CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

Similar documents
CAUSE NO STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEV ADA. consented to the entry of this Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction (the "Decree"), without

Case 5:14-cv JLV Document 138 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1868

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES, AND OTHER RELIEF

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION. vs. DIVISION: A

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

NO. C A AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

United States v. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals Inc. 1:06cr382-JTC Attachment 3

Practices Act," and , Florida Statutes (2011), the STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS (hereafter the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Office of the Attorney General State of Florida Department of Legal Affairs

Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv KJM-EFB Document 40 Filed 01/14/13 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv FAM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2014 Page 1 of 15

Case dml11 Doc 6977 Filed 03/13/12 Entered 03/13/12 15:13:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 26 Filed 04/17/2006 Page 1 of 10

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiffs, )

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Jason Foscolo, Esq. (631) Food Safety Modernization Act Enforcement Prepared by Lauren Handel, Esq.

DRAFT Do Not Use Without Legal Review DRAFT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Release and Settlement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is

Case 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff,

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 30 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case: 5:14-cr KKC Doc #: 9 Filed: 09/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 - Page ID#: 23

CLINICAL TRIAL AGREEMENT for INVESTIGATOR-INITIATED STUDY

EXHIBIT C (Form of Reorganized MIG LLC Agreement)

NO Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Audrey Udashen 23 Assistant Attorney General

W~S"' \ (,-IJS$ t/ 1 V\ 1 C..

Investigations and Enforcement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 2:17-cv-4720

MEDICAL DEVICE ISSUES IN HEALTH CARE FRAUD CASES

Trademark License Agreement

Case bjh11 Doc 957 Filed 04/16/19 Entered 04/16/19 14:24:44 Page 1 of 12

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.

Filing # E-Filed 05/08/ :47:12 PM

Case 1:15-cv RDB Document 3-1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff,

Case: 3:14-cv wmc Document #: 404 Filed: 06/21/17 Page 1 of 15

SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL RIGHTS AGREEMENT. dated October 2, between PATTERN ENERGY GROUP INC. and PATTERN ENERGY GROUP LP

Case KRH Doc 3040 Filed 07/12/16 Entered 07/12/16 17:55:33 Desc Main Document Page 62 of 369

SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE SERIES A FINANCING

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Model Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

cag Doc#413 Filed 04/02/18 Entered 04/02/18 13:54:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

~/

LICENSE AGREEMENT. For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

Courthouse News Service

FINAL JUDGMENT OF INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING (AFTER NOTICE)

reg Doc 5700 Filed 02/24/12 Entered 02/24/12 11:37:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SALES REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT. This Agreement, entered into as of this day of,20,by and between

SAMPLE PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE BROKER SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPOKANE AIRPORT AND

INDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

FILING AN EVICTION LAWSUIT

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

~/

~'

ARTICLE 7A Dairy Products

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SOUTH SHORE HOSPITAL, INC., ) ) Defendant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. I. INTRODUCTION. action against Defendants Garnishment Services, LLC and Richard John Brees, d/b/a

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. SENIOR CARE CENTERS, LLC, et al. Case No.

Transcription:

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff VS. GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S DENSON INGRAM, individually, Defendants. JUDICIAL DISTRICT FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Plaintiff, the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through Attorney General Greg Abbott ( ATTORNEY GENERAL ), and Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, having consented to the entry of this Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction, and before any testimony is taken in this case and without Defendants admitting to any violations of the Texas Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 431.001 et seq. ( TFDCA ) or the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices - Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. 17.21 et seq. ( DTPA ); or any other law, have jointly moved that the Court enter this Judgment. Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, consent and agree to the entry of this Judgment and that the terms of said agreement are fair, just and equitable. Defendants further agree that Plaintiff s execution of this Judgment does not constitute an approval by the Plaintiff of their business practices. Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, stipulate that the Gentle Colonics Irrigation System and the GC Irrigator rectal nozzles are colon FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 1

irrigation systems and prescription medical devices as cleared for marketing by the Federal Food and Drug Administration, pursuant to 21 C.F.R. 876.5220, and are approved only for colon cleansing, when medically indicated, such as before radiologic or endoscopic examinations. Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, also stipulate that the term colon irrigation system used in this Final Judgment and Agreed Permanent Injunction includes all accessories and parts, such as rectal nozzles or tubes, even if not explicitly stated in each term. Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, stipulate that the State of Texas agreement to and the Court s approval of this Final Judgment are expressly premised upon Defendants compliance with Defendants stipulations 1) to dissolve GENTLE COLONICS, INC.; 2) to cease the manufacturing, marketing, and advertising of all colon irrigation systems, including any accessories, parts, nozzles, and tubes; 3) not to sell, give, use, or transfer any of Defendants 510(k) clearances for the Gentle Colonics Irrigation System and the GC Irrigator rectal nozzles to any individual or entity; and 4) not to engage in the colon irrigation business individually, in any partnership, or in cooperation with any other person or business; and that these stipulations are specifically relied upon by the State of Texas in negotiating and agreeing to the terms of this Final Judgment. Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, stipulate that Defendants will not make any claims or representations or be involved in any way with the designing, manufacturing, marketing, using, or advertising of any Class I or Class II medical devices used to cleanse the colon. Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 2

stipulate to the amount of civil penalties, attorneys fees, and investigative costs listed in paragraphs 7, 8, and 9 below, if Defendants fail to comply with paragraph 11 below. Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, each stipulate that Defendants indebtedness to the State of Texas for civil penalties, identified in paragraph 7 below, for violations of the DTPA and TFDCA, having been found by this court to constitute a civil fine or penalty to and for a governmental unit and not compensation for actual pecuniary loss, would be a debt that would be nondischargeable in a subsequently filed bankruptcy proceeding under either Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 and that, in the event a voluntary or involuntary chapter 7 or chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding is commenced against either debtor, the debtors stipulate that they shall not contest either directly or indirectly future attempts, if any, by the State of Texas to have such debt declared nondischargebable in accordance with 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(7). The Court, after reading the pleadings and stipulations of the parties and it appearing to the Court that all parties agree to and have approved its entry of this Judgment, makes the following orders under the provisions of the TFDCA and the DTPA. The Court is of the opinion that, in view of these findings, said agreement should be and is hereby in all things approved, and accordingly that this Judgment should be entered. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED THAT: 1. This Court has jurisdiction, through the TFDCA and the DTPA, over the subject matter and over all parties to this action. 2. Plaintiff s Original Petition states a claim for relief against GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually. FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 3

3. Venue of this matter is proper in Dallas County by virtue of the fact that Defendants were engaged in the business of advertising and marketing colon irrigation systems in Dallas County, Texas. 4. By entering into this Judgment, Defendants admit no wrongdoing and this Judgment does not constitute any evidence or admission of any kind regarding any issues set forth herein, nor does it acknowledge that Defendants have engaged in any unlawful activity, nor shall it be construed as evidence that Defendants have engaged in any methods, acts, practices, uses or solicitations declared to be unlawful under the TFDCA and the DTPA. Defendants do not admit the truth of any alleged facts, any of the characterizations of Defendants alleged conduct, or any of the conclusions in Plaintiff s Original Petition, or any amended pleadings pertaining to this matter. 5. The following definitions shall be used in construing this Judgment: A. Adulterate a device means any violation of 431.111 of the Texas Health and Safety Code. B. Advertising means all representations disseminated in any manner or by any means, other than by labeling, for the purpose of inducing, or that are likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase of food, drugs, devices or cosmetics. C. Colon irrigation systems, as used in this injunction, shall mean the Gentle Colonics Irrigation System, the GC Irrigator rectal nozzles, any accessories to this system, or any colon irrigation systems, rectal nozzles or tubes, and any accessories/parts to the system as identified in 21 C.F.R. 876.5220. D. Dangerous drug means a device or drug that is unsafe for self-medication that bears or is required to bear a federal legend, as defined by Chapter 483, Texas Dangerous Drug Act, of the Texas Health and Safety Code. E. False advertisement of a food, drug, device, or cosmetic shall be deemed to be false if it is false or misleading in any particular as defined in 431.182(a) of the TFDCA. FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 4

F. FDA means the Federal Food and Drug Administration. G. Federal Act means the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. H. Labeling means all labels and other written, printed, or graphic matter (1) upon any article or any of its containers or wrappers, or (2) accompanying such article. I. Medical device reporting requirements means reporting requirements in Section 519 of the Federal Act. J. Misbrand a device means any violation of 431.112 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, including but not limited to, labeling of a device if it is false or misleading in any particular; labeling of a device without adequate directions for use unless otherwise exempted; advertising of a restricted device if the advertising is false or misleading in any particular; or if a restricted device is sold, distributed, or used in violation of federal regulations. K. Practitioner means a person as defined in 483.001 (12), Texas Dangerous Drug Act, TEX. HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE ANN. L. Prescription device(s) means device(s) which, because of any potentiality for harmful effect, or the method of its use, or the collateral measures necessary to its use is not safe except under the supervision of a practitioner licensed by law to direct the use of such device, and hence for which adequate directions for use cannot be prepared; and therefore are required to bear a federal legend that states: Caution: Federal law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a with the blank filled in with the designation of a practitioner licensed by the law of the State in which he practices to use or order the use of the device, as required by 21 CFR 801.109. M. Purchaser means a practitioner or a person authorized by a practitioner to purchase a prescription colon irrigation system. N. User means a practitioner or person authorized and supervised by a practitioner who provides colon cleansing services or uses prescription colon irrigation systems. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT if Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., or DENSON INGRAM, individually, or any of their officers, agents, servants, employees, subsidiaries, assigns, successors and any other person acting in concert or participation with or on behalf of GENTLE COLONICS, INC., or DENSON INGRAM, individually, enter into any FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 5

business related to colon irrigation that all such persons or entities shall not: A. Misbrand prescription colon irrigation systems by selling such devices to a person other than a practitioner licensed to use or order the use of such devices under the law of the state of the purchaser; B. Advertise or represent that prescription colon irrigation systems do not need to be purchased, possessed, used, or supervised by a practitioner licensed to use or order the use of such devices under the law of the state of the practitioner; C. Misbrand prescription colon irrigation systems by advertising and representing that such devices can be used for uses not approved by FDA; D. Adulterate prescription colon irrigation systems by advertising such devices for uses not approved by FDA; E. Introduce or deliver or cause the introduction or delivery into commerce of misbranded or adulterated prescription colon irrigation systems by failing to label these devices; F. Misbrand or cause the misbranding of any colon irrigation system or accessory, including rectal nozzles, in commerce by failing to label these devices; G. Cause the receiving in commerce of a prescription colon irrigation system that is adulterated or misbranded; H. Disseminate false advertising or cause the dissemination of false advertising of a prescription colon irrigation system; I. Advertise that prescription colon irrigation systems can be self-administered at home when FDA has not approved these devices for such uses; and FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 6

J. Manufacture prescription colon irrigation systems in Texas without placing a label on the devices, including any accessory, such as rectal nozzles as required by federal law; K. Cause confusion as to the approval of a good by selling prescription colon irrigation systems without a label as required by state and federal law; L. Fail to disclose in any advertisement, representation, user manual, or publication that prescription colon irrigation systems can only be performed upon the order of a practitioner licensed to use or order the use of such devices under the law of the state of the purchaser; M. Fail to disclose that Defendants prescription colon irrigation systems are approved only for colon cleansing, when medically indicated, such as before radiologic or endoscopic examinations; N. Fail to develop and implement written Medical Device Reporting procedures to report injuries and deaths alleged to involve Defendants colon irrigation systems; O. Fail to develop and implement procedures for handling complaints; corrective and preventive actions; device history records; acceptance activities; design control; process controls; quality system and audit; and P. Fail to obtain a license as a medical device manufacturer from the Texas Department of Health. MONETARY RELIEF 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., or DENSON INGRAM, individually, shall pay Thirty-one Thousand Dollars ($31,000.00) to the FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 7

Office of the Attorney General as civil penalties pursuant to 431.0585 of the TFDCA and to DTPA 17.47(c)(1)-(2). THIS ORDER shall further constitute a judicial determination that these civil penalties shall constitute a civil fine or penalty to and for a governmental unit, as defined under 11 U.S.C. 101(27), and are not compensation for actual pecuniary loss, subject to paragraphs 9-12 below. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., or DENSON INGRAM, individually, shall pay One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00) to the Office of the Attorney General as attorneys fees and investigative costs under 431.047 of the TFDCA and the TEX. GOVT. CODE 402.006 (c) and Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) to cover the investigative costs pursuant to 431.047 of the TFDCA for the Texas Department of Health, subject to paragraphs 9 and 10 below. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ninety-one (91) days following receipt by the State of Texas from Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., or DENSON INGRAM, individually, of the total sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) to the Office of the Attorney General, with One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) payable as civil penalties pursuant to 431.0585 of the TFDCA and to DTPA 17.47(c)(1)-(2); with One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00) designated as attorneys fees and investigative costs under 431.047 of the TFDCA and the TEX. GOVT. CODE 402.006 (c); and Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) to the Texas Department of Health to cover the investigative costs pursuant to 431.047 of the TFDCA, the State of Texas shall consider the monetary portion of the Final Judgment, as ordered in paragraphs 7 and 8 above, satisfied in full unless the State has evidence that this Final Judgment should be reopened as outlined in paragraph 12 below. The State of FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 8

Texas then may reopen this Final Judgment for the sole purpose of allowing the State of Texas to modify the monetary liability of Defendants. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, within 30 days of this Order being signed by the Court, shall at their own expense destroy, under supervision by the Texas Department of Health, all colon irrigation systems, including any accessories, such as rectal nozzles, currently under detention. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, agreement to and the Court s approval of this Final Judgment are expressly premised upon the above stipulations, as relied upon by the State of Texas in negotiating and agreeing to the terms of this Final Judgment. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the State of Texas has evidence that the Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., or DENSON INGRAM, individually, fails to comply with Defendants stipulations listed above, the State of Texas may reopen this Final Judgment for the sole purpose of allowing the State of Texas to modify the monetary liability of Defendants. If the Court finds that Defendants failed to comply with the above stipulations relating to dissolving GENTLE COLONICS, INC.; ceasing the manufacturing, marketing, and advertising of all colon irrigation systems, including any accessories, parts, nozzles, and tubes; not selling, giving, using, or transfering any of Defendants 510(k) clearances for the Gentle Colonics Irrigation System or the GC Irrigator rectal nozzles to any individual or entity; or not engaging in the colon irrigation business, the Court shall reinstate the suspended judgment against Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, in favor of the State of Texas, in the FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 9

amounts listed in paragraphs 7 and 8 above. All other terms of this Final Judgment shall remain in full force and effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. For the purposes of reopening or enforcing this Final Judgment, Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, waive any right to contest any of the allegations set forth in Plaintiff s Original Petition filed in this matter. 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually, shall notify, in writing within 30 days of the entry of this Final Judgment, all of the previous purchasers of the Gentle Colonic irrigation systems, including nozzles, from Defendants that the State of Texas has determined that these colon irrigation devices are prescription devices as cleared by the FDA and approved only for colon cleansing, when medically indicated, such as before radiologic or endoscopic examinations and that Defendants are no longer manufacturing colon irrigation systems or nozzles. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall pay all costs of the Court. 15. The clerk of the Court is authorized to issue such writs of execution or other process necessary to collect and enforce this Judgment. 16. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Judgment. 17. It is agreed and understood that this Judgment shall in no way affect the rights of individual citizens. 18. All relief not granted herein is hereby denied. Signed this day of, 2004. DISTRICT JUDGE FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 10

THE UNDERSIGNED, WHO HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CONSENT AND SIGN ON BEHALF OF THE PARTIES IN THIS ACTION, HEREBY CONSENT TO THE FORM AND CONTENTS OF THE FOREGOING FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND TO ITS ENTRY: Signed this day of, 2004. DEFENDANTS GENTLE COLONICS, INC., and DENSON INGRAM, individually By: DENSON INGRAM, President GENTLE COLONICS, INC. By: DENSON INGRAM, individually Thomas C. Self Thomas & Self, P.C. State Bar No. 18008020 5339 Spring Valley Road Dallas, Texas 75254 (972) 490-1580 (972) 4901584 fax Attorney for Defendants FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 11

Date: Plaintiff State of Texas GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas BARRY MCBEE First Assistant Attorney General ED D. BURBACH Deputy Attorney General for Litigation PAUL D. CARMONA Assistant Attorney General Chief, Consumer Protection and Public Health Division JOYCE WEIN ILIYA Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection and Public Health Division State Bar No. 00784319 1600 Pacific Avenue, Suite 1700 Dallas, Texas 75201-3513 (214) 969-7639, ext. 111 Facsimile: (214) 969-7615 Attorneys for the State FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 12