Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 1, 2018 Subject Summary of Issues Interstate 680 (I 680)/State Route 4 (SR4) In

Similar documents
Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 21, 2017 Subject Summary of Issues Interstate 680 (I-680)/State Route 4 (SR4) In

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT July 7, 2016 Page 2 of 3 and Protection Program (SHOPP) funds to cover the Grayson Creek Bridge rep

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 1, 2016 Subject State Route 4 (SR4) Balfour Road Interchange (Project 5005)

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT November 5, 2015 Page 2 of 3 Background The table below lists general information for each contract

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT June 4, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Background The fourth bore of the Caldecott Tunnel was opened to traffic o

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT June 4, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Background URS provided ROW engineering services for the SR4/Bailey Road t

EXHIBIT B SANTA ANA REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR (SARI) LINE LOAN AND REPAYMENT AGREEMENT NO. D10-022D

DIRECTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF THE MASTER AGREEMENT

Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 17, 2014 Subject Summary of Issues Subregional Transportation Needs Program

OPTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE OPTIONEE NAMED HEREIN (Not to be Recorded)

Authority Board Meeting MINUTES

Authority Board Meeting MINUTES

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATIVE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHAMBERS CREEK CANYON TRAIL

MORRISON CREEK METROPOLITAN WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT POLICY REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF VAULT PROGRAM AND LOT OWNER CONSENT AND AGREEMENT

A. 2'"1 Public I-lcaring: Amendment to the Robbers Roost Developn-rent Agreement

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT For Devolution of Secondary Highway System Construction

REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE RUWAP RECYCLED PROJECT (AWT PHASE

AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 28E, IOWA CODE BETWEEN CITY OF OSKALOOSA, IOWA AND CITY OF PELLA, IOWA AND MAHASKA COUNTY, IOWA FOR

TRANSPAC JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT

DIRECTOR S REPORT TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECEMBER 11, 2017

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA AND LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR JOINT FIRE STATION

City of Los Alamitos

D. COMMENDATION: Commendation to Outgoing Chair David E. Hudson (No Attachment Information)

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Background

CITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE LEGISLATIVE BULLETIN

Requested by: John Greifzu Sponsored by: Council as a Whole

SENATE, No. 876 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

)JY" /If'- Department of Transportation

SURROUNDING COMMUNITY AGREEMENT RECITALS

ROAD USE AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, Operator intends to engage in Natural Gas Activities at various locations in the Municipality; and

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MD 410 KIPLINGER PROPERTY PARCEL 1INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING. by and between

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4797

REVISED CODE LIEN WAIVER AGREEMENT R E C I T A L S

LAKE FOREST PARK CITY COUNCIL. Agenda Item Cover Sheet Meeting Date: August 14, 2014

CITY OF WAUCHULA/HARDEE COUNTY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT OF WAY UTILIZATION

LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT

ORDINANCE NO. 12 of 2014

RECITALS. WHEREAS, CVTD currently operates five bus routes within the City with a total of eighty-five stops along such routes;

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. DATE: Adjourned Regular Meeting of December 16, The Mayor and Members of the City Council

COOPERATIVE PRICING SYSTEM AGREEMENT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 16, 2017

. Agenda Item B.4 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: December 17, Traffic Modeling Services Contract with Kittelson and Associates

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA POSTING AUTHORITY EXCESS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

CASH DEPOSIT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

AN ORDINANCE AFFIRMING ADOPTION OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DEVELOPMENT AREA, AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF

VALLEY CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 8

Lee County Board Of County Commissioners Agenda Item Summarv

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. MU BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY AND VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR

WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

Coun!I Administrator's Signature~

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ANTELOPE BIG SKY RANCH SOLAR PROJECT POWER SALES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY AND

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

LANCASTER CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/ FINANCING/POWER AUTHORITY MINUTES June 9, 2015

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MONO BYLAW NUMBER

AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN MANAGING ATTORNEY AND SPONSOR 1

1.0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

RESOLUTION NO /0001/62863v1

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT BOOTLEG CANYON DETENTION BASIN OUTFALL. THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT made and entered into as of the of WITNESSETH

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

THE CITY OF MARGATE CITY IN THE COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 6:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING 6:30 P.M.

BOROUGH OF WOODBINE COUNTY OF CAPE MAY ORDINANCE NO

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. LAMBERTVILLE, IN THE COUNTY OF HUNTERDON, NEW JERSEY (not less than

AMENDMENT NUMBER ELEVEN TO CONTRACT Z BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND RANCHO SANTIAGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

ORDINANCE NO GAS FRANCHISE

AGREEMENT. by and between the CITY OF LOS ANGELES. and ERNST & YOUNG INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORS, LLC. for the DOWNTOWN LA STREETCAR PROJECT

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN OF 56 TH STREET/CIRQUE DRIVE BETWEEN THE CITY OF TACOMA AND THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE

I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF. Agenda Item# 3-C-3. Districts 1 and 7 (MRE) PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF ORLANDO AND BIKE/WALK CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC. RE: BEST FOOT FORWARD FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY

APPLICATION FOR OFF-PREMISE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DEVICE PERMIT

ORDINANCE NO

PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY. Consent Workshop I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF

F RESOLUTION NO. 8366

TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

MAY 9, :00 P.M.

RESOLUTION NO. 18/19-21

CONSTRUCTION LIEN CLAIM

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. between the CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS. and KELLOGG AND WEST, LLC, and EAST SIDE INVESTMENT, LLC. Dated as of September 18, 2015

AND WBS ELEMENTS: PE CITY OF GASTONIA CON TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDS [NCDOT PARTICIPATION] $0

WHEREAS, the Township has elected to exercise these redevelopment entity powers directly, as permitted by Section 4 of the Redevelopment Law; and

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

PRO FORMA MEMORANDUM OF DEDICATION AGREEMENT

Applying for Presidential Permits for Border Crossing Facilities (Mexico)

BEFORE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CHABOT-LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

PURCHASE AGREEMENT IN LIEU OF CONDEMNATION

THE CITY OF MARGATE CITY IN THE COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

MONROE CITY COUNCIL. Agenda Bill No Authorize Mayor to Sign Agreement with Mara J. Rozzano, Monroe Municipal Court Judge

RESOLUTION NO

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT is entered into this

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Regular Meeting

SECOND AMENDMENT TO ROAD DESIGN, PERMITTING & CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT [EXTENSION NW 35 TH STREET PHASE 2a]

ORDINANCE NO

FAYETTE WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION (New form 4/2014) NON-STANDARD SERVICE APPLICATION

AHEAD Program Agreement

Transcription:

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 1, 2018 Subject Summary of Issues Interstate 680 (I 680)/State Route 4 (SR4) Interchange Improvements (Project 1117/6001) Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 4 to Cooperative Agreement No. 90.14.28 with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for Right of Way (ROW) Acquisition and Services, and Utility Coordination As part of the I 680/SR4 Interchange Improvements, Phase 3 project, SR4 is proposed to be widened in the median to accommodate additional Eastbound (EB) and Westbound (WB) lanes. In September 2014, Cooperative Agreement No. 90.14.28 was executed with Caltrans for ROW support in the amount of $200,000 and ROW capital in the amount of $300,000. To accommodate project needs for ROW, coordination and expenditures for utility relocations, agency coordination, and extended schedule, Amendment Nos. 1, 2, and 3 were executed bringing the total agreement value to $10,156,000. To address the increase in the utility relocation cost estimates as provided by Philip 66, which is $1,800,000 higher than the original estimates, the utility agreement between Caltrans, the ROW agent acting on behalf of the Authority for this project and Philip 66 needs to be amended to reflect the new cost. This will fully fund the Philip 66 Oil Pipeline Relocation project and move the project to construction once all permits are obtained. Recommendations Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 4 to Cooperative Agreement No. 90.14.28 with Caltrans in the amount of $1,800,000 for a new total agreement value of $11,956,000 for ROW acquisition and services, and utility coordination. Staff also seeks authorization for the Executive Director to make any non substantive changes as needed. 5.2-1

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT March 1, 2018 Page 2 of 3 Financial Implications Options Sufficient State Transportation Improvements Program and Regional Improvement Program (STIP/RIP), Measure C and Measure J funds for this proposed amendment are included under the project. The Authority Board could elect not to approve this amendment; however, this may delay the project delivery schedule. Attachments A. Draft Amendment No. 4 to Cooperative Agreement No. 90.14.28 Changes from Committee Background The I 680/SR4 Interchange Improvements, Phase 3 project would widen SR4 in the median to provide a third lane in the EB and WB directions from Morello Avenue to just east of SR242. The project is in the final design phase. The project originally included widening the existing Grayson Creek bridge structures. However, due to the age and condition, the bridge is being replaced rather than widened. Amendment No. 1 provided for additional support and capital as several utilities needed to be relocated that previously would have remained in place, increasing the capital and support budgets from the original cooperative agreement estimates. To accommodate coordination and expenditures for utility relocations, agency coordination, and an extended schedule, Amendment No. 2 was executed to compensate for the additional capital and support costs. Amendment No. 2 increased the support budget to $700,000 and the capital budget to $9,156,000 for a new total agreement value of $9,856,000. Amendment No. 3 was executed to reprogram STIP/RIP funds from the construction phase to the ROW phase and to increase the support cost by $300,000 for a new total agreement value of $10,156,000. In December 2017, Philip 66, owner and operator of the oil pipeline completed the design phase of relocating the pipeline and updated its cost estimates. After examining the updated estimates, it was discovered that contingencies were accounted at each level in addition to the overall contingency. Staff and Caltrans entered into a discussion with Philip 66 about the need to have the estimates updated using the most recent bid prices and have one overall 5.2-2

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT March 1, 2018 Page 3 of 3 contingency. Philip 66 staff agreed to this method and thus revised their estimates accordingly. The revised engineer s estimate is $1,800,000 higher than what was previously estimated. Amendment No. 4 to the Cooperative Agreement No. 90.14.28 with Caltrans is needed in order to execute the utility agreement with Philip 66 for the construction phase of relocating the oil pipeline. Amendment No. 4 will increase the ROW capital cost by $1,800,000 for a new total agreement value of $11,956,000. 5.2-3

ATTACHMENT A AGREEMENT 04-2545-A4 Project No. 0414000130 EA 22911 04-CC-4-R11.2/R15.1 90.14.28 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 04-2545 (Draft 2/20/18, AH) This Amendment No. 4 to Agreement (AMENDMENT 4 ), entered into, and effective on, 2018, is between the State of California, acting through its Department of Transportation, referred to as CALTRANS, and Contra Costa Transportation Authority, a public entity, referred to hereinafter as CCTA. RECITALS 1. CALTRANS and CCTA, collectively referred to as PARTNERS, entered into Agreement 04-2545 (AGREEMENT) on September 25, 2014, defining the terms and conditions for cooperating on the R/W phase of a highway improvement project (PROJECT) in Contra Costa County. PROJECT consisted of widening the median of State Route 4 (SR 4) in both directions to provide a third lane from east of Milano Way/Glacier Drive to east of SR 242 in Phase 3 of the I-680/SR 4 interchange. PROJECT also included widening of Grayson Creek Bridge. Under AGREEMENT, CCTA is the sole SPONSOR and FUNDING PARTNER and CALTRANS is the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY and CEQA and NEPA lead agency for PROJECT. 2. It was decided in early 2015 that Grayson Creek Bridge will be replaced, rather than widened, thereby significantly increasing the scope of PROJECT. The Project Report was approved on February 9, 2009 and was consistent with the Negative Declaration / Initial Study and Final Environmental Assessment dated November 26, 2008. The re-evaluation of the environmental document was approved on December 17, 2015. A Supplemental Project Report is being prepared to address the change in scope and is expected to be approved by July 1, 2017. 3. PARTNERS entered into Amendment 1 to AGREEMENT (AMENDMENT 1) on July 3, 2015, to increase the local funding for R/W Support from $200,000 to $613,000 and that for R/W Capital from $300,000 to $6,350,000 due to the increase in the PROJECT scope discussed above. 4. PARTNERS also entered into Amendment 2 to AGREEMENT (AMENDMENT 2) on August 11, 2016, to reflect the revised funding obligations on PROJECT. Under AMENDMENT 2, the local funding for R/W SUPPORT was increased from $613,000 to $700,000 and that for R/W CAPITAL from $6,350,000 to $9,156,000 to meet the PROJECT needs. The increase in R/W CAPITAL and SUPPORT costs was primarily due to additional utility relocations, coordination and extended schedule. 5. PARTNERS then entered into Amendment 3 to AGREEMENT (AMENDMENT 3) on July 20, 2017, to incorporate the STIP/RIP funds in the amount $5,100,000 that became available for PROJECT after CTC s approval in May, 2017. $4,800,000 of these STIP/RIP funds were used for R/W CAPITAL and $300,000 were used to augment the R/W 1 of 5 5.2-4

AGREEMENT 04-2545-A4 Project No. 0414000130 SUPPORT funding. The increase in the R/W SUPPRT cost was due to additional utility coordination, delay in Contra Costa County Flood Control District permit issues, resolution of the deed language issue with the Contra Costa County, the lengthy condemnation process with 1st & 2nd level reviews and the delayed response from the property owner and attorney. The total R/W SUPPORT funds increased under AMENDMENT 3 to $1,000,000, which included the previously allocated $700,000 in local funds. The total R/W CAPITAL funds were unchanged from the previously reported $9,156,000, but now included the STIP/RIP funds, as discussed above. 6. PARTNERS now wish to enter into AMENDMENT 4 to address the current PROJECT needs with respect to R/W CAPITAL. Under AMENDMENT 4, the local funds for R/W CAPITAL will be increased from the previously reported $4,356,000 to $6,156,000, which constitutes an increase of $1,800,000. Accordingly, the R/W CAPITAL funding will increase to $10,956,000 causing the total R/W cost for PROJECT to increase to $11,956,000. IT IS THEREFORE MUTUALLY AGREED: 7. PARTNERS hereby amend AGREEMENT by replacing FUNDING SUMMARY NO. 4 of AMENDMENT 3 in its entirety with FUNDING SUMMARY NO. A4, attached hereto and made a part of AMENDMENT 4. Any reference to FUNDING SUMMARY in AGREEMENT will now be deemed a reference to FUNDING SUMMARY NO. A4. 8. All other terms and conditions of AGREEMENT, as revised under AMENDMENT 1, shall remain in full force and effect. 9. AMENDMENT 4 is deemed to be included in, and made a part of, AGREEMENT. 2 of 5 5.2-5

AGREEMENT 04-2545-A4 Project No. 0414000130 SIGNATURES PARTNERS declare that: 1. Each PARTNER is an authorized legal entity under California state law. 2. Each PARTNER has the authority to enter into AMENDMENT 4. 3. The people signing AMENDMENT 4 have the authority to do so on behalf of their public agencies. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Helena (Lenka) Culik-Caro Deputy District Director, Design Federal D. Glover Chair Certified as to funds: Attest: District Budget Manager Tarienne Grover Clerk of the Board Certified as to financial terms and policies: Approved as to form and procedure: Accounting Administrator Malathy Subramanian CCTA Counsel 3 of 5 5.2-6

FUNDING SUMMARY NO. A4 Funding Source FUNDING PARTNER FUNDING TABLE IMPLEMENTING AGENCY R/W SUPPORT CALTRANS R/W CAPITAL Fund Type Totals Local CCTA Local $700,000 $6,156,000 $6,856,000 State CALTRANS STIP/RIP $300,000 $4,800,000 $5,100,000 Totals $1,000,000 $10,956,000 $11,956,000 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY SPENDING SUMMARY CALTRANS R/W SUPPORT R/W CAPITAL Fund Type CALTRANS CCTA CALTRANS Totals Local $700,000 $0 $6,156,000 $6,856,000 STIP/RIP $300,000 $0 $4,800,000 $5,100,000 Totals $1,000,000 $0 $10,956,000 $11,956,000 PACT Version 10.1 4 of 5 5.2-7

Invoicing and Payment 1. PARTNERS will invoice for funds where the SPENDING SUMMARY shows that one PARTNER provides funds for use by another PARTNER. PARTNERS will pay invoices within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of invoice. 2. If CCTA has received Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) certification from CALTRANS then CCTA will use the EFT mechanism and follow all EFT procedures to pay all invoices issued from CALTRANS. CCTA will pay all invoices via EFT within five (5) days of receipt of invoice. 3. When CALTRANS is to be reimbursed from state or federal funds that are provided by CCTA and CALTRANS administers those funds, then CALTRANS will draw from those funds without invoicing CCTA. 4. When a PARTNER is reimbursed for actual costs from funds administered by another PARTNER, invoices will be submitted each month for the prior month's expenditures. Right of Way Support (R/W SUPPORT) 5. CALTRANS will invoice CCTA for a $40,000 initial deposit after execution of this AGREEMENT and thirty (30) working days prior to the commencement of R/W SUPPORT expenditures. This deposit represents two (2) months estimated costs. Thereafter, CALTRANS will invoice and CCTA will reimburse for actual costs. Right of Way Capital (R/W CAPITAL) 6. CALTRANS will invoice CCTA for a $30,000 initial deposit after execution of this AGREEMENT and thirty (30) working days prior to the commencement of R/W CAPITAL expenditures. This deposit represents one (1) months estimated costs. Thereafter, CALTRANS will invoice and CCTA will reimburse for the accepted offer price of parcels 5 of 5 5.2-8