Dangerous and insanitary building policy

Similar documents
Policies on Dangerous Buildings & Insanitary Buildings

Dangerous and Insanitary Buildings Policy

Dangerous and Insanitary Building Provisions of the Building Act 2004

Session of SENATE BILL No. 31. By Committee on Ethics, Elections and Local Government 1-17

Regarding the issuing of a code compliance certificate for building work affecting other property at 2C Hastie Avenue, Mangere, Auckland

FIRE SAFETY. The Fire Safety Act. being. Chapter F-15.11* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, (effective November 2, 2015).

ABANDONED PROPERTIES BYLAW BYLAW NO

OAKLAND COUNTY HEALTH DIVISION SANITARY CODE ARTICLE X DRINKING WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM WELL PROTECTION AND EDUCATION INDEX OF CODE

1. The matter to be determined

Processing of Building Consent Applications

TRAFFIC NOTE 10. Revision 3. Trials of traffic control devices Guidelines. Date January 2011

CITY OF EAST LANSING ORDINANCE NO. 1360

Article 12.0 Violations, Penalties and Enforcement

1. The matter to be determined

6TH ASSEMBLY, HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY, LAGOS STATE

THE TOWN OF DEERPARK, ORANGE COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2011

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER

Building Inspector to be Appointed. Enforcement of Building Code; Authority of Inspector to Enter Buildings. Plans to Accompany Application.

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA PRIVATE TREE PROTECTION BY-LAW (amended by 13-13)

CP Motors Storage Terms & Conditions (2014)

ORDINANCE #1324 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF NEW CARLISLE THAT:

COMMUNITY GROUP LICENCE TO OCCUPY

Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities

CHAPTER 3C UNSAFE BUILDINGS - PUBLIC NUISANCE

CHAPTER 4 BUILDINGS PART 1 DANGEROUS STRUCTURES PART 2 NUMBERING OF BUILDINGS PART 3 OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS

CHAPTER DANGEROUS BUILDINGS

FIRE SAFETY ENFORCEMENT POLICY

REPORT UNDER THE OMBUDSMAN ACT CASE THE WINNIPEG FIRE PARAMEDIC SERVICE REPORT ISSUED ON MARCH 6, 2015

Pressure Equipment Act (869/1999; amendments up to 1160/2003 included)

Protection work is only required when the relevant building surveyor (RBS) determines that it is necessary.

FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER 402. WATER, STORM WATER AND SANITARY SEWER ADMINISTRATION

Oasys Software Licence and Support Agreement

Construction Warranties

Procedure for unsafe structures and equipment.

2. PLAN ADMINISTRATION

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF DOUGLAS COUNTY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

City of Calistoga. Code Enforcement Manual for Public Nuisance Abatement

Determination regarding a dispute about a house built by one shareholder of a jointly owned block of Maori land at 41 Rarapua Place, Te Puna, Tauranga

Apply for Hot Works Permit

CITY OF Michigan Michigan, North Dakota ORDINANCE #112 MINIMUM HOUSING, DILAPIDATED BUILDINGS, PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY ORDINANCE

CHAPTER 6 TECHNICAL REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES. Article 1: Definitions

City of Saint Louis ARTICLE V. DANGEROUS BUILDINGS* Sec Dangerous building defined.

Chapter 132 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS. ARTICLE I Street Openings and Excavations

REFERENCE OFFER SUBJECT TO CONTRACT PART II CO-MINGLING CONTENTS

ARTICLE G. CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL; CONTAINMENT PROVISIONS

ORDINANCE NO. 906 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ATHENS MUNICIPAL CODE BY REVISING CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 16 IN ITS ENTIRETY.

HUD's Office of Manufactured Housing Programs Draft Proposed Rule for MHCC Consideration

The National Energy Board s Enforcement Policy

Compliance & Enforcement Manual

CHAPTER 4 BUILDINGS. Part 1 Dangerous Structures. Part 2 Building Permits. Part 3 Building Numbers

RULES GOVERNING THE CONSTRUCTION, USE, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEMS WITHIN ANY AREA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, IOWA

COMPASS contracts for the provision of accommodation for asylum seekers

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (Act No.9 of 2001) MSWATI III King of Swaziland AN ACT. Entitled

HOUSING REGULATIONS FOR KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Regarding whether there is a change of use in respect of the conversion of a house to include 13 bedrooms at 68 McParland Street, Upper Hutt

PURCHASE OF GOODS AND/OR SERVICES TERMS AND CONDITIONS

General Terms of Contract

CHAPTER 9 BUILDING AND ELECTRICAL CODES

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1926

MINIMUM HOUSING STANDARDS ORDINANCE

CHAPTER 5 SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES. Article 1: Definitions

TAVISTOCK SELF STORAGE TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

Bristol City Council. Private Housing Service Enforcement Policy 2013

MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE

The City of Florence shall administer, implement, and enforce the provisions of these regulations. Any powers granted or

58: Short title This act shall be known and may be cited as "The Realty Improvement Sewerage and Facilities Act (1954)."

1. The matter to be determined

Operational Risk and Sustainability Committee (ORSC) Charter

Dangerous Goods Safety Management Act 2001

Chapter 36 - HISTORIC PRESERVATION ARTICLE I. - IN GENERAL. Sec Purpose. Sec Definitions. Page 1 FOOTNOTE(S):

For Internal Discussion: MHCC, Subcommittee on Enforcement Version:

Article 2: Administration and Enforcement

Title 27A. Environment and Natural Resources Chapter 4: Emergency Response Notification Article I: Oklahoma Emergency Response Act

A Private Tree Preservation By-law # For the City of St. Thomas

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. (Date of Subdivision Map Recordation: )

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2382

BOND AGREEMENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY - CASH ONLY COMPLETION OF PUBLIC OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS

Texas State University Facilities Safety Committee Bylaws

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, do ordain as follows:

TEMPORARY OCCUPATION LICENCE

Act No. 19 of 2002 (as amended) AN ACT. ENACTED by the Parliament of Mauritius, as follows - PART I - PRELIMINARY

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL BY-LAW NUMBER

LICENCE Waterfront BE_RU_. Licence Fee - CDN$2.00. Plant Name: OPGI File No: OPG Assessment # OPGI Lands Legal Description. Box Date of Licence

EXFO Care - Simulators

New Zealand. 5. Amending provisions as to appointment of San ita r y Inspectors by local authorities.

UNMIK REGULATION NO. 2003/4 ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF KOSOVO ON THE LABOUR INSPECTORATE OF KOSOVO

Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999

Pollution (Control) Act 2013

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT NO 85 OF 1993

NESCOPECK TOWNSHIP LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Access Agreement. Queensland Rail Limited. [Insert name of Operator] [Insert name of Access Holder]

ARTHUR ROBINSON & HEDDERWICKS. Building Bill EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM PART I-PRELIMINARY

1. The matter to be determined

Number 4 of 2010 PETROLEUM (EXPLORATION AND EXTRACTION) SAFETY ACT 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

TITLE IX: GENERAL REGULATIONS

RAMSEY COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH NUISANCE ORDINANCE Ordinance Adopted November 21, 2006 Effective January 1, 2007

S P P U R C H A S I N G S P WI- 03 P U R C H A S E O R D E R G T C DATE OF ISSUE: 15/11/2015 REVISION: 01

General Bylaw Chapter 3. Cemeteries. Explanatory Note

MUNICIPAL UTILITY PERMIT ISSUANCE AGREEMENT

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF HURON VILLAGE OF PORT AUSTIN ORDINANCE NO. 82 DANGEROUS BUILDINGS.

Transcription:

Dangerous and insanitary building policy

1. Introduction 1.1 Background Section 131 of New Zealand Building Act 2004 requires territorial authorities to adopt a policy on dangerous and insanitary buildings. The policy is required to state: The approach that the Central Otago District Council will take in performing its functions under section 131 of the Building Act 2004. Central Otago District Council s priorities in performing those functions. How the policy will apply to heritage buildings. The meanings of dangerous and insanitary buildings are set out in section 121 and section 123 respectively of the Building Act 2004. These are: Section 121 Meaning of Dangerous Building 1. A building is dangerous for the purpose of this Act if (a) In the ordinary course of events (excluding the occurrence of an earthquake the building is likely to cause i. injury or death (whether by collapse or otherwise) to any persons in it or to persons on other property; or ii. damage to other property; or In the event of fire, injury or death to any persons in the building or a to persons on other property is likely, because of fire hazard or occupancy of the building. 2. For the purpose of determining whether a building is dangerous in terms of subsection (1), a territorial authority - (a) May seek advice from members of the New Zealand Fire Service who have been notified to the territorial authority by the Fire Service National Commander as being competent to give advice; and If advice is sought, it must have due regard to that advice. Section 123 Meaning of Insanitary Building 1. A building is insanitary for the purpose of this Act if the building (a) Is offensive or likely to be injurious to health because i. of how it is situated or constructed; or ii. it is in a state of disrepair; or (c) (d) Has insufficient or defective provisions against moisture penetration so as to cause dampness in the building or in any adjoining building; or Does not have a supply of potable water that is adequate for its intended use; or Does not have sanitary facilities that are adequate for its intended use.

This document sets out the policy of Central Otago District Council in accordance with the requirements of the New Zealand Building Act 2004. In developing and adopting this dangerous-insanitary building policy, Council has followed consultative procedures set out in Section 83 of the Local Government Act 2002. Section 132 of the New Zealand Building Act 2004 requires the policy to be reviewed within five years of being adopted and then at five yearly intervals with any replacement or amendment being subject to the consultative procedures in the Local Government Act 2002. 1.2 Policy Principles Council acknowledges there are situations that arise from time to time across the District where buildings have become dangerous and/or insanitary for various reasons including neglect, inadequate maintenance, fire damage or through noncompliance with the Building Code. In such situations, Council s first approach will be to endeavour to negotiate a resolution with the building owner. However, where this fails or an immediate hazard exists Council may, at its sole discretion, take appropriate action to mitigate the dangerous and/or insanitary conditions. 1.3 Social, Environmental, Economic and Cultural Impact of Policy In adopting a proactive approach to policy in respect to dangerous/insanitary buildings, Council will have a positive influence in reducing the incidence of neglected, inadequately maintained, fire damaged or non-compliant buildings impacting on the community. This approach will contribute to the purpose of the Local Government Act 2002 by addressing: heritage buildings by consultation with The Historic Places Trust will occur before action is taken negative environmental effects resulting from dangerous or insanitary conditions amenity issues concerning neighbouring property owners social issues such as the removal of potential sites of illegal occupation and infestation of vermin in so far as these are dealing with dangerous or insanitary buildings. 2. Policy Process 2.1 Overall Approach Council will: Be proactive in responding to situations where dangerous or insanitary buildings are identified. Where a potentially dangerous or insanitary building is identified, an inspection will be undertaken by Council s Building Control staff.

On reporting back, the Building Control Team Leader, with direction from the Manager, Planning and Environment, will reach a decision as to whether the building is deemed to be dangerous or insanitary. Where deemed necessary, expert opinion will be sought on whether the situation is dangerous or insanitary. This could include an Environmental Health Officer, The Ministry of Health, ERMA, a Registered Engineer, The New Zealand Fire Service, Occupational Safety and Health, or other sources of expert advice. Where a building is deemed to be dangerous or insanitary the first approach will be to negotiate a solution with the building owner. Where this fails, or an immediate hazard exists, Council may, at its sole discretion, take appropriate action under the provisions of sections 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129 and 130 of the Building Act to mitigate the dangerous or insanitary conditions. Where it is deemed immediate action is necessary to mitigate a dangerous or insanitary situation, Council reserves the right to appoint any contractor it deems competent to undertake the work. Where Council is forced to take action to mitigate a dangerous or insanitary situation, all costs incurred, including any work necessary, shall be recovered from the building owner as set out in the Building Act 2004. Heritage buildings will be assessed in the same way as other potentially dangerous or insanitary buildings and negotiation held with the owners and Historic Places Trust to identify a mutually acceptable way forward. Although special effort will be made to meet heritage objectives, the safety of the building users/general public and other properties will take priority over heritage provisions where deemed necessary. 2.2 Interaction between Dangerous and Insanitary Building Policy and the Building Act 2004 The following sections of the Building Act could initiate action under Council policy relating to dangerous and insanitary buildings: Section 96 Certificate of Acceptance. Section 108 Annual Building Warrant of Fitness. Section 112 Alteration to an existing building. Section 115 Change of Use. Section 122 Meaning of an Earthquake Quake-prone Building. Sections 124 130 Powers of Territorial Authorities in respect to dangerous, earthquake-prone, or insanitary buildings. Section 164 Notice to Fix.

Section 216 (e) Complaints received by Territorial Authority. 3. Heritage Buildings 3.1 Special Consideration and Constraints Council is concerned that measures are put in place to ensure identified heritage buildings within the District are maintained in a safe and sanitary condition. Where deficiencies are identified, heritage buildings will be assessed in the same way as other potentially dangerous or insanitary buildings and negotiation held with the owners and Historic Places Trust to identify a mutually acceptable way forward. Although special effort will be made to meet heritage objectives, the building s performance in terms of ensuring user and general public safety will take priority over heritage considerations. Where remedial or upgrade work can not be negotiated with the owner of a heritage building within what Council deems as a satisfactory timeframe, notice will be served under Section 124 of the Building Act 2004 to remedy the situation. A satisfactory time frame will be determined taking into consideration danger to building users, the general public or other property. In cases likely to be of particular public concern, consultation will be held with the relevant Community Board or Committee of Council.