Police Say, WASH. POST (May, 0), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/postnation/wp/0/0//immigration-debate-might-be-having-a-chilling-effect-on-crime-reporting-inhispanic-communities-police-say/?utm_term=.dceecd. Fay, supra note. John Burnett, New Immigration Crackdowns Creating Chilling Effect On Crime Reporting, NPR (May, 0 : AM), http://www.npr.org/0/0///new-immigrationcrackdowns-creating-chilling-effect-on-crime-reporting. Bever, supra note 0.

Case :-cv-00-who Document - Filed 0// Page of explained in an April statement, recent immigration enforcement actions have instill[ed] needless additional fear and anxiety within immigrant communities, discourage[d] interacting with the judicial system, and endanger[ed] the safety of entire communities. Recent reports detailing this chilling effect, combined with those cited in Amici s earlier Brief, demonstrate that, unless enjoined, the Executive Order will continue to undermine cooperation between law enforcement and immigrant communities, and continue to endanger community safety. CONCLUSION The Court should deny. 0 0 Statement of United States Commission on Civil Rights, Concern with Immigrants Access to Justice (April, 0), http://www.usccr.gov/press/0/statement_0--0-immigrant- Access-Justice.pdf. Case Nos. :-cv-00-who; :-cv-00-who

Case :-cv-00-who Document - Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Dated: June, 0 Respectfully submitted, /s/ JAMIE S. GORELICK JAMIE S. GORELICK jamie.gorelick@wilmerhale.com CATHERINE M.A. CARROLL catherine.carroll@wilmerhale.com CLAIRE M. BERGERON claire.bergeron@wilmerhale.com SHEILA E. MENZ sheila.menz@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) - Case Nos. :-cv-00-who; :-cv-00-who