IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER IN INSURANCE CASE

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.

Case 1:11-cv JDB Document 3 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case Doc 89 Filed 07/26/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:29:16 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 14 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA

Case 1:06-cv CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

brl Doc 111 Filed 12/17/13 Entered 12/17/13 15:22:56 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ADOPTING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Issued January 23, 2012)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

Case: 2:16-cv WOB-JGW Doc #: 112 Filed: 10/27/16 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 1626

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv RMB Document 35 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 5 U.S. Department of Justice

PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL

Case KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : :

STEVEN J. HATFILL, M.D., Plaintiff, v. ALBERTO GONZALES, et al., Civil Action No (RBW)

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law

DATA USE AGREEMENT RECITALS

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

Case 1:13-cv KBJ Document 21 Filed 09/06/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

* IN THE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AFFIDAVIT OF N. TUCKER MENEELY

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 24 Filed 03/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/16/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/16/2017. Exhibit D

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION NOTICE OF DEBTORS MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO.:12-CV-1984 OF EVIDENCE RELATED TO OBAMA S BIRTH. Plaintiff, Montgomery Blair Sibley ( Sibley ), pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(11), moves this

[CAPTION] INTERROGATORIES [NAME AND ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF S ATTORNEY] Attorneys for Plaintiff TO:

Case 1:10-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, United Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "United" or

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

PlainSite. Legal Document

1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Document 78 Filed 01/20/10 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :34 AM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2017 EXHIBIT F

READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION FOR MODIFICATION

Case 1:10-cv RMC Document 46 Filed 11/21/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 1:12-cv GBL-JFA Document 67 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 748

Case 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case3:13-cv JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 4

rdd Doc 825 Filed 12/11/17 Entered 12/11/17 16:29:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 4

vs. ) Case No. CIV Pursuant to [insert Settlement Act citation] (hereinafter the Settlement Act ),

Case 1:10-cv RMU Document 25 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

considering appointing, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

stipulated that each of the above parties shall bear its own costs and fees.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A POLICY REGARDING REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

TITLE XIV TRIALS (6/30/03) 84. The amendment is effective as of June 30, 2003.

Case 1:13-cv RCL Document 89 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ORDER

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 557 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 1 of 7

NON-DISCLOSURE AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN

BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD. Finance Docket No

First Session Tenth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO. Act No. 11 of 2010

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

Chapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6

Case 1:07-cv RGS Document 24 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

E-FILED on 12/11/03 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:12-cv WWE Document 44 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/19/2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

Litigating in California State Court, but Not a Local? (Part 2) 1

Depositions upon oral examination. A. When depositions may be taken. After commencement of the action, any party may take the testimony of any

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

ZONING CHANGES PROCEDURE/PROCESS FOR ZONE CHANGES APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGES

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Steven J. HATFILL, M.D., Plaintiff Civil No. 1:03-CV-01793 (RBW v. Attorney General John ASHCROFT, Timothy BERES, Daryl DARNELL, Van HARP, the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et alia, Defendants. Consent Motion for Entry of Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c, Defendants Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation (the Agency Defendants, and Plaintiff Steven J. Hatfill, M.D., through their undersigned counsel, hereby move for entry of the attached Protective Order to prevent public disclosure of certain information that may be exchanged during discovery. This proposed Protective Order supersedes the proposed protective orders submitted by these same parties on

November 4, 2004. Accordingly, the Plaintiff and the Agency Defendants hereby ask the Court to consider those November 4, 2004 motions to be withdrawn. May 6, 2005 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Elizabeth J. Shapiro /s/ Mark A. Grannis Elizabeth J. Shapiro (D.C. Bar #418925 Thomas G. Connolly, D.C. Bar # 420416 Alan S. Modlinger Mark A. Grannis, D.C. Bar # 429268 Paul G. Freeborne Patrick O Donnell, D.C. Bar # 459360 Department of Justice Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis, LLP Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 1200 18th Street, NW 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Room 7222 Suite 1200 Washington, D.C. 20530 Washington, DC 20036 Tel: (202 514-5302 Phone: 202-730-1300 Fax: (202 616-8470 Fax: 202-730-1301 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVEN J. HATFILL, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Civ. A. No. 03-1793 (RBW (Judge Walton ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASHCROFT, et al. Defendants. PROTECTIVE ORDER Upon consideration of the Agency Defendants Motion for a Protective Order, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. For purposes of this Order, the term Protected Information shall mean the names of lower-level non-supervisory attorneys, investigative agents, or support personnel that the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (collectively, the Agency Defendants may disclose during discovery and specifically identify as Protected Information ; provided, however, that certain names may be excluded from the class of Protected Information by agreement of the parties, whenever the persons in question possess discoverable information about this case or are likely to be named frequently enough in discovery that treatment of such information as Protected Information would unduly inhibit the progress of discovery. 2. The limitations set forth in this Order shall not apply to documents, discovery requests, discovery responses, deposition transcripts, or other materials if the Protected Information contained therein has been fully redacted and cannot be determined from context. 1

3. Documents that contain Protected Information shall be marked PRODUCED SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER or SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER or contain a similar marking, and may be used only for purposes of this litigation. For any records, such as computer data, whose medium makes such stamping impracticable, the diskette case and/or accompanying cover letter shall be marked PRODUCED SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER or SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER or contain a similar marking. Discovery requests or responses to discovery requests, if any, that contain Protected Information shall be marked PRODUCED SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER or SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER or contain a similar marking, and may be used only for purposes of this litigation. At the request of counsel for the Department of Justice, deposition transcripts, if any, that contain Protected Information shall be marked PRODUCED SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER or SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER or contain a similar marking, and may be used only for purposes of this litigation. Except as provided herein, no person having access to Protected Information shall make public disclosure of Protected Information without further Order of the Court. 4. Protected Information shall be used by the plaintiff or his representative(s only for purposes of litigating this case, including any appeals, and shall not be disclosed by the plaintiff or his representative(s to the public or any other person or entity for any reason other than for purposes of litigating this case. 5. Except as specifically provided in this Order, or as otherwise ordered by this Court, any Protected Information may be disclosed only to the following persons: (a parties and counsel for the parties in this action; (b partners, associates, secretaries, paralegal assistants, and employees of such counsel to the extent reasonably necessary to render professional services in 2

this case; (c persons retained by the parties or their counsel to assist in discovery, preparation for any hearing, or to serve as expert witnesses, provided that such disclosure is reasonably and in good faith calculated to aid in litigating this case; (d persons with factual knowledge relating to this case who may be called as witnesses at any hearing, provided that such disclosure is reasonably and in good faith calculated to aid in litigating this case; (e any deponent in this case during his or her deposition; and (f any other person as to whom counsel for the Department of Justice expressly consents in writing. 6. Except for the persons described in subparagraphs 5(d and 5(e, all individuals to whom Protected Information is disclosed shall be provided with and shall agree with the terms of this Order and shall not otherwise disclose the Protected Information to the public or to any person or entity, and shall, before receiving Protected Information, acknowledge their agreement to comply with the provisions of this Order by signing a copy of the attached acknowledgment form. The same procedure shall be followed with persons described in paragraphs 5(d and 5(e, but the refusal of any such person to sign the acknowledgment shall not prevent the plaintiff from serving any subpoena or propounding any question, and any person under the subpoena power of the Court shall be bound by this Order whether or not he or she signs the acknowledgment. To the extent such person falls outside the subpoena power of this Court, the parties must obtain from the court issuing the subpoena an order protecting against the further dissemination of the Protected Information before the Protected Information is disclosed to the person. 7. The plaintiff or other third party to this Order may challenge the Agency Defendants designation of particular information as Protected Information (or the refusal to exclude particular information from the class of Protected Information pursuant to paragraph 1 by 3

moving the Court to have the information made public or for other appropriate relief. In addition, each party reserves the right to move to modify the terms of this Protective Order at any time, and each party reserves the right to oppose any motion to modify the terms of the Protective Order. 8. Unless Protected Information is fully redacted from documents, briefs, or other materials presented to the Court, and cannot be determined from context, those portions of the documents, briefs, or other materials containing the Protected Information shall be filed under seal. Except as provided herein, neither plaintiff nor any third party may use Protected Information in open Court or at trial, orally or through documents, without first obtaining the written consent of the Department of Justice or an Order from the Court ruling that the Protected Information is relevant and may be publicly disclosed. 9. Within sixty days of the conclusion of this case, including any appeals, documents, discovery requests, discovery responses, and deposition transcripts, and all copies thereof, containing Protected Information and produced or served in connection with this case must be returned by the plaintiff or other receiving party to the Agency Defendants. Within sixty days of the conclusion of this case and any appeals, plaintiff or plaintiff's counsel or other person receiving protected documents, discovery requests, discovery responses, or deposition transcripts must certify in writing that all documents, discovery requests, discovery responses, and deposition transcripts, and all copies thereof, containing Protected Information and produced or served in connection with this case have been returned to the Agency Defendants. Within sixty days of the termination of this case, including any appeals, plaintiff or plaintiff's counsel or other person receiving documents, discovery requests, discovery responses, or deposition transcripts containing Protected Information must also certify in writing that any documents he or she or his or her attorneys or agents have created which contain Protected Information derived solely from the 4

protected documents, discovery requests, discovery responses, or deposition transcripts have been fully redacted with respect to the Protected Information or destroyed; provided, however, no party is required to redact or destroy any document that has been filed with this Court or with a court of appeals of competent jurisdiction in connection with this case. 10. Neither the United States Department of Justice nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation nor any of their officers, employees, or attorneys, shall bear any responsibility or liability for any unauthorized disclosure of any Protected Information obtained by plaintiff s counsel under this Order. 11. This Order does not constitute any ruling on the question of whether any particular document or category of information is properly discoverable and does not constitute any ruling on any potential objection to the discoverability, relevance, or admissibility of any document or information. 12. This Order does not apply to any information or documents other than the Protected Information as defined in paragraph 1, and this Order shall not be precedent for adopting any procedure with respect to the disclosure of any other information. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of, 2005 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVEN J. HATFILL, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Civ. A. No. 03-1793 (RBW (Judge Walton ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASHCROFT, et al. Defendants. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROTECTIVE ORDER I,, hereby acknowledge that I have read and understand the Protective Order entered in this action. I hereby agree to be bound by the terms of the Order. Specifically: 1. I agree that I will use information protected by the Order only for purposes of this litigation, including any appeals, and not for any other purpose of any kind, including that I will not disclose any such information to the public. 2. I agree that I will return all documents, discovery requests, discovery responses, and deposition transcripts containing information subject to this order to counsel for the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (collectively, the Agency Defendants within sixty days of the termination of this litigation or, when I am no longer a party to or assigned or retained to work on this case, to the plaintiff's counsel who within sixty days of the termination of this litigation will return such records to the Agency Defendants. I also agree to destroy or redact, or to return to plaintiff's counsel for destruction or redaction, any records created 1

that contain information subject to this Order, within sixty days after the termination of this litigation. 3. I (or plaintiff's counsel on my behalf will certify to the Agency Defendants that any documents created that contain information subject to this Order have been destroyed or redacted within sixty days after the termination of this litigation. 4. I agree that I will disclose information protected by the Order solely to the Court (under seal, the parties to this action and their attorneys of record, persons regularly in the employ of such attorneys, and any experts or consultants hired for this case by the parties or their attorneys and who (except the Court, the Agency Defendants employees and the Agency Defendants counsel have signed an acknowledgment like this one and have a need for such information to perform duties specifically related to the conduct of this litigation. 5. Should I wish to disclose the information which is subject to the Order to any additional persons except those indicated in the Order and herein, I will first seek the Agency Defendants consent. If the Agency Defendants do not consent to the disclosure, then I may, on motion, seek modification of the Order from the Court. 6. I agree that any information subject to the Order may not be disclosed in open Court, orally or through documents, without first obtaining an Order from the Court or the written consent of the Department of Justice. I further agree that portions of filings that contain information subject to this Order shall be filed under seal. 7. I hereby confirm that my duties under this Acknowledgment shall survive the termination of this case and are binding upon me for all time. 8. I hereby consent to the personal jurisdiction of the United States District Court for 2

the District of Columbia in the above-captioned case for the purpose of enforcing the aforementioned Order. [signature] DATED: [print name] 3