IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEFEENDANT-APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

UNOPOSSED PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT S AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT S APPROVAL TO ELECTRONIC FILE CASE DOCUMENTS VIA CM/ECF SYSTEM 1

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT LEON H. RIDEOUT; ANDREW LANGOIS; BRANDON D. ROSS. Plaintiff - Appellees

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: Document: Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 04, 2012

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Tel: (202)

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. EDWARD TUFFLY, AKA Bud Tuffly, Plaintiff-Appellant,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. JEFFREY F. SAYERS Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

NO CV. In the Court of Appeals. For the Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas. Austin, Texas JAMES BOONE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, CHARLES D.

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

No P DOYLE HAMM, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, JEFFERSON S. DUNN, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit RICHARD DOUGLAS HACKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants,

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

STATE DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSES TO AMICUS BRIEF OF UNITED STATES AND FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

No , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT SUSAN L. VAUGHAN, ANDERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. ULTRAMERCIAL, LLC and ULTRAMERCIAL, INC., and WILDTANGENT, INC.

Case No , & (consolidated) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. DAMIAN STINNIE, et al.,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

Case 3:12-cv MJR-PMF Document 83 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #806 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. Related Case Nos & CAPITAL CASE EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 27, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Nos (L), IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. SIERRA CLUB; and VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE,

United States Court of Appeals

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 04/23/2012 Pages: 6. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice. Federal Circuit Rule 1

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL,

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ALEXIS DEGELMANN, et al., ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS INC.,

Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

Case: Document: 20 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 11, 2014

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Decision Filed Mar. 5, 2014 ED PRIETO; COUNTY OF YOLO,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (L) (5:15-cv D)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND, LLC Patent Owner

No In the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT APPELLEES RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

Transcription:

Case: 17-51063 Document: 00514380489 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. No. 17-51063 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; DAVID J. KAUTTER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, Defendants-Appellants APPELLANTS MOTION FOR A STAY OF BRIEFING, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A LEVEL II SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME OF 45 DAYS WITHIN WHICH TO FILE THEIR OPENING BRIEF The appellants, through counsel, hereby move to stay the briefing schedule in the above-captioned case. In support of this motion, the appellants state as follows: 1. We respectfully request a stay of the briefing schedule due to imminent administrative action, described below, that will require the Government to reevaluate whether it should proceed with this appeal (assuming that it is authorized by the Solicitor General, which, as of the

Case: 17-51063 Document: 00514380489 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2018-2 - date of this motion, has not yet occurred. A stay is warranted for the following reasons: a. At issue in this appeal is an April 2016 temporary regulation, 26 C.F.R. 1.7874-8T, issued by Treasury and the IRS, which became effective immediately without notice and comment. At the same time, consistent with standard practices, Treasury and the IRS issued the same regulation as a proposed regulation, subject to notice and comment. The district court held that the temporary regulation was invalid because it did not comply with the notice-and-comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. The Government filed this protective appeal. b. Having completed notice and comment, Treasury and the IRS plan to finalize the proposed regulation. That process is nearly complete. A draft of the final regulation has been prepared, and it has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review. The final regulation would replace the temporary regulation that is at issue in this case, which will be removed.

Case: 17-51063 Document: 00514380489 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/09/2018-3 - c. Accordingly, we respectfully request that briefing of this case be stayed until a final regulation is published in the Federal Register, during which time the Government will evaluate whether it should proceed with this appeal or dismiss it. 2. In the alternative, we respectfully request, for the reasons stated above, a level II second extension of time of 45 days within which to file our opening brief in this appeal. (See Fifth Cir. R. 31.4. a. The appellants opening brief is currently due, pursuant to a 30-day extension, on March 16, 2018. Granting the requested 45-day extension would mean that the appellants opening brief would be due on April 30, 2018. b. The requested extension is supported by [m]ore than ordinary good cause. (Fifth Cir. R. 31.4.3.2. As stated above, a final regulation is in the final stages of the rulemaking process. The regulation would replace the temporary regulation that is at issue in this case, requiring the Government to reevaluate its position in this case. This administrative action presents extraordinary circumstances that necessitate the requested extension.

Case: 17-51063 Document: 00514380489 Page: 4 Date Filed: 03/09/2018-4 - 3. Counsel for the appellants has contacted counsel for the appellees regarding this motion for a stay of briefing, or in the alternative, for a 45-day extension of time. See Fifth Cir. R. 27.4 & 31.4.1(b. Yaakov M. Roth, Esquire, one of counsel for the appellees, stated that appellees had not yet formulated a position regarding this motion, but that they would do so in due course after this motion is filed. CONCLUSION For the reasons discussed above, the appellants request that this Court stay the briefing schedule in this case. In the alternative, the

Case: 17-51063 Document: 00514380489 Page: 5 Date Filed: 03/09/2018-5 - appellants request a level II second extension of time of 45 days, to and including April 30, 2018, for filing an opening brief in this case. Respectfully submitted, RICHARD E. ZUCKERMAN Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General TRAVIS A. GREAVES Deputy Assistant Attorney General /s/ Teresa E. McLaughlin Of Counsel: GILBERT S. ROTHENBERG (202 514-3361 TERESA E. MCLAUGHLIN (202 514-4342 DEBORAH K. SNYDER (202 305-1680 Attorneys Tax Division Department of Justice Post Office Box 502 Washington, D.C. 20044 RICHARD L. DURBIN, JR. United States Attorney March 9, 2018

Case: 17-51063 Document: 00514380489 Page: 6 Date Filed: 03/09/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. No. 17-51063 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; DAVID J. KAUTTER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, Defendants-Appellants DECLARATION I, Teresa E. McLaughlin, of the Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., state as follows: 1. I am an attorney in the Tax Division, United States Department of Justice. In that capacity, I have been assigned as one of counsel for the appellants in the above-captioned case. 2. The facts stated in the foregoing motion are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Case: 17-51063 Document: 00514380489 Page: 7 Date Filed: 03/09/2018-2 - I declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 9th day of March, 2018, at Washington, D.C. /s/ Teresa E. McLaughlin TERESA E. McLAUGHLIN _

Case: 17-51063 Document: 00514380489 Page: 8 Date Filed: 03/09/2018 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 1. This document complies with the word limit of Fed. R. App. P. 27(d(2(A because, excluding the parts of the document exempted by Fed. R. App. P. 32(f: [X] this document contains 883 words, or [ ] this brief uses a monospaced typeface and contains lines of text. 2. This document complies with the typeface requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a(5 and the type style requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a(6 because: [X] this document has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Microsoft Word 2016 in Century Schoolbook 14, or [ ] this brief has been prepared in a monospaced typeface using with. /s/ Teresa E. McLaughlin TERESA E. McLAUGHLIN Attorney for Appellants _ March 9, 2018

Case: 17-51063 Document: 00514380489 Page: 9 Date Filed: 03/09/2018 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on March 9, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing motion with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. I further certify that all counsel of record are registered CM/ECF users who will be served by the court s CM/ECF system. /s/ Teresa E. McLaughlin TERESA E. McLAUGHLIN _