Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Similar documents
Case3:13-cv JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 4

Case4:08-cv JSW Document320 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 3

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case 1:10-cv FJS Document 24 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 165 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 345 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

1900 M Street, NW, Ste. 250, Washington, D.C

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

mg Doc 49 Filed 11/15/16 Entered 11/15/16 17:30:11 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Case 3:05-cv Document 22 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 4:11-cv RAS Document 37 Filed 06/16/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 7 SAN FRANCISCO

Case4:13-cv JSW Document122 Filed10/31/14 Page1 of 4

Case 1:17-cv LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES. FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURJD/f /':. - - ' - :_; o~r:r ~ WASHINGTON, D. C., _ fl J I r".~! '''

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CaseM:06-cv VRW Document716 Filed03/19/10 Page1 of 8

Case 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv JDB Document 3 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case Doc 369 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 9. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM DIVISION Chapter 11

Case Doc 434 Filed 09/08/14 Entered 09/08/14 15:29:08 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING NOTICE OF MOTION

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 557 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF THE QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA (THE O-GAH-PAH) ) In re Petition for Change of Name of: ) ) ) Petitioner. ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

Case 3:17-cv WHA Document 230 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:16-cv RFB-NJK Document 28 Filed 11/02/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 4:08-cv JSW Document 767 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Harrisburg Division --ELECTRONICALLY FILED--

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/06/ :34 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/06/2017

Case 1:15-cv LM Document 8 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:03-cv NG Document 492 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

CLEARSTREAM BANKING S.A. S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OR MODIFICATION OF THE JUNE 27, 2014 ORDER

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2391 Filed 12/31/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

PlainSite. Legal Document

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:99-cv EGS Document 685 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOINT STATUS REPORT

CASE NO.:12-CV-1984 OF EVIDENCE RELATED TO OBAMA S BIRTH. Plaintiff, Montgomery Blair Sibley ( Sibley ), pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(11), moves this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISIO N. Plaintiffs, Defendants. Plaintiffs, Defendants. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case 2:10-cv v. HON.

Case 1:16-cv MLW Document 91 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case4:08-cv JSW Document280 Filed09/18/14 Page1 of 12

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

Case5:11-cv RMW Document72 Filed01/10/12 Page1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

6. In the body of the motion:

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv RMC Document 12 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 1:13-cv KBJ Document 21 Filed 09/06/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:18-cv JSW Document 18 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:13-cv ER-KNF Document Filed 11/19/14 Page 1 of 17

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Transcription:

Case:-cv-0-JSW Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 0 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 0 Washington, D.C. 000 Phone: (0 -; Fax: (0-0 Attorneys for the Government Defs. in their Official Capacity UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. :-cv-0-jsw FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF LOS ANGELES, et al., GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE Plaintiffs, UNDER SEAL THEIR RESPONSE TO v. THE COURT S ORDER OF MARCH, 0 REGARDING NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al., PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE Defendants. The Honorable Jeffrey S. White Pursuant to Local Rule - and the Court s March, 0 Order regarding the preservation of evidence (ECF No. 0 ( Order, the undersigned counsel for the Government Defendants hereby move to file under seal their response to the Court s Order regarding the preservation of evidence., 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al., Case No. -cv-0-jsw

Case:-cv-0-JSW Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 As required by Local Rule -, submitted herewith are: a declaration establishing that the document requested to be filed under seal is properly sealable, and a proposed order that identifies the sealable material. As explained in the Declaration of James J. Gilligan submitted herewith, the Government Defendants response to the Court s Order regarding the preservation of evidence is properly sealable because the Court s Order required that the document in question be submitted under seal. See Decl. of James J. Gilligan, Exhibit hereto, ; see also Order E. For the foregoing reasons, the Government Defendants respectfully request that the Court grant this administrative motion. 0 Dated: May, 0 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ James J. Gilligan, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al., Case No. -cv-0-jsw

Case:-cv-0-JSW Document Filed0/0/ Page of U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 0 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 0 Washington, D.C. 000 Phone: (0 - Fax: (0-0 Attorneys for the Government Defendants Sued in their Official Capacities 0 0, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al., Case No. -cv-0-jsw

Case:-cv-0-JSW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 0 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 0 Washington, D.C. 000 Phone: (0 -; Fax: (0-0 Attorneys for the Government Defs. in their Official Capacity UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. :-cv-0-jsw FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF LOS ANGELES, et al., DECLARATION OF Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al., Defendants. The Honorable Jeffrey S. White Pursuant to U.S.C., I, James J. Gilligan, hereby declare:. I serve as in the United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch. I serve as one of the counsel for the Government Defendants in the above-captioned case. Declaration of James J. Gilligan, Submitted in Support of the Government Defendants Administrative Motion to File Under Seal their Response to the Court s Order of March, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al., Case No. -cv-0-jsw

Case:-cv-0-JSW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of 0. I submit this declaration, pursuant to Local Rule -(d((a, in support of the Government Defendants Administrative Motion to File under Seal their Response to the Court s Order of March, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence.. The Government Defendants Response to the Court s Order of March, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence is sealable pursuant to this Court s March, 0 Order regarding the preservation of evidence (ECF No. 0 ( Order which requires that, inter alia, counsel representing each party submit to the Court a statement that the directive in paragraph E of the Order has been carried out. See Order E. The Order further requires that counsel submit that statement under seal. See id.. That statement, the Government Defendants Response to the Court s Order of March, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence, constitutes the sole document that the Government Defendants seek to file under seal in their Administrative Motion. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 0 Dated: May, 0 /s/ James J. Gilligan Declaration of James J. Gilligan, Submitted in Support of the Government Defendants Administrative Motion to File Under Seal their Response to the Court s Order of March, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al., Case No. -cv-0-jsw

Case:-cv-0-JSW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 0 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 0 Washington, D.C. 000 Phone: (0 -; Fax: (0-0 Attorneys for the Government Defs. in their Official Capacity UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. :-cv-0-jsw FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF LOS ANGELES, et al., [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, et al., Defendants. The Honorable Jeffrey S. White Upon consideration of the Government Defendants Administrative Motion to File under Seal their Response to the Court s Order of March, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence, it is hereby, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al., Case No. -cv-0-jsw

Case:-cv-0-JSW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of ORDERED that the Government Defendants motion is granted. The Government Defendants Response to the Court s Order of March, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence shall remain under seal in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. 0 0 Dated: JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, 0 Regarding Preservation of Evidence First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al., Case No. -cv-0-jsw