cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/14/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:09-cv CE Document 1 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv TJW-CE Document 1 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 6:10-cv LED Document 1 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 2:10-cv TJW Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

Transcription:

Case 3:11-cv-01103-AC Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 1 Bradley M. Ganz, OSB 94076 Lloyd L. Pollard II, OSB 07490 Ganz Law, P.c. P.O. Box 2200 163 SE 2 nd Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97124 (503) 844-9009 Facsimile (503) 296-2172 mail@ganzlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffl2Z Technology, LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION I2Z TECHNOLOGY, LLC Plaintiff v. MICROSOFT CORPORA non D/B/A BING. COM, TOEAT.COM LLC, ZILLOW, INC., Defendants. cij;'l~jl NO~ 10 3- AC.. PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Page 1 of 8

Case 3:11-cv-01103-AC Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 Page 2 of 8 Page ID#: 2 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT PiaintiffI2Z TECHNOLOGY, LLC ("I2Z"), for its complaint against Microsoft Corporation d/b/a Bing.com ("Microsoft"), Toeat.com LLC, Zillow, Inc. ("Zillow"), Google, Inc. ("Google") (collectively, "Defendants"), demands ajury trial and alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.c. 271 et seq., brought against Defendants for violations of those laws. THE PARTIES 2. PlaintiffI2Z Technology, LLC is a Texas limited liability company with its principal place of business at 3301 W. Marshall Ave., Suite 302, Longview, TX 75604. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Microsoft is a Washington corporation with its principal place of business at 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington, 98052. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant Toeat.com LLC is a Washington company with its principal place of business at 7231 Old County Road 54, New Port Richey, Florida, 34653-6106. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant Zillow is a Washington corporation with its principal place of business at 1301 Second Avenue, Floor 31, Seattle, Washington 98101. Page 2 of8

Case 3:11-cv-01103-AC Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 Page 3 of 8 Page ID#: 3 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code, 1, et seq. 7. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuantto 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 8. Upon infonnation and belief, Microsoft has contacts that are sufficiently continuous and systematic to constitute doing business within the State of Oregon, and within this District, and has engaged and continues to engage in sales and other conduct with respect to Microsoft's products and services within this District. 9. Upon infonnation and belief, Toeat.com, LLC has contacts that are sufficiently continuous and systematic to constitute doing business within the State of Oregon and within this District and has engaged and continues to engage in sales and other conduct with respect to Toeat.com LLC's products and services within this District. 10. Upon infonnation and belief, Zillow has contacts that are sufficiently continuous and systematic to constitute doing business within the State oforegon and within this District and has engaged and continues to engage in sales and other conduct with respect to Zillow's products and services within this District. Page 3 of8

Case 3:11-cv-01103-AC Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 Page 4 of 8 Page ID#: 4 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 11. I2Z Technology, LLC is a software, internet services, web site development, and web site hosting company. 12. On September 6, 1994, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 5,345,551 ("the '551 patent"), entitled "Method and System for Synchronization of Simultaneous Displays of Related Data Sources." 13. A true and correct copy of the'551 patent is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint. 14. I2Z is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in and to the' 551 patent. MICROSOFT 15. Microsoft is a software company providing software and web related products, including the website Bing.com. 16. Microsoft's website, Bing.com, displays maps and driving directions at Bing.com/maps ("Bing Maps"). 17. Bing Maps displays two separate frames of data present on the screen, including a map demonstrating the highlighted driving route and driving directions. 18. Between these two separate frames on Bing Maps, there is a visible cause and effect. Page 4 of8

Case 3:11-cv-01103-AC Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 Page 5 of 8 Page ID#: 5 19. Changes to the map made by dragging the highlighted route affect the driving directions. 20. The directions change as a response to the highlighted route. 21. The cause and effect is consistent so that when the changes to the highlighted route are removed, the directions return to their original form. TOEAT.COM 22. TOEA T.COM LLC ("TOEAT") provides restaurant location information on its website www.toeat.com (the TOEAT website). 23. The TOEAT website displays two separate frames of data present on the screen, including a map demonstrating the locations of particular restaurants and detailed listings including location information. 24. Between these two separate frames on the TOEA T website, there is a visible cause and effect. 25. Changes to the map made by zooming in or out affect the listings. 26. The listings change as a response to the changes made to the map by zooming in or out. 27. The cause and effect is consistent so that when the changes made to the map are removed the listings return to their original form. ZILLOW 28. ZILLOW, Inc. has a website offering real estate location maps and listing information at www.zillow.com ("the Zillow website"). Page 5 of8

Case 3:11-cv-01103-AC Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 Page 6 of 8 Page ID#: 6 29. The Zillow website displays maps and detailed property information. 30. The Zillow website displays two separate frames of data present on the screen, including a map demonstrating the locations of particular real estate listings and real estate listing information. 31. Between these two separate frames on the Zillow website, there is a visible cause and effect. 32. Changes to the map made by zooming in or out or scrolling so that a different area is covered affect the real estate listings. 33. The real estate listings change as a response to the changes made to the map by zooming in or out or scrolling so that a different area is covered. 34. The cause and effect is consistent so that when the changes made to the map are removed the listings return to their original form. COUNT 1 INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,345,551 (ALL DEFENDANTS) 35. I2Z realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 34. 36. Without license or authorization, the Defendants have been, andlor continue to be, literally or equivalently infringing the '551 patent, directly andlor indirectly, by making, using, marketing, selling, offering to sell, licensing andlor supporting systems, websites, products andlor services covered by one or more claims ofthe '551 patent. Page 6 of8

Case 3:11-cv-01103-AC Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 Page 7 of 8 Page ID#: 7 37. 12Z has been damaged by the Defendants' infringements, and will continue to suffer damage and irreparable injury until all infringements are enjoined by this Court. 38. 12Z is entitled to injunctive relief and damages in accordance with 35 U.S.c. 271,281,283,284, and 287. JURY DEMAND 39. Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 12Z hereby respectfully requests a jury trial on all issues and claims so triable. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, 12Z prays for judgment as follows: A. That the Defendants have infringed, contributorily infringed and/or actively induced others to infringe the '551 patent. B. That, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 283, the Defendants, and all affiliates, employees, agents, officers, directors, attorneys, successors and assigned, and all those acting on behalf of or in active concert or participation with any of them, be enjoined from infringing, contributorily infringing and/or inducing others to infringe the'551 patent. C. That 12Z be awarded damages sufficient to compensate it for the Defendants' infringement of the'551 patent. D. That 12Z be awarded pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; and Page 7 of8

Case 3:11-cv-01103-AC Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 Page 8 of 8 Page ID#: 8 E. That 12Z be awarded such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 14, 2011 Lloyd L. Pollard, II, OSB 07490 Ganz Law, PC 163 SE 2nd Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 (503) 844-9009 mail@ganzlaw.com Attorneysfor Plaintiff 122 TECHNOLOGY, LLC Page 8 of8