IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Similar documents
~ Civil Action No. A-04-C~-o03370lI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

Case 2:99-cv JPM Document 14 Filed 11/24/1999 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

I. Background and History of Proceedings

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

September 19, Veronica Zertuche, Esq. Deputy City Attorney City of San Antonio 100 Military Plaza, 3 rd Floor San Antonio, Texas 78205

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

)

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Case 6:06-cv CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 8

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE LmGATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. ) Defendant. )

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

UNITED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT EAS1ERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 06 CV 2697 (ARR)(RER) CONSENT DECREE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E CONSENT DECREE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

)

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

EEOC v. Altec Industries

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Case 2:01-cv MLM Document 59 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:00-cv JDT Document 26 Filed 06/21/2001 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED BY W D.C.

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Transcription:

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. NATIONWIDE HOUSING SYSTEMS, INC. Defendant IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CONSENT DECREE Civil Action No. United States DistrIct Court Southem DistrIct of Texas FILED DEC 26 2000 Michael N. Milby. Clerk ~s CAOOl~"'d States Distrf t C loiitrtem District oft= ENTERED JAN 1 0 206, ""liuby,aagl The parties to this Consent Decree are the Plaintiff, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), and Defendant, Nationwide Housing Systems, Inc. ("Nationwide"). This Consent Decree resolves the allegations raised by the EEOC in the abovereferenced Civil Action No. COO12S. The EEOC initiated this lawsuit under 623(a) of the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. 623(a), to correct alleged unlawful employment practices on the basis of age, and to provide appropriate relief to James W. Stovall, who the EEOC maintains was adversely affected by these alleged practices based on his age. The EEOC alleges that James W. Stovall was subjected to unlawful discrimination when Nationwide failed to promote Stovall to the position of general manager. Nationwide denies the allegations brought by the EEOC as alleged in the Complaint filed in this Civil Action. The EEOC and Nationwide wish to settle this action, without the risks, uncertainties and expenses of continued litigation, under the terms in the Decree. Neither Nationwide's consent to the entry of this Decree, nor any of the terms set forth in it, shall constitute or be construed as Nationwide's admission of any ADEA violation. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:

1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and the parties, venue is proper, and all administrative prerequisites to the EEOC's filing of this action have been met. The parties stipulate to the Court's jurisdiction. 2. This Decree is entered in full and complete settlement of all claims contained in this lawsuit. EEOC expressly reserves its right to process and litigate any other charges (other than EEOC Charge No. 36B 97 0273 filed by James W. Stovall against Nationwide) which may now be pending or may in the future be filed against Defendant Nationwide. 3. The duration of this Decree shall be two years from the date of its filing with the Court. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action during the period of this Decree and may enter further orders or modifications as may be appropriate. 4. Defendant Nationwide is enjoined from engaging in any employment practice which discriminates on the basis of age, including, but not limited to promotion. 5. Within one (1) year of the date of entry of this Decree, one of Nationwide's human resources personnel, general counsel, or an attorney from the law offices of the Ashcraft Law Firm, P.C., shall provide EEO training to the regional manager and all general managers in Region 18 (consisting of the sales centers in Boerne, Corpus Christi, New Braunfels, and Seguin) of the South Division of Defendant Nationwide. The training shall: (a) explain that age discrimination is unlawful; (b) instruct what conduct may constitute age discrimination; and (c) explain the damaging effects of age discrimination to victims, their families, their coworkers, and the workplace environment. Within 20 days after the EEO training has been completed, Nationwide shall provide to the EEOC a written report identifying each individual who attended this training and the date(s) and time of attendance. This training may be conducted in conjunction with previously scheduled conferences or training. 2

6. Defendant Nationwide agrees to post a notice, for at least the duration of this Decree, of its intent to comply with the ADEA. This notice is set forth in Exhibit "A," which is attached to this Decree. Nationwide agrees to post a copy of Exhibit "A" in a conspicuous place III Nationwide's sales center in Corpus Christi, Texas, within ten days after this Decree is entered. 7. Defendant Nationwide, in settlement of this dispute, shall pay to James W. Stovall, the sum total of $6,500.00 (SIX THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/1 00), including all legal deductions. Payment shall be mailed directly to, James W. Stovall, Rt. 7, Box 860, Livingston, Texas 77351, within 14 days of the Court entering this Decree. A copy of the settlement check and any accompanying transmittal documents shall be forwarded to the EEOC to the attention of Robert B. Harwin, Regional Attorney, 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Suite 200, San Antonio, Texas 78229. 8. The terms of this Decree shall be binding upon the EEOC and Defendant Nationwide, its agents, officers, employees, servants, successors, and assigns, as to the issues resolved herein. 9. The parties to this Decree shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees incurred in this action. The parties agree that there is no "prevailing p _ J I ~o I SO ORDERED AND ENTERED 21'"/ day of L., ~. y" in this action or proceeding. Respectfully submitted, C. GREGORY STEWART General Counsel GWENDOL YN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel &u1j.~~u~v ~~ 3 ROBERT B. HARWIN ht ~

fi)~o. {1yt~ " (t1~w0~,,') WILLIAM O. ASHCRAFTWw rv.d.njj.j AttorneyinCharge Texas State Bar No. 01372800 Southern District No. 11654 ANITA M. ALESSANDRA Texas State Bar No. 00988000 Southern District No. 13936 ASHCRAFT LAW FIRM 8750 North Central Expressway Suite 1070 Dallas, Texas 75231 Telephone: (214) 9870660 Telecopier: (214) 9873847 Supervisory Trial Attorney Texas State Bar No. 08642750 Southern District No. J44 4) l/" /' R. Atto eyincharge Texas State Bar No. 00794465 Southern District No. 23449 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Antonio District Office 5410 Fredericksburg Rd., Suite 200 San Antonio, Texas 782293555 Telephone: (210) 2817636 Telecopier: (210) 2817669 ATTORNEYS FORPLAINTnF and TOM M. HARRISON Texas State Bar No. 09122300 Southern District No. 1891 ROXANA V. SmA Texas State BarNo. 00785146 Southern District No. 15608 HORNBLOWER, MANNING & WARD, P.C. 711 N. Carancahua, Suite 1810 Corpus Christi, Texas 78475 Telephone: (361) 8888041 Telecopier: (361) 8888222 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 4

NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES NATIONWIDE HOUSING SYSTEMS, INC. SUPPORTS FEDERAL LAW REQUIRING THERE BE NO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST ANY APPLICANT OR EMPLOYEE BECAUSE OF HIS OR HER RACE, COLOR, SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN, RELIGION, AGE OR DISABILITY AND REAFFIRMS ITS COMMITMENT NOT TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY APPLICANT OR EMPLOYEE ON ANY TERM OR CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT. NA TIONWIDE HOUSING SYSTEMS, INC. WILL NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY EMPLOYEE FOR OPPOSING EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION OR FOR FILING OR PARTICIPATING IN A CHARGE OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION. IF YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST IN ANY TERM OR CONDITION OF YOUR EMPLOYMENT BECAUSE OF YOUR RACE, RELIGION, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, AGE, OR DISABILITY, OR THAT YOU ARE BEING SUBJECTED TO HARASSMENT BECAUSE OF YOUR AGE OR HAVING ENGAGED IN ADEAPROTECTED ACTIVITY, YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SEEK ASSISTANCE FROM SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL, THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, 2450 SOUTH SHORE BOULEVARD, SUITE 300, LEAGUE CITY, TEXAS 77573, (281) 3349700. YOU MAY ALSO SEEK ASSISTANCE FROM THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 5410 FREDERICKSBURG ROAD, SUITE 200, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 782293550, (210) 2817600 OR 1 8006694000. NO RETALIATORY ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST YOU FOR SEEKING ASSISTANCE, FILING A CHARGE, OR COMMUNICATING WITH THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION. EEOC ENFORCES TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, WHICH PROHIBITS EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX OR NATIONAL ORIGIN; THE AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT; THE EQUAL PAY ACT; PROHIBITIONS AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AFFECTING INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES; SECTIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1991, AND TITLE I OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, WHICH PROHIBITS DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. EXHIBIT "A" 5