CITY USER PROFILE 15 ADELAIDE CITY COUNCIL RESEARCH REPORT

Similar documents
CUP - City User Population Research

UTS:IPPG Project Team. Project Director: Associate Professor Roberta Ryan, Director IPPG. Project Manager: Catherine Hastings, Research Officer

Background. Response Rate and Age Profile of Respondents. Community Facilities and Amenities. Transport Issues. Employment and Employment Land Issues

2016 Nova Scotia Culture Index

Appendix B: Input Survey Results

Market Research Report

COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF MIGRANTS AND IMMIGRATION

Social and Demographic Trends in Burnaby and Neighbouring Communities 1981 to 2006

Public Attitudes Survey Bulletin

Survey of Tourism Attitudes of Residents Prepared by Market Research & Development, Inc. June 2017

POPULATION STUDIES RESEARCH BRIEF ISSUE Number

How s Life in Mexico?

How s Life in Belgium?

How s Life in Austria?

Community perceptions of migrants and immigration. D e c e m b e r

How s Life in Norway?

East Peoria, Illinois Quality of Life Survey

How the world views Britain 2017

For whom the city? Housing and locational preferences in New Zealand

How s Life in Australia?

BRIEFING. Long-Term International Migration Flows to and from the UK.

Item No Halifax Regional Council July 19, 2016

Paid Patronage in Philadelphia:

Motivations and Barriers: Exploring Voting Behaviour in British Columbia

QUALITY OF LIFE IN TALLINN AND IN THE CAPITALS OF OTHER EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES

Government Online. an international perspective ANNUAL GLOBAL REPORT. Global Report

Quarterly Labour Market Report. February 2017

Chapter One: people & demographics

City of Janesville Police Department 2015 Community Survey

Italy s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

How s Life in France?

A Snapshot of Current Population Issues in the Northern Territory

Bottom Line: Bridging the Labour Gap

WAGE THEFT IN AUSTRALIA

HOW CAN BORDER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS BETTER MEET CITIZENS EXPECTATIONS?

How s Life in Germany?

Release of 2006 Census results Labour Force, Education, Place of Work and Mode of Transportation

How s Life in Finland?

TOURIST TRIPS AND TOURISM-RELATED EXPENDITURE OF THE POPULATION IN SECOND QUARTER OF 2015 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

POPULATION STUDIES RESEARCH BRIEF ISSUE Number

How s Life in the United Kingdom?

Executive summary. Migration Trends and Outlook 2014/15

Appendix A: Economic Development and Culture Trends in Toronto Data Analysis

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: ARMENIA

Analysis of the Influence Factors of China s Tourism Market

How s Life in the Netherlands?

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Official Plan Review Growth Analysis Technical Background Report

Voter ID Pilot 2018 Public Opinion Survey Research. Prepared on behalf of: Bridget Williams, Alexandra Bogdan GfK Social and Strategic Research

APTA Local Priority Message Testing Results. October 30, 2013

How s Life in Canada?

Mapping migrants: Australians wide-ranging experiences of immigration

Is this the worst crisis in European public opinion?

Spain s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Consistency in Daily Travel Time An Empirical Assessment from Sydney Travel Surveys

Inbound consumer sentiment research. VisitBritain Research conducted August March 2018

NOVEMBER visioning survey results

RMIT University, Melbourne, 3001, Australia for correspondence: Abstract

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: GEORGIA

How s Life in New Zealand?

How s Life in Switzerland?

Imagine Canada s Sector Monitor

Migrant Youth: A statistical profile of recently arrived young migrants. immigration.govt.nz

Vancouver Police Community Policing Assessment Report Residential Survey Results NRG Research Group

o n e c i t y d i v e r s e p l a c e s

Influence of Consumer Culture and Race on Travel Behavior

Public Attitudes Survey Bulletin

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 6: An Examination of Iowa Absentee Voting Since 2000

Survey Results Summary

Justice Sector Outlook

Life in our villages. Summary. 1 Social typology of the countryside

Chile s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Downtown Cincinnati Perceptions Survey

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: REGIONAL OVERVIEW

NATIONAL POPULATION PLAN FOR REGIONAL AUSTRALIA

Understanding Welcome

Fiscal Impacts of Immigration in 2013

Recent immigrant outcomes employment earnings

CHINA MARKET PROFILE. The Demographics

How s Life in Estonia?

Mapping Social Cohesion: The Scanlon Foundation surveys 2014

English Australia. Survey of major ELICOS regional markets in 2014

QUALITY OF LIFE IN EUROPEAN CITIES

8.1 Trends in Agency Assisted Employment: Galway 1

Trends in Labour Supply

TOURIST TRIPS AND TOURISM-RELATED EXPENDITURE OF THE POPULATION IN THIRD QUARTER OF 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

TOURIST TRIPS AND TOURISM-RELATED EXPENDITURE OF THE POPULATION IN SECOND QUARTER OF 2018 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Settling in New Zealand

Over the past three decades, the share of middle-skill jobs in the

Focus Canada Fall 2018

Committee for Economic Development: October Business Leader Study. Submitted to:

Culture Plan Progress Report II. Toronto Culture, February 2008

WISCONSIN ECONOMIC SCORECARD

BRIEFING. Immigration by Category: Workers, Students, Family Members, Asylum Applicants.

2. Challenges and Opportunities for Sheffield to 2034

Public Attitudes Survey Bulletin

The Demography of the Territory s

How s Life in Ireland?

Introduction of the euro in the new Member States. Analytical Report

THE STATE OF TRANSPORT OPINION POLL SOUTH AFRICA: A FOUR-YEAR REVIEW ( )

Visitor Satisfaction & Activity Report

Transcription:

CITY USER PROFILE 15 ADELAIDE CITY COUNCIL RESEARCH REPORT

CONTENTS What is the City User Profile and why do we do it? p. 03 How is CUP data collected? p. 03 What are some of the key findings from CUP 2015? p. 04 Who uses the City? p. 04 Overall, why do people use the City? p. 06 Overall, how often do people use the City? p. 08 What is the main reason for using the City today? p. 09 How often do people use the City for the main reason? p. 10 Apart from the main reason, why else do people use the City? p. 11 How do people get to the City? p. 14 How often do City users exercise in the City? p. 15 How safe do City users feel in the City? p. 16 What do users think of the City experience? p. 17 2 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015

What is the City User Profile and why do we do it? How is CUP data collected? The City User Population (CUP) Survey is a study of people that are in the City of Adelaide on any given day. By collecting data direct from City users, Council can develop better insight into the types of people that use the City, what they use it for, how often they use it and how the City is perceived by its users. The information can then be used to assist Council in delivering the right mix of services and amenities for all users of the City. The CUP Survey has been undertaken by Adelaide City Council once every one to two years since 2002. Originally starting out as a customer satisfaction survey, CUP has now evolved to focus on the demographic, attitudinal and behavioural profile of City users and how this has changed over time. This report presents the key results of CUP 2015. During May 2015, over 2,000 City users were surveyed using an on street intercept method at numerous locations across the City. City users were randomly approached and asked a number of questions around why they use the City, how often they visit the City and how they travelled into the City on the day. Survey respondents are informed that the City is defined as Adelaide, North Adelaide, the surrounding Park Lands, Adelaide Zoo and the Botanic Gardens. City users were also asked for their opinion on aspects of Council performance, community centre and library usage, perceptions of safety, awareness of Council engagement initiatives, preferred communications methods with Council and perceptions of the City experience. To ensure that information was captured from a range of City users, surveys were conducted at various times throughout the day and night on weekdays as well as on weekends. City User Profile Summary Report October 2015 3

Who uses the City? Residential Location Of the 2002 users surveyed, 13% lived in the suburbs of Adelaide and North Adelaide, 56% lived in inner metropolitan suburbs 1 and 22% lived in the outer metropolitan suburbs. Approximately 5% of City users came from interstate while 4% came from overseas. The composition of City users in terms of postcode of residence has changed little over the history of CUP. Age profile The age profile of City users has largely remained consistent over the history of CUP. Those aged 35 and under continue to make up roughly half of total City users, although this figure has fluctuated slightly over time. In 2015, users aged between 15 and 35 made up 45% of City users while those aged 15 to 24 accounted for 24%. The proportion of 15 to 24 year olds tends to reflect the number of international students that are studying in the City at the time. In 2009 when the number of international students was at a peak, the proportion of City users aged 15 to 24 accounted for 37% of the total. Since 2005, there has been a slight increase in the proportion of City users aged 25 to 34, with users aged between 45 and 54 years decreasing. The age group that experienced the largest increase over the ten years of CUP were the over 65s, which increased from 6% in 2005 to 12% in 2015. The age breakdown of City users is similar to the age profile of residents living in the city but is substantially younger when compared with the age profile of the state. 1 Defined as postcode areas that falls within a 10km radius of the City. Figure 0: Age of City users, 2005 to 2015 2015 2012 44% 41% 15-34 35-54 55 + 2009 56% 2006 46% 20% 40% 60% 80% 4 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015

What are some of the key findings from CUP 2015? People come into the City mainly for work, to study or to shop Most people use the City for different reasons at different times Our green spaces are immensely popular with City users with over half indicating that they visit the Park Lands at least once a year. Over two-thirds of City users come to the City at least two to three times a week City users tend to be younger with 45% of those surveyed being under 35 years of age in 2015. The proportion of City users aged 65 and over has increased steadily from 6% in 2005 to 12% in 2015, reflecting the trend of an ageing population across the metropolitan area. 40% of City users travel to the city by car as a driver or a passenger while 29% travel by bus The number of people who come to the City to work or to study has been increasing over the past 10 years 54% visit the Park Lands at least once a year The most popular reason for coming into the city after working, studying and shopping was for dining and entertainment or to meet friends. 50%+ Visit the City daily or most days 2/3+ Feel safe in the City between 8pm and 1am City User Profile Summary Report October 2015 5

Overall, why do people use the City? People use the City for a number of reasons. On any given day, City users could be shopping, working, studying or using the City for recreation and leisure. In CUP 2015, City users were asked to identify all the reasons for using the City at any time and not just on the day of the survey. Some City users listed up to five different reasons for using the City. By far, the most popular reason for visiting the City was for shopping with 85% of users indicating that they shop in the City at least once a year. Other popular reasons for coming to the City include visiting the Park Lands (54%) and for work (35%). A significant number of users (69%) said that they used the City for reasons other than those listed. One in five respondents said that they came into the City to study either as a university or post-secondary student. A small proportion of the City users surveyed also lived in the City (13%) while 9% identified themselves as a tourist or a visitor staying in short-term accommodation. In contrast, the percentage of secondary students using the City has mostly remained stable at one to two percent since 2003. However, this figure is expected to change in the future with the establishment of the new high school within the City in the next few years. Questions around Park Lands use were introduced in 2007 and since that time, there has been an upward trend in the proportion of people that use the Park Lands. While Park Land usage dipped slightly in 2015 to 54% from 61% in 2013, the overall movement over the past few years remains positive. Shopping continues to be a popular activity with 85% of city users coming into the City to shop at least once a year in 2015, which is consistent with the long term average. Over the past ten years, while the numbers has fluctuated slightly, there has been a modest but noticeable increase in the proportion of City users that list shopping as one of the many reasons for coming into the city. Since 2009, close to 90% of city users would on average, shop in the city at some point in time. The mix of City users has mostly remained consistent over the history of CUP with around one third of users being in the City for work, one fifth for study, 13% residents and around 10% visitors or tourists. This shows that the City continues to provide users with a good variety of work, study and leisure options. Looking at the CUP results over time, there has been a surge in the proportion of university and post-secondary students in the City, rising from 5% in 2003 to 21% in 2015 with the latest results being at a similar level to the peak achieved in 2009 of 22%. This increase is likely to be driven by the growth in international student numbers at the national level during 2013-14, which was at its highest level since 2008-09. Other factors that could have contributed to the boost in student numbers include the relative decline of the Australian dollar over the past six to twelve months 2 and federal government policy changes to streamline the international student visa application process. 3 2 Historical daily exchange rates of the Australian dollar 2010 to 2014, Reserve Bank of Australia, http://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/historicaldata.html#exchange-rates 3 Student visa and temporary graduate visa programme trends: 2006-07 to 2013-14, Department of Immigration and Border Protection, http://www.border.gov.au/reportsandpublications/ Documents/statistics/student-visa-programme-trends-2013-14.pdf 6 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015

100% 85% 54% 38% SHOPPING USING THE PARK LANDS WORKING 22% 13% 9% STUDY / EDUCATION RESIDENT VISITOR / TOURIST Figure 1: Reasons for using the City (general, % of total respondants) - note that multiple answers can be chosen 80% 85% 60% 54% 40% 35% 20% 21% 2006 2009 2012 2015 I shop in the City at least once a year I visit the Park Lands at least once a year I work in the City I am a University / post secondary student Figure 2: Selected City usage - 2006, 2009, 2012 and 2015 (% of respondants) City User Profile Summary Report October 2015 7

Overall, how often do people use the City? In general, most City users were frequent users of the City with over half reporting that they came to the City daily or most days of the week. Another 13% said that they visit the City about two to three times a week and 8% said that they came into the City weekly. In 2015, 3% of City users said that this was their first visit to the City. Those that lived in the City, worked in the City or studied in the City were the most frequent users with more than 80% coming into the City daily or on most days of the week. 75% of respondants said they were in the City at least once a week (54% daily) daily / Most days of the week (54%) once to three times a week (21%) once to three times a month (12%) once to three times a year (9%) Figure 3: Frequency of City use 8 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015

What is the main reason for using the City today? In addition to asking why people use the City at any given time, City users were also asked about the one main reason for using the City on the day of the interview. Just under a third of City users surveyed said that they were in the City mainly for work while one in five said that their main reason was shopping. City users who were in the City mainly to study or to meet friends on the day of the survey each accounted for 13% of total users. Similar to previous CUP results, working and shopping continue to be the main reasons for using the City on the day of the survey. While working has consistently been a popular main reason for being in the City, shopping is still a popular secondary reason. Ongoing promotion of the City retail offer and other activity associated with the implementation of Council s recently endorsed Retail Strategy may influence the number of City users citing shopping as either the primary or a secondary reason for using the City in the future. The proportion of City users that come here mainly for study has increased over the history of CUP. In 2004, 9% of city users quoted studying as the main reason for being in the City compared to 13% in 2015. The proportion of users who come into the City mainly for work has grown over time as have the proportion of those visiting the City mainly to meet friends, although to a lesser extent. 30% to work 21% to shop 20% to meet friends / dining / entertainment 13% 30% 20% 10% 2003 2005 2007 2009 2012 2013 2015 to study to work to shop to meet friends to study Figure 4: Main reason for using the City on the day of response Figure 5: Main reason for visiting the City, 2003 to 2015 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015 9

How often do people use the City for the main reason? After identifying the main reason for using the City on the day of the interview, users were then asked how often they came into the City for that reason, not surprisingly, those who came into the City mainly for work or study were the most frequent users with over three-quarters visiting daily or most days of the week. City users who came into the City mainly to visit a library or for sport and recreation also did so on a regular basis with 40% to 50% coming into the City at least two to three times per week. People who were meeting friends or coming into the City for shopping as their main reason were more likely to do so about once a week. Users who stated that they were mainly in the City for entertainment or dining out purposes were more inclined to visit once every few months. Respondents whose main reason for coming into the City was for personal business tend to visit the City the least. In 2015, 38% of all City users came into the City daily or most days of the week for their main reason. This is less than 46% reported in 2012 but is higher than the 32% reported in the 2013 results. Over time, the proportion of users visiting the City one to three times a week has largely remained the same while those visiting between 1 and 6 times a year has increased. 10 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015

For Work Shopping Study To meet friends Personal Business Dining / Entertainment Sport / Recreation 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Daily / Most Days once to three times a month Once to three times a week once to three times a year first visit / less frequent Figure 6: Frequency of visiting for main reason (2015) 2015 2013 2012 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Daily / Most Days Once to three times a week once to three times a month once to three times a year first visit / less frequent Figure 7: Frequency of visiting for main reason (2012,2013 and 2015 comparison) City User Profile Summary Report October 2015 11

Apart from the main reason, why else do people use the City? 12 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015

After asking users for their main reason for being in the City, CUP then asked if there were any other reasons for being in the city on the day of the survey. According to the results, two-thirds of users said that they came into the City for more than reason on the day. This supports the view that the City has a range of offerings and services for a variety of users. The most popular secondary reasons for coming into the City were dining and entertainment (36%), meeting friends (29%) and shopping (28%). Those living in the City were more likely to be in the City for personal business compared to overall City users while those studying in the City were more likely also to be shopping, particularly in Rundle Mall. Over time, there has been an increase in the proportion of users who come into the City for dining and entertainment as a secondary reason as well as those who come into the City to meet friends. This growth may be associated with concerted activity around growing the evening economy. There has also been a marked increase in the proportion of City users that listed sport and recreation as a secondary activity when visiting the City. This is consistent with the current health trends towards individual physical activity, increased demand for health-related information, products and services and greater social pressures such as weight management, social interaction and enjoyment that influence participation in physical activity. It also coincides with the increased usage of the Park Lands by City users over the past few years. 36% dining / entertainment 28% to shop 33% main reason only 9% for sports / rec 29% to meet friends 4% study / visit a library Figure 8: Secondary reasons for visiting the City (%of respondants) 30% 20% 10% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012 2013 2015 dining / entertainment to shop to meet friends sport / recreation Figure 9: Secondary reasons for visiting the City (%of respondants) 2003 to 2015 comparison City User Profile Summary Report October 2015 13

How do people get to the City? City users were asked how they travelled to the City on the day of the interview and could list more than one mode of transport. The most popular way of getting into the City was by car as a driver with 31% of respondents reporting this as one of the ways in which they travelled to the City. Other popular modes of transport to the City include by bus (29%) and walking (19%). Residents and visitors were more inclined to walk to the City while City workers were more likely to drive in. Around one in ten City users caught the train in the City or came into the City as a passenger in a private vehicle. A small proportion of city users (3%) also listed cycling as one of the ways of getting to the city with residents being more likely to cycle (5% of city residents) in comparison to the overall city user population. Over time, there has been an increased tendency to use public transport to travel into the City, which has been matched by a gradual decline in the use of cars. The use of non-motorised transport such as walking and cycling and other private transport has largely remained steady over the past ten years. Campaigns such as Active Ambassadors as well as ongoing measures to increase the safety and convenience of walking and cycling within the City is likely to have led to greater uptake of nonmotorised modes of transport for City users. 31% car - as driver 29% bus 19% walk 9% train Figure 10: Travel into the City, 2015 50% 30% 46% 44% 43% 40% 10% 15% 22% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012 2013 2015 Figure 11: Travel into the City, 2006 to 2015 compared walking / cycling public transport car (driver / passenger) 14 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015

How often do City users exercise in the City? City users were also asked about how often they undertook 30 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity in the City. Over 60% of City users said that they did not undertake 30 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity in the City. Only 8% of City users said that they did so daily or on most days of the week while another 10% said that they undertook 30 minutes of activity two to three times a week. Compared to overall City users, City residents and City workers were more likely to be active in the City and be undertaking physical activity at least two to three times a week. 53.4% of residents are active most days 14.9% of residents are active weekly 23.9% of workers are active most days Most days - daily/most days/two-three times a week Weekly - once a week/two-three times a month 9.7% of workers are active weekly City User Profile Summary Report October 2015 15

How safe do City users feel in the City? Questions on the perception of safety in the day and at night have been included in some previous CUP surveys. In 2015 the question was altered to better align with the Good Evening Adelaide Strategy. City users were asked for their perception of safety in the City at various times: In general, how safe or unsafe do you feel in the City before 8pm? In general, how safe or unsafe do you feel in the City between 8pm and 1am? In general, how safe or unsafe do you feel in the City after 1am? City users felt the safest in the City before 8pm with 98% of respondents reporting that they feel very safe or quite safe. When asked about how safe they felt being in the City between 8pm to 1am, this proportion decreased though 65% of users still felt safe in the City at that time. Residents were more likely to report feeling very safe during this time while City workers were more likely to feel quite safe when compared to overall City users. When City users were asked how safe they felt after 1am, over half of the respondents stated that they did not use the City at that time. Of those who reported using the City after 1am, more respondents reported feeling safe (60%) than unsafe (40%). After 1am 8pm to 1am Before 8pm 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Very safe Quite safe Quite unsafe very unsafe not applicable Figure 12: Safety in the City 16 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015

What do users think of the City experience? In CUP 2015, users were also asked on their experience of events, arts, culture and festivals within the City. City users were asked the extent to which they agreed with the below statements. A score of zero meant that the respondent strongly disagreed with the statement while a score of ten meant that they strongly agreed. Most respondents agreed with all three statements with more than two-thirds of City users giving a score of 7 or more. Of the three comments, the statement around the City being filled with festivals, events, activities, for all ages and backgrounds throughout the year had the lowest proportion of scores greater than 7 (69%) and the highest proportion scores less than three (4%). This reflects the widespread sentiment that events and festivals within the city tend to be centred on certain periods during the year and was consistent across City workers, City residents and City students. City workers and weekend users had the lowest proportion of users providing a score of higher than 7 for this at 66% and 68% respectively. These results suggest that there may be a need to better promote the artistic and cultural experiences available in the City and encourage events and festivals throughout the year. 84% agreed to strongly agreed that the City has great places for people to enjoy events, activities, art and culture 78% agreed to strongly agreed that thriving arts, cultural, and creative industries and events, are in the City 69% agreed to strongly agreed that the City is filled with festivals, events, activities, artistic and cultural experiences for people of all ages and backgrounds throughout the year City User Profile Summary Report October 2015 17

CONTACT ADELAIDE CITY COUNCIL 25 PIRIE STREET, ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA SMART INSIGHTS TEAM GPO BOX 2252 ADELAIDE SA 5001 T. +61 8 8203 7203 F. +61 8 8203 7575 E. city@adelaidecitycouncil.com 18 City User Profile Summary Report October 2015