ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on January 14, 2013, to receive public input; and

Similar documents
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EULESS, TEXAS, THAT; SECTION 1.

CITY OF LOWRY CROSSING, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 262

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, by act of the General Assembly of Virginia as codified by Chapter 11,

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, such modification is in the interest of public safety;

ORDINANCE NO application to the City of Keller to request a. Specific SUP ), which has been reviewed by the

TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO P&Z

RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES WHILE OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK ORDINANCE #

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO * * * * * WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mont Belvieu, Texas, ( City ) is

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Chapter 46, Article II of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clute, as amended,

ORDINANCE NO. NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

ORDINANCE NO

LOWER SAUCON TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF MELISSA, TEXAS

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

Ordinance No. 10- BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: 1.

Ordinance No. PD12-10

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO (b) Authority of Permitting Officer. The permitting officer is hereby authorized to accept or deny applications.

ORDINANCE NO Town of Rising Sun. Cecil County, Maryland

THE CODE OF ORDINANCES

ORDINANCE NO

Ordinance No. WHEREAS, certain wildlife such as birds and coyotes pose a significant danger to incoming and outgoing flights; and

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BOROUGH OF CHAMBERSBURG CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 204, PARADES AND PUBLIC GATHERINGS

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASA GRANDE, ARIZONA: Permitting or Encouraging Underage Drinking

ORDINANCE NO. 867 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF THE DACONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SITE PLANS AND USES IN THE C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICT

ORDINANCE 11-O-14 { }{

Ordinance No. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: 1.

BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK ORDINANCE # 15-21

ORDINANCE NO XXX

ORDINANCE NO. C-13-34

Article 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Perris hereby ordains as follows:

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:

CITY COUNTY ZIP CODE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE

CITY OF ROCKWALL ORDINANCE NO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NO. S -138 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

Borough of Berwick ORDINANCE

City CQ)f WesiwCQ)Jrth Village 31]1 Bm ' ~o:n JHljl1 IRo 'Il '~ VVest-wodh Village, T :g: ]Pax ll7.7jlo.2501

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

TITLE I: GENERAL PROVISIONS. Chapter 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Chapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Master sign plan/o#- belterra commercial

ORDINANCE NO. C-14-38

CITY ORDINANCE NO. 585

GENERAL PROVISIONS GP 1

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

the City Council has previously adopted ordinances regulating animal control; and

TOWNSHIP OF WORCESTER MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Now, therefore be it and it is hereby ordained chapter 152 Outdoor Advertising shall read as follows:

PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE,

ORDINANCE NO. 610-C.S.

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

Tract 2, Abstract 186, J. A. Ramsey Survey ( acre), located at 2315 Hwy 276, and

CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE

Honorable Mayor Bill Agan and members of the Richland Hills City Council. Zoning Ordinance Change as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS", AS

ORDINANCE NO (b) Authority of Permitting Officer. The permitting officer is hereby authorized to accept or deny applications.

ORDINANCE NO ~

CITY of NOVI CITY COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth, Texas, is a home rule City acting under its Charter

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF WELLINGTON, COLORADO THAT:

ORDINANCE NO. O

D. COUNCIL. The City Council of Waukee, Iowa.

ORDINANCE NO 100 CITY OF PATTISON, TEXAS SUBSTANDARD BUILDING ORDINANCE

City of Signal Hill Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

ORDINANCE NO

WHEREAS, Part 10, Chapter 2, Section requires that a Special Use Permit be obtained to operate a school, private or special; and

ORDINANCE NO. 980 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANCASTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO EAST BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

NEW BUSINESS Agenda Item No. : 8b CC Mtg. : 7/12/2005

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Borough of Berlin, by Ordinance No. 101, enacted August 17, 1943, established a curfew for minors; and,

ORDINANCE # N:\WEB SITE UP DATE\Adoption of 2015 IBC_For Y Adoption_Final.docx Page 1 of 12

City of. Lake Lillian

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

KERSEY MUNICIPAL CODE

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HAPEVILLE, GEORGIA, CHAPTER 11, BUSINESS LICENSING AND

LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO. 87-1

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK

CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION OCTOBER Attachments. Approved. City Manager

Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

ORDINANCE NO. O THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, COLORADO

ORDINANCE NO. ARTICLE VI. COMMERCIAL FILM AND VIDEO PRODUCTIONS

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, do ordain as follows:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HAHIRA, GEORGIA

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAMAR, COLORADO AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE 17 SIGNS AND AWNINGS REGULATIONS

TITLE I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

CITY OF Michigan Michigan, North Dakota ORDINANCE #112 MINIMUM HOUSING, DILAPIDATED BUILDINGS, PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY ORDINANCE

CITY OF SHELBYVILLE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHELBYVILLE FOR POST DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

ANIMAL NEGLECT REGISTRY Ordinance No O-090

BRUCE TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO. 121 BRUCE TOWNSHIP INOPERABLE MOTOR VEHICLE ORDINANCE TITLE

Transcription:

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KELLER, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CITY OF KELLER UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 1435, DATED NOVEMBER 18, 2008; BY AMENDING ARTICLE 3, DEFINITIONS, SECTION 3.01, DEFINITIONS, AND ARTICLE 9, ZONING/DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 9.04, SIGN REGULATIONS, REGARDING ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD SIGNS FOR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, WITHIN THE CITY S UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING A CONFLICTING ORDINANCE CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. in the deliberation of the City Council of the City of Keller, Texas, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Keller that the Unified Development Code be amended by amending Article 3, Definitions, Section 3.01, Definitions, and Article 9, Zoning/Development Standards, Section 9.04, Sign Regulations, regarding electronic message board signs for governmental entities, within the City s Unified Development Code; and notice of a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Keller at least ten (10) days prior to such hearing; and a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on January 14, 2013, to receive public input; and notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Keller at least fifteen (15) days before such hearing; and the City Council of the City of Keller, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether the Ordinance changes contained herein should be 1

approved: safety of the motoring public and pedestrians; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of property from flood or water damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of said Ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street location spaces; and the effect on the promotion of the health, safety, and the general welfare of the citizens of the City of Keller; and the City Council does find that there is a public necessity for said Ordinance changes, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, that said Ordinance changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that said Ordinance changes lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; promotes health, safety, and the general welfare of the citizens of the City of Keller; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration or population; and facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, parks, and other public requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KELLER, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT, the above findings are hereby found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein in their entirety. 2

Section 2: THAT, Article 3, Definitions, Section 3.01, Definitions, 274., Signs, within the City s Unified Development Code shall be amended by adding the following new definition for Item p., relating to an electronic message board sign and renumbering subsequent sections accordingly: p. Sign, Electronic Message Board A sign with characters, letters, or other content that can be changed, altered, or rearranged electrically or electronically without physically altering the permanent physical face or surface of a sign. Section 3: THAT, Article 9, Zoning/Development Standards, Section 9.04, Sign Regulations, K., Sign Requirements for Non-Residential Uses, 1., Detached Signs, a., General Provisions, shall be adding the following new standard for electronic message board signs to read as follows: 10) An electronic message board sign shall be permitted as part of a monument sign for governmental entities only (federal, state, county, city, and school district) provided that: a. The area of the electronic message board sign does not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the total allowable monument sign area. b. The sign is monochromatic having a black background with letters, characters and/or images created by a single color illumination. c. The sign message shall be static and shall not blink, flash, or move/scroll. 3

d. The sign message may change but the display interval shall have a minimum duration of five (5) minutes. Section 4: THAT, all other ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 5: THAT, any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance as read together with the Unified Development Code, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction therefore, shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day any such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such hereunder. Section 6: THAT, if any section, paragraph, clause, phrase, or provision of this Ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the validity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause, phrase, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. Section 7: THAT, this Ordinance supercedes all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions stated herein. Section 8: THAT, the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause of this Ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Section 9: THAT, this Ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication provided by law. 4

AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. Passed and approved by a vote of to on this the 5th day of February, 2013. CITY OF KELLER, TEXAS BY: P.H. McGrail, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Stephens, City Secretary Approved as to Form and Legality: L. Stanton Lowry, City Attorney 5