Environmental Voters

Similar documents
Impact REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT IMPACT REPORT 2017

1 Year into the Trump Administration: Tools for the Resistance. 11:45-1:00 & 2:40-4:00, Room 320 Nathan Phillips, Nathaniel Stinnett

NextGen Climate ran the largest independent young

Consolidating Democrats The strategy that gives a governing majority

1. A Republican edge in terms of self-described interest in the election. 2. Lower levels of self-described interest among younger and Latino

DEEP ROOT A UDIENCES. At Deep Root Analytics we make your target audiences the backbone of your advertising campaign.

Case Study: Get out the Vote

THE TARRANCE GROUP. Interested Parties. Brian Nienaber. Key findings from the Battleground Week 6 Survey

The Path to 270 In 2016, Revisited

Beyond cities: How Airbnb supports rural America s revitalization

How the Rising Share of Latino Voters Will Impact the 2016 Elections. By Anna Chu and Charles Posner December

MOVEON S 2018 MARCH TO THE BALLOT BOX

Why The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice

WASHINGTON CONSERVATION VOTERS MISSION

Chapter 9: The Political Process

Beyond cities: How Airbnb supports rural America s revitalization

PRESS RELEASE October 15, 2008

Corporate Fund-Raising Creating Strategic Partnerships with Donors. Denise Couyoumdjian General Manager Libertad y Desarrollo

A NEW AMERICAN LEADER

THE 50-STATE TURNOUT. Every Voter Counts. The 50-State Strategy

COMMUNICATIONS H TOOLKIT H NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION DAY. A Partner Communications Toolkit for Traditional and Social Media

CHAPTER 9: THE POLITICAL PROCESS. Section 1: Public Opinion Section 2: Interest Groups Section 3: Political Parties Section 4: The Electoral Process

PENNSYLVANIA: SMALL LEAD FOR SACCONE IN CD18

CAMPAIGN MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION

United States Senate OFFICIAL REGISTERED DOCUMENT ENCLOSED SENATOR TED CRUZ PO BOX HOUSTON, TX PERSONAL BUSINESS

NEW JERSEY: DEM TILT IN CD07

MEMORANDUM. Members of the Republican National Committee

Public Opinion and Government Responsiveness Part II

Current Pennsylvania Polling

WITH YOURhelpWE WE CAN MORE THAN DOUBLE THE NUMBER OF WOMEN AND GIRLS PROTECT FROM VIOLENCE

What's the most cost-effective way to encourage people to turn out to vote?

The Initiative Industry: Its Impact on the Future of the Initiative Process By M. Dane Waters 1

NATIONAL: 2018 HOUSE RACE STABILITY

This Rising American Electorate & Working Class Strike Back

VOTER ID 101. The Right to Vote Shouldn t Come With Barriers. indivisible435.org

Focus on OUR Concerns

AP United States Government and Politics

Reaching Young Voters NEXTGEN YOUTH RESEARCH 2018

hij Report on the Examination Government and Politics examination June series General Certificate of Education The Politics of the USA

State of the Union 2015: Playing offense, President Obama makes gains on critical issues

100actions.com. Neighborhood Outreach Packet. 100actions.com has one goal: to help elect Democrats in November. a project of the democratic party

Romney Leads in Confidence on Recovery But Obama Escapes Most Economic Blame

BATTLEGROUND BRIEFING

Campaigns & Elections. US Government POS 2041

THE FIELD POLL FOR ADVANCE PUBLICATION BY SUBSCRIBERS ONLY.

Spurring Growth in the Global Economy A U.S. Perspective World Strategic Forum: Pioneering for Growth and Prosperity

September Board Meeting. September 16, 2015

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Participatory Voting: How do you create a compelling incentive to improve young voter engagement in local elections?

UndecidedVotersinthe NovemberPresidential Election. anationalsurvey

September 2017 Toplines

Curriculum Vita. Mark A. Smith

Friends of Democracy Corps and Campaign for America s Future. It s Jobs, Stupid

Union Voters and Democrats

Growth Leads to Transformation

AP US GOVERNMENT & POLITICS UNIT 2 REVIEW

ORGANIZING TOPIC: NATIONAL GOVERNMENT: SHAPING PUBLIC POLICY STANDARD(S) OF LEARNING

The Cook Political Report / LSU Manship School Midterm Election Poll

Annual Report Fiscal Year 2016 TRANSFORM ENGAGE INNOVATE

OFL Workers Compensation Lobby Kit Tips for Effective Lobbying

New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Report from phone survey & web-panel in the 12-state battleground

APPLICANT INFORMATION CLASS OF 2018

FOR RELEASE APRIL 26, 2018

ELECTION OVERVIEW. + Context: Mood of the Electorate. + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward?

Kim Weaver IDP Chair Proposal 12/8/2016

Chapter 09: Campaigns and Elections Multiple Choice

A Glance at THE LATINO VOTE IN Clarissa Martinez De Castro

The Social Policy & Politics Program. March 2012

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

WEEKLY LATINO TRACKING POLL 2018: WAVE 10 11/5/18

SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEMOCRATS IN Planting the Seeds of Progress

ENGAGING NEW VOTERS. The Impact of Nonprofit Voter Outreach on Client and Community Turnout.

New Progressive America

Today s Presenters. John Chrastka Executive Director, EveryLibrary. Carrie Andrew Director, Lone Cone Library District, Norwood, CO

OHIO: GAP NARROWS IN CD12 SPECIAL

Unit 7 Political Process

PENNSYLVANIA: UNCERTAIN DEM EDGE IN CD07

To understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on

Director, Bolder Advocacy Alliance for Justice Washington, DC

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS CAMPAIGN CONSULTANTS SURVEY FINAL TOPLINE November 1997 March 1998 N=200

GOP leads on economy, Democrats on health care, immigration

Cultivating Engaged Citizens & Thriving Communities

LETTER FROM THE CEO. Wa el Alzayat. National CEO. Sincerely, Wa el Alzayat. Chief Executive Officer

November 2017 Toplines

PENNSYLVANIA: SMALL GOP LEAD IN CD01

Starting an election campaign. A primer for CPAs interested in running for political office

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

How to Talk About Money in Politics

MILLION. NLIRH Growth ( ) SINCE NLIRH Strategic Plan Operating out of three new spaces. We ve doubled our staff

How The Mountain West States Voted In 2016: A Post-Election Analysis of Trends, Demographics, and Politics in America s New Swing Region

Why your members aren t voting. A GUIDE TO INCREASING VOTER TURNOUT AND PARTICIPATION

A Journal of Public Opinion & Political Strategy. Missing Voters in the 2012 Election: Not so white, not so Republican

HOUSE VOTING INTENTIONS KNOTTED, NATIONAL TREND NOT APPARENT

Endnotes on Campaign 2000 SOME FINAL OBSERVATIONS ON VOTER OPINIONS

New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Findings from Wave 1 of Battleground web-panel & phone survey. May 2018

Catholic voters presidential preference, issue priorities, and opinion of certain church policies

Rising American Electorate & Working Class Women Strike Back. November 9, 2018

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 6: An Examination of Iowa Absentee Voting Since 2000

Growing the Youth Vote

Transcription:

IMPACT REPORT 2018 MOBILIZING AN ARMY OF Environmental Voters ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT

OUR VISION Our planet is in crisis, yet policy-makers continue to look the other way. Why? In short, voters aren t forcing them to face the problem. Over 10 million environmentalists sat out the 2016 presidential election, while those of us who do vote rarely list climate or the environment as a top issue. With an electorate that doesn t prioritize the environment, it s no mystery that policy-makers don t either. Founded in 2015, the Environmental Voter Project is a non-partisan nonprofit focused on a simple, high-leverage solution to this problem: we (1) use data analytics to identify the millions of existing environmentalists who don t vote, and then (2) apply cutting-edge behavioral science to nudge them into being more consistent voters. We are in the behavior-changing business, not the mind-changing business. EVP s goal is not to change the way anybody thinks about climate or the environment. Rather, our goal is to find the already persuaded environmentalists who currently don t vote, and turn them into consistent super-voters who drive policy-making at the local, state, and federal levels. Politicians go where the votes are; EVP simply focuses on making more environmental voters. Then comes the best part: once EVP turns a non-voting environmentalist into a consistent voter, campaigns and activists see the result on voter files and swoop in to mobilize that voter at no cost to us. EVP can then turn our resources to the next batch of non-voting and seldom-voting environmentalists. ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT 2

LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Nothing will hold us back in 2019. With successful results and a proven ability to scale, EVP is now poised to launch an expanded and relentless mobilization campaign that will flood the electorate with environmental voters. 2018 was an extraordinarily successful year for the Environmental Voter Project. Our budget increased by 225%, the number of voters we contacted increased by 709%, and we ultimately added a stunning 58,961 new environmental voters to the midterm election who otherwise would have stayed home. Most strikingly, just three years after launching our pilot program and barely one year after expanding into five new states, EVP has created 93,423 environmental super-voters. These people were recently such poor voters that they qualified as seldom- or non-voting environmentalists for EVP to target with our pioneering behavior-change messaging. Yet they now vote so consistently that we have graduated them out of our program, and politicians are fighting for their attention. This is the tremendous value proposition of the Environmental Voter Project: as soon as we turn a non-voter into a super-voter, campaigns see the change on public voter files and start mobilizing EVP s voters at no cost to us. These environmentalists will continue to provide a return-on-investment to EVP and our donors for years to come, even though we are spending zero money to mobilize them. None of this groundbreaking work would have been possible without the 2,244 EVP volunteers who contacted our voters, the more than 1,500 donors who supported our work, our dedicated staff, and our amazing board. We couldn t have done this without you, and we hope you re as proud of these results as we are. Nothing will hold us back in 2019. With successful results and a proven ability to scale, EVP is now poised to launch an expanded and relentless mobilization campaign that will flood the electorate with environmental voters. With tremendous gratitude, Nathaniel Stinnett Founder & Executive Director 3 IMPACT REPORT 2018

WHAT S AT STAKE THE PROBLEM THE OPPORTUNITY Voters aren t demanding environmental leadership, so politicians aren t supplying it. Exit Poll of 2018 Midterm Voters MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING THE COUNTRY HEALTH CARE 27% IMMIGRATION 23% THE ECONOMY AND JOBS 19% GUN POLICY 8% THE ENVIRONMENT 7% TERRORISM 6% FOREIGN POLICY 5% TAXES 4% ABORTION 2% AP/NORC/Fox Exit Poll of 114,677 actual 2018 midterm voters This is a huge problem. While 7% is more support for the environment than we saw in 2014 or 2016, it s still nowhere close to the level of political power we need. Simply put: politicians go where the votes are. Regardless of who wins an election, we can t expect politicians to spend their political capital on climate and environmental issues when so few voters are demanding it. While there are not yet enough environmental voters to drive policymaking, there are millions of environmental non-voters who could change everything if they start showing up on Election Day. 10.1 million Over 10 million environmentalists who are registered to vote ended up skipping the 2016 presidential election. This huge pool of latent political power presents an enormous opportunity for the environmental movement for a simple reason: convincing an environmentalist to vote is much easier and cheaper than convincing a voter to start caring about the environment. It s about turnout, not persuasion. This is why EVP is laser-focused on just one thing: getting more environmentalists to vote. These millions of non-voting and seldomvoting environmentalists are the low-hanging fruit of the climate and environmental movements. If we can turn even a small percentage of these environmentalists into consistent voters, politicians will start fighting to win their approval...because voters decide elections, not non-voters. ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT 4

WHAT S AT STAKE THE EVP SOLUTION IDENTIFICATION Leveraging the latest advances in data analytics and predictive modeling, EVP is able to identify millions of environmentalists by name and street address. We then use public voter files to narrow our focus to only those environmentalists who typically don t vote and thus are ignored by most political campaigns. MOBILIZATION Using proven voter turnout messaging built on the latest behavioral science, we canvass, call, text, mail, email, and send digital ads to our target environmentalists before every election. HABIT REINFORCEMENT Voting is a sticky habit: once someone votes for the first time, they re much more likely to vote again in future elections. Therefore, EVP views every election -- local, state, and federal -- as an opportunity to turn non-voters into voters. When our targets do vote, we alter our messaging accordingly, and continue to mobilize them until they become consistent super-voters. EVP canvassers at a voter s door. PHOTO CREDIT: EVE ANDREWS CHANGE THE ELECTORATE Nothing motivates a politician more than the prospect of winning or losing an election. EVP s ultimate goal is to change the electorate to such an extent that politicians will have no choice but to appeal to environmental voters and their priorities. 5 IMPACT REPORT 2018

2018 MOBILIZATIONS Powered by Volunteers 2,244 VOLUNTEERS CONTACTING VOTERS Millions of Voter Contacts 57,789 DOORS KNOCKED 65,263 CALLS TO VOTERS 913,177 PIECES OF VOTER TURNOUT MAIL SENT 3.9 MILLION TEXT MESSAGES SENT 41.3 MILLION DIGITAL AD IMPRESSIONS Partnerships: We worked closely (often forming formal partnerships) with over 30 national and local organizations, including Appalachian Mountain Club Citizens Climate Lobby Conservation Law Foundation Elders Climate Action Indivisible Mass Audubon Mothers Out Front Swing Left The YEARS Project ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT 6

OUR IMPACT IN 2018 NEw VOterS i n 2 0 1 8 58,961 VOTERS ADDED TO THE ELECTORATE Ultimately, EVP was responsible for adding 58,961 of these environmentalists to the electorate. In other words, our studies show that 58,961 of these voters would have stayed home on Election Day if it weren t for EVP s interventions. 2,162,552 VOTERS CONTACTED In 2018, EVP contacted 2,162,552 poorly-voting environmentalists with cutting-edge messaging designed to nudge them into being more consistent voters. consistent v ot e r s 93,423 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPER-VOTERS Since launching just three years ago, EVP has now graduated 93,423 environmental voters out of our program. While these 93,423 environmentalists were previously poor voters, they have now built such robust voting records that politicians will reliably target them in every election. 7 IMPACT REPORT 2018

OUR IMPACT IN 2018 We submit all of our mobilization efforts to COLORADO FLORIDA GEORGIA randomized controlled trials the gold standard for behavioral science experiments. This allows us to isolate the impact of our work, while controlling for 194,385 VOTERS TARGETED 2.2% INCREASE IN TURNOUT CAUSED BY EVP 4,276 NEW VOTERS ATTRIBUTED TO EVP 844,121 VOTERS TARGETED 2.2% INCREASE IN TURNOUT CAUSED BY EVP 18,571 NEW VOTERS ATTRIBUTED TO EVP 277,744 VOTERS TARGETED 2.2% INCREASE IN TURNOUT CAUSED BY EVP 6,110 NEW VOTERS ATTRIBUTED TO EVP all outside variables. MASSACHUSETTS NEVADA PENNSYLVANIA 228,616 VOTERS TARGETED 82,681 VOTERS TARGETED 535,005 VOTERS TARGETED 2.3% INCREASE IN TURNOUT CAUSED BY EVP 5,258 NEW VOTERS ATTRIBUTED TO EVP 3.4% INCREASE IN TURNOUT CAUSED BY EVP 2,811 NEW VOTERS ATTRIBUTED TO EVP 4.1% INCREASE IN TURNOUT CAUSED BY EVP 21,935* NEW VOTERS ATTRIBUTED TO EVP *The Pennsylvania results are from a year-long Nov. 2017 - Nov. 2018 experiment, where EVP targeted the same set of voters for multiple elections over an entire year. ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT 8

OUR MULTI-YEAR IMPACT EVP s primary focus is to change the electorate so that ultimately policy-makers have no choice but to lead on environmental issues. This means that the true measure of our success is how many non-voters we turn into supervoters with each passing year. SEPTEMBER 2015 EVP launches its pilot program in Massachusetts MARCH 2017 EVP launches in Georgia SEPTEMBER 2017 EVP launches in Colorado, Florida, Nevada, and Pennsylvania An Army of Environmental Super Voters * The Environmental Voter Project has already graduated 93,423 voters out of our program. These graduates are environmentalists whom EVP targeted because they had never or rarely voted before. Now, they are such consistent super-voters that politicians are competing for their attention - without EVP having to spend another dime. * This Man is Building an Army of Environmental Super Voters to Rival the NRA in Turnout, Huffington Post, October 7, 2017. 9 IMPACT REPORT 2018

OUR VALUE PROPOSITION Almost 100,000 Environmental Voter Project graduates are now voting consistently in local, state, and federal elections. EVP no longer spends any money to mobilize these environmentalists, but our donors can continue to take credit for them. 1. Initial Voter Contact u We don t abandon these environmentalists just because they vote once or twice. EVP continues to mobilize our targets year-round until they build consistent voting habits. u 2. Creating Super-Voters EVP, and our donors, will continue to realize a return on investment each time these environmental super-voters vote, even though we re no longer spending any money to make it happen. 3. Campaigns Take Notice u u 4. Long-Term Return on Investment Campaigns and other groups regularly check public voter files so they can target likely voters. These groups will begin mobilizing EVP s voters at no cost to us simply because of our voters newly robust voting histories. EVP can then graduate these voters out of our program. Working with volunteers and inexpensive voter contact methods like texting, direct mail, and digital ads EVP efficiently turns non-voters into voters. ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT 10

THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT S FIELD LABORATORY Always Testing. Always on the Cutting-Edge. u Over 30 randomized controlled trials conducted in 2018 u Always testing the cost efficiency of texting, calling, canvassing, mail, and digital ads u Optimizing voter contact messaging for the greatest impact on turnout u Isolating the messages and media that work best with particular demographic groups u Collaborating with leading behavioral scientists Sharing our Learnings. u Over 70 presentations to environmental groups and nonprofits u Lectures and seminars at MIT, Harvard, Yale, Swarthmore, and over a dozen other colleges and universities in 2018 11 IMPACT REPORT 2018

WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING The Environmental Voter Project knows who you are, and how to trick you into saving the planet. Relying on tools of behavioral psychology, [the] get-out-the-vote effort urges environmentalists to the polls and barely mentions the environment at all. Mother Jones The most important environmental effort you ve probably never heard of. Center for American Progress s Think Progress Campaigns are built around winning the next election not changing the electorate in the long term. But changing the long-term shape of the electorate is all [Environmental Voter Project Executive Director, Nathaniel] Stinnett is focused on, and to do it, he s bucking one of the most enduring features of U.S. politics. The system is set up to cater to people who voted in the last few elections. Unlikely voters are nearly invisible. But, if Stinnett is right, they may be the key to saving the world. Washington Monthly ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT 12

COVERAGE FEATURING EVP In 2018, The New York Times named Nathaniel Stinnett one of five climate visionaries for the Environmental Voter Project s cutting-edge work. 13 IMPACT REPORT 2018

FINANCIAL OVERVIEW In 2018, more than 1,500 donors powered the Environmental Voter Project to a 225% increase in revenue over 2017. REVENUE GROWTH 2016 (pilot year) 2017 $312,252 $467,741 This tremendous amount of support not only fueled a 709% increase in the number of voters EVP contacted, it also allowed us to take advantage of significant economies of scale and further leverage our staff and voter identification research. This is why we were able to direct a stunning 91.6% of our expenditures towards voter identification and mobilization efforts in 2018. As we look towards 2019 and 2020, EVP is tremendously encouraged by our ever-growing base of small, medium, and large funders. We re confident in our capacity to rapidly expand in an increasingly efficient way. 2018 REVENUE AND EXPENSES Total Net Assets for End of Year 2017 $ 101,047 REVENUE 2018 Contributions $ 1,517,570 Speaking Fees & Honoraria $ 2,150 Interest $ 3 Total Revenue $ 1,519,723 EXPENSES 2018 Environmental Voter Mobilization $ 1,222,715 Voter Identification & Data $ 150,921 General & Administrative $ 75,699 Fundraising $ 51,801 Total Operating Expenses $ 1,501,136 $1,519,723 99.9% Contributions 0.1% Speaking Fees & Honoraria 81.5% Environmental Voter Mobilization 3.5% Fundraising 5% General & Administration 10.1% Voter Identification & Data Total Net Assets for End of Year 2018 $ 119,634 ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT 14

AT A GLANCE QUICK FACTS ABOUT EVP u We are uniquely focused on finding environmentalists who don t vote, and then consistently mobilizing them for local, state, and federal elections. u We do not endorse candidates we focus on voters, not politicians. u Named a 2018 Visionary by The New York Times. u We are born out of a new, empirical approach to politics and activism. Our model is based on scientifically rigorous research, and we demand the same precision and accountability of ourselves. LEADERSHIP TEAM You want a way to help save the planet, and we want to give it to you. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: Environmental Voter Project P.O. Box 962002 Boston, MA 02196 GO ONLINE TO MAKE A CONTRIBUTION: www.environmentalvoter.org/donate FOR MORE INFORMATION: info@environmentalvoter.org Nathaniel Stinnett u Founder & Executive Director Peter Polga-Hecimovich u Field & Data Director Kate Heffernan u Organizing Director 501(C)(4) NONPROFIT The Environmental Voter Project is a non-partisan 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization. Contributions or gifts to the Environmental Voter Project are not tax deductible because they will be used to influence environmental policy. There is no limit to the amount you may contribute. DIRECTORS AND ADVISORS Sam Arons u Director of Sustainability, Lyft Reid Capalino u Principal, Aligned Intermediary Ayana Elizabeth Johnson u CEO, Ocean Collectiv Robert LaRocca u Political Strategist Melanie Wachtell Stinnett u EVP Co-Founder u Senior Advisor, Case Method Project at Harvard Business School Kiran Bhatraju u CEO, Arcadia Power Megan Reilly Cayten u Chief Impact Officer, Catrinka u Sustainable infrastructure development consultant Philip Jordan u VP and Principal, BW Research Partnership u Fellow, Harvard University s JFK School of Government Frederick A. O. Schwarz u Chief Counsel, Brennan Center for Justice u Former Board Chair, Natural Resources Defense Council Bevin Butler u CEO, CADE, NYC James Hoyte u Senior Advisor, Tremont Strategies Group u Former MA Secretary of Environmental Affairs Timothy Kistner u Associate, Goodwin Procter LLP u Former Regional Field Director, Obama for America Ron Turiello u Of Counsel, Woodside Counsel u Co-Founder, Voter Genome Project 15 IMPACT REPORT 2018

ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT /EnvironmentalVoterProject @Enviro_Voter @EnvironmentalVoter www.environmentalvoter.org