UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
Case 3:16-md VC Document 2391 Filed 12/31/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2866 Filed 02/28/19 Page 1 of 7

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 4:11-cr JST USA v. Su. Document 193. View Document.

Case 3:16-md VC Document 1461 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 3

STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS.

E D AUG 1 G 2 0 « CLERK OF THE COURT CSeriT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Case No.

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2940 Filed 03/07/19 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-md VC Document 1100 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 5. February 5, In re Roundup Prod. Liab. Litig., No.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) Vs. Defendant.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION 6. MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) )

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2935 Filed 03/07/19 Page 1 of 11

LARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT NO.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE COUNTY OF MACON SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO. 10 CRS

Case 2:11-cr KJM Document 258 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 16-cv CMA

Case 1:04-cv JJF Document Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:12-cr JTN Doc #220 Filed 04/04/13 Page 1 of 20 Page ID#1769. Plaintiff,

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 3 BEFORE THE HONORABLE JUDGE ROBERT MCGUINESS 4 DEPARTMENT 22

Court Reporter: Felicia Rene Zabin, RPR, CCR 478 Federal Certified Realtime Reporter (702)

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. -vs- ) FWV ) ) TRAVIS EARL JONES,

2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CRIMINAL DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/18/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/18/2017

Case 1:06-cv RDB Document Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY Branch 9

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT 61 BEFORE HON. JOHN S. MEYER, JUDGE

TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONIE M. BRINKEMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. (Pages 1-15)

David M. Lee, CSR 9543, RMR, CRR

Volume 7. Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 1

Case 2:12-cv WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25. Exhibit C

The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, et al. v. Brunner, Jennifer, etc.

What were the final scores in your scenario for prosecution and defense? What side were you on? What primarily helped your win or lose?

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 DEPARTMENT CJC 48 HON. CHRISTOPHER K. LUI, JUDGE

Case 3:13-cv DRH-SCW Document 15-6 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #781 EXHIBIT F

CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep an open

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 26 5 vs. Case No.

HAHN & BOWERSOCK FAX KALMUS DRIVE, SUITE L1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626

Case4:10-cv SBA Document81 Filed05/31/11 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) VS. ) June 15, ISHMAEL JONES, ) A pen name ) ) Defendant. ) )

5 v. 11 Cv (JSR) 6 SONAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, et al., 7 Defendants x 9 February 17, :00 p.m.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ISADORE ROSENBERG, REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2011

10 BEFORE THE HONORABLE MARIANNE B. BOWLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 INITIAL APPEARANCE April 22,

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/08/2016 Page: 1. Re: Supplemental Authority in Fish, et al. v. Kobach, Case No.

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, MOTION HEARING. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

CIRCUIT COURT BRANCH 4

English as a Second Language Podcast ESL Podcast Legal Problems

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL-DAY 27 VERDICT 5 vs. Case No.

Case 1:08-cv CMA Document 71-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2008 Page 1 of 12 6/16/2008 Sancho, Ion

Case 2:11-cr KJM Document 142 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. --o0o-- Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Plaintiff,

No th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT'S CHARGE

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT-CRIMINAL DIVISION

Verdict on Punishment

Case3:07-md SI Document7414 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 9

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.. IN RE:. Chapter 11. The SCO Group, Inc.,. et al.,.. Debtor(s).. Bankruptcy # (KG)...

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 1492 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 11 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Arenda Langford (not permitted to testify)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA HEARING Monday, January 26, 2009

21 Proceedings reported by Certified Shorthand. 22 Reporter and Machine Shorthand/Computer-Aided

vs. vs. vs. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL TRIALS DIVISION

Case 2:08-cv AHM-PJW Document 93 Filed 12/28/09 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1024 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

The Florida Bar v. Bruce Edward Committe

Defense Motion for Mistrial

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2282 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 5:17-cv CBM-RAO Document 446 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:17580

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 06SC99, Craig v. Carlson Successor Court May Conduct Post- Trial Batson Hearing when Nondiscriminatory Reason for Strike Confirmed by Record

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

E-FILED: Jun 13, :57 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G-84481

Case 2:03-cv DGC Document 141 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 1 of 32

No In The Supreme Court of the United States PAUL RENICO, Warden, Petitioner, vs. REGINALD LETT, Respondent.

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 CASE NO. 12-CV MGC. Plaintiff, June 11, vs.

Volume 6. Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 449

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/04/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/04/2017. Exhibit A

(718) Jordan Greenberger, Esq. Ouzounian v. Herrera et al.; No /2017 Scheduling Sanctions Motion (Motion Sequence 006)

Dynamic Opening Statements How to Establish Credibility and Persuade From the Beginning

: : : : : : : : : : Defendants

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. Petitioner, ) vs. ) Cause No Defendant.

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 6

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CI-19 UCN: CA015815XXCICI

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1 IN RE: PEOPLE VS. ANNABEL MELONGO SGJ# APR 2241 ARR. DATE BEFORE THE SPECIAL GRAND JURY OF COOK COUNTY 7 APRIL 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) HONORABLE WILLIAM BRADY, on the 12th of April, MS. AISHA DAVIS, for the defendant.

James M. Maloney. Attorney at Law Proctor in Admiralty. P.O. Box Bayview Avenue Port Washington, NY April 7, 2014

1/2/ ANNETTE FAKLIS MORIARTY, C.S.R.

^neiyit, Tffn-i)So'''

ARROWHEAD CAPITAL FINANCE, LTD., CHEYNE SPECIALTY FINANCE FUND L.P., et al.

Case 3:18-cv RS Document Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 139

Transcription:

Volume Pages 0 - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before The Honorable Vince Chhabria, Judge EDWARD HARDEMAN, Plaintiff, VS. MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant. NO. C -00 VC San Francisco, California Wednesday, March, 0 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff: ANDRUS WAGSTAFF PC W. Alaska Drive Lakewood, Colorado 0 BY: AIMEE H. WAGSTAFF, ATTORNEY AT LAW DAVID J. WOOL, ATTORNEY AT LAW BY: MOORE LAW GROUP South th Street Louisville, Kentucky 00 JENNIFER MOORE, ATTORNEY AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE REPORTED BY: Marla F. Knox, RPR, CRR Jo Ann Bryce, CSR No., RMR, CRR, FCRR Official Reporters

APPEARANCES : For Defendant : (CONTINUED 0 0 BY: WILKINSON WALSH ESKOVITZ LLP 00 M Street, NW - 0th Floor Washington, D.C. 00 BRIAN L. STEKLOFF, ATTORNEY AT LAW RAKESH N. KILARU, ATTORNEY AT LAW TAMARRA MATTHEWS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW JULIE RUBENSTEIN, ATTORNEY AT LAW CALI COPE-KASTEN, ATTORNEY AT LAW

I N D E X Wednesday, March, 0 - Volume PAGE VOL. Verdict 0 0 0

VERDICT Wednesday - March, 0 P R O C E E D I N G S ---000--- : p.m. (Proceedings were heard out of presence of the jury: THE COURT: reached a verdict. Okay. I have been told the jury has You can go ahead and bring them in. (Proceedings were heard in the presence of the jury: THE COURT: Okay. Welcome back. 0 It looks like, the presiding juror; is that right? you have continued to be THE COURT: is that correct? THE COURT: I understand you have reached a verdict; We have. Why don't you hand that to Kristen. (Pause in proceedings VERDICT THE COURT: Thank you. Okay. I'm going to read the 0 verdict. Question : Did Mr. Hardeman prove by a preponderance of the evidence his claim that Roundup's design was defective? Question : Did Mr. Hardeman prove by a preponderance of the evidence his claim that Roundup lacks sufficient warnings of the risk of NHL?

VERDICT Question : Did Mr. Hardeman prove by a preponderance of the evidence his claim that Monsanto was negligent by not using reasonable care to warn about Roundup's NHL risk? Question : What are Mr. Hardeman's compensatory damages? Past economic loss, $00,.0. Past non-economic loss, $,0,. Future economic loss, $ million. Did I read that right? 0 (No audible response. THE COURT: Okay. Question : Did Mr. Hardeman prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is entitled to punitive damages? Question : If you answered "yes" to the previous question, what amount do you award Mr. Hardeman in punitive damages? $ million. Would anybody like the jury polled? 0 MR. STEKLOFF: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. As we did last time, I will ask each one of you if that accurately reflects your unanimous verdict that you reached. Juror Number,, does that accurately reflect the verdict that you reached?

VERDICT Yes, it does. I would like that 0 second number read off again because I wasn't sure if that was read off correctly. THE COURT: Certainly. The past non-economic loss of million -- THE COURT: $,0,. : $ million - THE COURT: $,0,. That's correct? : That's correct. Thank you. THE COURT: The remainder of it was correct? THE COURT: Okay. Juror Number,, is that an accurate description of the jury's unanimous verdict? THE COURT: Juror Number, accurate description of your verdict?, is that an THE COURT : Thank you. 0 And Juror Number, reflection of your verdict? Yes, it is. is that an accurate THE COURT: And, Juror Number, is that an accurate description of your verdict?

PROCEEDINGS THE COURT: Okay. And Juror Number, is that an accurate description of your verdict? THE COURT: Thank you very much. I will hand the verdict form down to Kristen. And, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you have now completed your service. Thank you very much for all the 0 incredibly hard work you put into this over these past five weeks. It is obvious that you have been very attentive. You have taken your job very seriously, and on behalf of all the parties and everybody who is here watching this trial and on behalf of the community and the public, I thank you very much for that. Now, you have been hearing an instruction from me over and over and over again throughout the trial which is you are not allowed to do any research. You are not allowed to talk to anybody about the trial. You are not allowed to expose yourself to any media reports. now lifted. Those restrictions on you are 0 wish. You are free to talk to anybody about the case if you You are also perfectly free not to talk to anybody about the case if you wish. And if anybody is really sort of after you to talk to you about the case, and you really prefer not to talk about the case; and you are having problems keeping someone off your

PROCEEDINGS back, you contact us right away and I can assure you that we will intervene. But with that, I would love the opportunity to invite you back to my chambers. First you will go back to the jury room. Kristen will spend a little time with you getting your badges and everything. After that, I would love to invite you back to my chambers and answer any questions you have about the process. We always have some questions for you about how we 0 can make the process better for jurors. appreciate that. We would very much With that, you are free to head back to the jury room. Thank you. (Proceedings were heard out of presence of the jury: THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. I assume that there will be some post-trial motions coming and all of that. I will also want to have a conference call with all of you -- kind of a case management conference -- about next steps. I sort of 0 alluded to it earlier when I was speaking with the Plaintiff's lawyer for the next trial. Kristen will reach out to you in the next week or so - she will reach out to you to schedule a conference in the next week or so. Thank you. But until then, enjoy and I will talk to you soon. MS. MOORE: Thank you, Your Honor. (Proceedings adjourned at : p.m.

CERTIFICATE OF REPORTERS I certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript from the record of proceedings in the above-entitled matter. DATE: Wednesday, March, 0 0 0 Jo Ann Bryce, CSR No., RMR, CRR, U.S. Court Reporter Marla F. Knox, RPR, CRR U.S. Court Reporter FCRR