UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY No. 3:04-cv SRC ) ) CLASS ACTION ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

MASTER FILE NO. 2: 03-CV-1270 (JS) (ETB)

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

Case: 3:08-cv slc Document #: 84-2 Filed: 09/23/2010 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x : : CLASS ACTION : : : : Master File No. 1:08-cv LTS

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:12-cv MCA-LDW CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Lead Case No CV CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

QUESTIONS? Call toll free, or visit

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

Plaintiff, Defendants.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A CLASS ACTION READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

OBJECT NO LATER THAN JULY 5, 2016 GO TO A HEARING DO NOTHING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12-CV JTT-CMH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Ca l i f o r n i a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, CLASS ACTION

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION In re HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : :

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 35

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case 2:11-cv RSL Document Filed 09/28/12 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. C.A. No JLT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION EXHIBIT A-1

CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re TERAYON COMMUNICATION ) Master File No. C-00-1967-MHP SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CLASS ACTION ) This Document Relates To: ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT ) OF CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS. ) ) IF YOU PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED PUBLICLY TRADED COMMON STOCK OR PURCHASED CALL OPTIONS OR SOLD PUT OPTIONS OF TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC. BETWEEN NOVEMBER 15, 1999 AND APRIL 11, 2000, YOU COULD GET A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Securities and Time Period: Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. ( Terayon ) publicly traded common stock purchased or acquired and call options purchased and put options sold ( Affected Securities ) between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000. Settlement Fund: $15,000,000 in cash. Your recovery will depend on the amount of securities purchased and the timing of your purchases and any sales. Depending on the number and type of eligible securities that participate in the settlement and when those securities were purchased and sold, the estimated average recovery per share of common stock will be approximately $0.65 before deduction of Court-approved fees and expenses. The recovery for options will be limited to 3% of the Net Settlement Fund. Reasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including danger of no recovery due to the financial condition of the company. If the Case Had Not Settled: In addition, continuing with the case could have resulted in loss at trial. The two sides do not agree on the amount of money that could have been won if Lead Plaintiffs prevailed at trial. The parties disagree about: (1) the method for determining whether the Terayon Affected Securities were artificially inflated during the relevant period; (2) the amount of any such inflation; (3) the extent that various statements by Defendants were materially false or misleading; (4) the extent that various facts alleged by Lead Plaintiffs influenced the trading price of Terayon Affected Securities during the relevant period; and (5) whether Defendants statements were material, false, misleading or otherwise actionable under the securities laws. Attorneys Fees and Expenses: Co-Lead Counsel have not received any payment for their work investigating the facts, conducting this litigation and negotiating the settlement on behalf of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Class. Court-appointed Co-Lead Counsel will ask the Court for attorneys fees of approximately 30% of the Settlement Fund and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses not to exceed $1,500,000 to be paid from the Settlement Fund. If the above amounts are requested and approved by the Court, the average cost per share of common stock will be $0.26. Deadlines: Submit Claim: October 30, 2006 File Objection: September 8, 2006 Court Hearing on Fairness of Settlement: September 25, 2006

More Information: Claims Administrator: RG/2 Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102 www.rg2claims.com or Co-Lead Counsel: Rick Nelson Shareholder Relations Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 -or- Timothy J. MacFall BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD & LIFSHITZ, LLP 10 East 40th Street New York, NY 10016 Your legal rights are affected whether you act, or don t act. Read this Notice carefully. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM OBJECT GO TO A HEARING DO NOTHING The only way to get a payment. You may write to the Court if you don t like this settlement. You may ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the settlement. Get no payment. These rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained in this Notice. The Court in charge of this case must decide whether to approve the settlement. Payments will be made if the Court approves the settlement and, if there are any appeals, after appeals are resolved. Please be patient. BASIC INFORMATION 1. Why Did I Get This Notice Package? You or someone in your family may have purchased or otherwise acquired the Terayon Affected Securities listed above between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000. The Court sent you this Notice because you have a right to know about a proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit, and about all of your options, before the Court decides whether to approve the settlement. If the Court approves it and after any objections or appeals are resolved, the Claims Administrator appointed by the Court will make the payments that the settlement allows. This package explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible for them, and how to get them. The Court in charge of the case is the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and the case is known as In re Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File No. C-00-1967-MHP. The people who sued are called the Lead Plaintiffs, and the company and the individuals they sued, Terayon, Zaki Rakib, Selim Rakib, and Raymond M. Fritz, are called the Defendants. Page 2 of 7

2. What Is This Lawsuit About? This case was brought as a class action alleging that the Defendants disseminated false and misleading statements claiming Terayon s proprietary cable modem technology was accepted as the industry standard when Defendants knew this claim was false. Lead Plaintiffs allege that these false statements resulted in the artificial inflation of the price of Terayon Affected Securities between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000. Defendants deny that they did anything wrong. 3. Why Is This a Class Action? In a class action, one or more people called class representatives (in this case the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiffs, David Yen, Michael F. Henry and Jose Cruz), sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. Here, all these people are called a Class or Class Members. One court resolves the issues for all Class Members, except for those who have excluded themselves from the Class. Judge Marilyn H. Patel is in charge of this class action. 4. Why Is There a Settlement? The Court did not decide in favor of Lead Plaintiffs or Defendants. Instead, both sides agreed to a settlement. That way, they avoid the cost of a trial, and eligible Class Members who make a valid claim will get compensation. The Lead Plaintiffs and their attorneys think the settlement is best for all Class Members. WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT To see if you will get money from this settlement, you first have to determine if you are a Class Member. 5. How Do I Know if I Am Part of the Settlement? The Class includes all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Terayon Affected Securities between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000, except those persons and entities that are excluded, as described below. 6. What Are The Exceptions to Being Included? You are not a Class Member if you are a Defendant, a member of the immediate family of one of the individual defendants listed in question 1, an entity in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest, a director or officer of Terayon, a legal representative, heir, successor, or assign of any excluded party. If you sold Terayon common stock between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000, that alone does not make you a Class Member. You are a Class Member only if you purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Terayon common stock, if you purchased call options, or if you sold put options between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000. 7. I m Still Not Sure if I Am Included. If you are still not sure whether you are included, you can ask for free help. You can call Rick Nelson at 619/231-1058 for more information. Or you can fill out and return the claim form described in question 10, to see if you qualify. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET 8. What Does the Settlement Provide? Defendants have agreed to pay $15 million in cash to be divided among all eligible Class Members who send in valid claim forms, after payment of Court-approved attorneys fees and expenses and the costs of claims administration, including the costs of printing and mailing this Notice and the cost of publishing newspaper notice (the Net Settlement Fund ). 9. How Much Will My Payment Be? Your share of the fund will depend on the number of valid claim forms that Class Members send in and how many shares of securities you purchased during the relevant period and when you bought and sold them. A claim will be calculated as follows: Common Stock (a) For shares of Terayon common stock purchased or otherwise acquired between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000, and (i) sold on or before April 11, 2000, the claim per share is $0; (ii) held at the close of trading on April 11, 2000, the claim per share is the lesser of (a) the purchase price less $58.731 (90 Day Average Closing Price), or (b) $21.50 per share (April 12, 2000 Price Decline). Page 3 of 7

Terayon Call Options (b) For call options on Terayon common stock purchased between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000, and (i) owned at the close of trading on April 11, 2000, the claim per call option is the difference between the price paid for the call option less the proceeds received upon the settlement of the call option contract; (ii) not owned at the close of trading on April 11, 2000, the claim per call option is $0. (c) For call options on Terayon common stock written between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000, the claim per call option is $0. Terayon Put Options (d) For put options on Terayon common stock written between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000, and (i) owned at the close of trading on April 11, 2000, the claim per put option is the difference between the price paid upon settlement of the put option contract less the initial proceeds received upon the sale of the put option contract; (ii) not owned at the close of trading on April 11, 2000, the claim per put option is $0. (e) For put options on Terayon common stock purchased from November 15, 1999 through April 11, 2000, the claim per put option is $0. In the case the option was exercised for Terayon common stock, the amount paid, or proceeds received, upon the settlement of the option contract equals the intrinsic value of the option using Terayon common stock s closing price on the date the option was exercised. In addition, for the purposes of this allocation, the total aggregate allowed claims for option holders shall not exceed 3% of the Net Settlement Fund. The payment you get will reflect your pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund. Depending on the number and type of eligible securities that participate in the settlement and when those shares were purchased and sold, the estimated average payment for common stock will be approximately $0.65 for each share before deduction of Court-approved fees and expenses. The number of claimants who send in claims varies widely from case to case. If fewer than anticipated Class Members send in a claim form, you could get more money. The date of acquisition or sale is the contract or trade date as distinguished from the settlement date. For Class Members who held Terayon Affected Securities at the beginning of the Class Period or made multiple purchases or sales during the Class Period, the first-in, first-out ( FIFO ) method will be applied to such holdings, purchases and sales for purposes of calculating a claim. Under the FIFO method, sales of securities during the Class Period will be matched, in chronological order, first against securities held at the beginning of the Class Period. The remaining sales of securities during the Class Period will then be matched, in chronological order, against securities purchased during the Class Period. A Class Member will be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund only if a Class Member had a net loss, after all profits from transactions in Terayon Affected Securities during the Class Period are subtracted from all losses. HOW YOU GET A PAYMENT SUBMITTING A CLAIM FORM 10. How Will I Get a Payment? To qualify for payment, you must be an eligible Class Member and you must send in a claim form. A claim form is enclosed with this Notice. Read the instructions carefully, fill out the form, include all the documents the form asks for, sign it, and mail it in the enclosed envelope postmarked no later than October 30, 2006. 11. When Will I Get My Payment? The Court will hold a hearing on September 25, 2006, to decide whether to approve the settlement. If Judge Patel approves the settlement, there may be appeals. It is always uncertain whether these appeals can be resolved, and resolving them can take time, perhaps several years. Everyone who sends in a claim form will be informed of the determination with respect to their claim. Please be patient. 12. What Does It Mean to Be in the Class? Unless you previously excluded yourself in response to the Notice of Pendency of Class Action sent to Class Members on April 13, 2003, you are in the Class, and that means that you cannot sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit against the Defendants about the same legal issues in this case. It also means that all of the Court s orders will apply to you and legally bind you and you will release your claims in this case against the Defendants. The terms of the release are included in the claim form that is enclosed. Page 4 of 7

13. If I Excluded Myself from the Class, Can I Get Money from This Settlement? No. If you excluded yourself in response to the Notice of Pendency of Class Action sent on April 13, 2003, do not send in a claim form. However, you may continue to sue or be part of a different lawsuit against the Defendants. THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU 14. Do I Have a Lawyer in This Case? The Court asked the law firms of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP and Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP to represent you and other Class Members. These lawyers are called Co-Lead Counsel. You will not be charged for these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 15. How Will the Lawyers Be Paid? Co-Lead Counsel will ask the Court for attorneys fees of approximately 30% of the Settlement Fund (an average of $0.195 per share of common stock) and for reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses up to $1,500,000 ($0.065 per share of common stock), which were advanced in connection with the litigation. The Lead Plaintiffs may also seek reimbursement of their expenses, including lost wages, incurred in representing the Class in this litigation. Such sums as may be approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund. Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses. The attorneys fees and expenses requested will be the only payment to Co-Lead Counsel for their efforts in achieving this settlement and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a wholly contingent basis. To date, Co-Lead Counsel have not been paid for their services for conducting this litigation on behalf of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Class over the past 6 years, nor for their substantial out-of-pocket expenses. The fee requested will compensate Co-Lead Counsel for their work in achieving the Settlement Fund and is well within the range of fees awarded to class counsel under similar circumstances in other cases of this type. The Court may award less than this amount. OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT You can tell the Court that you don t agree with the settlement or some part of it. 16. How Do I Tell the Court that I Don t Like the Settlement? If you are a Class Member, you can object to the settlement if you don t like any part of it. You can give reasons why you think the Court should not approve it. The Court will consider your views. To object, you must send a letter saying that you object to the settlement in In re Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File No. C-00-1967-MHP. Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, the number and type of Terayon Affected Securities purchased and sold between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000, and the reasons you object to the settlement. Any objection to the settlement must be mailed or delivered such that it is received no later than September 8, 2006 by filing said objections and briefs with the Clerk of the Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States Courthouse 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 THE COURT'S FAIRNESS HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you don t have to. 17. When and Where Will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? The Court will hold a fairness hearing at 2:00 p.m., on September 25, 2006, at the United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. At this hearing the Court will consider whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. If there are objections, the Court will consider them. Judge Patel will listen to people who have asked to speak at the hearing. The Court will also consider how much to pay to Co-Lead Counsel. The Court may decide these issues at the hearing or take them under consideration. We do not know how long these decisions will take. Page 5 of 7

18. Do I have to Come to the Hearing? No. Co-Lead Counsel will answer questions Judge Patel may have. But, you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you don t have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it is not necessary. 19. May I Speak at the Hearing? You may ask the Court for permission to speak at the fairness hearing. To do so, you must send a letter saying that it is your intention to appear in In re Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File No. C-00-1967-MHP. Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, and the number and type of Terayon Affected Securities purchased or otherwise acquired between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000. Your notice of intention to appear must be received no later than September 8, 2006, and filed with the Clerk of the Court at the address listed in question 16. You cannot speak at the hearing if you have excluded yourself from the Class. IF YOU DO NOTHING 20. What Happens if I Do Nothing at All? If you do nothing, you ll get no money from this settlement. But, unless you have already excluded yourself, you won t be able to start a lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be part of any other lawsuit against the Defendants about the same legal issues in this case. GETTING MORE INFORMATION 21. Are There More Details About the Settlement? This Notice summarizes the proposed settlement. More details are in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of March 17, 2006. You can get a copy of the Stipulation of Settlement by writing to Rick Nelson, c/o Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 or from the Clerk s office at the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA during regular business hours. 22. How Do I Get More Information? You can call 619/231-1058 or write to Rick Nelson, Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 or Timothy J. MacFall, Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP, 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 or visit the website at www.rg2claims.com. DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE Page 6 of 7

SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES If you hold shares of any Terayon Affected Securities purchased or otherwise acquired between November 15, 1999 and April 11, 2000, as nominee for a beneficial owner, then, within ten (10) days after you receive this Notice, you must either: (1) send a copy of this Notice by first class mail to all such Persons; or (2) provide a list of the names and addresses of such Persons to the Claims Administrator: Terayon Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o RG/2 Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102 If you choose to mail the Notice and Proof of Claim yourself, you may obtain from the Claims Administrator (without cost to you) as many additional copies of these documents as you will need to complete the mailing. Regardless of whether you choose to complete the mailing yourself or elect to have the mailing performed for you, you may obtain reimbursement for or advancement of reasonable administrative costs actually incurred or expected to be incurred in connection with forwarding the Notice and which would not have been incurred but for the obligation to forward the Notice, upon submission of appropriate documentation to the Claims Administrator. DATED: July 24, 2006 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Page 7 of 7