Our Quibble With Tibble

Similar documents
Good Deals Gone Bad Structuring Transactions to Reduce the Risk of Litigation

Protecting Your Trade Secrets Under the DTSA

Good Deals Gone Bad Drafting Dispute Resolution Provisions to Avoid International Disputes

What s Willful Now? The Practical Impact of the Supreme Court s Halo v. Pulse Patent Willfulness Decision. June 2016

Arbitration vs. Litigation

The UK Bribery Act 2010 How Will It Impact the Life Sciences Industry and How Does It Compare With the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?

Supreme Court Unanimously Overturns Federal Circuit Standards For Shifting Of Attorneys Fees In Patent Cases: What Are the New Rules Of The Road?

Lessons from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit s Recent Jurisprudence on Inter Partes and Post-Grant Review

WHAT TO DO TO START PREPARING FOR DISCOVERY

Fourth Circuit Addresses Protections for US IP Licenses in Case Under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code

France: Dallah, a whole new law and the Tecnimont decisions

US Supreme Court Issues Important Opinion on Patent Eligibility of Computer- Implemented Inventions

The Rising Tide of Terrorism- Related Civil Litigation

United States Court of Appeals

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

United States District Court

1. Claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Appeal Bonds and Other Asset Protection: Staying an Adverse Judgment Execution

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

JANUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC JANUS CAPITAL SINGAPORE PTE. LIMITED PERKINS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC. Proxy Voting Procedures February 2016

Case: 2:17-cv WOB-CJS Doc #: 52 Filed: 07/23/18 Page: 1 of 11 - Page ID#: 1500

Campaign Contribution Limits Increased for the US Election Cycle

Zien Halwani, J.D. Candidate 2017

The Legal Landscape of False Marking Claims in the US, Germany, Hong Kong, and China

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

OPINION and ORDER. This matter was previously before the Court on Plaintiff s. motion to remand the case to state court. The Court denied the

CalPERS v. ANZ Securities: U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Securities Act s Three-Year Statute of Repose Is Not Tolled by a Pending Class Action

Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

GlobalSign Certificate Centre (GCC) Terms of Service Non US Version

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, No. 3:16-cv-02086

Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

FAQs Main Board Listing Rules Chapter 3

In their initial and amended complaints, the plaintiffs, who are beneficiaries of

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

[Rule 6.3 and 10.52(1)] COURTFILENO FLED COURT COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA NOV

2. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION ARTICLE

CHAPTER 7 ENFORCEMENT OF PROPER GOVERNMENT SPENDING

Case 4:16-cv JSW Document 32 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Mergers & Acquisitions: Ethical Considerations

M I L L E R T H O M S O N LLP Barristers & Solicitors, Patent & Trade Mark Agents

Case 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/10/12 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Filing an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12

Ramifications of Fraud

Supreme Court Rejects Argument That Section 16(b) Claims Based on Short Swing Trades Are Tolled Until Filing of a Section 16(a) Statement

Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Sze Siu Hung

MFS 2018 Proxy Season Preview: Proxy Policy Updates & Engagement Priorities

Terms of Service Overview

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2008

DISTRIBUTION TERMS. In Relation To Structured Products

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

17 th Annual New York City Bankruptcy Conference: Governed by New York Law? Considering the Impact of New York State Law in Bankruptcy Matters

What You Need To Know About The Rise Of Civil Litigation By State Attorneys General

United States Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Working at Height Seminar. The Kube, Leicester Racecourse 4 October 2018

Terms and Conditions of appointment of Independent Directors:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOW COME Defendants Michael P. Daniel, M.D. and Daniel Urological Center, Inc.,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU COMPLETE THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT:

Case 4:16-cv O Document 100 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID 3990

Applicant Seal PENAL NOTICE ]1 DISOBEY THIS ORDER YOU MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND MAY BE IMPRISONED, FINED OR HAVE YOUR ASSETS SEIZED.

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010)

Case: , 03/23/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 55-1, Page 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Enterprise Recon. Software License Agreement

ANSWER OF INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv CMH-IDD Document 93 Filed 09/05/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1129

CONQUAS TRAINING CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM TERMS & CONDITIONS

The Hosts of the Ferrari Competition are Kaspersky Lab Singapore Pte. Ltd and Kaspersky Lab India Pvt. Ltd.

RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS ON CLASS ACTIONS AND GROUP LITIGATION

Beware Distinctions Between Veil Piercing And Alter Ego

Class Action Arbitration Waivers After Stolt-Nielsen Drafting and Defending Waivers Amid Evolving Case Law

Benzies v Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc NY Slip Op 32504(U) December 19, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /16

Multidistrict Litigation, Forum Selection and Transfer: Tips and Trends Julie M. Holloway Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP

MEALEY S 1 LITIGATION REPORT ERISA. A commentary article reprinted from the February 2018 issue of Mealey s Litigation Report: ERISA. by Ian S.

What High Court's Expansion Of FCA Time Limits Would Mean

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Examining The Statute Of Limitations In CFPB Cases: Part 2

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective February 8, 2013)

Case 4:17-mc DMR Document 4 Filed 08/04/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Tillage Commodities Fund, L.P. v SS&C Tech., Inc NY Slip Op 32586(U) December 22, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Alert Memo. The Facts

No IN THE. i I! GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES, INC., et al.,

Government & Global Trade Post-Inauguration Webinar Series

cv 1S~'S~V I&~ Court File No.

CRB checks: eligibility guidance

Recent Rule Changes in International Arbitration: Key Lessons for Practitioners

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

CHAPTER I Preliminary

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

TERMS AND CONDITIONS. V6 (15 December 2017) 2017 Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 1 of 6

REGULATORY OVERVIEW. Civil liability in relation to product liability claims arises under the law of contract and/ or the law of negligence.

February 6, Practice Groups: Class Action Litigation Defense; Financial Institutions and Services Litigation

ADJUDICATION: RAISING OBJECTIONS TO THE ADJUDICATOR S JURISDICTION OR BREACH OF SOP ACT AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITY

Transcription:

Our Quibble With Tibble Tibble v. Edison International Nancy Ross Partner Chicago 312.701.8788 nross@mayerbrown.com Brian Netter Partner Washington, D.C. 202.263.3339 bnetter@mayerbrown.com Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe-BrusselsLLP, both limited liabilitypartnerships establishedin IllinoisUSA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liabilitypartnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Walesnumber OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELASestablished in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated legal practices in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilianlaw partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. Mayer Brown Consulting (Singapore) Pte. Ltd and its subsidiary, which are affiliatedwith Mayer Brown, provide customs and trade advisory and consultancy services, not legal services. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

Presenters Nancy G. Ross Chicago +1 312 701 8788 nross@mayerbrown.com Bio: http://www.mayerbrown.com /people/nancy-g-ross/ Brian B. Netter Washington, DC +1 202 263 3339 bnetter@mayerbrown.com Bio: http://www.mayerbrown.com /people/brian-d-netter/

Background: Key Statutes ERISA s Duty of Prudence ( 404(a)(1)(B)) a fiduciary shall discharge his duties with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims

Background: Key Statutes ERISA s Period of Repose ( 413(1)) No action may be commenced under this subchapter with respect to a fiduciary s breach of any responsibility, duty, or obligation under this part, or with respect to a violation of this part, after the earlier of (1) six years after (A) the date of the last action which constituted a part of the breach or violation, or (B) in the case of an omission the latest date on which the fiduciary could have cured the breach or violation, or (2) three years after the earliest date on which the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the breach or violation; except that in the case of fraud or concealment, such action may be commenced not later than six years after the date of discovery of such breach or violation.

Background: The Facts & Arguments Edison International offered mutual funds within its 401(k) plan Retail Class with higher fees than Institutional Class Some had been in the plan for more than 6 years when the complaint was filed Some were added more recently Plaintiffs argued Edison plan fiduciaries breached their fiduciary duty by not offering the funds at the lower cost Defendants argued that plaintiffs claims were stale, and that nothing changed since time of selection, so no duty to remove the funds from the plan within the 6-year period

Background: Trial Proceedings Older Funds Summary judgment for Edison Claims barred by 6-year period because funds selected more than 6 years before lawsuit filed Newer Funds Bench trial Edison found liable after evidence showing what a reasonable fiduciary would have done in similar circumstances Ninth Circuit affirmed As to older funds, agreed that claims were barred by ERISA s 6- year limitations period

Supreme Court Proceedings Issue for Court was whether ERISA s statute of repose barred plaintiffs claim when the challenged funds were selected more than 6 years ago (also a question as to standard of review which was not certified) Call for the View of the Solicitor General Oral Argument Decision 9-0 reversed and remanded Court agreed there is a duty to monitor and remanded to lower courts to determine whether plaintiffs presented that argument and if so, the appropriate contours of that duty Court gave no guidelines or suggestions as to scope of the duty to monitor

Implications Open Questions after Tibble What does duty to monitor entail? Are there general principles which courts will instruct apply to all fiduciaries Does the ruling apply to monitoring of other decisions made in course of plan administration? Does Tibble impact ERISA s 3-year statute of limitations running from actual knowledge? Increase in Litigation? Best Practices for Fiduciaries

Questions? Please email eweber@mayerbrown.com Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe-BrusselsLLP, both limited liabilitypartnerships establishedin IllinoisUSA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liabilitypartnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Walesnumber OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELASestablished in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated legal practices in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilianlaw partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. Mayer Brown Consulting (Singapore) Pte. Ltd and its subsidiary, which are affiliatedwith Mayer Brown, provide customs and trade advisory and consultancy services, not legal services. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe BrusselsLLP, both limitedliabilitypartnerships established in IllinoisUSA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liabilitypartnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Walesnumber OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELASestablished in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated legal practices in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilianlaw partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. Mayer Brown Consulting (Singapore) Pte. Ltd and its subsidiary, which are affiliatedwith Mayer Brown, provide customs and trade advisory and consultancy services, not legal services. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.