Contents. Legal Guide for Police Constitutional Issues 10 th Edition Jeffery T. Walker and Craig Hemmens. Preface. Chapter 1.

Similar documents
5. Pursuit... 2:25 6. High Speed Chases... 2:26 III. IDENTIFICATIONS... 3:1 A. In-Person Identifications... 3:1 1. Right to Have Counsel Present...

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS IN A NUTSHELL. Fifth Edition JEROLD H. ISRAEL

FEDERAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: THE BASICS. Glen A. Sproviero, Esq. Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP New York, New York

Search Warrant Exceptions. Coach Presnell

HOW TO WRITE ESSAYS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW SCHOOL AND BAR EXAMS. WHAT to Say and HOW to Say It! Tim Tyler Ph.D.

ROLE AND AUTHORITY WRITTEN DIRECTIVE: 1.10 EFFECTIVE DATE: REVISION DATE: SUPERSEDES EDITION DATED:

Section: 2.310, Page 1 of 10 Effective: August 5, 2011 Reissued: 08/25/16. Towson University Police Department Manual of General Directives

Laws of Arrest, Search, & Seizure. Instructor: Judge Mark Arnold (310) Fall, Course Outline

GENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE

FOR IMMIGRATION OFFICERS M-69

California Bar Examination

Subject FIELD INTERVIEWS, INVESTIGATIVE STOPS/DETENTIONS, WEAPONS PAT-DOWNS & SEARCHES. DRAFT 7 April By Order of the Police Commissioner

CRJ 551 Legal Issues in Criminal Justice Administration II. Case Brief Guidelines and Rubric

Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 7 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1973 SESSION CHAPTER 1286 HOUSE BILL 256 AN ACT TO AMEND THE LAWS RELATING TO PRETRIAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

Detentions And Photographing Detainees

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Criminal Justice 100

Total Test Questions: 100 Levels: Units of Credit: 0.50

COVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

NH DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT AND LICENSING ADMINISTRATION & OPERATIONS MANUAL

Chief of Police: Review Date: July 1

Content Review Form PREREQUISITE COURSE

ORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to define legal implications and procedures involved when a search is performed.

Miranda Rights. Interrogations and Confessions

United States Constitutional Law: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation

Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: Basics of Criminal Procedural Analysis for Government Searches and Seizures

1 of 5 9/16/2014 2:02 PM

23 Motions To Suppress Tangible Evidence

CHAPTER 17 - ARREST POLICIES Alternatives to Arrest and Incarceration Criminal Process Immigration Violations

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS AT A GLANCE COMMAND LEVEL TRAINING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2015 COURTESY PROFESSIONALISM RESPECT

ESSAY APPROACH. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. TPCA Best Practices Recognition Program Reference Searches Without a Warrant

I. PURPOSE DEFINITIONS RESPECT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. Page 1 of 8

GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE AND HOUSE S Page 1 of 11. Subject: Crimes; innocence protection; eyewitness identification

CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I Professor Nancy S. Forster Fall 2017 Semester

Marquette University Police Department

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DEFINITIONS. Accuse To bring a formal charge against a person, to the effect that he is guilty of a crime or punishable offense.

DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT

2017 Case Law Update

Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence

ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE , BIAS-FREE POLICING 1. PHILOSOPHY

Suspects Who Refuse to Identify Themselves By Jeff Bray, Senior Legal Advisor, Plano, Texas, Police Department

Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department

OBJECTS AND REASONS. Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY PART II FORENSIC PROCEDURES BY CONSENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR CURTIS, : (Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant.

TOPEKA POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 4.1 INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Defence Forces (Forensic Evidence) Bill General Scheme

BIASED BASED PROFILING

UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT

Criminal Justice Process

POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RULES

QUESTION 6. Alan gave the arrest warrant to Bob, an undercover police officer, and told Bob to contact Debbie and pretend to be a hit man.

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COLONIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION AND THE DELAWARE STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT

Fennimore Police Department Evidence, Contraband and Recovered Property Issue Date: 04/11/2014. Last Updated: 12/07/2017

FAQ: Preparing, Presenting, and Closing a Case

Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition

MICHAEL EUGENE JONES OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR. April 15, 2010 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND

Searches Conducted by Public School Officials under the Fourth Amendment

No. 103,472 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, BILLY WHITE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE

THE POLITICS OF CIVIL LIBERTIES

TYPES OF SEIZURES: stops and arrests; property seizures

Stop, Frisk and Related Issues. Capt. Adam R. Austino Vineland Police Department

Arrest, Search, and Seizure

Knowledge Objectives (2 of 2) Skills Objectives. Introduction. Legal Considerations During Investigation 12/20/2013. Legal Considerations

[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : OPINION. MR. JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: January 20, 1999

Rights of the Accused

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,576 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, TRAE D. REED, Appellee.

KAUPP v. TEXAS. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of texas, fourteenth district

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 5.14

Bowie State University Police Department General Order

Maryland-National Capital Park Police Prince George s County Division DIVISION DIRECTIVE DISTRIBUTION EFFECTIVE DATE

POCOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date June 1, 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2012 NO AGAINST

From the Attorneys at the Legacy Counsel James Publishing

Video Course Evaluation Form. My Name is: Name of Course: My Street address: Address:

a) The entry is limited in purpose and scope to discovery of a number as to which there is no reasonable expectation of privacy;

DENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

ELECTRONIC RECORDING OF CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION PROCEDURES

BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS Baltimore School Police Force STOP AND FRISK

This policy outlines the process and procedures to be considered and followed by members when making an arrest.

SUBJECT: Sample Interview & Interrogation Policy

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTY ADVOCATE TRAINING

MOTION OF AMICUS CURIAE FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

THE LAW PROFESSOR CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION

Supreme Court of the United States

Criminal Procedure Outline

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date November 1, 2015

DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER. Rev. 29 Sep 97. Index as: Lineups Prisoner Lineups Show-Ups, Prisoner M-6 PRISONER LINEUPS

Maricopa County Attorney Officer Involved Shooting Response Protocol

2. inevitable discovery

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

SECTION: ADMINISTRATION ADM-133

Transcription:

Legal Guide for Police Constitutional Issues 10 th Edition Jeffery T. Walker and Craig Hemmens Contents Preface Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Criminal Procedure 1.2 Sources of Criminal Procedure Law 1.3 Judicial Functions 1.4 The Supreme Court and the Police 1.5 Packer s Models of the Criminal Justice System 1.6 Summary Chapter 2 Results of Failure to Comply with Constitutional Mandates 2.1 The Exclusionary Rule 2.2 Extension of the Exclusionary Rule to All Courts: Mapp v. Ohio 2.3 Application and Modification of the Exclusionary Rule 2.4 Civil Liabilities 2.5 Civil Rights Actions 2.6 Liability of Supervisors, Administrators, and Agencies

2.7 Admissibility of Evidence 2.8 Summary Chapter 3 Police Power and Limitations 3.1 Police Power, Authority, and Responsibility 3.2 Limits on Police Authority 3.3 Bill of Rights 3.4 Due Process of Law 3.5 Effects of Broadening the Scope of the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause 3.6 Protection of Rights via State Constitutions and Laws 3.7 Summary Chapter 4 Police Authority to Detain 4.1 General Considerations 4.2 Consensual Encounters 4.3 Terry v. Ohio Stop-and-Frisk Rationale 4.4 Application to Off-Street Situations 4.5 Application to Detention of Motorists 4.6 Detention of Luggage 4.7 Duration of the Detention 4.8 Detention to Check Driver s License and Registration 4.9 Detention at Police Roadblocks 4.10 Summary

CHEACK AND UPDATE ALL SECTION NUMBERING BELOW Chapter 5 Law of Arrest 5.1 General Considerations 5.2 Statutory Authority to Arrest 5.3 Definition and Elements of Arrest 5.4 Arrest under the Authority of an Arrest Warrant 5.5 Arrest without a Warrant 5.6 Post-Arrest Probable Cause Determination 5.7 Use of Force in Making an Arrest 5.8 The Citation and Summons in Law Enforcement 5.9 Arrest after Fresh Pursuit 5.10 Summary Chapter 6 Search and Seizure with a Warrant 6.1 General Considerations 6.2 Constitutional Provisions 6.3 Seizure with a Valid Search Warrant General 6.4 Requirements of a Valid Search Warrant 6.5 Execution of the Search Warrant 6.6 Search of a Person on the Premises Where Such Person Is Not Described in the Warrant 6.7 Return of the Warrant

6.8 Summary Chapter 7 Search and Seizure without a Warrant 7.1 General Considerations 7.2 Search Incident to a Lawful Arrest 7.3 Search with a Valid Waiver (Consent Searches) 7.4 Search of Movable Vehicles and Objects 7.5 Search after Lawful Impoundment (Inventory Searches) 7.6 Exigent Circumstances Exception to the Warrant Requirement 7.7 Plain View Searches 7.8 Search of Premises Not Protected by the Fourth Amendment (Open Fields) 7.9 Search by a Private Individual 7.10 Standing to Challenge the Search 7.11 Stop and Frisk 7.12 Seizure of Verbal Evidence via Recorders or Microphones: Electronic Searches 7.13 Airport Searches 7.14 Search of Pervasively Regulated Businesses 7.15 Summary Chapter 8 Questioning Suspects 8.1 General Considerations 8.2 The Free and Voluntary Rule 8.3 Warning and Waiver Requirements (Miranda Rule)

8.4 Exclusion Related to the Fourth Amendment 8.5 Right to Counsel 8.6 The Delay in Arraignment Rule 8.7 Corroboration 8.8 Exceptions to Right to Counsel and Self-Incrimination 8.9 Admissibility of a Second Confession After an Inadmissible First Confession 8.10 Summary Chapter 9 Pretrial Identification Procedures 9.1 General Considerations 9.2 Fingerprinting and Photographing Suspects 9.3 Lineup Self-Incrimination Challenge 9.4 Lineup Right to Counsel Challenge 9.5 Lineup Due Process Challenge 9.6 Pretrial Photographic Identification 9.7 Dental Examination 9.8 Voice Exemplars 9.9 Footprint Comparisons and Other Body Examinations 9.10 Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Tests 9.11 Summary Chapter 10 TAKING THE LAW TO THE STREETS 10.1 General Considerations

10.2 The Consequences of Not Complying with the Law 10.3 Detention and Arrest 10.4 Searches and Seizures 10.5 Questioning Suspects 10.6 Pretrial Identification 10.7 When You Are On Your Own Appendix The Bill of Rights (First Ten Amendments to the Constitution) and the Fourteenth Amendment Table of Cases Index

Preface Law enforcement officials must be highly skilled in the use of investigative tools and knowledgeable of the intricacies of the law. One error in judgment during initial contact with a suspect can, and often does, impede the investigation. For example, an illegal search or unauthorized questioning may so contaminate the evidence obtained that it will not be admitted into evidence in court. Such errors may result in the release of dangerous criminals. In addition to losing evidence for prosecution purposes, failing to comply with constitutional mandates often leads to liability on the part of police officers, administrators, or agencies. A thorough knowledge of the U.S. Constitution as interpreted by the courts can reduce unauthorized action and make it possible for officers to act with confidence. The legal rules under which law enforcement officers must operate as trained professionals are not simple, but neither are they impossible to master. The trend toward uniformity in state and federal laws in the area of criminal justice makes it possible to articulate general standards that may apply in all jurisdictions. However, a state, by statute or by interpretation of its own constitution, may place additional restrictions on the use of evidence. It is, therefore, necessary that police officers, especially investigators and administrators, be familiar with both federal and state laws and court decisions interpreting both state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution. Due to the federalization of the Bill of Rights, most of the protections of the first eight amendments, which originally restricted the federal government, now apply to the states by way of the Fourteenth Amendment. The United States Supreme Court, using the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as the conduit, has established minimum standards that must be followed by all public law enforcement officials.

After discussing the effects of failing to comply with constitutional mandates and considering the general limitations on police power, emphasis is placed on the common constitutional questions that confront officers when they are called on to enforce the law. In particular, the legal standards relating to detention, arrest, search, questioning suspects, and pretrial identification procedures are discussed. This book is designed for officers who have the important task of protecting rights, seeking out illegalities, and preparing evidence for use in court. It may be used in departmental training programs as well as in colleges that offer courses for in-service and pre-service officers. Because the law in this area changes constantly, it is necessary for all criminal justice personnel to keep up to date by reading United States Supreme Court decisions and relevant federal and state court decisions. This edition reflects U.S. Supreme Court decisions up to and including the 2013 term of court. Important cases added to this edition include: Bailey v. United States (2013), Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010), Kentucky v. King (2010), Maryland v. King (2013), and Michigan v. Bryant (2011). Jeffery T. Walker Craig Hemmens