DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PALM BEACH COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

Similar documents
DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY BROWARD COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PINELLAS COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

PINELLAS DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY

Juvenile Detention Center Statistics Quarter 1, 2010 Report (period includes January March 31, 2010)

DETENTION SERVICES. There are 2,057 secure detention beds currently in operation in the State of Florida.

Ventura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

SPARTANBURG ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION

Key Facts. There are 2,057 secure detention beds in Florida. 55,170 youth were admitted to secure detention.

Correctional Population Forecasts

Evidence-Based Policy Planning for the Leon County Detention Center: Population Trends and Forecasts

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1552

BECCA PETITIONS AND THE USE OF DETENTION IN WASHINGTON STATE. Amanda B. Gilman, PhD Rachael Sanford

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division

DETENTION SERVICES. Detention Services. detention facilities with 1,302. beds in operation in the State. of Florida.

DETENTION SERVICES Detention Services. Julia Strange Assistant Secretary for Detention Services (850)

Pinellas County Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) 2016 Work Plan

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

Select Strategies and Outcomes from DMC Action Network and Replication Sites

New Jersey Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) 2010 Annual Data Report

REDUCING RECIDIVISM STATES DELIVER RESULTS

Alaska Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Drivers

Seventy-three percent of people facing

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

Adult and Juvenile Correctional Populations Forecasts

Palm Beach County Jail Population Forecast: 2003 to 2015 March 25, 2003

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

2014 Kansas Statutes

Baseline Measures for Illinois. The MacArthur Foundation s Juvenile Justice Initiative

Examining the Trends and Use of Iowa s Juvenile Detention Centers

Safety and Justice Challenge: Interim performance measurement report

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

Prepared by: Meghan Ogle, M.S.

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Prepared for the Broward Sheriff s Office Department of Community Control. September Prepared by:

Prince William County 2004 Adult Detention Services SEA Report

Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative

Analysis of Senate Bill

Florida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn

JUVENILE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS 2015

M E M O R A N D U M. Bill Smith, Esquire Attorney for John Doe. Meredith Patti, Esquire Mary Cate Rush, Chief Statistician. DATE: August 5, 2014

Disproportionate Minority Contact. by Moire Kenny Maine Statistical Analysis Center Muskie School of Public Service

Short-Term Transitional Leave Program in Oregon

Disproportionate Representation of Minorities in the Alaska Juvenile Justice System. Phase I Report

Jail: Who is in on bail?

OFFICE OF THE MAGISTRATE Bruce Adam, Chief Magistrate

At yearend 2014, an estimated 6,851,000

Prison Rape Elimination Act Annual Report Fiscal Year Stop Sexual Violence

Offences Against the Administration of Justice Statistical Report Summary Report 1 ISBN

Youth Justice Statistics 2014/15. England and Wales. Youth Justice Board / Ministry of Justice Statistics bulletin

RAMSEY COUNTY JDAI / DMC QUARTERLY STAKEHOLDER GROUP MEETING JANUARY 19, 2011

20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates

Ramsey County, Minnesota

crossroads AN EXAMINATION OF THE JAIL POPULATION AND PRETRIAL RELEASE

Delinquency Hearings

At yearend 2012, the combined U.S. adult

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

Local Justice Reinvestment: The Challenge of Jail Population Projection

CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE

Juristat Article. The changing profile of adults in custody, 2006/2007. by Avani Babooram

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

FLORIDADEPARTMENTOF CORRECTIONS

REALIZING POTENTIAL & CHANGING FUTURES

THE EFFECTIVENESS AND COST OF SECURED AND UNSECURED PRETRIAL RELEASE IN CALIFORNIA'S LARGE URBAN COUNTIES:

Identifying Chronic Offenders

Juvenile Justice Referrals in Alaska,

Juveniles Charged as Adults and Held in Adult Detention Facilities: Trend Analysis and Population Projections

Jail Population Trend Report April - June 2016

JUVENILE JUSTICE & DISPROPORTIONALITY: Patterns of Minority Over-Representation in Washington's Juvenile Justice System*

NEW ORLEANS PRETRIAL SERVICES OVERVIEW

Adult Correctional Services in Canada, 2001/02

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses

17th Circuit Court Kent County Courthouse 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

Options of court at dispositional hearing. If in its decree the juvenile court finds that the child comes within the purview of this chapter,

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Detention, Commitment, and Parole Population Projections

Criminal Justice Reforms

63M Creation -- Members -- Appointment -- Qualifications.

Maine Statistical Analysis Center. USM Muskie School of Public Service.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

REPORT # O L A OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF M INNESOTA PROGRAM EVALUATION R EPORT. Chronic Offenders

Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons A Presentation to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice

Center for Criminal Justice Research, Policy & Practice: The Rise (and Partial Fall) of Illinois Prison Population. Research Brief

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma Initial Work Group Meeting

[First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED APRIL 14, 2016

Facing the Future: Juvenile Detention in Alameda County

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Commitment and Parole Population Projections

Racial Disparities in Youth Commitments and Arrests

Prison Rape Elimination Act Annual Report Fiscal Year Stop Sexual Violence

Youth at High Risk of Disconnection

FLORIDA DETENTION RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

Economic and Social Council

Transcription:

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PALM BEACH COUNTY JUNE 2015 Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice Rick Scott, Governor Christina K. Daly, Secretary

The youth population (age 10-17) in Palm Beach County has remained stable over the past 5 fiscal years, from 125,030 in FY2009-2010 to 123,477 in FY2013-2014. N=125,030 N=124,383 N=123,997 N=123,642 N=123,477 ***These youth population estimates differ from those reported in the 2011 study due to different methodology. The 2011 study used census data whereas the current study uses EDR data to provide a more accurate estimate on youth population in Florida counties.

The number of arrests continued to trend downward in Palm Beach County over the past 5 fiscal years. There was a 5% decrease in arrests since last fiscal year. 6,300 Arrests 5,722 Arrests 5,276 Arrests 4,488 Arrests 4,277 Arrests Despite overall arrests going down, there was a 7% increase in felony arrests since last fiscal year There was a 20% reduction in felony arrests from FY2009-2010 to FY2013-2014.

The arrest rates of all races/ethnicities have decreased over the past 5 fiscal years in Palm Beach County. The arrest rate of Black youth relative to the population decreased by 14 arrests per 1,000 Black youth over the past 5 fiscal years. During the same time period, the arrest rate of White youth decreased by 16 arrests per 1,000 White youth The arrest rate of Hispanic youth also decreased by 16 arrests per 1,000 Hispanic youth over the past 5 fiscal years

Annual racial and ethnic disparities in arrest rates over the past 5 years in Palm Beach County. Disparities in arrest rates between Black youth and Hispanic youth and between White youth and Black youth have been decreasing over the past 5 years The disparity in arrest rates between White youth and Hispanic youth has increased over the past 5 years.

Annual admissions to secure detention in Palm Beach County have been on an overall decline over the past 15 fiscal years, with an upward slope in the most recent year. Admissions to secure detention increased by 25% since last fiscal year. During the same period, felony arrests increased by 7%, despite overall arrests decreasing by 5%

There has been an increase in the percent of Black youth admitted to secure detention in Palm Beach County over the past 3 fiscal years and a decrease in the percent of White youth. 65% of youth admitted to secure detention in Palm Beach County in FY2013-14 were Black while only 20% were White. There was a 2 percentage point increase in percent Black youth admitted to secure detention from the previous fiscal year and a 2 percentage point decrease in percent White youth admitted to secure detention. *Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding and the fact that Other youth were excluded from comparison

Sixty-five percent of youth admitted to secure detention in Palm Beach County during fiscal year 2013-2014 were Black Black youth are overrepresented in arrests and secure detention admissions relative to the percent of Black youth in the population The percent of Black youth admitted to secure detention in FY2013-2014 was 65% while the percent of Black youth arrested was 61% and the percent of Black youth (age 10-17) in the population was only 25% *Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding and the fact that Other youth were excluded from comparison

Gender of Youth Admitted to Secure Detention in Palm Beach County Over the Past 2 Fiscal Years

Approximately three quarters (77%) of youth admitted to secure detention in Palm Beach County in fiscal year 2013-2014 were between the ages of 15 and 17.

50% of admissions to secure detention in Palm Beach County were related to new charges while half of admissions to secure detention were related to court orders. There were 511 less admissions to secure detention in the current study period than in the comparison 2010-2011 study period. A larger proportion of admissions to secure detention (5 percentage points more) were related to court orders in the present 18-month study period than in the comparison 2010-2011 study period. *N = number of admissions. Individual youth may have been admitted and released multiple times during the study period

Of youth screened and remanded to secure detention in Palm Beach County, 10% of youth were DRAI screened on the basis of an underlying charge. There was a 4 percentage point increase in youth screened on an underlying charge and sent to secure detention between this 18- month period and the comparable 2010-2011 study period *Includes all detained youth administered a DRAI screening within 1 day of (either before or after) beginning secure detention. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

The distribution of most serious current offense for youth detained in Palm Beach County has remained stable since the January 2010-June 2011 comparison period *Includes all detained youth administered a DRAI screening within 1 day of (either before or after) beginning secure detention. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

Of youth admitted to secure detention in Palm Beach County, almost half (44%) have never been in secure detention before. The distribution of prior detention stays has remained stable in Palm Beach County compared to the 2010-2011 study period. *N=First admission to secure detention within the 18-month study period for each youth

Over one quarter (28%) of youth in secure detention in Palm Beach County are only detained for 2 days. The proportion of youth in secure detention for less than 24 hours is less than half what it was (21%) in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. *N= number of releases. Individual youth may have been admitted and released multiple times during the study period.

The average length of stay in secure detention in Palm Beach County is one day shorter than the statewide average. *N = number of releases. Individual youth may have been admitted and released multiple times during the study period. Statewide Average LOS: 10 days Palm Beach Average LOS: 9 days

DRAI Decision at Palm Beach Regional Juvenile Detention Center Actual Outcome Of all youth with DRAI records (including youth with 0 scores): 52% were detained. This is 6 percentage points more than in the 2010-2011 comparison period 29% were released. This is 1 percentage point more than in the 2010-2011 comparison period 20% were placed on home detention. This is 6 percentage points less than in the 2010-2011 comparison period *N = all youth administered a DRAI screening. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

DRAI Section III Risk Assessment: C. Prior History Palm Beach County Distribution 13% of youth detained had 2 or 3 felony adjudications which is 10 percentage points more than in the 2010-2011 comparison period, suggesting detention is being used for more serious offenders. 28% of youth detained had no prior history. This is 23 percentage points less than the 2010-2011 comparison period. *N = all detained youth administered a DRAI screening with a non-zero score. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

DRAI Section III Risk Assessment: D. Legal Status Palm Beach County Distribution 29% of youth with non-zero DRAI scores detained in Palm Beach County do not have any active legal status. This is an 18 percentage point decrease from the 2010-2011 comparison period. The proportion of detained youth scoring 2) Active probation cases with last adjudication or adjudication withheld more than 90 days ago on this section increased from 22% to 32% since the 2010-2011 comparison period. *N = all detained youth administered a DRAI screening with a non-zero score. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

Palm Beach County Detention Overview: Strengths, Concerns, and Serious Concerns Strengths Concerns Serious Concerns Fewer first time offenders detained 28% of youth detained had no prior history. This is 23 percentage points less than the 2010-2011 comparison period. Fewer less than 24 hour stays The proportion of youth in secure detention for less than 24 hours is less than half what it was in the comparable 2010-2011 study period. Almost half of admissions are new to detention 44% of youth admitted to secure detention have never been to secure detention before Long length of stays 210 youth spent more than 22 days in secure detention More detention admissions for court orders and technical violations A larger proportion of admissions to secure detention (5 percentage points more) were related to court orders in the present 18-month study period than in the comparison 2010-2011 study period. Over half of all screenings result in detention 52% of youth screened go to secure detention as opposed to release, home, or respite Half of all admissions are not for new charges 50% of admissions to secure detention are due to court orders and technical violations Large increase in detention admissions Between FY2012-2013 and FY2013-2014, there was a 25% increase in detention admissions.