ALI-ABA Course of Study Asbestos Litigation in the 21st Century. November 30 - December 1, 2006 New Orleans, Louisiana

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division : : : : : : : : : PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY. Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. NO. 05C JRS (ASB) v. )

CACH, LLC v. Taylor, Del: Court of Common Pleas CACH, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DEBORAH J. TAYLOR, Defendant. No. CPUU

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Trials 101: Civil and Criminal Case Management Essentials, Part 3

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

AFFIDAVIT OF MEGAN D. McINTYRE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

1. The petitioners hereby allege that Respondent erroneously concluded that the

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Attorneys for BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, LLP and the class of similarly situated persons SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Richard Thompson v. Colonial Court Apartments, LLC C.A. No. 05C RRC. Submitted: October 10, 2006 Decided: November 1, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

Case 1:07-cv GMS Document 7 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 103 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2017

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY

Actions must be set down for trial within two years of being defended.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case MFW Doc 2283 Filed 06/23/16 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Docket Number: 1150 GREEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. Paul A. Logan, Esquire (co-counsel) CLOSED VS.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

WESTMORELAND COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE TABLE OF RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY ORDER

Remove the Judge from Your Case

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MARY LOU BENNEK, Derivatively on ) Behalf of THE HOME DEPOT, INC.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Title 255 LOCAL COURT RULES

THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ), dated as of, 2015 (the "Effective Date"), is entered into by and between the Petitioner TOWNSHIP OF

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CLEARSTREAM BANKING S.A. S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OR MODIFICATION OF THE JUNE 27, 2014 ORDER

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

25 8/15/05 2 7/ /17/06 3 4/ /24/06 4 4/ /21/06 5 8/ /1/07 6 1/22/ /21/08 7 1/22/ /18/09 8 1/26/98

STATE OF LOUISIANA DR. BARBARA FERGUSON AND CHARLES J. HATFIELD VS. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Case 1:07-cv GMS Document 25 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Memorandum of Understanding among California Natural Resources Agency, California Department of Parks and Recreation, and Resources Legacy Fund

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:15-cv WB

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 101 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2017

Date Submitted: October 8, 2012 Date Decided: October 31, 2012

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

McKinney & Tallant, P.A. by Zeyland G. McKinney, Jr. for Plaintiff Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated.

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (Miami) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv MGC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : Chapter 7

considering appointing, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

Case 2:15-cv MAK Document 78 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 130

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

LOCAL RULES CASE MANAGEMENT IN CIVIL CASES

U= ---^ ^ ^.., IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO . THIS IS A DEATH PENALTY CASE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

0:17-cv JMC Date Filed 08/18/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DATE FILED:21. Case 1:13-cv RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 6

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Submitted: April 16, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 43 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 2

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 105 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 106

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CONSENT DECREE. I. Background

Case 1:08-cv TPG Document 585 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 4. x : : : : : : : : : x : : : : : : : : : : : : x : : : : : : : : : : : : x

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Case MBK Doc 635 Filed 01/16/15 Entered 01/22/15 08:05:30 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY. Plaintiff,

SUGGESTED AMENDMENT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (CR)

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

Case 1:11-cv GBL -TRJ Document 4 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 349

2010 Amendments to Expert Witness Discovery Under Federal Rule 26 Address Four Issues:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

Docket Number: 3757 WASHINGTON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. Mark F. Nowak, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Case 1:13-cv JKB Document 180 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:10-md RS Document 2860 Filed 09/18/18 Page 1 of 6

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-cv GBD

DOCKET NO.: 065,803. On Appeal From: APPELLATE DIVISION. Sat Below:

MINUTES OF COMMISSION MEETING. April 20, Also in attendance was Alida Kass, Esq., Chief Counsel, New Jersey Civil Justice Institute.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Transcription:

1691 ALI-ABA Course of Study Asbestos Litigation in the 21st Century November 30 - December 1, 2006 New Orleans, Louisiana Emerging Jurisdictions: Delaware Submitted By R. Thomas Radcliffe, Jr., Esquire DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P. Baltimore, Maryland

1692 Emerging Jurisdictions: Delaware Materials Submitted By R. Thomas Radcliffe, Jr. DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P. Baltimore, Maryland TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Master Trial Scheduling Order and Table of Trial Schedule Abstracts, In re Asbestos Litigation, No. 77C-ASB-2, Super. Ct., New Castle Cty., DE, May 26, 2006. 2. Master Trial Scheduling Order and Table of Trial Schedule Abstracts (amended), In re Asbestos Litigation, No. 77C-ASB-2, Super. Ct., New Castle Cty., DE, September 7, 2006. 3. Memorandum Opinion Denying Defendants Motions to Dismiss Based on Forum Non Conveniens, In re Asbestos Litigation, No. 05C-05-246-JRS(ASB), Super. Ct., New Castle Cty., DE, March 8, 2006. 4. Chart summarizing theories of liability, defense, and damage limitations on asbestos cases in 13 states. 5. Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants Motions for the Application of Substantive Law of Other Jurisdictions, In re Asbestos Litigation, No. 77C-ASB-2, Super. Ct., New Castle Cty., DE, January 20, 2006. 6. Order affirming summary judgment for defendant Oy Partek Ab, In re Asbestos Litigation; Colgain v. Oy Partek Ab, No. 359,201, Sup. Ct., DE, May 22, 2002.

SO ORDERED 1693 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE : ASBESTOS LITIGATION : C.A. No. : 77C-ASB-2 MASTER TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND TABLE OF TRIAL SCHEDULE ABSTRACTS (Amended on : May 26, 2006) AND NOW TO WIT, on this 26th day of May, 2006, in order to clarify the record and avoid confusion with regard to those cases assigned trial dates and to avoid confusion and SO ORDERED disputes in the future; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) This Order lists all asbestos litigation matters set for trial as of the date of its issue and shall be known as the Master Trial Scheduling Order. Amended versions of this Order shall be filed from time to time as the trial dates set herein pass and as new trial dates and trial groupings are established. Any amendments to this Order required as a result of changes made pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 2 hereof shall also result in the filing of an amended version of this Order. All amended versions of this Order shall clearly indicate the date of the amendment in the caption hereof. (2) Informal and/or oral requests for any changes to the provision of this Order will not be entertained. (3) Any party seeking to add any matter to an existing trial grouping, re-align trial groupings, delete a matter from a trial grouping, move or assign any particular matter to or from a particular trial date, create trial groupings in addition to or in place of those groupings Page 1 of 33

1694 established by this Order, or otherwise alter the provisions of this Order shall follow the following procedures: (a) Any plaintiff wishing to alter the provisions of this Order shall advise Loreto P. Rufo, Esq., as Defense Coordinating Counsel of the changes requested and the reasons therefore. Defense Coordinating Counsel shall communicate with all defense counsel and shall advise plaintiff of its position, the position of defendants as a group, and any specific or individual defendant issues with regard to such changes within five (5) business days of the date of notification of requested changes. In the event no objections are raised to the requested changes, Defense Coordinating Counsel shall prepare and file an amended version of this Order which shall be entered by the Court. In the event agreement can not be reached with regard to the requested changes, plaintiff shall file a formal motion seeking such changes. Such motion shall be captioned as a Motion to Alter Master Trial Scheduling Order As Amended On and shall be filed in the general civil action number: 77C-ASB-2 as well as in the civil action number corresponding to any particular matter directly affected by the changes requested. All parties shall be noticed and served with any such Motion. Loreto P. Rufo, Esq., as Defense Coordinating Counsel., shall be served with a copy of such Motion. The form of Order submitted with any such Motion will indicate, with particularity and specificity, the changes to this Order requested. Within five (5) business days of this Court s ruling on any such Motion, defense Coordinating Counsel shall prepare and file an amended version of this Order which shall reflect the changes made and which shall be entered by the Court. (b) Any defendant wishing to alter the provisions of this Order shall advise plaintiffs counsel and Loreto P. Rufo, Esq., as Defense Coordinating Counsel of the changes requested and the reasons therefore. Defense Coordinating Counsel shall communicate with Page 2 of 33

1695 other defense counsel and with plaintiffs counsel and shall advise the requesting defendant of its position, the position of other defendants, and the position of plaintiffs counsel with regard to such changes within five (5) business days of the date of notification of requested changes. In the event no objections are raised to the requested changes, Defense Coordinating Counsel shall prepare and file an amended version of this Order which shall be entered by the Court. In the event agreement can not be reached with regard to the requested changes, the requesting defendant shall file a formal motion seeking such changes. Such motion shall be captioned as a Motion to Alter Master Trial Scheduling Order As Amended On and shall be filed in the general civil action number: 77C-ASB-2 as well as in the civil action number corresponding to any particular matter directly affected by the changes requested. All parties shall be noticed and served with any such Motion. Loreto P. Rufo, Esq., as Defense Coordinating Counsel., shall be served with a copy of such Motion. The form of Order submitted with any such Motion will indicate, with particularity and specificity, the changes to this Order requested. Within five (5) business days of this Court s ruling on any such Motion, defense Coordinating Counsel shall prepare and file an amended version of this Order which shall reflect the changes made and which shall be entered by the Court. (2) The following is a compilation of trial groupings currently in place and a Table of Trial Schedule Abstracts for each trial setting. The dates set on the Table of Trial Schedule Abstracts may be altered upon agreement by and between counsel. Defense Coordinating Counsel shall be notified of any such accommodations or agreements reached by and between counsel. In the event a formal motion to alter pretrial deadline dates is required, the requesting party shall file caption the motion as a Motion to Alter Master Trial Scheduling Order As Amended On and it shall be filed in the general civil action number: 77C-ASB-2 as well Page 3 of 33

1696 as in the civil action number corresponding to any particular matter directly affected by the changes requested. All parties shall be noticed and served with any such Motion. Loreto P. Rufo, Esq., as Defense Coordinating Counsel., shall be served with a copy of such Motion. Within five (5) business days of this Court s ruling on any such Motion, defense Coordinating Counsel shall prepare and file an amended version of this Order which shall reflect the changes made and which shall be entered by the Court. Page 4 of 33