THE TARRANCE GROUP. BRIEFING MEMORANDUM To: Interested Parties. From: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber. Date: November 7, 2006

Similar documents
METHODOLOGY Public Opinion Strategies recently completed three surveys on behalf of Human Rights First:

A Dead Heat and the Electoral College

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN COLORADO. June 25, 2014

NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION DAY. September 26, 2017

2014 LATINO ELECTION EVE POLL

The Youth Vote in 2008 By Emily Hoban Kirby and Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg 1 Updated August 17, 2009

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

Charlie Cook s Tour of American Politics

NATIONAL VOTER SURVEY. November 30 December 3, 2017 N = 1,200 respondents (1/3 Landline, 1/3 Cell, 1/3 Internet) margin of error: +/- 2.

Now is the time to pay attention

Constitution in a Nutshell NAME. Per

State Legislative Competition in 2012: Redistricting and Party Polarization Drive Decrease In Competition

THE POLICY CONSEQUENCES OF POLARIZATION: EVIDENCE FROM STATE REDISTRIBUTIVE POLICY

Rising American Electorate & Working Class Women Strike Back. November 9, 2018

2016 NATIONAL CONVENTION

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

State Governments Viewed Favorably as Federal Rating Hits New Low

Trump, Populism and the Economy

RULE 1.14: CLIENT WITH DIMINISHED CAPACITY

2018 NATIONAL CONVENTION

2018 MIDTERMS PRE- ELECTION OVER VIEW OCTOBER 2018

STATISTICAL GRAPHICS FOR VISUALIZING DATA

Governing Board Roster

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

Candidate Faces and Election Outcomes: Is the Face-Vote Correlation Caused by Candidate Selection? Corrigendum

Mandated Use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PMPs) Map

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010

Next Generation NACo Network BYLAWS Adopted by NACo Board of Directors Revised February, 2017

ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND BACKGROUND INFO

If you have questions, please or call

Obama Builds Real Lead in Presidential Contest

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Breakdown of the Types of Specific Criminal Convictions Associated with Criminal Aliens Placed in a Non-Custodial Setting in Fiscal Year 2015

Mineral Availability and Social License to Operate

2016 us election results

February Research Findings. National Immigration Survey / FWD.us

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

RULE 1.1: COMPETENCE. As of January 23, American Bar Association CPR Policy Implementation Committee

Uniform Wage Garnishment Act

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

Admitting Foreign Trained Lawyers. National Conference of Bar Examiners Washington, D.C., April 15, 2016

Migrant and Seasonal Head Start. Guadalupe Cuesta Director, National Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Collaboration Office

A Glance at THE LATINO VOTE IN Clarissa Martinez De Castro

Latino Decisions / America's Voice June State Latino Battleground Survey

The Aftermath of the Elections ABC Virginia Webinar

RIDE Program Overview

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. An overwhelming majority of likely 2018 voters are looking for bipartisan solutions from Congress to address immigration.

Ballot Questions in Michigan. Selma Tucker and Ken Sikkema

Campaign 16. A Hawthorn Group visit with Kansas City Chamber June 24, 2016

Election 2014: The Midterm Results, the ACA and You

RULE 2.4: LAWYER SERVING

DC: I estimate a 4,600 valid sig petition drive for President in I budget $15,000 from the LNC.

RULE 3.1: MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS

A contentious election: How the aftermath is impacting education

This report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by

Supreme Court Decision What s Next

Graduation and Retention Rates of Nonresidents by State

Rising American Electorate & White Working Class Strike Back. November 27, 2018

RIDE Program Overview

The Effect of Electoral Geography on Competitive Elections and Partisan Gerrymandering

the polling company, inc./ WomanTrend On behalf of the Center for Security Policy TOPLINE DATA Nationwide Survey among 1,000 Adults (18+)

Generic Pharmaceutical Association February 10, 2015

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

The Strength of the Latina Vote: Gender Differences in Latino Voting Participation

Battleground 2016: new game. June 30, 2016

Bylaws of the Prescription Monitoring Information exchange Working Group

The Presidential Election. Paul Beck, The Ohio State University Lifelong Learning Institute December 7, 2016

LATINO VOTERS IN COMPETITIVE GOP HOUSE DISTRICTS

Research Brief. Resegregation in Southern Politics? Introduction. Research Empowerment Engagement. November 2011

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

RULE 3.8(g) AND (h):

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN ARIZONA. March 4, 2014

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2019

Federal Education: Of Elections &Politics. Oh, and Policy. Noelle Ellerson December 2014

National Popular Vote

America s Voice/Latino Decisions Congressional Battleground Poll - July 2013 Released July 24, 2013

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

The Impact of Wages on Highway Construction Costs

The Rising American Electorate

Update on State Judicial Issues. William E. Raftery KIS Analyst Williamsburg, VA

Electing a President. The Electoral College

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

Prison Price Tag The High Cost of Wisconsin s Corrections Policies

The Progressive Era. 1. reform movement that sought to return control of the government to the people

2018 MIDTERM ELECTION OUTLOOK

Election Cybersecurity, Voter Registration, and ERIC. David Becker Executive Director, CEIR

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

What to Do about Turnout Bias in American Elections? A Response to Wink and Weber

Comprehensive Immigration Reform and Winning the Latino Vote

Latino Voter Growth by State. UnidosUS Page 1. California Civic Engagement Project

A national telephone survey of 800 actual voters, conducted November 7, Margin of error +3.5%; and,

America s Electoral Future

WHAT IS THE PROBABILITY YOUR VOTE WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

Presentation Outline

Transcription:

THE TARRANCE GROUP BRIEFING MEMORANDUM To: Interested Parties From: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber Date: November 7, 2006 Re: Key findings from a recent national study on Methodology These findings come from a survey of a nationwide survey of likely voters with oversamples in contested Congressional Districts (N=200), in Arizona (N=100), and in Pennsylvania (N=100). All respondents interviewed in the main sample were part of a fully representative sample of N=800 registered likely voters nationwide. Responses to this survey were gathered November 3-5, 2006. The confidence interval associated with the main sample is ± 3.5% in 19 of 20 cases. The contested Congressional districts for this survey are: AZ01, AZ05, AZ08, CA 04, CA11, CO04, CO07, CT02, CT04, CT05, FL13, FL16, FL22, GA08, GA12, IL06, IL08, IN02, IN08, IN09, IA01, IA03, KY03, KY04, MN01, MN06, NV02, NV03, NH02, NM01, NY20, NY24, NY26, NY29, NC11, OH01, OH02, OH12, OH15, OH18, PA04, PA06, PA07, PA08, PA10, TX22, VA02, WA08, WI08, WY-AL. Introduction and Overview On the eve of potentially historic elections for Congress, this survey reinforces the trend seen in other data that the Republicans may be improving their standing with voters in terms of vote intensity and in terms of performance on the generic Congressional ballot. In addition, the survey finds that despite a high level of voter intensity and voter interest, is not a top vote determining issue and is not a top turnout motivator. In fact, voters remain supportive of comprehensive reform and expect Congress to take action on comprehensive reform next year. Political Environment is Improving for Republicans The generic ballot stands at 49% for the Democrats and 43% for the Republicans. Given the institutional 5-point Democratic advantage in the generic, this places the Republicans at near parity with the Democrats. In contested Congressional Districts, this margin is 7-points for the Democrats (47%-40%). Looking at the turnout model of 70% of the electorate most likely to vote, the parties are locked in a statistical tie with 47% for the Republicans and 46% for the Democrats. 1

For President Bush, 52% of likely voters disapprove of his job performance and 42% of likely voters approve of his job performance. In contested Congressional Districts, President Bush stands at 40% approve and 54% disapprove. Immigration Is Not a Key Issue in This Election Fully 63% of likely voters say they are extremely likely to vote and 49% rate their level of at 10 or extremely and the numbers for contested Congressional Districts are similar (69% and 59% respectively). Despite this high level of enthusiasm and interest, is not a critical issue in this election. Just 11% of likely voters select as the most important issue in deciding their vote for Congress, putting it behind the War in Iraq (29%), terrorism and homeland security (15%), and the economy and jobs (11%). Thirty-nine percent (39%) of likely voters and 38% of voters in contested Congressional Districts say they plan to use illegal as one of their top issues when deciding their vote. So, a strong majority of these voters do not plan on using illegal as one of their top issues. Just 26% of likely voters and 27% of voters in contested Congressional Districts say that illegal is one of the top issues motivating them to come out to vote in the Congressional elections. Again, an overwhelming majority of these voters are not using illegal as a top issue motivating them to vote. Support Continues for Comprehensive Reform Likely voters are informed of the recent law providing more resources for tougher enforcement at the border, including the construction of a 700 mile fence. Likely voters are then presented with the option of thinking of this law as a solution that means it will be years before we need to consider more legal or allow current illegal to earn legal status OR thinking of this law as a first step towards comprehensive reform, which includes securing the border, dealing with the future flow of legal and creating an earned legalization program. A plurality (48%) of likely voters and 47% of voters in contested Congressional Districts say they think of this law as a merely a first step towards comprehensive reform. In contrast, 28% of likely voters and 23% of voters in contested Congressional Districts say they think of this law as a solution. Looking at partisanship on this question, Republicans have more intense support for thinking of this law as merely a first step. Fully 62% of Republicans think of this law as just a first step. Page 2

On the next question, likely voters are given viewpoints about whether Congress should consider comprehensive reform or give these new border security and enforcement measures a chance to work first. The two views presented were: Since it was an election year it was fine that all Congress could do this year on reform was to provide more resources for tougher enforcement of current laws at the border, including the construction of a 700 mile long fence along the Mexican border. However, the next Congress should consider comprehensive reform that deals with other issues like the adjusting the flow of legal and creating an earned legalization plan for current illegal immigrants, OR Since Congress has already passed a law that deals with the critical issues of border security and enforcement, we should give these measures time to work before considering more comprehensive measures like adjusting the flow of legal and creating an earned legalization plan for current illegal immigrants. Fifty percent (50%) of likely voters and 52% of contested Congressional District voters say they want the next Congress to consider comprehensive reform. In contrast, 37% of likely voters and 33% of contested Congressional District voters say they want to give the current measures time to work. In contrast with conventional wisdom, there is not a notable partisan divide on this question. For Republicans, 54% want comprehensive reform to be considered next year and 37% want to let the current law be given a chance to work. For Democrats, 48% want comprehensive reform to be considered next year and 37% want to give the current law a chance to work. This interest in comprehensive reform is also seen in a Candidate A versus Candidate B match-up. In this match-up, Candidate A advocates a border security and enforcement only measure and Candidate B advocates comprehensive reform. A majority (57%) of likely voters and 53% of contested Congressional District voters select Candidate B, the comprehensive reform advocate as the candidate they would be more likely to vote for. On a specific ask about dealing with comprehensive reform, 75% of likely voters and 68% of contested Congressional District voters say they expect Congress to deal with comprehensive reform next year, including the creating a guest worker program and creating an earned legalization program for current illegal immigrants. On partisanship, 76% of Republicans and 76% of Democrats expect Congress to deal with comprehensive reform next year. In addition, likely voters already accept two of the key premises for any debate on comprehensive reform. A strong majority (65%) of likely voters and 60% of contested Congressional District voters disagree that just vigorous enforcement of current laws would cause most illegal immigrants to go back home. Similarly, 68% of likely voters and 69% of contested Congressional District voters agree that a program in which illegal immigrants can earn citizenship over several years by meeting a variety of requirements including paying a fine, working, paying taxes, living crime free, and learning English is not amnesty. Page 3

Conclusions In these critical Congressional elections, Republicans appear to be closing the gap with Democrats. However, these gains are certainly not being made by making harsh criticisms about the dangers of illegal and amnesty. In fact, most voters view the recent efforts on as a first step. Likely voters remain committed to finding a comprehensive solution that deals with all aspects of the issue including guest workers, legal flow, and an earned legalization program for current illegal immigrants. Page 4

Addendum The table below compares the key results for likely voters nationwide, voters in contested Congressional Districts, voters in Arizona, and voters in Pennsylvania. Likely voters Contested CD voters AZ voters PA voters Question nationwide Vote Likelihood 63% extremely likely 69% extremely likely 53% extremely likely 80% extremely likely Interest in election 49% extremely 59% extremely 59% extremely 54% extremely Generic Cong. ballot 43%=GOP and 49%=Dem 40%=GOP and 47%=Dem 42%=GOP and 44%=Dem 42%=GOP and 50%=Dem Presidential job 42% approve 40% approve 40% approve 37% approve approval Top issue in deciding vote for 11%=illegal 10%=illegal 16%=illegal 16%=illegal Congress Will use 39% 38% 60% 34% as top vote deciding issue Immigration is a 26% 27% 46% 30% top GOTV issue Recent law as first step or solution Comprehensive reform next year or let current Enforcement would force most illegal immigrants to go home Earned legalization with requirements is not amnesty Cand. A (enforcement only) vs. Cand. B (comp. reform) Expect Congress to deal with comp. reform next year 48%=first step; 28%=solution 50%=comprehensive next year; 37%=let 47%=first step; 23%=solution 52%=comprehensive next year; 33%=let 42%=first step; 29%=solution 59%=comprehensive next year; 27%=let 54%=first step; 25%=solution 53%=comprehensive next year; 36%=let 65% disagree 60% disagree 74% disagree 60% disagree 67% agree 69% agree 74% agree 67% agree 37% (Cand. A) to 57% (Cand. B) 39% (Cand. A) to 53% (Cand. B) 34% (Cand. A) to 61% (Cand. B) 42% (Cand. A) to 52% (Cand. B) 75% yes 68% yes 69% yes 71% yes Page 5