RESOLUTION NO INTRODUCED BY: Councilperson Hamilton-Bruer. Councilperson Hoffman

Similar documents
Resolution No

WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit pursuant to the Illinois

ORDINANCE NUMBER -2..Q.Q..3~) (City Council Series)

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS

TOWN OF KIOWA ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

RULE 4. Candidate Petitions. (Enacted 6/06/12)

ORDINANCE NO

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON,

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

HOME RULE CHARTER COMMISSION December 3, 2018 Castle Pines City Hall 5:30-8 pm AGENDA

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMMERCE, TEXAS:

NOTICE OF ADOPTED ORDINANCE

THE INITIATIVE PROCESS IN THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA (January 2008)

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Article XI of the Charter requires the City Commission to place the charter review committee s proposals on the ballot; and

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa supports the full participation of all residents in electing Members of the City Council; and

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. The Citizen Initiative Process

ADMINISTRATION Article 2. Elected Officials 1-203

CONCORD SCHOOL DISTRICT REVISED CHARTER AS ADOPTED BY THE VOTERS AT THE 2011 CONCORD CITY ELECTION

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: April 18, City Council. FROM: Regan M. Candelario, City Manager. PRESENTER: Claudia Laughter, City Clerk

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA RESOLUTION

RESOLUTION NO

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: February 7, 2017 Item Number: D 8 To:

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

RICHLAND COUNTY, NORTH DAKOTA HOME RULE CHARTER PREAMBLE

HOME RULE CHARTER COMMISSION January 14, 2019 Castle Pines City Hall 360 Village Square Lane 5:30-8:30 pm AGENDA

CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Commission discussed a proposal to eliminate odd year elections; and

City of Castle Pines, Colorado CITY OF CASTLE PINES 7501 VILLAGE SQUARE DRIVE, SUITE 100 CASTLE PINES, CO CITY COUNCIL- February 23, 2016

AMENDED CHARTER OF THE CITY OF WAUCHULA, COUNTY OF HARDEE, STATE OF FLORIDA 2004

The City Of Federal Heights

CITY OF CASTLE PINES HOME RULE CHARTER TABLE OF CONTENTS

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 Article 1. Definitions Article 2. General Provisions

WHEREAS, the Council of the City desires to establish the Administrative Oversight Committee and the Citizens Oversight Committee at this time.

AGENDA ITEM # 6.F. Requirements: Appropriation Code: Costs: $ M E M O R A N D U M. TO: Mayor Mel Jurado and Members of City Council

ORDINANCE NO

John Harpootlian Thursday, June 09, :38 AM Deborah Padovan Fw: Joint Los Altos/Los Altos Hills Senior Commission

AN ORDINANCE BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL OF YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA:

St. Louis City Ordinance 63154

TO: BOARD OF EDUCATION ACTION/MAJOR 10/25/07 FROM: DIANNE TALARICO / UPDATE PARCEL TAX FEASIBILITY COMMITTEE

RESOLUTION NO

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Choteau, Montana, that:

City of Westminster 2018Page

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Town of Scarborough, Maine Charter

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE AMENDING SECTIONS 35-2 AND 35-5 TO CHAPTER 35 OF THE BUTTE COUNTY CODE ENTITLED THE RIGHT TO FARM ORDINANCE.

A Resident's Guide to Changing the Broomfield Municipal Code

NOTICE OF BOND ELECTION TO THE RESIDENT, QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE PFLUGERVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT:

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

CHARTER TOWN OF LINCOLN, MAINE Penobscot County

STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MARTIN D. KOCZANOWICZ, CITY ATTORNEY

relating to appropriation of money, levy of taxes, or salaries of city officers or employees. city officers or employees.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE,

MUD Act MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. December This publication contains legislation enacted through 2016

CITY OF YPSILANTI NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 1281

Updated: 7/16/2015 9:32 AM Page 1

ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AMENDING THE CALISTOGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, Section 7.01 of the Charter of the City of Daytona Beach Shores, Florida

(Published in the Tulsa World,

Revised CITY OF WOODLAND PARK MUNICIPAL MAIL BALLOT ELECTION CALENDAR APRIL 3, Action

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CARLISLE HOME RULE CHARTER. ARTICLE I General Provisions

Req. # SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE NO

INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 1417

CHAPTER 189 SPECIAL DISTRICTS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

This Resolution applies in unincorporated Larimer County, including all Growth Management Areas and the Estes Valley.

CITY OFDICKINSON NORTHDAKOTA

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1733

ORDINANCE NO THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

Constitutional Amendment Language. Be it resolved by the people of the state of Missouri that the Constitution be amended:

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDED ORDINANCE NO

23.2 Relationship to statutory and constitutional provisions.

WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

SENATE NOMINEE ELECTION BILL. No. 60. An Act to provide for the Election of Saskatchewan Senate Nominees TABLE OF CONTENTS

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

Ramsey County, North Dakota Home Rule Charter Draft

A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 1, ELECTIONS, OF THE GREENWOOD VILLAGE MUNICIPAL CODE

AGENDA REPORT. Request of Council Member Trembley: City Council Term Limits

HOME RULE CHARTER OF UMATILLA COUNTY, OREGON

CHARTER [1] Footnotes: --- (1) --- Section 1 - HOME RULE CHARTER. Page 1

CHARTER CITY OF GOLDEN COLORADO

NOTICE OF BOND ELECTION TO THE RESIDENT, QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SCHULENBURG INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT:

GUNNISON VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT. by and among CITY OF GUNNISON, COLORADO TOWN OF CRESTED BUTTE, COLORADO

Municipal Township Initiative and Referendum

CHARTER OF THE TOWN OF HOULTON ARTICLE 1 POWERS OF THE TOWN

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the City Council ordered to call an election for City Councilmembers to be held on May 7, 2016, pursuant to Texas law; and,

IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ELECTION DEADLINES CHARTER AMENDMENT SCHEDULE FOR November 5, 2019 ELECTION

CITY OF BERKELEY CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT

ORDINANCE NO. 689 THE SPECIAL BOND ELECTION; APPROVING A FORM OF BALLOT; PROVIDING FOR

RESOLUTION NO. _. WHEREAS, the City of Council of the City of Pasadena, California, desires to

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NO. 10-68 INTRODUCED BY: Councilperson Hamilton-Bruer Councilperson Hoffman A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH ORDERING AN ELECTION AND REFERRING AND APPROVING BALLOT QUESTIONS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT THE COORDINATED ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 2, 2010 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. I 0-64, the City Council of the City of Castle Pines North ("City Council") approved an intergovernmental agreement with the Douglas County Clerk and Recorder regarding the City's participation in a coordinated election to be held on November 2, 2010:and WHEREAS, pursuant to C.R.S. 31-11 -1 04(1 ), an initiative petition (the "Petition") for a proposed ordinance to abolish the Castle Pines Urban Renewal Authority ("Authority") was filed in the office of the City Clerk on July 2 1, 201 0; and WHEREAS, by letter dated August 9, 2010, the Deputy City Clerk cer1ified the sufficiency of signatures on the Petition as required by C..R.S. 31-11-109, subject to expi1 ation of the protest period authorized under C.R.S. 3 1-1 L-110 which protest period expires on August 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby directs that the initiated ordinance proposing the abolishment of the Authority be submitted to the voters at the coordinated election to be held on November 2, 2010 subject to expiration of the protest period set forth in 31-11-110, C. R.S.; and WHEREAS, in addition to the ini tiated ordinance to be presented on the ballot, City Council desires to refer and approve a ballot question relating to House Bill 10-1284, approved in 2010 by the Colorado General Assembly ("Colorado Medical Marijuana Code"), which authorizes by ei ther a majority of registered electors of the municipality voting at a regular or special election or a majority of the members of the governing board for the municipality to vote to prohibit the operation of medical marijuana centers, optional premises cultivation operations. and medical marijuana-infused products manufacturers' licensed businesses; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to take advantage of the local option provided for in Section 12-43.3-106 of the Colorado Medical Marijuana Code, by presenting to the registered electorate of the City of Castle Pines North at the coordinated general election on November 2. 2010, the question of whether to prohibit the operation of medical marijuana centers, optional premises cultivation operations, and medical marijuana-infused products manufacturers' licensed businesses; and

City of Castle Pines North Resolution No. I 0-68 WHEREAS. approval of the medical marij uana local option question by more 'Yes votes than "No" votes shall result in the immediate prohibition of such land uses within the City and the City Council shau act quickly to codify such prohibitions; and WHEREAS. in accordance with 31-11 -111 (2), C.R.S.. lhe City Council further desires to submit to a vote of the registered electors of the City a question regarding the name change of the City; and WHEREAS. the City COtmdl hereby submits a question seeking voter approval to change the name of the City from The City of Castle Pines North to The City of Castle Pines; and WllEREAS, in accordance with 3 1-11 -111 (2), C.R.S., the City Council further desires to submit to a vote of the registered electors of tbe City an advisory question pertaining to the application for dissolution filed by the City wi th the Castle Pines North Metropolitan District pursuant to 32-1-701(3) (the "Application for Dissolution"), C.R.S.; and WHEREAS. the City Council hereby submits an advisory question to the registered electors of the Ci ty regarding the Application for Dissolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH, COLORADO, TRA T: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Castle Pines North hereby calls a special City election to be held on November 2. 20 10 as a coordinated election with Douglas County in accordance with C.R.S. L-7-11 6 and in accordance with lhe terms of that certain intergovernmental agreement with the Douglas County Clerk and Recorder previously approved by City Council pursuant to Resolution No. I 0-64. Section 2. The City Council hereby refers and approves the following ballot questions in the order presented for submission to the voters and to appear on the ballot for the election to be held on November 2, 2010: QUESTION : SHALL THE OFFICIAL NAME OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH BE CHANGED TO THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES? YES NO **************************************************************************** 2

City of Castle Pines North Resolution No. I 0-68 QUESTION : SHALL THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH PROHIBIT MEDICAL MARJJUANA CENTERS, OPTIONAL PREMISES CULTIVATION OPERATIONS, AND MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCTS MANUFACTURERS FROM OPERATING WITHIN THE CITY?. YES NO ***************************************************************************** QUESTION : IN THE EVENT THE CASTLE PINES NORTH METROPOLITAN DISTRICT ("DISTRICT") DISSOLUTION PROCEEDING, WHICH WAS INITIATED BY THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH IN AN EFFORT TO DELIVER COST SAVINGS BY COMBINING MUNICIPAL AND DISTRICT SERVICES, SHOULD RESULT TN A FUTURE ELECTION WHEREIN THE REGISTERED VOTERS OF THE DISTRICT ARE ASKED TO CONSIDER A PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION, WmCH ENTITY WOULD YOU PREFER TO PROVIDE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS CURRENTLY SERVED BY THE DISTRICT, ASSUMING FOR PURPOSES OF TIDS ADVISORY QUESTION THAT EACH OF THE POSSIBLE OPTIONS SET FORTH BELOW WOULD RESULT IN COMPARABLE NET SAVINGS TO THE AVERAGE TAXPAYER WITHIN THE CITY? (CHOOSE ONE) THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH 0 PARKER WATERAND SANITATION DISTRICT 0 THE TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK 0 CENTENNIAL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRLCT 0 NOPREFERENCE 0 ****************************************************************************** QUESTION : SHALL THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE ABOLISHING THE CASTLE PINES URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY BE ADOPTED? YES NO ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE ClTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH ABOLISHING THE CASTLE PINES URBAN REN EWAL AUTHORITY 3

City of Ca.>lle Pines North Resolution No. I 0-6!! WHEREAS. by Resolution No. 10-27, the City Council of the City of Castle Pines North termed the Castle Pines Urban Renewal Authority, also referred to in the City's documents as the Castle Pines North Urban Renewal Authority; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 10-46, the Castle Pines Urban Renewal Authority adopted an urban renewal plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to C.R.S. 3 1-25-1 15(2), an urban renewal authority may be abolished by ordinance, provided that adequate arrangements have been made for payment of any outstanding indebtedness and other obligations of the urban renewal authority; and WHEREAS. the Castle Pines Urban Renewal Authority has no outstanding indebtedness or other obligations. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council ofthe City of Castle Pines North, Colorado: Section I. The Castle Pines Urban Renewal Authority, also known as the Castle Pines North Urban Renewal A uthority, is hereby abolished, pursuant to C.R.S. 31-25- 115(2). Section 2. Severabilitv. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason judicially determined to be invalid or unenforceable, such determination shah not affect, impair or invalidate the remajning provisions of this Ordinance, the intention being that the various provisions are severable. Section 3. Effective Date. T hi s Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after publication following final passage without alteration by the City Council of the City of Castle Pines North. or if the City Council fails to adopt this Ordinance within twenty (20) days fouowing the final determination of initiative petition sufficiency, upon approval by the majority of the registered electors of the City of Castle Pines North voting on the measure at an election held for that purpose. lntroduced, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTl-1. this day of, 2010. READ, PASSED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH thjs day of, 2010. Jeffrey T. Huff, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sharon DeRouen, City Clerk Linda C. Mjcbow, City Attomey **************************************************************************************************** 4

City of Castle Pi11cs North Resolution No. 10-68 Section 3. For purposes of C.R.S. 31-11-111. this Resolution shall serve to set the title and content for the ballot questions set forth herein and the ballot titles for such questions shall be the text of the questions themselves. Section 4. This Resolution shall be effective as of S p.m. on August 30, 2010 to allow for the protest period required pursuant to C.R.S. 31-1 1-110 to expire. Should there be a written protest of the Petition filed with the City Clerk. the ballot question relating to the initiated ordinance shall be removed and deemed severed from this Resolution in accordance with Section 7 below. Section S. The Deputy City Clerk is authorized to correct typographical errors and omissions and to cause to be entered into the blanks of any of the ballot questions the appropriate ballot question number or letter upon designation of the ballot number or letter by the appropriate election official. Section 6. The Interim City Manager, City Attorney, and Deputy City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary and appropriate action to effectuate the provisions of this Resolution including all reasonable and necessary action to cause such approved ballot questions and issues to be printed and placed on the ballot for the election. Section 7. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this resolution shah for any reason be held to be ineffective, invalid or unenforceable, the ineffectiveness, invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the remaining issues of this resolution. rntroduced, READ, AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH by a vote of six (6) in favor, none against, and one ( 1) absent this 24th day of August, 20 I 0. ' yt.l f:,may: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1fn:k c_ ~ claj~ Linda C. Michow, City Attorney 5

City of Castle Pines North, Colorado CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION FORM AGENDA ITEM RESOLUTION NO. 10-68, ORDERING AN ELECTION AND APPROVING BALLOT QUESTIONS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT THE COORDINATED ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 2, 2010 FROM: Linda Michow, City Attorney DATE: August 18, 2010 ITEM: Resolution No. 10-68 NEXT STEP: Direct Staff to implement election procedures in conjunction with Douglas County; continue adherence to Fair Campaign Practices Act I. REQUEST OR ISSUE: Resolution No. 10-68 would order an election to be held on November 2, 2010 in conjunction with the statewide election and in coordination with Douglas County. Resolution No. 10-68 further approves ballot questions to be placed on the ballot. II. RECOMMENDED ACTION / NEXT STEP: Adopt the Resolution and continue compliance with Fair Campaign Practices Act. III. FISCAL IMPACTS: By participating in the November general election, the City will incur costs under the IGA with Douglas County. The estimated amount of expenditure is approximately $15,000.00. Council will need to seek input from Hammersmith Management Inc. to determine this impact on the 2010 budget. IV. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On July 21, 2010, the Council received a citizens petition for an initiated ordinance to abolish the Castle Pines Urban Renewal Authority ( URA ). The Deputy City Clerk certified the sufficiency of the petition on August 9, 2010. This certification is subject to a 40 day protest period provided in C.R.S. 31-11-110 which commenced on July 21, 2010, and will expire on August 30, 2010. The protest period allows for registered electors to challenge the signed petition or circulators affidavits as noncompliant with state law. Assuming there is no timely filed protest as of August 30, 2010, the initiated ordinance is required to be submitted to the voters at a municipal election held not less than 60 days and not more than 150 days following the clerk s certification of petition sufficiency. To meet this requirement, the City Council intends to hold a special election on November 2, 2010 as a coordinated election with Douglas County. As requested by City Council, there are other ballot questions submitted by the City that are proposed to be on the ballot. One relates to House Bill 10-1284, approved in 2010 by the Colorado General Assembly ( Colorado Medical Marijuana Code ), which authorizes by either a majority of registered electors of the City voting at a regular or special election or a majority of the members of City Council vote to prohibit the operation of medical marijuana centers, optional premises cultivation operations, and medical marijuana-infused products manufacturers licensed businesses. It is staff s understanding that the City Council wishes to take advantage of the local option provided for in 12-43.3-106 of the Colorado Medical Marijuana Code, by presenting to the registered electorate of the City of Castle Pines North at the coordinated general election on November 2, 2010, the question of whether to prohibit the

operation of medical marijuana centers, optional premises cultivation operations, and medical marijuanainfused products manufacturers licensed businesses. A third proposed ballot question seeks to change the city s name from The City of Castle Pines North to The City of Castle Pines. Under C.R.S. 31-2-401, the process to change the name of a municipality may be initiated by petition filed with the City Council signed by registered electors equal in number to fifty percent (50%) of the total votes cast for all candidates for mayor in the last regular election of the city. As this statutory process is permissive and not mandatory, the City Council may choose to refer the question to the registered electors at an election. City Council has directed the City Attorney s Office to proceed with a referred ballot question on the name change. Accordingly, Resolution No. 10-68 includes a ballot question seeking voter approval to change the city name to The City of Castle Pines. V. LEGAL ISSUES: The ballot questions are authorized pursuant to Article 11 of Title 31 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. Specifically, pursuant to C.R.S. 31-11-104, the initiated ordinance to abolish the URA is required to be submitted to the registered electors at an election held not less than 60 and not more than 150 days following the determination of sufficiency of the Petition. The statutory time period coincides with the November 2, 2010 general election. The City Council is also authorized to submit any question to a vote of the registered electors of the City pursuant to C.R.S. 31-11-111 (2). The order of the ballot questions on the ballot will be as presented in Resolution No. 10-68. The Colorado Secretary of State s Election Rules dictate the order of ballot questions, with referred measures (e.g., medical marijuana question, city name change) appearing before citizen initiated petitions (e.g., abolishment of URA). See Rule 6.5.2 (c), 8 CCR 1505. Following Council s approval of Resolution No. 10-68, the City will be required to publish the initiated ordinance at least once in the newspaper prior to the date of the election. This publication requirement is intended to provide the electors with information regarding the ordinance in advance of the election, similar to how a Council ordinance is published in advance of second reading. As Council is aware, under the Fair Campaign Practices Act, the City is prohibited from expending public money on urging voters to vote in favor or against any ballot question. This restriction applies to all three ballot questions through the date of the election. VI. CONFLICTS OR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: N/A VII. SUMMARY AND ALTERNATIVES: With the exception of the question on the initiated ordinance, City Council could decide not to submit any ballot questions to the voters at the November 2, 2010 election. City Council could also decide to modify the text of each ballot question presented in Resolution No. 10-68. cc: CPN Elected Officials via Council Meeting Packet CPN Staff via Email 2