DWI Hearings. DWI motions in my district. Motions In Implied Consent Trials. James Drennan UNC School of Government March, 2007

Similar documents
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 6 February 2018

MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE IN SUPERIOR COURT

Court of Appeals. Slip Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. EDDIE CROSS OPINION BY v. Record No JUDGE WILLIAM G. PETTY APRIL 3, 2007 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Part 1 Rules for the Continued Delivery of Services in Non- Capital Criminal and Non-Criminal Cases at the Trial Level

DWI Procedures: Navigating the Maze

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. Case Nos CA-101 And 2002-CA-102

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 August v. Wake County No. 06 CRS ADAM DERBYSHIRE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

Joseph R. Burkard and Matthew A. Miller for Appellee

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN November 1, 2002 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. MARK B. ASBLE OPINION BY v. Record No JUDGE JERE M.H. WILLIS, JR. NOVEMBER 27, 2007 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINA

BENJAMIN B. FITZGERALD OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY April 16, 2015 LOUDOUN COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case Nos UNREPORTED

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

(2) was imposed as a result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines; or

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY. v. O P I N I O N. CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Criminal Appeal from Municipal Court.

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Wesley Paxson III, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Before Judges Leone and Vernoia. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, Municipal Appeal No

2018 PA Super 13 : : : : : : : : :

USA v. Terrell Haywood

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Codeluppi, Slip Opinion No Ohio-1574.

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT JUDGE ELIZABETH V. KRIER COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, BUILDING L NAPLES, FLORIDA TELEPHONE:

S09A0155. TIMMRECK v. THE STATE. A jury found Christopher Franklin Timmreck guilty of the malice murder

IN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED May 11, AP1257 DISTRICT II NO. 2010AP1256-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Video Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched

In the Third Court of Appeals Austin, Texas ROBERT TORRES, Appellant, STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,900 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JOSEPH E. THAYER, Appellant.

Court Records Glossary

2014 PA Super 234 OPINION BY STABILE, J.: FILED OCTOBER 14, The Commonwealth appeals from an order granting a motion to

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Chapter 4: Motions and Motions Procedures in Implied Consent Cases Contents Introduction

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed June 25, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Jon Stuart

v) Deletes exemption for lawnmowers and bicycles, which means that driving on either is now covered by impaired driving offense.

Types of Briefs to a Trial Court

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 11, 2013

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,883 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. WESLEY L. ADKINS, Appellant, STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee.

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 17 December v. New Hanover County No. 12 CRS FREDERICK L. WEAVER

Court of Appeals of Ohio

State v. Tavares, N.J. Super. (App. Div. 2003).

RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)

CHAPTER 10. RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT AND THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT TRAFFIC DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,324. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, FRANCISCO ESTRADA-VITAL, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 2, 2010

NH DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT AND LICENSING ADMINISTRATION & OPERATIONS MANUAL

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 August v. Onslow County Nos. 10 CRS CRS JAMES ERIC MARSLENDER

No. 46,522-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 November 2017

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2016

PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT. The Advocacy Institute Is Pleased to Present NOTICE REGARDING COURSE MATERIALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,451 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant,

NO. 50,546-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * versus * * * * * *

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 119,013 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

PRESENT: Carrico, C.J., Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, Koontz, and Kinser, JJ., and Compton, S.J.

Supreme Court of Florida

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 114,439 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, OSIEL OROZCO, Appellant.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 116,406. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, MARK T. SALARY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

Joey D. Moya, Clerk New Mexico Supreme Court P.O. Box 848 Santa Fe, New Mexico (fax)

CHAPTER 21. BRIEFS AND REPRODUCED RECORD IN GENERAL CONTENT OF BRIEFS

Submitted March 28, 2017 Decided. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Indictment No

2017 PA Super 170. OPINION BY OTT, J.: Filed: May 31, David Smith appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed on

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 5, STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FREDRICK SLEDGE

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 February Appeal by Defendant from judgment entered 23 January 2009 by

Administrative Appeals

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 5/12/2014 :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 111,572. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JEREMY A. CHAPMAN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 102,471. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, RUSTY SIEVERS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

RENDERED: MAY 2, 2008; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO CA MR

Supreme Court of Florida

Court of Appeals of Ohio

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DANIEL COCHRANE. Argued: February 8, 2006 Opinion Issued: April 26, 2006

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

CLAIMS ON APPEAL: A PRIMER ON THE APPELLATE PROCESS FOR CLAIMS PROFESSIONALS

Transcription:

DWI Hearings James Drennan UNC School of Government March, 2007 DWI motions in my district 1. Are all heard pretrial 2. Are never heard pretrial 3. Mostly are heard pretrial 4. Are sometimes heard pretrial Motions In Implied Consent Trials Heard only at pretrial, unless Motion to dismiss at close of evidence Based on facts not previously known, discovered during the course of the trial Role of discovery If heard during trial, state must be given reasonable time to prepare for motion 1

A reasonable time to prepare is 1. Until the end of the day 2. One day 3. Officers next court date 4. A week 5. As long as the state wants 6. Depends on the case, Summary Decision Does not require written findings May occur If motion not filed pretrial and no exception applies If state concedes that evidence in question won t be used Orders and Findings 1. I do 2. I do and use a form 3. Winning party does 4. Who knows? 2

Orders and Findings Required in all motions unless summarily disposed of Findings of fact and conclusions of law must be in writing Testimony must be under oath Must make preliminary ruling on motion Rulings for the State Must be in writing and set out findings of fact and conclusions Must indicate preliminary indication of court s decision Apparently then may enter final ruling May not be appealed by defendant, but apparently may be renewed in superior court on de novo appeal Ruling for Defense Must be in writing and set out findings of fact and conclusions Must indicate preliminary indication of court s decision May not enter final ruling at that point, but must enter preliminary written ruling Must give state opportunity to decide whether to appeal No time limit specified 3

Ruling for Defense If motion heard during trial, trial must be continued until the appeal in superior court is heard On appeal, superior court reviews matter on the record, unless there is a dispute about the findings of fact If there is a dispute, matter heard de novo Case Management Nightmare 1. Motion heard during trial 2. State gets continuance to prepare 3. Ruling for defense 4. Order prepared 5. State takes time to decide to appeal and does 6. Dispute about findings, so de novo rehearing of evidence in the motion Case Management Scenario 7. Superior court rules for state, remands 8. District court trial resumes, defendant is convicted 1. Who hears rest of trial if original judge unavailable? 9. Defendant appeals for trial de novo 10. Defendant reasserts motion to suppress 11.Defendant tried in superior court 4

Case Management Nightmare 1. Defendant makes pretrial motion 2. Ruling for state 3. Defendant tried and convicted 4. Defendant appeals 5. Defendant reasserts motion in superior court 6. Ruling for defendant 7. Defendant tried and acquitted Possible Motions To suppress intoxylizer results To suppress all evidence based on illegal stop or illegal arrest To return vehicle seized based on failure to have speedy trial To activate sentences based on impairment in jail Facts, facts. You want facts you can t handle facts or can you? Just the Facts, Ma am. Sergeant Joe Friday Facts are generally over esteemed. For most practical purposes, a thing is what men think it is. When they judged the earth flat, it was flat. As long as men thought slavery tolerable, tolerable it was. We live down here among shadows, shadows among shadows. John Updike 5

Purpose of Findings of Fact It is not enough that there may be evidence in the record sufficient to support findings which could have been made. The trial court must itself determine what pertinent facts are actually established by the evidence before it, and it is not for an appellate court to determine de novo the weight and credibility to be given to evidence disclosed by the record on appeal. Knutton v. Cofield, 273 N.C. 355, 160 S.E.2d 29 (1968) (emphasis added) Findings of Fact General Law Factfinder must make findings of fact in ultimate facts only. It is of the highest importance in the art of detection to be able to recognize out of a number of facts which are incidental and which are vital... I would call your attention to the curious incident of the dog in the night-time. The dog did nothing in the night-time. That was the curious incident. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Ultimate facts are final facts necessary to establish a cause of action or defense. Evidentiary facts are subsidiary facts required to prove ultimate facts. Often included in orders to provide context to the ultimate facts Guidelines for Findings Limit facts to those necessary for outcome of case; KNOW WHAT THE ISSUES ARE Must be accurate, as a matter of fairness Findings given great deference Must be selective Not all evidence is material to resolution of issues Findings should normally be in sequence; tell the story Findings should be written in clear, simple, declarative sentences 6

Conclusion of Law A single statement With legal significance Supported by the facts previously found Articulating the law applicable on an issue or element necessary to determine a disputed principle of law Used along with other conclusions of law to determine the rights of the parties 7