National Popular Vote

Similar documents
The Electoral College

ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND BACKGROUND INFO

Constitution in a Nutshell NAME. Per

Trump, Populism and the Economy

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010

Supreme Court Decision What s Next

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

2016 us election results

Electing a President. The Electoral College

NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION DAY. September 26, 2017

Ballot Questions in Michigan. Selma Tucker and Ken Sikkema

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

If you have questions, please or call

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

State Legislative Competition in 2012: Redistricting and Party Polarization Drive Decrease In Competition

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

RULE 1.14: CLIENT WITH DIMINISHED CAPACITY

THE TARRANCE GROUP. BRIEFING MEMORANDUM To: Interested Parties. From: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber. Date: November 7, 2006

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

DC: I estimate a 4,600 valid sig petition drive for President in I budget $15,000 from the LNC.

A Dead Heat and the Electoral College

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

WLSA&RDC 2014 GARY MONCRIEF

Now is the time to pay attention

Presentation Outline

Campaign 16. A Hawthorn Group visit with Kansas City Chamber June 24, 2016

Research Brief. Resegregation in Southern Politics? Introduction. Research Empowerment Engagement. November 2011

Mineral Availability and Social License to Operate

Uniform Wage Garnishment Act

Charlie Cook s Tour of American Politics

The Law Library: A Brief Guide

The Effect of Electoral Geography on Competitive Elections and Partisan Gerrymandering

RULE 1.1: COMPETENCE. As of January 23, American Bar Association CPR Policy Implementation Committee

THE POLICY CONSEQUENCES OF POLARIZATION: EVIDENCE FROM STATE REDISTRIBUTIVE POLICY

Admitting Foreign Trained Lawyers. National Conference of Bar Examiners Washington, D.C., April 15, 2016

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

Election 2014: The Midterm Results, the ACA and You

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

What to Do about Turnout Bias in American Elections? A Response to Wink and Weber

Mandated Use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PMPs) Map

A contentious election: How the aftermath is impacting education

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Independent and Third-Party Municipal Candidates. City Council Election Reform Task Force April 8, :00 p.m.

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

RIDE Program Overview

Unsuccessful Provisional Voting in the 2008 General Election David C. Kimball and Edward B. Foley

Governing Board Roster

ELECTION UPDATE Tom Davis

WHAT IS THE PROBABILITY YOUR VOTE WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

2016 NATIONAL CONVENTION

/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/

The Youth Vote in 2008 By Emily Hoban Kirby and Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg 1 Updated August 17, 2009

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Electing our President with National Popular Vote

2018 NATIONAL CONVENTION

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

NATIONAL VOTER SURVEY. November 30 December 3, 2017 N = 1,200 respondents (1/3 Landline, 1/3 Cell, 1/3 Internet) margin of error: +/- 2.

How Congress Is Organized

Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5

10/23/2012. Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 5

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES

RIDE Program Overview

Historically, state PM&R societies have operated as independent organizations that advocate on legislative and regulatory proposals.

RULE 2.4: LAWYER SERVING

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008

2018 MIDTERMS PRE- ELECTION OVER VIEW OCTOBER 2018

RULE 3.1: MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN COLORADO. June 25, 2014

Washington, D.C. Update

State Governments Viewed Favorably as Federal Rating Hits New Low

Migrant and Seasonal Head Start. Guadalupe Cuesta Director, National Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Collaboration Office

STATISTICAL GRAPHICS FOR VISUALIZING DATA

Promoting Second Chances: HR and Criminal Records

RULE 4.2: COMMUNICATION WITH PERSON REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL

Making Sense of the Federal Policy Landscape

Next Generation NACo Network BYLAWS Adopted by NACo Board of Directors Revised February, 2017

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

RULE 2.10: Judicial Statements on Pending and Impending Cases

Bylaws of the Prescription Monitoring Information exchange Working Group

Exhibit A. Anti-Advance Waiver Of Lien Rights Statutes in the 50 States and DC

Election Cybersecurity, Voter Registration, and ERIC. David Becker Executive Director, CEIR

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

The Progressive Era. 1. reform movement that sought to return control of the government to the people

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2019

The Impact of Wages on Highway Construction Costs

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

State Health Policy What s the Message and Who s Listening? Ellen Jones, PhD (ABD), CHES

Incarcerated Women and Girls

States Checking Up on Health Reform: States Opting out

RULE 3.8(g) AND (h):

Testimony of. Amanda Rolat. Legal Fellow, Democracy Program Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. Before the

Transcription:

National Popular Vote

Motivations This is NOT about trying to change the rules so that Team A or Team B has a better chance. This is about improving our elections for better democracy, better participation, better conversations.

Agenda Current electoral college process Effects of current system NPV explained Other solutions NPV doubters NPV benefits Now what

At the beginning At constitutional convention, founders decided to put the electoral college in place and let the states decide how to send electors. The founders went back to their home states and passed their own state laws on how the president would be elected. Election of 1796 illustrates how the Founders intended - the EC deliberated about the presidency

History of Winner Take All Laws 1800 started a domino effect so that by 1824 ten states had enacted winner-take-all laws By 1836 all but one state had them, and by 1880 all states had them Maine went to district elections in 1969 and Nebraska followed in 1992. The winner-take-all approach in each state distorts the value of each vote. Swing states become very powerful

The electoral college Each state is allocated a certain number of electors who in turn select the president. (total = 538) Federal law specifies how many electors each state gets and when they must make their selections. State law specifies how electors are selected for each state. Electors in each state sign Certificates of Vote which are then given to the US Senate. The certificates of votes are then counted in a joint session of congress. If no one candidate receives a majority (270) of electoral votes, then the House of Representatives votes.

Effects of winner-take-all Campaign effects Policy effects Voter participation effects

2012 Presidential Elections After Party Conventions candidate visits went to only 12 states 54.4% of TV ad spending went to OH, FL, VA 58.9% of Campaign Events went to OH, FL, VA 4/5 of states and 4/5 of voters do not matter in the General Election for President. Guess which state s issues get attention?

2016 Presidential Elections Again, after Party Conventions candidate visits largely went to only 12 states 2/3 of events were in just 6 states (FL, NC, PA, OH, VA, MI) Roughly 95 Million Americans were in the 12 battleground states. 215 Million Americans were largely ignored Again, which states get their issues addressed?

Policy Examples due to Today s Swing State System Between 1996 and 2008, swing states received 7.6% more federal grants and about 5.7% more grant money than safe states No Child Left Behind targeted suburban soccer moms in Ohio Ethanol and corn subsidies exist to woo voters in Iowa Steel Tariffs were passed by George HW Bush to secure votes in Pennsylvania Medicare Part D passed by George Bush to secure Florida votes And so on

Big Issues Get Ignored Not just voters and states that get ignored National Issues get ignored in general elections (infrastructure, national debt, environment, etc.) Campaigns only listen to voters in a few states NPV is the only way to get attention to national issues.

In Swing States, Tiny Issues Matter

Pennsylvania s NPV Debate in 2011

Voter Turnout Swing states about 60% of age eligible voters turn out Safe states about 45% of age eligible voters turn out. 2016 data: FL 56.9% - HI 38.3% PA 61% - TX 43.4% OH 61% - CA 47% CO 64.6% (yay) - AZ 48.9% source: http://www.electproject.org/2016g

What is National Popular Vote? Presidency awarded to the national popular vote winner Via an interstate compact https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinio n/100000001821730/electoral-college-1 01.html

How does National Popular Vote work? Takes effect when passed by states totaling 270 electoral votes Counts the votes in ALL 50 states and D.C. whether states are in the compact or not Awards the electors to the popular vote winner National Popular Vote has been passed in 11 states totaling 165 electoral votes so far National Popular Vote has passed legal review in 23 states.

Text of the NPV law The chief election official of each member state shall certify the appointment in that official s own state of the elector slate nominated in that state in association with the national popular vote winner. and other clauses about when it takes effect and specifies that each state will conduct a popular vote. 888 words in total, including definitions. Must be enacted into law in each state with the same text.

Where does the authority come from? The U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 reads: Each state shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress That is, the states decide

Other proposed solutions Constitutional Amendment to change presidential elections NPV is simpler: The States keep ownership Keeps EC, but directs it to follow will of people States can continue to evolve the way they select delegates Congressional District Method Would make gerrymandering worse

NPV doubters say Rural vs urban, however... According to a 2015 study (fivethirtyeight), nationally, 26 percent of Americans described where they live as urban, 53 percent said suburban and 21 percent said rural. Media cost is less in rural areas Governors and senators do not ignore rural areas today Invested in current status-quo Don t want presidential campaigns amped up in their state Prefer their vote to be lumped with their state s votes Campaign managers would have to radically change their campaign strategy Past elections and different outcomes, however with NPV, campaigns would have been different it is impossible to project past winners based on NPV Concerns about legalities NPV has passed legal review in 23 states

Imagine an Election with NPV Campaigns would need to speak to all voters Campaign issues would be different The candidates would likely be different Turnout would be different Election Day would be very different EVERY VOTE, EVERYWHERE, WOULD MATTER

Time to Learn More! www.nationalpopularvote.com

Please Review the NO Arguments Watch the No videos on YouTube and read some no articles. Some of their claims are silly, but some sound serious. Review Chapter 9 of the National Popular Vote book for answers to each of the myths Feel free to contact us with any unanswered questions and take your time It took us a long time to figure it all out!

Please Review the YES Arguments Every vote equal = empowerment. You would vote as a US citizen not with a state. Direct democracy. President and Vice President are the ONLY major offices not directly elected. Popular vote for governors, representatives, and senators works. Popular vote for president works in other countries. Less confusing.

Most Importantly National Popular Vote is Constitutional National Popular Vote is an exercise in State Sovereignty National Popular Vote is the best way to ensure that a vote every where matters. We can leave the compact as easily as we get into it

Current national status Passed in 11 places: CA, DC, HI, IL, WA, MA, MD, NJ, NY, RI, VT. All of these had bi-partisan support. Passed in at least one chamber in 23 states Passed in one chamber or another in Colorado in the past National efforts going on in CT, AZ, AK, OR. Soon to be focus on OK, UT

Current Colorado status Introduced in Senate in 2017 died in committee In 2018, likely to be introduced in the House We need it to get the floor of either the House or the Senate to get good discussions To pass, we need both chambers to pass it and then the governor to sign it We need an upswelling of citizens demanding the NPV be passed in Colorado We need to teach others about NPV

How Can You Help? Join ColoradoNPV Learn about NPV so you can educate Help us to reach additional groups Spread the word on social media Avoid Partisanship NOT a partisan effort Get active with your legislator

THANK YOU! For More Information: Colorado NPV coloradonpv.org

Extra slides follow

Pennsylvania s NPV Debate in 2011 (cont.)

Federalist Paper #45 The State governments may be regarded as constituent and essential parts of the federal government; whilst the latter is nowise essential to the operation or organization of the former. Without the intervention of the State legislatures, the President of the United States cannot be elected at all. They must in all cases have a great share in his appointment, and will, perhaps, in most cases, of themselves determine it. The Senate will be elected absolutely and exclusively by the State legislatures. Even the House of Representatives, though drawn immediately from the people, will be chosen very much under the influence of that class of men, whose influence over the people obtains for themselves an election into the State legislatures. Thus, each of the principal branches of the federal government will owe its existence more or less to the favor of the State governments, and must consequently feel a dependence, which is much more likely to beget a disposition too obsequious than too overbearing towards them.

April 3, 2015

What/Why the Electoral College? - A BRIEF REFRESHER - Created at the Constitutional Convention Maintains state power (worth protecting), while determining how large of a voice each state shall have The EC was a necessary compromise at the Constitutional Convention (after 30 votes in 22 days it was time to compromise)